Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support count=estimated for RPC #3652

Open
wolfgangwalther opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support count=estimated for RPC #3652

wolfgangwalther opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement a feature, ready for implementation

Comments

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Member

It seems like this is not supported, yet.

It probably only makes sense to do this for inlineable RPCs, so that the estimation will actually estimate the underlying query of that RPC. So we should probably just base this off of pdVolatility. This isn't a 100% match, we'd still have some non-inlineable RPCs for which this could be used (without useful results), but volatility is a requirement to make it useful.

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther added the idea Needs of discussion to become an enhancement, not ready for implementation label Jul 10, 2024
@steve-chavez steve-chavez added enhancement a feature, ready for implementation and removed idea Needs of discussion to become an enhancement, not ready for implementation labels Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement a feature, ready for implementation
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants