Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IntersectionObserver V2: Detecting occlusion and visual effects #416

Open
bkardell opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

IntersectionObserver V2: Detecting occlusion and visual effects #416

bkardell opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering topic: web apis Spec relates to web APIs (entry points for script) venue: W3C Web Apps WG

Comments

@bkardell
Copy link

bkardell commented Oct 14, 2024

WebKittens

@hober @annevk @marcoscaceres

Title of the proposal

Intersection Observer v2

URL to the spec

https://w3c.github.io/IntersectionObserver/

URL to the spec's repository

https://github.com/W3C/IntersectionObserver

Issue Tracker URL

https://github.com/W3C/IntersectionObserver/issues/

Explainer URL

https://github.com/szager-chromium/IntersectionObserver/blob/master/explainer.md

TAG Design Review URL

No response

Mozilla standards-positions issue URL

mozilla/standards-positions#109

WebKit Bugzilla URL

No response

Radar URL

No response

Description

This was added as a potential area to Interop 2025 and it lists a positive Mozilla position, but no position from WebKit.

@nt1m nt1m added from: Igalia Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Igalia. venue: WHATWG DOM Workstream labels Nov 2, 2024
@othermaciej othermaciej added venue: none / personal repository The venue for discussion is a GitHub repository not affiliated with a standards body. and removed venue: WHATWG DOM Workstream labels Nov 2, 2024
@othermaciej
Copy link

@bkardell the Mozilla standards-positions URL field is meant to be for a link to an issue in Mozilla’s standards-positions repo, not an interop issue that indirectly claims a positive position. We want to see Mozilla’s reasoning, not just their final answer, ideally.

@othermaciej othermaciej added from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. and removed from: Igalia Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Igalia. labels Nov 2, 2024
@othermaciej
Copy link

Ok this was a bit confusing but it seems the changes in the fork are actually merged to the W3C Intersection Objeserver spec, which is owned by the W3C Web Applications Working Group.

PR: w3c/IntersectionObserver#523
Diff: https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/IntersectionObserver/523/ef83cd2...szager-chromium:885a800.html

@othermaciej othermaciej added venue: W3C Web Apps WG topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering topic: web apis Spec relates to web APIs (entry points for script) and removed venue: none / personal repository The venue for discussion is a GitHub repository not affiliated with a standards body. labels Nov 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from: Google Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Google. topic: layout Spec relates to layout topic: rendering topic: web apis Spec relates to web APIs (entry points for script) venue: W3C Web Apps WG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants