You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the level of mid-scale algorithms, it might be nice to differentiate between different "types" of wires, for example by coloring them differently, or giving them distinct line styles. As an example, in this demo on preparing matrix product states, there are auxiliary bond qubits and physical qubits, and coloring them differently would be a neat thing to do.
Implementation
This should be as simply as allowing a nested dictionary for wire_options with wires as keys and inner wire_options dictionaries. If such a nested dictionary is passed, we only need to iterate over it, instead of reusing the same for all wires.
How important would you say this feature is?
1: Not important. Would be nice to have.
Additional information
This is really just a small cosmetic idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature details
On the level of mid-scale algorithms, it might be nice to differentiate between different "types" of wires, for example by coloring them differently, or giving them distinct line styles. As an example, in this demo on preparing matrix product states, there are auxiliary bond qubits and physical qubits, and coloring them differently would be a neat thing to do.
Implementation
This should be as simply as allowing a nested dictionary for
wire_options
with wires as keys and innerwire_options
dictionaries. If such a nested dictionary is passed, we only need to iterate over it, instead of reusing the same for all wires.How important would you say this feature is?
1: Not important. Would be nice to have.
Additional information
This is really just a small cosmetic idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: