You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This library will be far from "complete" at v1 due to many missing bindings, but also it will be forever expanding as the web platform expands.
Couple this with the fact that ReScript bindings are not simpl typed declarations to existing JS (a la lib.dom.d.ts), they are more new APIs that model the underlying platform. It makes the API decisions of this library more of a creative and subjective endeavour than it may be in TypeScript-land.
That's a lot of words to say that I think a style guide is valuable. It would:
Help to keep the API consistent as this library grows
Aid users in the discoverability of the API. If you know how a Web API works you should be able to intuit how rescript-webapi does it
Make lives easier for external contributors
Maybe we can use this issue as a starting point for what would be included in this documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This library will be far from "complete" at v1 due to many missing bindings, but also it will be forever expanding as the web platform expands.
Couple this with the fact that ReScript bindings are not simpl typed declarations to existing JS (a la lib.dom.d.ts), they are more new APIs that model the underlying platform. It makes the API decisions of this library more of a creative and subjective endeavour than it may be in TypeScript-land.
That's a lot of words to say that I think a style guide is valuable. It would:
Maybe we can use this issue as a starting point for what would be included in this documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: