You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We help people configure id to support any interactions among them according to the provisions of any agreements among them.
Each human being can prevent any other human being from deleting their data.
We help people store their data for as long as they like (1 minute, 10 years etc.).
One can grant the right to sense a [data unit](#6 and rights to change it to any number of people, e.g. one or all users who state that they speak the language of the unit.
One can grant any right to any user with any label (combination). To interact with any number of people (1, 1 billion etc.), you can create data units with any number of labels, e.g. the names of the participants and a topic.
id notifies each of these users that you've invited them to do something together, e.g. to have a conversation or to create a piece of content, if they allow such notifications. After being notified of such an invitation, one can mute notifications about the use of units with this label combination or remove oneself from this label combination. (One can find muted notifications in a database.)
At least one software developer suggested this: We create a box and call it a "group". They might know about the tradition of building a box (house) and controlling others' entry. Thoughts don't work like this. It doesn't seem to me that there are such boxes in the cranium.
It's useful for people to do what they want together. That design allows the creator of a group to delete data created by people they accept into that group. (In some cases, only the copy available to the users of such software is deleted.) We let each human being decide whether they share any right to the data created by them.
One can search any group of data units e.g. by (partial) strings, labels, and times.
One can sort units e.g. by label and time.
Such a design allows people to find their "tribes" more easily, e.g. when they want to interact more democratically or more meritocratically.
To discuss a certain topic, however small or trendy, one subscribes to notifications about its label (combination). id can display each such subscription on a different page, so that one can process any unit separately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We help people configure id to support any interactions among them according to the provisions of any agreements among them.
Each human being can prevent any other human being from deleting their data.
We help people store their data for as long as they like (1 minute, 10 years etc.).
One can grant the right to sense a [data unit](#6 and rights to change it to any number of people, e.g. one or all users who state that they speak the language of the unit.
One can grant any right to any user with any label (combination). To interact with any number of people (1, 1 billion etc.), you can create data units with any number of labels, e.g. the names of the participants and a topic.
id notifies each of these users that you've invited them to do something together, e.g. to have a conversation or to create a piece of content, if they allow such notifications. After being notified of such an invitation, one can mute notifications about the use of units with this label combination or remove oneself from this label combination. (One can find muted notifications in a database.)
At least one software developer suggested this: We create a box and call it a "group". They might know about the tradition of building a box (house) and controlling others' entry. Thoughts don't work like this. It doesn't seem to me that there are such boxes in the cranium.
It's useful for people to do what they want together. That design allows the creator of a group to delete data created by people they accept into that group. (In some cases, only the copy available to the users of such software is deleted.) We let each human being decide whether they share any right to the data created by them.
One can search any group of data units e.g. by (partial) strings, labels, and times.
One can sort units e.g. by label and time.
Such a design allows people to find their "tribes" more easily, e.g. when they want to interact more democratically or more meritocratically.
To discuss a certain topic, however small or trendy, one subscribes to notifications about its label (combination). id can display each such subscription on a different page, so that one can process any unit separately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: