Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDN vs Local Hosting of Static JS/CSS Libraries #32

Open
manistal opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

CDN vs Local Hosting of Static JS/CSS Libraries #32

manistal opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
js Issues that refer to the JavaScript or Charts code

Comments

@manistal
Copy link
Collaborator

manistal commented Mar 7, 2020

Need to decide whether to use a CDN (Content Delivery Network/remote hosting) for JS and CSS Libraries like, JQuery, Bootstrap, Bokeh.

Pros:
- Decreased latency, remote sites download to the client in parallel
- Not stuffing other people's code into our repo

Cons:
- Can't work in offline mode (this seems big)

Should probably do neither and use a package manager in the install script so they're not stored locally and can be used in offline mode after the install. #PacakgeManagers

@manistal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

manistal commented Mar 7, 2020

In the meantime, I'm gonna stuff a bunch of libs locally, this issue can serve as a TODO to get rid of them while we figure out how to do JS/CSS installs.

@manistal manistal added the js Issues that refer to the JavaScript or Charts code label Mar 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
js Issues that refer to the JavaScript or Charts code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant