You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Three gene nodes in the network have preferred name "MFT" but only one was linked to trait "germination rate".
Evidence sentence: Recent studies in both Arabidopsis and wheat have uncovered a new role of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT) in seed germination. [PMID:24932489]
Does this depend on the TM plug-in only? Most importantly, does it make sense to consider one case at a time, or is it more sensible to assess overall scores like precision/recall?
Precision/recall would be good if we had a gold standard. Until then I think we will need to go case by case and slowly build our own gold standard for more systematic evaluation in the future.
Missing relation: TPP7 is a concept name of a gene but TM method doesn't map it to publication that contains OsTPP7 in its abstract.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16688177
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: