Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

coalesce should allow "execute ahead" semantics #1

Open
RobertFischer opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

coalesce should allow "execute ahead" semantics #1

RobertFischer opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
coalesce Issues/PRs about the "coalesce" function enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RobertFischer
Copy link
Owner

coalesce should take an optional number argument (defaulting to 0) which is the number of elements to execute concurrently while still returning the first one in the iteration that resolves. This would allow some concurrency in expensive operations while still avoiding firing them all off.
@RobertFischer RobertFischer added enhancement New feature or request coalesce Issues/PRs about the "coalesce" function labels Nov 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
coalesce Issues/PRs about the "coalesce" function enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@RobertFischer