Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make hcom, com, coe, et al Chk tactics #393

Open
ralsei opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Make hcom, com, coe, et al Chk tactics #393

ralsei opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@ralsei
Copy link
Collaborator

ralsei commented Jul 8, 2022

As it currently stands, the new hcom_chk tactic as given in #386 is the only one with the behavior such that:

  • When the boundary is satisfied, don't drop a hole
  • When the boundary is unsatisfied, drop a hole around the entire thing

However, when the non-inference hcom is used, you have to do {! hcom ... !} to avoid confusing boundary errors. hcom_chk does this automatically.

The other tactics should replicate this behavior, dropping a hole when the boundary is unsatisfied and automatically removing the cone of silence when the boundary is satisfied.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant