From bcf234f9ef8f3b859a8dcc0f5308946360c92250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Piers Sinclair [SSW]"
 <79821522+piers-sinclair@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:31:43 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix small grammar (#8283)

---
 rules/turn-emails-into-pbis/rule.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rules/turn-emails-into-pbis/rule.md b/rules/turn-emails-into-pbis/rule.md
index 8ef87c8c0c9..f86dedd28ad 100644
--- a/rules/turn-emails-into-pbis/rule.md
+++ b/rules/turn-emails-into-pbis/rule.md
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Providing one source of truth
 :::
 
 ::: good
-Better Prioritization
+Better prioritization
 :::
 
 ::: good
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Sometimes you will receive feedback on an existing PBI within an email. It is im
 
 3. Add an Acceptance Criteria: *"Reply 'Done' to all emails mentioned in this PBI and @mention the sender with 'Done'"*
 
-### Keeping it up-to-date
+### Keeping the PBI up-to-date
 
 If there is more communication in emails at a later date, it's important to make sure the PBI stays in sync with the emails. Otherwise, the source of truth will become confusing since there will be differing information in 2 places.