You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently unique NFT ids are generated from the index of the vote in getTxsForVotes. That obviously doesn't work when minting to an already existing collection. We need to think about a unique id for collection NFTs of type u32.
E.g. ${refId}${1-n for rarity index}{voteIndex}
or query nfts.collection to get the number of items and start from numItems + 1
Ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
New collections i will build, the ui is already ready in a way. still i think when we as poc want to start we should mint to a default collection (and maybe encourage others). I imagine having 10s of rewards collections with only 3 different rarities will clutter all NFT marketplaces UIs like crazy and make it even harder for people to follow / organize. I liked how it was done before.
Currently unique NFT ids are generated from the index of the vote in
getTxsForVotes
. That obviously doesn't work when minting to an already existing collection. We need to think about a unique id for collection NFTs of typeu32
.E.g.
${refId}${1-n for rarity index}{voteIndex}
or query
nfts.collection
to get the number of items and start from numItems + 1Ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: