From 8754edafc1e83276f869745bed45a4429ed4e53f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Brady Stroud [SSW]" Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 18:16:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Rename image and references - from desision to decision --- rules/specification-review-presentation/rule.md | 2 +- ...n-makers.jpg => spec-review-decision-makers.jpg} | Bin 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename rules/specification-review-presentation/{spec-review-desision-makers.jpg => spec-review-decision-makers.jpg} (100%) diff --git a/rules/specification-review-presentation/rule.md b/rules/specification-review-presentation/rule.md index cbd18e55813..cdf803442d1 100644 --- a/rules/specification-review-presentation/rule.md +++ b/rules/specification-review-presentation/rule.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The findings of the Spec Review should be presented by the developers and the Ac -![Figure: It's a lot easier to get a signature when you've got the right people in the room](spec-review-desision-makers.jpg) +![Figure: It's a lot easier to get a signature when you've got the right people in the room](spec-review-decision-makers.jpg) If you've run the Spec Review successfully the client should not be surprised by anything you present. This means discussions should focus on issues such as what particular requirements could be added into the scope for the MVP, or what releases can be completed by what date, rather than spending the meeting helping the client regain consciousness after they blacked out from seeing the price. diff --git a/rules/specification-review-presentation/spec-review-desision-makers.jpg b/rules/specification-review-presentation/spec-review-decision-makers.jpg similarity index 100% rename from rules/specification-review-presentation/spec-review-desision-makers.jpg rename to rules/specification-review-presentation/spec-review-decision-makers.jpg