You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was interested in using alg.ignoredConcepts and alg.startClass as shown in 1 and 2 for complex concepts, i.e, concepts having lengths >1. To this end, I use Grandgrandmother.conf example, include rendering = "dlsyntax" and
alg.startClass = "ex:Female" and alg.ignoredConcepts = {"ex:Male"}
This work flawlessly. However, I am interested in using concepts like
Female ⊓ (∃ hasChild.T) as startClass and ignore complex concepts (Male ⊔ Female). However, I seem to fail to do so. Consequently, I was wondering whether you may suggest some solutions.
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we have to check how well complex start concepts are supported as it is handled differently per algorithm. With CELOE at least, the following should work (note, you should give the concept in Manchester syntax regardless of the output rendering)
alg.startClass = "( ex:Female and ( ex:hasChild some owl:Thing ))"
Currently, the ignored concepts are pruned at the hierarchy level, so there is no support to ignore complex concepts directly.
Hello all,
I was interested in using alg.ignoredConcepts and alg.startClass as shown in 1 and 2 for complex concepts, i.e, concepts having lengths >1. To this end, I use Grandgrandmother.conf example, include rendering = "dlsyntax" and
This work flawlessly. However, I am interested in using concepts like
Female ⊓ (∃ hasChild.T) as startClass and ignore complex concepts (Male ⊔ Female). However, I seem to fail to do so. Consequently, I was wondering whether you may suggest some solutions.
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: