Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noise Result #16

Open
simonmecho opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 12 comments
Open

Noise Result #16

simonmecho opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 12 comments

Comments

@simonmecho
Copy link

Hello, I'm trying the workflow using fp8 and also the gguf version, but in both case I just got result of noise only, what was the case for that? please see the attached screenshot. Thanks!
CleanShot 2024-09-03 at 14 10 27@2x

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 3, 2024

It's a bit strange indeed. Is there any error message in the terminal?
or try .bin format model instead.

@simonmecho
Copy link
Author

Actually I've already tried the .bin model, and in both cases there is no errors on the console, which is quite weird...

@chenheng0620
Copy link

newscreen21609562
这是什么情况????怎么解决

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 3, 2024

uugf model or the normal one?

@kakachiex2
Copy link

And the generation take forever is really slow

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 4, 2024

try using non-uugf format model with hyper-flux lora.

@kakachiex2
Copy link

_Here is my workflow can you give it a check :: | there are 3 workflow | CNet Union | MistoLine | Xlabs | ::
FLUX_WF_V1 01

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 4, 2024

It looks quite ok, have you ever tried our example workflow?

@kakachiex2
Copy link

Yes same result

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 4, 2024

You guys using Lora with clip port or only use load only Lora weight?

@kakachiex2
Copy link

I was using model only load lora, I bypass the lora node and the result is the same, the ksampler take a lot of time to render.

  • Loader 445.20s
  • Ksampler 1943.20s

@baizh0u
Copy link
Member

baizh0u commented Sep 4, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants