Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

autocorrelation is very high for some parameters #38

Open
grahamgower opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

autocorrelation is very high for some parameters #38

grahamgower opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@grahamgower
Copy link
Member

When inferring multiple parameters (e.g. 3 params in the bottleneck model), samples from the MCMC for two of the parameters are highly autocorrelated (for at least the randomwalk MCMC kernel). The one parameter with low autocorrelation is inferred with reasonable accuracy, whereas the highly autocorrelated paramers are not. Sampling every 10 accepted MCMC steps reduces the autocorrelation, but does not affect accuracy of param inference.

We might try to specify a new_state_fn for tfp.mcmc.RandomWalkMetropolis(). It's not clear to me how the new state proposal function and the bijectors might interact. More investigation needed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant