You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Akita rover parts are cheaper than the stock parts despite being more powerful/useful. E.g., Akita wheels cost 200 compared to the cheapest stock RoveMax Model S2 that costs 300; Akita Core and Command Seat cost together 400 compared to RoveMate, which costs 800 (while not having a fuel cell, monoprop container or light).
In my opinion, Akita as the more advanced technology should cost appropriately, say, 50-100% more than corresponding stock parts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've taken a look at the values and increasing the akita part costs as suggest would balance with stock like parts but would also throw out the balance of the other Kontruction parts, i.e. Truss, magnet & counterweight are only 200 each and much larger and more advanced.
Maybe they could be re balanced along with the new Konstruction/GroundConstruction parts.
Akita rover parts are cheaper than the stock parts despite being more powerful/useful. E.g., Akita wheels cost 200 compared to the cheapest stock RoveMax Model S2 that costs 300; Akita Core and Command Seat cost together 400 compared to RoveMate, which costs 800 (while not having a fuel cell, monoprop container or light).
In my opinion, Akita as the more advanced technology should cost appropriately, say, 50-100% more than corresponding stock parts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: