You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the baseline benchmark reports the average OSD throughput and OSDs that deviate from this average by a certain percentage.
When two (or more) class of OSDs are in a cluster (think one class on spinners, another only on SSDs) and given the right amount of instances of each class this would report all OSDs as outliers. The average is a bad statistical tool here.
Implement some clustering after the test was run and report each cluster (hopefully OSDs of the same class) individually. With some tuning the clustering could be quite good and make the output much more informative on heterogeneous clusters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the baseline benchmark reports the average OSD throughput and OSDs that deviate from this average by a certain percentage.
When two (or more) class of OSDs are in a cluster (think one class on spinners, another only on SSDs) and given the right amount of instances of each class this would report all OSDs as outliers. The average is a bad statistical tool here.
Implement some clustering after the test was run and report each cluster (hopefully OSDs of the same class) individually. With some tuning the clustering could be quite good and make the output much more informative on heterogeneous clusters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: