Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support AVIF image format as an option #82

Open
3 tasks
franckc opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

Support AVIF image format as an option #82

franckc opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P2 Small number of users are affected, major cosmetic issue

Comments

@franckc
Copy link

franckc commented Dec 14, 2022

To improve both site load performance and SEO score we should add AVIF support. This is relevant for all our marketing sites:

  • originprotocol.com
  • ousd.com
  • story.xyz

Notes:

  • Some browsers do not support AVIF so we should provide a fallback like jpeg.
    Here is an article with an example of how to use the tag for that purpose.
  • One complication comes from images uploaded via the CMS. We would need to modify the CMS to be able to provide 2 formats for an image (AVIF and jpg). Or use a service that does image conversion on the fly. For example CloudFlare image or https://imgix.com/
@micahalcorn micahalcorn added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 15, 2022
@micahalcorn micahalcorn added the P4 Something to consider, a feature request that we may not pursue label Dec 15, 2022
@micahalcorn micahalcorn moved this from Backlog to To-do in Origin DeFi (OUSD + OETH) Dec 15, 2022
@micahalcorn micahalcorn added P2 Small number of users are affected, major cosmetic issue and removed P4 Something to consider, a feature request that we may not pursue labels Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P2 Small number of users are affected, major cosmetic issue
Projects
Status: To-do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants