From 85e8f4167a18916c4159b6abd5ab79befe56e647 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Tiago=20Ara=C3=BAjo=20=5BSSW=5D?= Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:27:00 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Update rule.md --- rules/have-a-definition-of-ready/rule.md | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/rules/have-a-definition-of-ready/rule.md b/rules/have-a-definition-of-ready/rule.md index 80b751253d3..8a273234429 100644 --- a/rules/have-a-definition-of-ready/rule.md +++ b/rules/have-a-definition-of-ready/rule.md @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ related: redirects: - do-you-have-a-＂definition-of-ready＂ - do-you-have-a-＂-definition-of-ready-＂ - - https-rules-ssw-com-au-do-you-have-a-＂-definition-of-ready-＂ - do-you-have-a-definition-of-ready created: 2013-08-23T18:42:58.000Z archivedreason: null @@ -32,8 +31,7 @@ Just like how the team has a [Definition of Done](/definition-of-done) as a chec A recommended “Definition of Ready” would be: * Has enough detail for the team to action (usually via good [Acceptance Criteria](/acceptance-criteria)) -* Has - [Business Value](/do-you-estimate-business-value) assigned +* Has [Business Value](/do-you-estimate-business-value) assigned * Has effort assigned * Is in the Approved state