You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a bug when trying to fuzz the full range of values in anything larger than an s_word() because when it tries to convert the max number of fuzzes from a python number to a C long, the number is too large. For example, the number of fuzzes for a dword is 4.3 billion and the C long data type maxes out at around 2.15 billion. I know it is kind of silly to be fuzzing something 4 billion times, but it would be nice for it to work in case someone wants to do that!
-4leaf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Really ?
I'd prefer that "full_range" is only valid with "s_byte" and "s_word" and reports an error if an attempt to use it with a dword or qword is made (none of us going to live that long!).
Hi,
There is a bug when trying to fuzz the full range of values in anything larger than an s_word() because when it tries to convert the max number of fuzzes from a python number to a C long, the number is too large. For example, the number of fuzzes for a dword is 4.3 billion and the C long data type maxes out at around 2.15 billion. I know it is kind of silly to be fuzzing something 4 billion times, but it would be nice for it to work in case someone wants to do that!
-4leaf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: