Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve UI for planar annotations #2404

Open
fedorov opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Improve UI for planar annotations #2404

fedorov opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority

Comments

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented May 10, 2021

I think planar annotations should be supported in a way similar to SEG/RTSTRUCT. Right now, it is virtually impossible (at least in the IDC fork) to determine if a given series has any planar annotations, or where they are.

  • when an SR with a planar annotation is dropped into the viewer, it becomes available in a section labeled "Annotations" or similar in the same place where SEG/SR are located
  • when the corresponding image series is available (when annotation is SCOORD), image series can be loaded into the viewer automatically
  • when an SR that contains planar annotations is loaded, individual annotations within the SR should show up as a list of items (like segments or structs in SEG/RTSTRUCT), and clicking on the individual item in the list should scroll to the location of that annotation in the series
  • it should not be possible to modify an existing planar annotation that was loaded (right now, this is possible)

Note that planar annotations may or may not be accompanied by any measurements, so there should probably be a distinction between annotations and measurements. Also, in IDC fork we don't want to confuse the user by allowing to create measurements/annotations that cannot be saved, but this should not prevent IDC viewer from displaying existing annotations/measurements when available (similar to how we display SEG/RTSTRUCT).

Let's discuss how this fits into OHIF development plans, and what is the effort of doing this, if we agree it makes sense.

@fedorov fedorov added Community: Request ✋ IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority labels May 10, 2021
@igoroctaviano igoroctaviano added the v2-legacy OHIF v2 label May 30, 2023
@igoroctaviano igoroctaviano added Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug? and removed Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug? labels Aug 2, 2023
@sedghi
Copy link
Member

sedghi commented Oct 3, 2023

@igoroctaviano what is the status on this? is it still applicable?

@igoroctaviano igoroctaviano removed the v2-legacy OHIF v2 label Oct 20, 2023
@igoroctaviano
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #1215
@rodrigobasilio2022 please revisit this ticket to get information on how we should display measurements in the OHIF measurements panel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants