-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Better ergonomy for ack responses with custom AckStream
struct
#201
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AckStream
structAckStream
struct
…to feat-ack-stream
Blocked by 1c3t3a/rust-socketio#385 for |
AckStream
structAckStream
struct
tausifcreates
approved these changes
Dec 25, 2023
tausifcreates
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replacement of the
BoxStream<'static, Result<AckResponse<V>, AckError>
to a customAckStream
that implement bothFuture
(it will yield the first element). AndStream
to poll every element.Thanks to that combo the interface will be unified between :
Socket::emit_with_ack
which sends to one socket and expect one ack.Io::emit_with_ack
which sends to all the sockets of the namespaces and expect n acks.Operator::emit_with_ack
which is doing both depending of the configuration.e2e-tests
to the suite