Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get a newer version of yaml-cpp working and in tree #119

Open
amikhalev opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Get a newer version of yaml-cpp working and in tree #119

amikhalev opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@amikhalev
Copy link
Contributor

The latest release of yaml-cpp has better error messages, and it would be useful to have the headers and .so in tree because it would no longer be necessary to copy the files into the frc toolchain directory. Would also fix #23.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

Where should we put all of the .h and .so?

@amikhalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure, maybe in lib/yaml-cpp so we could add lib/yaml-cpp/include/yaml-cpp to the include path and lib/yaml-cpp/yaml-cpp.so as a library.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

@zacharyjsnow Are you fine with that? It sounds good to me. I have the newest git version build BTW.

@amikhalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

My only concern is that the last time we tried testing the latest version, it segfaulted, but I think it might be because the headers weren't up to date.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

That could be it.

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

BTW Could we preload /lib/libSegFault.so? I think it would be helpful.

@amikhalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think last time I looked for it on the roboRIO I didn't find it, but I could look again when I have access to the robot

@PlasmaPower
Copy link
Contributor

It is in glibc, here is the source.

Edit: Also:

$ pkgfile libSegFault.so
core/glibc
multilib/lib32-glibc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants