Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Why use this instead of... #21

Open
JensRoland opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Question: Why use this instead of... #21

JensRoland opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@JensRoland
Copy link

This looks very cool -- but why build (use) this instead of, say, eslint-escope? From what I can tell, this has some convenience properties on scopes and the naming feels a bit more intuitive, but it doesn't seem like reason enough to build your own?

....but given that you are who you are I know that there's a damned good reason, so I'm just curious: What am I missing? Something in the existing libraries was causing you enough problems that you set out to build periscopic -- what was it?

Or, more to the point: I'm building a transpiler and I've been using eslint-escope -- should I migrate to periscopic? Am I going to hit a brick wall when this thing gets complicated?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant