Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

muxcover generates x states #4722

Open
miradarya opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

muxcover generates x states #4722

miradarya opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction

Comments

@miradarya
Copy link

miradarya commented Nov 8, 2024

Version

0.47

On which OS did this happen?

Linux, Windows

Reproduction Steps

I haven't been able to verify the fix for #3591 for some time now. Unfortunately however, commit 822c7b0 breaks muxcover, at least for some non-trivial cases. I currently have a design where muxcover after 822c7b0 generates x states on the S input of several $_MUX8_ cells. There are no x states present in the design before executing muxcover. Reverting muxcover.cc to before 822c7b0 does not generate x states (but still has the cost estimation issue mentioned in #3591). At this point, I cannot provide the actual design that reproduces the issue. I am unsure though, how to create a minimal example.

Expected Behavior

design with correctly connected $_MUX8_ cells

Actual Behavior

design with x states on (at least) S input of $_MUX8_ cells

@miradarya miradarya added the pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction label Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant