Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

guess_license_from_pod doesn't recognize Apache licenses #72

Open
Grinnz opened this issue Oct 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

guess_license_from_pod doesn't recognize Apache licenses #72

Grinnz opened this issue Oct 12, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Grinnz
Copy link

Grinnz commented Oct 12, 2020

Apache 1.1 and 2.0 licenses should get recognized.

polettix added a commit to polettix/software-license that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2024
Add more test inputs for the two Apache licenses, taking into account
what is presented as example or suggested in the official web pages
about the two licenses:

- https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
- https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply

This should hopefully cover the "actual" request in GH Perl-Toolchain-Gang#72
(Perl-Toolchain-Gang#72).

The added tests both fail, hence the proposed changes to the relevant
`@phrases` inside Software::LicenseUtils, as well as a cleanup.
polettix added a commit to polettix/software-license that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2024
Add more test inputs for the two Apache licenses, taking into account
what is presented as example or suggested in the official web pages
about the two licenses:

- https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
- https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply

This should hopefully cover the "actual" request in GH Perl-Toolchain-Gang#72
(Perl-Toolchain-Gang#72).

The added tests both fail, hence the proposed changes to the relevant
`@phrases` inside Software::LicenseUtils, as well as a cleanup.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant