reviewer1.tex

\begin{Reviewer}

  \begin{CommentSummary}
    The paper puts forward a new methodology for XXX.
    The concepts are clearly described and the algorithmic flows are presented carefully.
    Experiments are carried out in comparison to state-of-the-art methods on a set of benchmark functions.
  \end{CommentSummary}
  \begin{Response}
    Thank you very much for your valuable comments on our paper and work.
    We have revised the manuscript by taking your following comments and suggestions into consideration to enhance the paper quality.
    The revisions are marked in {\color{blue}blue} color in the revised manuscript. 
  \end{Response}

  \begin{ReviewerComment}
    The writing is generally good but could be further improved.
  \end{ReviewerComment}
  
  \begin{Response}
    Thank you for your valuable comment.
    We have further polished up the language presentations.
    We hope the revised paper will be more clear and accurate on expressions.
  \end{Response}

  \begin{ReviewerComment}
    The process of XXX is not clear.
  \end{ReviewerComment}
  
  \begin{Response}
    Thank you for your valuable comment. 
    In the revised paper, we have added some XXX.
    The revised description are shown in the Section XXX-X. 
  \end{Response}

  \begin{ReviewerComment}
    There are some typos and informal notations, e.g., the decision vector is a vector and thus it should be given as $\mathbf{x}$.
  \end{ReviewerComment}
  \begin{Response}
    Thank you very much for pointing out this issue.
    We have changed the notations according to your suggestion and double-checked the manuscript to avoid similar problems. 
  \end{Response}


  \begin{ReviewerComment}
    The format of the references should be unified, e.g., [8]  and [38].
  \end{ReviewerComment}

  \begin{Response}
    Thank you very much for pointing out this issue.
    We have carefully formatted all the references in the revised manuscript.
    The above three reference formats are presented as follows:

    \begin{enumerate}
      \item[8] \fullcite{kahn1962topological}

      \item[38] \fullcite{he2016deep}
    \end{enumerate}
  \end{Response}

\end{Reviewer}