Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can you share configs for training on other classes #4

Open
v-iashin opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Can you share configs for training on other classes #4

v-iashin opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@v-iashin
Copy link

v-iashin commented Jan 5, 2021

Hi,

Thanks for sharing the RegNet weights for the dog class as well as the training config.

I could assume that all other classes are trained with the same config but the number of videos in some of them is significantly less (in AudioSet classes) than in others (classes from VEGAS).

This means that the number of iterations will be different and, therefore, learning rate and, thus, training dynamics.

I was wondering if you could share the RegNet training configs for other classes if not the pre-trained models.

@PeihaoChen
Copy link
Owner

PeihaoChen commented Jan 17, 2021

Yes, there are a few differences between the configs of different sound types.

  1. The number of training epochs for gun, hammer, sneeze, and cough should be changed to 4000, 10000, 10000, 10000, respectively considering the number of videos.
  2. The testing set of gun, hammer, sneeze, and cough sound types includes the last 32 videos in each type as described in the paper.

Other settings should be the same as the ./config/dog_opts.yml file.

@v-iashin
Copy link
Author

Super. Thanks!

number of training echo

what do you mean? “Epochs”?

@PeihaoChen
Copy link
Owner

Yes. Sorry for the typo.

@v-iashin
Copy link
Author

Sure 🙂.

Interesting decision! I am wondering why should we increase the number of epochs considering we have less data? Wouldn't it lead to overfitting? I am curious what’s you take on it?

Is it because it is related to the number of iterations, which, in turn, is related to the learning rate schedule or something of the kind?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants