Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How about dynamically generated GeoJSON-VT vector tiles? #37

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #65
Open

How about dynamically generated GeoJSON-VT vector tiles? #37

ghost opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #65

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 7, 2015

I understand the mapbox vector tile layer reads pbf files. Why not generate them on-the-fly? https://www.mapbox.com/blog/introducing-geojson-vt/

@bwyss
Copy link

bwyss commented Nov 10, 2015

+1

@henryptung
Copy link
Contributor

More generally, I would vote for a provider interface over bundling GeoJSON-VT. Honestly, I think the library could benefit from an API between data fetching/parsing and rendering, something like getFeatures(z, x, y): VectorTileFeature[]. This would make it trivial to write different data providers, including a thin wrapper for a GeoJSON-VT source.

@wilg
Copy link
Contributor

wilg commented Jan 11, 2016

I agree, my use case involves both on-the-fly and precalculated vector tiles.

@reyemtm
Copy link

reyemtm commented Feb 4, 2016

+1 for geojson-vt compatibility

@wilg wilg linked a pull request Jun 7, 2016 that will close this issue
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants