pseudolabel_train.json

{"thread611": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:09:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "A chicken in every pot",
        "Text": "How about $1 billion to build some new pipelines in California?=20=09Jeffery Fawcett=0911/22/2000 10:08 AM=09=09=20Hey,Wouldn't this fix everything?   What a great idea-  a govenment owned=20utility.  Who in their right mind would want to give the money back to=20taxpayers?  I think Enron should cast aside its dependency on free markets,==20and throw its support behind this well thought out public initiative.  Let =us=20know how Transwestern can help!Calif. lawmaker pushes for state energy reserveCalifornia State Sen. Steve Peace called for the state to set aside $2=20billion of a projected $10billion budget surplus to create a reserve account to serve the state=01,s==20energy needs.A representative at Peace=01,s office said the senator planned the fund as =a=20=01&cushion=018 to helpthe state bounce back from energy price shocks like those that hit it last==20summer.Peace, speaking Monday at a briefing on the upcoming state budget, suggeste=d=20that theCalifornia Legislature set aside $2 billion to use at a later date.  The=20funds could be included inthe budget that Gov. Gray Davis is scheduled to announce Jan. 10. =20Ostensibly, the governmentcould use the funds to purchase some of the state=01,s transmission grid an=d=20generation assets, orto build new assets.In his remarks, Peace said some of the $2 billion could be used to build a==20500-MW generationfacility, which he estimates at $300 million, a peaker that could be set up==20for $16 million,or a transmission grid such as the $200 million system a California utility==20has proposed for thesouthern part of the state.=01&The use of public dollars to finance development, private-public=20partnerships, or to capitalizepublicly owned utilities are all options which California policymakers may==20have to considerif [FERC] is unable to bring wholesale energy markets under control,=018 he= said.Still, representatives at the senator=01,s office stressed that Peace was n=ot=20making any policydecisions in his statement. Rather, a representative said, Peace was acting==20in his capacity aschairman of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Committee and setting aside funds==20that can be availablefor future use.Peace=01,s initiative comes on the heels of a report by the Legislature=01,=s=20Legislative AnalysisOffice forecasting a $10.3 billion surplus for fiscal years 2000-2002 (a $6=.9=20billion surplus for2000-2001 and a $3.4 billion surplus for 2001-2002).=20",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.028735632183908046,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11206896551724138,
        "Sentiment": 0.2470779220779221,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.6,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05241605241605242
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "A chicken in every pot",
        "Text": "Unless Loretta Lynch, or worse, Gray Davis are your counter parties.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Sentiment": -0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.6,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04411764705882353
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 22 Nov 2000 04:40:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "A chicken in every pot",
        "Text": "you do the same, buddy.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.6,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08695652173913043
    }
],
"thread612": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:46:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas Capacity Forum",
        "Text": "Do we want to position this as \"let the market do it, cuz it can do it better than Socalgas; but the market ain't going to do anything if you don't create an hospitable investment climate?\"",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.027777777777777776,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.037037037037037035
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:48:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "bkc7@pge",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas Capacity Forum",
        "Text": "Greetings.  How's things?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.25,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:51:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas Capacity Forum",
        "Text": "You get this?  Someone that I know forwarded it along to me.  Know anything about it?Best,Jeff - Capacity Forum.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2857142857142857,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05217391304347826
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:19:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Jeff Dasovich on 02/27/2001 07:51 PM",
        "Recipient": "Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron, Drew ",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas Capacity Forum",
        "Text": "Lad can play both roles pretty effectively.\tDrew Fossum\t02/28/2001 01:57 PM\t\tThanks.  My guess is that someone ought to go and represent TW.  Fawcett and their \"get stuff done guy\" or their \"try to look like you are getting stuff done guy\" ?  DFFossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRONYou get this?  Someone that I know forwarded it along to me.  Know anything about it?Best,Jeff - Capacity Forum.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1076923076923077,
        "Sentiment": 0.3125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05483028720626632
    }
],
"thread613": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "Environmental Alert cancelled",
        "Text": "THAT'S a good one.  Have I told you how much I miss Norm?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.35714285714285715,
        "Sentiment": 0.44999999999999996,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05263157894736842
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:41:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Jeff Dasovich",
        "Subject": "Environmental Alert cancelled",
        "Text": "Noise pollution.  The #1 killer in America....\tJeffery Fawcett\t09/26/2000 10:39 AM\t\tCool!  Maybe I can play Black Sabbath on my 260 watt stereo for you guys on our way to work.  See if you get that kind of service on METRO.Susan Scott09/26/2000 10:34 AMIn compliance with the new Houston Clean Air standards Mr. Fawcett has agreed to use his new vehicle for carpooling (a generous gesture as we know he would much rather just ride the Metro bus to work).",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08641975308641975,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Sentiment": 0.18623737373737373,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04185022026431718
    }
],
"thread614": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Apr 2001 03:20:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "FERC ruling on Kern expansion",
        "Text": "Hmm. Interesting.  Thanks for the info.  Do we know who got to Breathitt?  Forgive me, but what time did we pick to talk today?  And will you call me?Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2727272727272727,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15151515151515152,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.050314465408805034
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Apr 2001 03:18:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "julie",
        "Subject": "FERC ruling on Kern expansion",
        "Text": "Kern Gets Speedy OK; Breathitt Questions Action FERC moved with record speed to issue a certificate last week to Kern River Gas Transmission for its 135 MMcf/d, mostly compression, expansion to the natural gas-starved California market, but not all of the commissioners were happy with the expedited manner in which the project was approved. \"The speed with which the Commission has acted in this proceeding is something which will no doubt be touted as a great effort,\" but the \"precedent we have created could be a double-edged sword,\" warned Commissioner Linda Breathitt in a partial dissent of the decision. Although she voted in favor of the certificate in the end, she questioned whether FERC \"should...be willing to sacrifice careful review for speedy action.\" Breathitt further said she seriously doubted the so-called California Action expansion of the 900-mile,Wyoming-to-California Kern River system merited the \"extraordinary regulatory treatment\" that the Commission gave it. Critics claim that the $81 million project will not flow any more gas to the Wheeler Ridge Interconnection in California than is currently available there, she noted, adding that it would simply displace existing gas. \"...[I]t will not necessarily result in any net increase of natural gas in the California marketplace. This makes it difficult to understand just how our approval of Kern River's proposal is going to assist in increasing electric generation in California this summer,\" Breathitt said. If anything, she noted the project could make the congestion problem at Wheeler Ridge even worse than it is. There should have been a \"fuller airing of this issue\" at FERC before the project was certificated, she noted. \"It would be counterproductive for this Commission to act precipitously on projects related to California without ensuring that they will, in reality, benefit specific markets --- and more importantly, that they will cause no further harm.\" The Commission majority, however, readily dismissed protests of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas and other California customers, that claim the Kern River expansion would degrade service to existing customers. They requested that existing customers be given priority over expansion shippers. \"We conclude that the California Action Project will not have undue negative impacts on existing shippers or competing pripelines,\" the order said [CP01-106. For starters, \"the record does not show that pro-rata allocations of primary firm capacity have been a problem at Wheeler Ridge.\" Kern River reports that the aggregate primary firm delivery rights of its shippers at Wheeler Ridge will increase to about 527 MMcf/d from 450 MMcf/d as a result of this project. At the same time, the design delivery capacity at the Wheeler Ridge Meter Station will be increased to about 800 MMcf/d from 598 MMcf/d to accommodate existing shippers, new expansion shippers and Mojave Pipeline shippers, it noted. \"Therefore, the expanded delivery point capacity at Wheeler Ridge will be greater than the sum of the combined Kern River and Mojave contract volumes. The Commission recognizes that this does not factor in the volumes attributable to both PG&E and local production that are also delivered to Wheeler Ridge. However, our emphasis is on Kern River being able to provide sufficient delivery point capacity for its customers,\" the order said. \"The solution to the problem of pro-rata allocations of any services at Wheeler Ridge lies not with the interstate pipelines, but rather in fixing the problem with the take-away capacity and the lack of firm transportation path rights on SoCalGas, a matter which is beyond our jurisdiction.\" The project would increase the \"limited-term, incremental transportation capacity\" of Kern River by 135 MMcf/d from Wyoming to California to help address the urgent need for additional gas in the West. An estimated 53,900 horsepower would be added to the pipeline, including three new compressor stations, and upgraded facilities at three existing compressor stations and an existing meter station. The project, which has been fully subscribed, has a targeted in-service date of July 1 of this year. Kern River plans to use a mix of permanent and temporary facilities on the project, with the temporary facilities intended to be subsequently replaced by permanent 2002 California Expansion Project facilities (which is pending at FERC), and the permanent facilities to be incorporated into the design of the pipeline's 2002 and 2003 California Expansion Projects. The 2003 project recently went through an open season",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03212290502793296,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07262569832402235,
        "Sentiment": 0.08525252525252526,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.027073857483214208
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Apr 2001 06:13:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": " Dasovich, Jeff  ",
        "Recipient": "Fawcett, Jeffery",
        "Subject": "FERC ruling on Kern expansion",
        "Text": "My apologies.  Just been \"ordered\" to be on a 1 PM (PDT) call.  Possible to do our call at 2:30 Houston time.  Sorry about that.Best,Jeff\tJeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate\t04/09/2001 10:34 AM\t\t I think we said we'd call you at 3:00 p.m. CDT.   See 'ya then. -----Original Message-----Hmm. Interesting.  Thanks for the info.  Do we know who got to Breathitt?  Forgive me, but what time did we pick to talk today?  And will you call me?Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.24691358024691357,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13580246913580246,
        "Sentiment": 0.14375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09049773755656108
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:24:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Jeff Dasovich on 04/09/2001 10:18 AM CDT",
        "Recipient": "Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher ",
        "Subject": "FERC ruling on Kern expansion",
        "Text": "Greetings:Let's talk more about ENA's position on Kern.  And I'll fill you in on Gas Accord extension.  It's been on-again-off-again with PG&E.  I can give them a ring and find out what the latest is.Best,Jeff\tStephanie Miller\t04/10/2001 10:55 AM\t\t ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 08:54 AM ---------------------------Stephanie Miller04/10/2001 08:54 AMJeff - We also need to talk about PG&E's process for Gas Accord discussions -We want to be very involved!I have been advised that PG&E filed a proposal that outlined their solution to the Gas Accord rollover - Have you seen this?  Stephanie Miller04/10/2001 08:51 AMJeff - we participated in this open season and hold capacity in our name. We will also take assignement of capacity from several shippers.Please call if you have any questions.F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECTKern Gets Speedy OK; Breathitt Questions Action FERC moved with record speed to issue a certificate last week to Kern River Gas Transmission for its 135 MMcf/d, mostly compression, expansion to the natural gas-starved California market, but not all of the commissioners were happy with the expedited manner in which the project was approved. \"The speed with which the Commission has acted in this proceeding is something which will no doubt be touted as a great effort,\" but the \"precedent we have created could be a double-edged sword,\" warned Commissioner Linda Breathitt in a partial dissent of the decision. Although she voted in favor of the certificate in the end, she questioned whether FERC \"should...be willing to sacrifice careful review for speedy action.\" Breathitt further said she seriously doubted the so-called California Action expansion of the 900-mile,Wyoming-to-California Kern River system merited the \"extraordinary regulatory treatment\" that the Commission gave it. Critics claim that the $81 million project will not flow any more gas to the Wheeler Ridge Interconnection in California than is currently available there, she noted, adding that it would simply displace existing gas. \"...[I]t will not necessarily result in any net increase of natural gas in the California marketplace. This makes it difficult to understand just how our approval of Kern River's proposal is going to assist in increasing electric generation in California this summer,\" Breathitt said. If anything, she noted the project could make the congestion problem at Wheeler Ridge even worse than it is. There should have been a \"fuller airing of this issue\" at FERC before the project was certificated, she noted. \"It would be counterproductive for this Commission to act precipitously on projects related to California without ensuring that they will, in reality, benefit specific markets --- and more importantly, that they will cause no further harm.\" The Commission majority, however, readily dismissed protests of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas and other California customers, that claim the Kern River expansion would degrade service to existing customers. They requested that existing customers be given priority over expansion shippers. \"We conclude that the California Action Project will not have undue negative impacts on existing shippers or competing pripelines,\" the order said [CP01-106. For starters, \"the record does not show that pro-rata allocations of primary firm capacity have been a problem at Wheeler Ridge.\" Kern River reports that the aggregate primary firm delivery rights of its shippers at Wheeler Ridge will increase to about 527 MMcf/d from 450 MMcf/d as a result of this project. At the same time, the design delivery capacity at the Wheeler Ridge Meter Station will be increased to about 800 MMcf/d from 598 MMcf/d to accommodate existing shippers, new expansion shippers and Mojave Pipeline shippers, it noted. \"Therefore, the expanded delivery point capacity at Wheeler Ridge will be greater than the sum of the combined Kern River and Mojave contract volumes. The Commission recognizes that this does not factor in the volumes attributable to both PG&E and local production that are also delivered to Wheeler Ridge. However, our emphasis is on Kern River being able to provide sufficient delivery point capacity for its customers,\" the order said. \"The solution to the problem of pro-rata allocations of any services at Wheeler Ridge lies not with the interstate pipelines, but rather in fixing the problem with the take-away capacity and the lack of firm transportation path rights on SoCalGas, a matter which is beyond our jurisdiction.\" The project would increase the \"limited-term, incremental transportation capacity\" of Kern River by 135 MMcf/d from Wyoming to California to help address the urgent need for additional gas in the West. An estimated 53,900 horsepower would be added to the pipeline, including three new compressor stations, and upgraded facilities at three existing compressor stations and an existing meter station. The project, which has been fully subscribed, has a targeted in-service date of July 1 of this year. Kern River plans to use a mix of permanent and temporary facilities on the project, with the temporary facilities intended to be subsequently replaced by permanent 2002 California Expansion Project facilities (which is pending at FERC), and the permanent facilities to be incorporated into the design of the pipeline's 2002 and 2003 California Expansion Projects. The 2003 project recently went through an open season",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041237113402061855,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07674684994272624,
        "Sentiment": 0.11684632034632032,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04575721359057538
    }
],
"thread615": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Apr 2001 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "Thanks much.  Sorry for being such a loser when it comes to calls these days.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.125,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1875,
        "Sentiment": -0.024999999999999994,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03488372093023256
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 1 Nov 2000 01:50:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "suzanne",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "Suzanne,Please call (not email - he doesnt check it) Paul Pipitone (Andrews & Kurth) and see if he is available for a meeting (or conference call) to discuss the GE facility agreement sometime tomorrow - either am or after 300.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.075,
        "Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05063291139240506
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 17 Nov 2000 03:06:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "200 sounds good to me, and an hour should be sufficient.\"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)\" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/17/2000 10:56:55 AMThings aren't great.  Maybe 2:00 p.m. your time (I'd only have 1 hour).  Leeprobably can't be on.Kent",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1388888888888889,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Sentiment": 0.75,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11965811965811966
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:11:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "Hi David,It is just us chickens, Gregg's agenda.Kay\"David Tucker\" <dtucker@bracepatt.com> on 10/23/2000 06:36:04 PMRegarding your call, I can make the 8:30 a.m. conference call tomorrow morning on the agency agreement.  [Can I assume it's an internal conference call?]I'm looking forward to speaking with you.  Thanks!  DT",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12244897959183673,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12244897959183673,
        "Sentiment": 0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08074534161490683
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 30 Mar 2001 04:10:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "ccampbell@kslaw",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "Stephen  is trying to set up a conference call at 200 re Delta.  Please advise if this doesn't work for you.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.21739130434782608,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13043478260869565,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03389830508474576
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:51:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "scott",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "Hi Scott,I'm tied up in a call and I don't know when I'll be out.  Hopefully, things will lighten up soon.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06422018348623854
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 17 Nov 2000 02:50:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kent",
        "Subject": "Conference call",
        "Text": "How do we look for a conference call today?  I'll be open in about an hour.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17647058823529413,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.038461538461538464
    }
],
"thread616": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Apr 2001 04:08:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "CPUC Workshop on 4/17",
        "Text": "Lemme know how it goes.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.043478260869565216
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "CPUC Workshop on 4/17",
        "Text": "This is unreal.  If TW ain't on the A list, who is?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0784313725490196
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "CPUC Workshop on 4/17",
        "Text": "I'll look at it and get back to you first thing Monday.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Sentiment": 0.125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03508771929824561
    }
],
"thread617": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 18 May 2001 10:06:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeffery",
        "Subject": "May 21 - 8:30 AM - conference call",
        "Text": "FYI.  Can you join?----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/18/2001 05:05 PM -----\t\"Angeles, Zenee G. - TPZGA\" <ZAngeles@sempra.com>\t05/18/2001 02:24 PM\t\t Craig@Calpine'\" <craigc@calpine.com>, \"'Clark, A@Calpine'\" <clarka@calpine.com>, \"'Dasovich, Jeff@Enron'\" <jdasovic@enron.com>, \"'Counihan, Rick@Green Mountain'\" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, \"'Kahl, Evelyn@IP'\" <ek@a-klaw.com>, \"'Leslie, John'\" <jleslie@luce.com>, \"'Alexander, Michael@sce'\" <alexanms@sce.com>, \"'Rochman, Michael@SPURR'\" <rochmanm@spurr.org>, \"'Rochman, Michael@CUB'\" <rochmanm@cubjpa.org>, \"'Beach, Thomas@Crossborder'\" <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>, \"'Burkholder, John@WHP-Beta'\" <burkee@cts.com>, \"'Day, Michael@GMSSR'\" <mday@gmssr.com>, \"'Gileau, Patrick@CPUC'\" <plg@cpuc.ca.gov>, \"'Yoo, Salle@dwt'\" <salleyoo@dwt.com>, \"'Pocta, Mark@ORA'\" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov><GWright@sempra.com>, \"Sullivan, Glen J.\" <GSullivan@sempra.com>sending on behalf of Lad Lorenz..... ??????? ???????  <<GIR-enbanc conf call.doc>> ???????  Thank you. Zenee Angeles SEMPRA ENERGY 213/244-3831  - GIR-enbanc conf call.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09473684210526316,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.042105263157894736,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.22664199814986125
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 18 May 2001 10:06:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "zangeles@sempra",
        "Subject": "May 21 - 8:30 AM - conference call",
        "Text": "Thank you.  I will participate in the call.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.057692307692307696
    }
],
"thread621": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:49:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jennifer",
        "Subject": "California Deregulation Summary",
        "Text": "thanks very much.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.3333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.23,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.058823529411764705
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 03:47:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES",
        "Subject": "California Deregulation Summary",
        "Text": "California dereg for a presentation(s) that Harold's assembling.  Attached is summary that Mona pulled together for Harold a couple of months ago.  I don't have Chris' email address (I've left him a message).  Could you forward this along to him?  Thanks a bunch.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:44 AM -----\tMona L Petrochko\t12/12/2000 11:38 AM\t\t FYI.---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:37 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron Energy Services\t\tPetrochko/SFO/EES@EES Per Ed's request, here is a summary of California's deregulation history:If you have any questions, please page me!---Jenniferwk 713-345-8206pgr 877-681-5956",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11458333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13541666666666666,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14630681818181818
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES",
        "Subject": "California Deregulation Summary",
        "Text": "----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 01:02 PM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t12/12/2000 11:47 AM\t\t California dereg for a presentation(s) that Harold's assembling.  Attached is summary that Mona pulled together for Harold a couple of months ago.  I don't have Chris' email address (I've left him a message).  Could you forward this along to him?  Thanks a bunch.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:44 AM -----\tMona L Petrochko\t12/12/2000 11:38 AM\t\t FYI.---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:37 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron Energy Services\t\tPetrochko/SFO/EES@EES Per Ed's request, here is a summary of California's deregulation history:If you have any questions, please page me!---Jenniferwk 713-345-8206pgr 877-681-5956",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11009174311926606,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11926605504587157,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14919852034525277
    }
],
"thread622": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:19:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR",
        "Text": "----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/19/2001 07:19 PM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t06/19/2001 07:11 PM\t\t James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Christian Yoder/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve C Hall/ENRON@enronXgateContracts--Privileged and Confidential\tPLEASE KEEP THIS NOTE, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTE CONFIDENTIAL.As folks are aware, we have been engaged in closed-door negotiations for the past two weeks regarding a possible market-based solution to California's electricity crisis.In the room are the major large customer groups, environmentalists, small customers (TURN), Independent Energy Producers, labor, the Western States Petroleum Association, and Enron.The negotiations were convened by the Speaker of the Assembly (Bob Hertzberg).When Hertzberg convened the meeting, he told the parties that he wanted to achieve a core/noncore structure, similar to the structure in place in California's gas market (i.e., large customers are required to buy gas from the market, with Direct Access available to all other customers).In effect, \"core\" customers (rez and small business) would be served by the utilities' retained generating assets and QF contracts; and large customers would go to market.  The core/noncore structure would begin 1.1.03.The negotiating group has struggled over the past two weeks, but is close devising a framework for core/noncore in Californis (but who pays for the utilities' past debts and the costs of DWR power purchased between January and today remain very contentious).Unfortunately, with the release of the information regarding the DWR contracts last Friday, it is now clear that achieving a core/noncore structure will be very difficult unless something is done to mitigate the contracts.The problem is that, if core is served by utility gen and QFs, and large customers are in the market, there is no (or very little) need for the DWR contracts.  Instead, they look like a signficant stranded cost.Hertzberg and the negotiating group are looking to Enron for creative ways to address \"the DWR contract problem\" in order to prevent the contracts from 1) killing the core/noncore deal and 2) forcing California to accept a structure focused on a state power authority headed-up by David Freeman that does not include Direct Access.Christian Yoder and Steve Hall are reviewing the contracts to analyze any \"out clauses\" that the buyer and/or the seller might have under the contract provisions.  (My cursory review of the contracts suggests that \"outs\" for the state are minimal or nonexistent.)In addition, we've started batting around ideas about how the State might reform the contracts.All this said, want to let everyone know that we have made it extremely clear that Enron fundamentally opposes any and all attempts to unilaterally abrogate anyone's contract rights.We'd like to have a quick call tomorrow (30-60 minutes) to brainstorm some options that we can offer Hertzberg to handle the contracts and keep the core/noncore solution alive.  We'd like to try to have the the call at 1 PM PDT.  Please let me know if this works for you, and if it doesn't, please let me know if there's a time after 1 PM PDT that works for you.Thanks,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.04970178926441352,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09542743538767395,
        "Sentiment": 0.026934523809523808,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042617046818727494
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:11:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "tim",
        "Subject": "Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR",
        "Text": "PLEASE KEEP THIS NOTE, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTE CONFIDENTIAL.As folks are aware, we have been engaged in closed-door negotiations for the past two weeks regarding a possible market-based solution to California's electricity crisis.In the room are the major large customer groups, environmentalists, small customers (TURN), Independent Energy Producers, labor, the Western States Petroleum Association, and Enron.The negotiations were convened by the Speaker of the Assembly (Bob Hertzberg).When Hertzberg convened the meeting, he told the parties that he wanted to achieve a core/noncore structure, similar to the structure in place in California's gas market (i.e., large customers are required to buy gas from the market, with Direct Access available to all other customers).In effect, \"core\" customers (rez and small business) would be served by the utilities' retained generating assets and QF contracts; and large customers would go to market.  The core/noncore structure would begin 1.1.03.The negotiating group has struggled over the past two weeks, but is close devising a framework for core/noncore in Californis (but who pays for the utilities' past debts and the costs of DWR power purchased between January and today remain very contentious).Unfortunately, with the release of the information regarding the DWR contracts last Friday, it is now clear that achieving a core/noncore structure will be very difficult unless something is done to mitigate the contracts.The problem is that, if core is served by utility gen and QFs, and large customers are in the market, there is no (or very little) need for the DWR contracts.  Instead, they look like a signficant stranded cost.Hertzberg and the negotiating group are looking to Enron for creative ways to address \"the DWR contract problem\" in order to prevent the contracts from 1) killing the core/noncore deal and 2) forcing California to accept a structure focused on a state power authority headed-up by David Freeman that does not include Direct Access.Christian Yoder and Steve Hall are reviewing the contracts to analyze any \"out clauses\" that the buyer and/or the seller might have under the contract provisions.  (My cursory review of the contracts suggests that \"outs\" for the state are minimal or nonexistent.)In addition, we've started batting around ideas about how the State might reform the contracts.All this said, want to let everyone know that we have made it extremely clear that Enron fundamentally opposes any and all attempts to unilaterally abrogate anyone's contract rights.We'd like to have a quick call tomorrow (30-60 minutes) to brainstorm some options that we can offer Hertzberg to handle the contracts and keep the core/noncore solution alive.  We'd like to try to have the the call at 1 PM PDT.  Please let me know if this works for you, and if it doesn't, please let me know if there's a time after 1 PM PDT that works for you.Thanks,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05319148936170213,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10212765957446808,
        "Sentiment": 0.027418154761904755,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.032564450474898234
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:28:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "tim",
        "Subject": "Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR",
        "Text": "Greetings:This item will be up for discussion in the California negotiations tomorrow beginning at 10 AM.We're going to have a call to discuss it tomorrow from 9 AM to 9:30 AM PDT.  You will receive a  call-in number shortly from Joseph Alamo.  If there are others who you think ought to participate, please feel free to invite them.  Thanks.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/20/2001 05:23 PM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t06/19/2001 07:11 PM\t\t James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Christian Yoder/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve C Hall/ENRON@enronXgateContracts--Privileged and Confidential\tPLEASE KEEP THIS NOTE, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTE CONFIDENTIAL.As folks are aware, we have been engaged in closed-door negotiations for the past two weeks regarding a possible market-based solution to California's electricity crisis.In the room are the major large customer groups, environmentalists, small customers (TURN), Independent Energy Producers, labor, the Western States Petroleum Association, and Enron.The negotiations were convened by the Speaker of the Assembly (Bob Hertzberg).When Hertzberg convened the meeting, he told the parties that he wanted to achieve a core/noncore structure, similar to the structure in place in California's gas market (i.e., large customers are required to buy gas from the market, with Direct Access available to all other customers).In effect, \"core\" customers (rez and small business) would be served by the utilities' retained generating assets and QF contracts; and large customers would go to market.  The core/noncore structure would begin 1.1.03.The negotiating group has struggled over the past two weeks, but is close devising a framework for core/noncore in Californis (but who pays for the utilities' past debts and the costs of DWR power purchased between January and today remain very contentious).Unfortunately, with the release of the information regarding the DWR contracts last Friday, it is now clear that achieving a core/noncore structure will be very difficult unless something is done to mitigate the contracts.The problem is that, if core is served by utility gen and QFs, and large customers are in the market, there is no (or very little) need for the DWR contracts.  Instead, they look like a signficant stranded cost.Hertzberg and the negotiating group are looking to Enron for creative ways to address \"the DWR contract problem\" in order to prevent the contracts from 1) killing the core/noncore deal and 2) forcing California to accept a structure focused on a state power authority headed-up by David Freeman that does not include Direct Access.Christian Yoder and Steve Hall are reviewing the contracts to analyze any \"out clauses\" that the buyer and/or the seller might have under the contract provisions.  (My cursory review of the contracts suggests that \"outs\" for the state are minimal or nonexistent.)In addition, we've started batting around ideas about how the State might reform the contracts.All this said, want to let everyone know that we have made it extremely clear that Enron fundamentally opposes any and all attempts to unilaterally abrogate anyone's contract rights.We'd like to have a quick call tomorrow (30-60 minutes) to brainstorm some options that we can offer Hertzberg to handle the contracts and keep the core/noncore solution alive.  We'd like to try to have the the call at 1 PM PDT.  Please let me know if this works for you, and if it doesn't, please let me know if there's a time after 1 PM PDT that works for you.Thanks,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05663716814159292,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10973451327433628,
        "Sentiment": 0.08911210317460318,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04154222101547651
    }
],
"thread625": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:24:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "The",
        "Text": "----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 05:24 PM -----\tLinda Robertson\t07/30/2001 11:29 AM\t\tconsultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.Your note flagged something for me.  I assume the Nancy McFadden mentioned in the article hails from the Clinton administration.  I \"sorta\" worked with Nancy when she was at the Department of Transportation.  She would remember me, at least.  If you ever need to explore this contact, let me know.  Otherwise I am glad to let sleeping dogs rest.\tJeff Dasovich\t07/30/2001 12:16 PM\t\t James D Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGateconsultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.JEFFREY L. RABIN; DARYL KELLEY; RICH CONNELLTIMES STAFF WRITERS07/28/2001Los Angeles TimesHome EditionA-1Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror CompanyThe Davis administration, stung by charges of excessive secrecy, disclosed late Friday that it has fired five energy consultants because of conflicts of interest involving their official duties and personal finances. A sixth consultant hired to help California purchase electricity has quit, according to state records.All were involved in purchasing electricity for the state from a generator whose stock they owned. In addition, the top lawyer for the agency buying the power was removed from her position because of concern about the way the issue of potential conflicts was handled. Top advisors to Gov. Gray Davis told The Times that they learned of the conflicts in the last week, after belatedly asking the consultants to file required economic disclosure statements. A review of those documents, which included stock holdings, showed that some of the consultants \"may have crossed the line,\" said the governor's senior advisor, Nancy McFadden. State law prohibits officials from participating in decisions involving their personal financial interests. Although portraying himself as seriously concerned that such conflicts could undermine public confidence, the governor has not required some of his most influential private-sector advisors to file the kind of disclosure statements that led to the firings. Among them are two Wall Street veterans who have been most influential in promoting the governor's energy rescue plan, which includes the largest state bond sale in U.S. history. The New York firms that employ executives Joseph Fichera and Michael Hoffman have been paid $275,000 a month to, among other things, help pitch the $12.5-billion bond issue to Wall Street analysts and state lawmakers. The companies stand to make an additional $14 million if the state goes through with the purchase of utility transmission lines. Davis contends that Fichera, Hoffman and their associates fall into a separate category of advisor, beyond the reach of the state's political reform laws. Critics question the distinction. \"The governor's approach may be convenient for him,\" said Jim Knox, executive director of the watchdog group California Common Cause, \"but it ignores the law.\" Disclosure is crucial because the public needs to know that \"decisions are not being made by people who have a conflict of interest,\" Knox said. \"Trying to evade the law with a creative use of semantics is not what they ought to be doing.\" The firings disclosed Friday are unlikely to diminish criticism surrounding the more than 50 consultants and advisors hastily hired by the administration as it rushed into the power trading business this year. More than $25 million is being spent by the state on consultants, according to state records. In the process, seemingly little attention was paid to routine government ethics laws. It took six months for state officials to direct the consultants to file even basic disclosures of their personal finances, including investments. The state Political Reform Act normally requires such forms to be filed publicly within 30 days of starting work for state agencies. Even with the hastily ordered disclosures made public thus far, the circumstances of most of the stock transactions remain a mystery because key information was omitted. Most of the consultants, for example, failed to state when they bought the energy stocks. One of those pressing hardest for an investigation of possible conflict of interest violations and insider trading is Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to challenge Davis next year. Jones has accused the governor of \"a conscious policy of secrecy\" in enforcing compliance with public disclosure laws. This week Jones called for a federal Securities and Exchange Commission probe of stock purchases by state energy consultants. 4 Traders Owned Shares of Calpine The four traders removed this week all owned shares of Calpine Corp., a San Jose-based power generator that has landed the largest share of the $43 billion in long-term state power contracts. Their investments ranged from several thousand dollars to more than $100,000, records show. While working for the state Department of Water Resources, officials said they bought undetermined amounts of Calpine power on the state's behalf. More than $14 million worth of electricity was purchased from the state by Calpine in the first quarter of this year, according to the most recent records available. \"We did not want them making governmental decisions and holding these stocks,\" the governor's legal affairs secretary, Barry Goode, said in an interview. The highest-ranking consultant removed, Richard Ferreira, was hired on a $500,000 contract in January to assist in obtaining bids for long-term power and negotiating contracts, records show. A former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Ferreira was paid $200 an hour by the state. After he disclosed owning as much as $10,000 in Calpine stock, officials discovered he had participated in a review of one of the company's contracts. Ferreira could not be reached for comment. The governor's office identified the other four as traders William F. Mead, Herman Leung, Constantine Louie and Peggy Cheng, most of whom could not be reached Friday by The Times. All of them formerly worked as energy schedulers at the Power Exchange, a now-defunct energy market similar to a stock exchange created in the early days of California's electricity deregulation. Hired by the state in February and March, the four signed temporary contracts calling for maximum payments of between $15,000 and $21,000 a month, including living expenses in Sacramento and flights home to Southern California. Mead, 55, a former Edison engineer, said state officials never warned him that owning energy stock was a problem until they demanded that he sell the stock a week ago. He said he bought nearly all of his shares 2 1/2 years ago for $12,000 and saw its value skyrocket as the stock split three times, doubling in value each time. Mead said he was called by the head of the state's energy buying team Thursday and fired. \"I asked very directly, 'Is this because of the stock?' and they wouldn't give me an answer,\" Mead said. \"[He] just said your services are terminated. \"I came up here, away from home, living in a hotel room, trying to keep the lights on, trying to get the state through a crisis and now I get a finger pointed at me as if I'm some sort of criminal. I guess it's just politics and we're the pawns.\" Administration officials said they also are examining the actions of other traders, including one who bought Calpine stock just before beginning work for the state. That trader, Elaine Griffin, who also came from the Power Exchange, left the state power buying operation July 14, three days after disclosing her energy industry investment. Griffin, who the governor's office said had obtained another job, could not be reached for comment. Griffin reported purchasing $10,000 to $100,000 of Calpine stock on Feb. 1, in her final days working at the electricity exchange. A few days later, Calpine signed and announced a $4.6-billion, 10-year deal to sell power to the Department of Water Resources. On Feb. 20, Griffin joined the state power buying agency, just as the state and Calpine were finalizing an additional $8.3 billion in power contracts. One of those, a 20-year deal signed Feb. 27, was the longest. The state has awarded Calpine about $13 billion in contracts to supply power for up to 20 years. In addition to the state consultants who bought Calpine stock, two others reported owning stock in Texas-based power marketing giant Enron Corp. And two more bought stock in Southern California Edison, the faltering utility that Davis has committed himself to saving from bankruptcy. Another consultant bought stock in Reliant Energy of Houston, a large power plant operator that bought several California plants from utilities after deregulation. Bernard Barretto, an energy trader, who buys energy on the daily spot market, said in an interview that he bought about $2,000 in Enron stock shortly before he began work for the state Feb. 28. Purchase of Enron Stock Defended \"I don't see a conflict,\" he said. \"At the time, we weren't really dealing with Enron. I [still] haven't bought from Enron.\" Barretto said he never considered his Enron ownership a possible conflict until he received notice July 18 that he had to sell the stocks by noon or lose his job. That notice came from Goode, the governor's lawyer. \"We expect and have always expected the state's consultants to uphold the highest ethical standards,\" he wrote. \"That standard is not met by those who hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while trading on behalf of the state on energy related matters.\" \"Therefore each consultant who holds an interest in an energy company must divest himself or herself of that interest by noon today. If he or she refuses, the state will sever its contract with that person.\" However, the governor's office has taken a distinctly different stance with his closest financial advisors, Fichera and Hoffman. Davis aides cite an opinion sought last week from attorney Raquelle de la Rocha, a former member of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the state Fair Political Practices Commission. She concluded that the advisors do not have to file disclosure statements because they are contractors, not consultants, and will be working for less than a year on a limited range of projects. Fichera is Davis' point man on the governor's energy rescue plan--including the unprecedented bond sale. He has pitched the plan to lawmakers, reporters and the Wall Street financial community. Fichera refused to comment on the record. Fichera and Hoffman's companies, Saber Partners and Blackstone Group, prepared a controversial analysis that helped underpin legislative approval of the bond measure, intended to pay for past and future power buying. Pact Specifies Financial Advice The state's contract with the Fichera and Hoffman firms calls for them to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. The decision not to require public disclosure of their financial holdings stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken with Montague DeRose and Associates. That consulting firm was hired on a $1.8-million contract. Like the other two firms, it too was hired to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. That firm's top advisor, Douglas S. Montague, was required by the administration to fill out a disclosure statement. He reported no power company interests. The governor's legal advisors said the difference is that Montague is on a longer contract.Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03279541905257678,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07287870900572618,
        "Sentiment": 0.10307233464210207,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0315712187958884
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:01:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "The",
        "Text": "we're always looking for new recruits, eh?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07142857142857142
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "linda",
        "Subject": "The",
        "Text": "Thanks. I'm pretty sure that is the same Ms McFadden.  Might be interesting for you to contact her.  Let's discuss a bit more.  I'll call you tomorrow, if you're around.  Thanks again for the info.Best,Jeff\tLinda Robertson\t07/30/2001 11:29 AM\t\tconsultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.Your note flagged something for me.  I assume the Nancy McFadden mentioned in the article hails from the Clinton administration.  I \"sorta\" worked with Nancy when she was at the Department of Transportation.  She would remember me, at least.  If you ever need to explore this contact, let me know.  Otherwise I am glad to let sleeping dogs rest.\tJeff Dasovich\t07/30/2001 12:16 PM\t\t James D Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGateconsultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.JEFFREY L. RABIN; DARYL KELLEY; RICH CONNELLTIMES STAFF WRITERS07/28/2001Los Angeles TimesHome EditionA-1Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror CompanyThe Davis administration, stung by charges of excessive secrecy, disclosed late Friday that it has fired five energy consultants because of conflicts of interest involving their official duties and personal finances. A sixth consultant hired to help California purchase electricity has quit, according to state records.All were involved in purchasing electricity for the state from a generator whose stock they owned. In addition, the top lawyer for the agency buying the power was removed from her position because of concern about the way the issue of potential conflicts was handled. Top advisors to Gov. Gray Davis told The Times that they learned of the conflicts in the last week, after belatedly asking the consultants to file required economic disclosure statements. A review of those documents, which included stock holdings, showed that some of the consultants \"may have crossed the line,\" said the governor's senior advisor, Nancy McFadden. State law prohibits officials from participating in decisions involving their personal financial interests. Although portraying himself as seriously concerned that such conflicts could undermine public confidence, the governor has not required some of his most influential private-sector advisors to file the kind of disclosure statements that led to the firings. Among them are two Wall Street veterans who have been most influential in promoting the governor's energy rescue plan, which includes the largest state bond sale in U.S. history. The New York firms that employ executives Joseph Fichera and Michael Hoffman have been paid $275,000 a month to, among other things, help pitch the $12.5-billion bond issue to Wall Street analysts and state lawmakers. The companies stand to make an additional $14 million if the state goes through with the purchase of utility transmission lines. Davis contends that Fichera, Hoffman and their associates fall into a separate category of advisor, beyond the reach of the state's political reform laws. Critics question the distinction. \"The governor's approach may be convenient for him,\" said Jim Knox, executive director of the watchdog group California Common Cause, \"but it ignores the law.\" Disclosure is crucial because the public needs to know that \"decisions are not being made by people who have a conflict of interest,\" Knox said. \"Trying to evade the law with a creative use of semantics is not what they ought to be doing.\" The firings disclosed Friday are unlikely to diminish criticism surrounding the more than 50 consultants and advisors hastily hired by the administration as it rushed into the power trading business this year. More than $25 million is being spent by the state on consultants, according to state records. In the process, seemingly little attention was paid to routine government ethics laws. It took six months for state officials to direct the consultants to file even basic disclosures of their personal finances, including investments. The state Political Reform Act normally requires such forms to be filed publicly within 30 days of starting work for state agencies. Even with the hastily ordered disclosures made public thus far, the circumstances of most of the stock transactions remain a mystery because key information was omitted. Most of the consultants, for example, failed to state when they bought the energy stocks. One of those pressing hardest for an investigation of possible conflict of interest violations and insider trading is Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to challenge Davis next year. Jones has accused the governor of \"a conscious policy of secrecy\" in enforcing compliance with public disclosure laws. This week Jones called for a federal Securities and Exchange Commission probe of stock purchases by state energy consultants. 4 Traders Owned Shares of Calpine The four traders removed this week all owned shares of Calpine Corp., a San Jose-based power generator that has landed the largest share of the $43 billion in long-term state power contracts. Their investments ranged from several thousand dollars to more than $100,000, records show. While working for the state Department of Water Resources, officials said they bought undetermined amounts of Calpine power on the state's behalf. More than $14 million worth of electricity was purchased from the state by Calpine in the first quarter of this year, according to the most recent records available. \"We did not want them making governmental decisions and holding these stocks,\" the governor's legal affairs secretary, Barry Goode, said in an interview. The highest-ranking consultant removed, Richard Ferreira, was hired on a $500,000 contract in January to assist in obtaining bids for long-term power and negotiating contracts, records show. A former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Ferreira was paid $200 an hour by the state. After he disclosed owning as much as $10,000 in Calpine stock, officials discovered he had participated in a review of one of the company's contracts. Ferreira could not be reached for comment. The governor's office identified the other four as traders William F. Mead, Herman Leung, Constantine Louie and Peggy Cheng, most of whom could not be reached Friday by The Times. All of them formerly worked as energy schedulers at the Power Exchange, a now-defunct energy market similar to a stock exchange created in the early days of California's electricity deregulation. Hired by the state in February and March, the four signed temporary contracts calling for maximum payments of between $15,000 and $21,000 a month, including living expenses in Sacramento and flights home to Southern California. Mead, 55, a former Edison engineer, said state officials never warned him that owning energy stock was a problem until they demanded that he sell the stock a week ago. He said he bought nearly all of his shares 2 1/2 years ago for $12,000 and saw its value skyrocket as the stock split three times, doubling in value each time. Mead said he was called by the head of the state's energy buying team Thursday and fired. \"I asked very directly, 'Is this because of the stock?' and they wouldn't give me an answer,\" Mead said. \"[He] just said your services are terminated. \"I came up here, away from home, living in a hotel room, trying to keep the lights on, trying to get the state through a crisis and now I get a finger pointed at me as if I'm some sort of criminal. I guess it's just politics and we're the pawns.\" Administration officials said they also are examining the actions of other traders, including one who bought Calpine stock just before beginning work for the state. That trader, Elaine Griffin, who also came from the Power Exchange, left the state power buying operation July 14, three days after disclosing her energy industry investment. Griffin, who the governor's office said had obtained another job, could not be reached for comment. Griffin reported purchasing $10,000 to $100,000 of Calpine stock on Feb. 1, in her final days working at the electricity exchange. A few days later, Calpine signed and announced a $4.6-billion, 10-year deal to sell power to the Department of Water Resources. On Feb. 20, Griffin joined the state power buying agency, just as the state and Calpine were finalizing an additional $8.3 billion in power contracts. One of those, a 20-year deal signed Feb. 27, was the longest. The state has awarded Calpine about $13 billion in contracts to supply power for up to 20 years. In addition to the state consultants who bought Calpine stock, two others reported owning stock in Texas-based power marketing giant Enron Corp. And two more bought stock in Southern California Edison, the faltering utility that Davis has committed himself to saving from bankruptcy. Another consultant bought stock in Reliant Energy of Houston, a large power plant operator that bought several California plants from utilities after deregulation. Bernard Barretto, an energy trader, who buys energy on the daily spot market, said in an interview that he bought about $2,000 in Enron stock shortly before he began work for the state Feb. 28. Purchase of Enron Stock Defended \"I don't see a conflict,\" he said. \"At the time, we weren't really dealing with Enron. I [still] haven't bought from Enron.\" Barretto said he never considered his Enron ownership a possible conflict until he received notice July 18 that he had to sell the stocks by noon or lose his job. That notice came from Goode, the governor's lawyer. \"We expect and have always expected the state's consultants to uphold the highest ethical standards,\" he wrote. \"That standard is not met by those who hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while trading on behalf of the state on energy related matters.\" \"Therefore each consultant who holds an interest in an energy company must divest himself or herself of that interest by noon today. If he or she refuses, the state will sever its contract with that person.\" However, the governor's office has taken a distinctly different stance with his closest financial advisors, Fichera and Hoffman. Davis aides cite an opinion sought last week from attorney Raquelle de la Rocha, a former member of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the state Fair Political Practices Commission. She concluded that the advisors do not have to file disclosure statements because they are contractors, not consultants, and will be working for less than a year on a limited range of projects. Fichera is Davis' point man on the governor's energy rescue plan--including the unprecedented bond sale. He has pitched the plan to lawmakers, reporters and the Wall Street financial community. Fichera refused to comment on the record. Fichera and Hoffman's companies, Saber Partners and Blackstone Group, prepared a controversial analysis that helped underpin legislative approval of the bond measure, intended to pay for past and future power buying. Pact Specifies Financial Advice The state's contract with the Fichera and Hoffman firms calls for them to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. The decision not to require public disclosure of their financial holdings stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken with Montague DeRose and Associates. That consulting firm was hired on a $1.8-million contract. Like the other two firms, it too was hired to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. That firm's top advisor, Douglas S. Montague, was required by the administration to fill out a disclosure statement. He reported no power company interests. The governor's legal advisors said the difference is that Montague is on a longer contract.Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03538461538461538,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07538461538461538,
        "Sentiment": 0.12462729978354976,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.030982733580764886
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 04:16:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "michael",
        "Subject": "The",
        "Text": "involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.JEFFREY L. RABIN; DARYL KELLEY; RICH CONNELLTIMES STAFF WRITERS07/28/2001Los Angeles TimesHome EditionA-1Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror CompanyThe Davis administration, stung by charges of excessive secrecy, disclosed late Friday that it has fired five energy consultants because of conflicts of interest involving their official duties and personal finances. A sixth consultant hired to help California purchase electricity has quit, according to state records.All were involved in purchasing electricity for the state from a generator whose stock they owned. In addition, the top lawyer for the agency buying the power was removed from her position because of concern about the way the issue of potential conflicts was handled. Top advisors to Gov. Gray Davis told The Times that they learned of the conflicts in the last week, after belatedly asking the consultants to file required economic disclosure statements. A review of those documents, which included stock holdings, showed that some of the consultants \"may have crossed the line,\" said the governor's senior advisor, Nancy McFadden. State law prohibits officials from participating in decisions involving their personal financial interests. Although portraying himself as seriously concerned that such conflicts could undermine public confidence, the governor has not required some of his most influential private-sector advisors to file the kind of disclosure statements that led to the firings. Among them are two Wall Street veterans who have been most influential in promoting the governor's energy rescue plan, which includes the largest state bond sale in U.S. history. The New York firms that employ executives Joseph Fichera and Michael Hoffman have been paid $275,000 a month to, among other things, help pitch the $12.5-billion bond issue to Wall Street analysts and state lawmakers. The companies stand to make an additional $14 million if the state goes through with the purchase of utility transmission lines. Davis contends that Fichera, Hoffman and their associates fall into a separate category of advisor, beyond the reach of the state's political reform laws. Critics question the distinction. \"The governor's approach may be convenient for him,\" said Jim Knox, executive director of the watchdog group California Common Cause, \"but it ignores the law.\" Disclosure is crucial because the public needs to know that \"decisions are not being made by people who have a conflict of interest,\" Knox said. \"Trying to evade the law with a creative use of semantics is not what they ought to be doing.\" The firings disclosed Friday are unlikely to diminish criticism surrounding the more than 50 consultants and advisors hastily hired by the administration as it rushed into the power trading business this year. More than $25 million is being spent by the state on consultants, according to state records. In the process, seemingly little attention was paid to routine government ethics laws. It took six months for state officials to direct the consultants to file even basic disclosures of their personal finances, including investments. The state Political Reform Act normally requires such forms to be filed publicly within 30 days of starting work for state agencies. Even with the hastily ordered disclosures made public thus far, the circumstances of most of the stock transactions remain a mystery because key information was omitted. Most of the consultants, for example, failed to state when they bought the energy stocks. One of those pressing hardest for an investigation of possible conflict of interest violations and insider trading is Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to challenge Davis next year. Jones has accused the governor of \"a conscious policy of secrecy\" in enforcing compliance with public disclosure laws. This week Jones called for a federal Securities and Exchange Commission probe of stock purchases by state energy consultants. 4 Traders Owned Shares of Calpine The four traders removed this week all owned shares of Calpine Corp., a San Jose-based power generator that has landed the largest share of the $43 billion in long-term state power contracts. Their investments ranged from several thousand dollars to more than $100,000, records show. While working for the state Department of Water Resources, officials said they bought undetermined amounts of Calpine power on the state's behalf. More than $14 million worth of electricity was purchased from the state by Calpine in the first quarter of this year, according to the most recent records available. \"We did not want them making governmental decisions and holding these stocks,\" the governor's legal affairs secretary, Barry Goode, said in an interview. The highest-ranking consultant removed, Richard Ferreira, was hired on a $500,000 contract in January to assist in obtaining bids for long-term power and negotiating contracts, records show. A former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Ferreira was paid $200 an hour by the state. After he disclosed owning as much as $10,000 in Calpine stock, officials discovered he had participated in a review of one of the company's contracts. Ferreira could not be reached for comment. The governor's office identified the other four as traders William F. Mead, Herman Leung, Constantine Louie and Peggy Cheng, most of whom could not be reached Friday by The Times. All of them formerly worked as energy schedulers at the Power Exchange, a now-defunct energy market similar to a stock exchange created in the early days of California's electricity deregulation. Hired by the state in February and March, the four signed temporary contracts calling for maximum payments of between $15,000 and $21,000 a month, including living expenses in Sacramento and flights home to Southern California. Mead, 55, a former Edison engineer, said state officials never warned him that owning energy stock was a problem until they demanded that he sell the stock a week ago. He said he bought nearly all of his shares 2 1/2 years ago for $12,000 and saw its value skyrocket as the stock split three times, doubling in value each time. Mead said he was called by the head of the state's energy buying team Thursday and fired. \"I asked very directly, 'Is this because of the stock?' and they wouldn't give me an answer,\" Mead said. \"[He] just said your services are terminated. \"I came up here, away from home, living in a hotel room, trying to keep the lights on, trying to get the state through a crisis and now I get a finger pointed at me as if I'm some sort of criminal. I guess it's just politics and we're the pawns.\" Administration officials said they also are examining the actions of other traders, including one who bought Calpine stock just before beginning work for the state. That trader, Elaine Griffin, who also came from the Power Exchange, left the state power buying operation July 14, three days after disclosing her energy industry investment. Griffin, who the governor's office said had obtained another job, could not be reached for comment. Griffin reported purchasing $10,000 to $100,000 of Calpine stock on Feb. 1, in her final days working at the electricity exchange. A few days later, Calpine signed and announced a $4.6-billion, 10-year deal to sell power to the Department of Water Resources. On Feb. 20, Griffin joined the state power buying agency, just as the state and Calpine were finalizing an additional $8.3 billion in power contracts. One of those, a 20-year deal signed Feb. 27, was the longest. The state has awarded Calpine about $13 billion in contracts to supply power for up to 20 years. In addition to the state consultants who bought Calpine stock, two others reported owning stock in Texas-based power marketing giant Enron Corp. And two more bought stock in Southern California Edison, the faltering utility that Davis has committed himself to saving from bankruptcy. Another consultant bought stock in Reliant Energy of Houston, a large power plant operator that bought several California plants from utilities after deregulation. Bernard Barretto, an energy trader, who buys energy on the daily spot market, said in an interview that he bought about $2,000 in Enron stock shortly before he began work for the state Feb. 28. Purchase of Enron Stock Defended \"I don't see a conflict,\" he said. \"At the time, we weren't really dealing with Enron. I [still] haven't bought from Enron.\" Barretto said he never considered his Enron ownership a possible conflict until he received notice July 18 that he had to sell the stocks by noon or lose his job. That notice came from Goode, the governor's lawyer. \"We expect and have always expected the state's consultants to uphold the highest ethical standards,\" he wrote. \"That standard is not met by those who hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while trading on behalf of the state on energy related matters.\" \"Therefore each consultant who holds an interest in an energy company must divest himself or herself of that interest by noon today. If he or she refuses, the state will sever its contract with that person.\" However, the governor's office has taken a distinctly different stance with his closest financial advisors, Fichera and Hoffman. Davis aides cite an opinion sought last week from attorney Raquelle de la Rocha, a former member of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the state Fair Political Practices Commission. She concluded that the advisors do not have to file disclosure statements because they are contractors, not consultants, and will be working for less than a year on a limited range of projects. Fichera is Davis' point man on the governor's energy rescue plan--including the unprecedented bond sale. He has pitched the plan to lawmakers, reporters and the Wall Street financial community. Fichera refused to comment on the record. Fichera and Hoffman's companies, Saber Partners and Blackstone Group, prepared a controversial analysis that helped underpin legislative approval of the bond measure, intended to pay for past and future power buying. Pact Specifies Financial Advice The state's contract with the Fichera and Hoffman firms calls for them to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. The decision not to require public disclosure of their financial holdings stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken with Montague DeRose and Associates. That consulting firm was hired on a $1.8-million contract. Like the other two firms, it too was hired to provide \"financial advisory services\" to the state. That firm's top advisor, Douglas S. Montague, was required by the administration to fill out a disclosure statement. He reported no power company interests. The governor's legal advisors said the difference is that Montague is on a longer contract.Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.02937853107344633,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07288135593220339,
        "Sentiment": 0.1030799282018794,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.028184281842818428
    }
],
"thread626": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:53:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "Industry Group Likes Our Portfolio Approach",
        "Text": "NRDC--RalphCLECA--Barkovich/BoothCMA--McCraePX--FloryEve ElsesserEdison--FielderSempraTurn--FlorioAES--Aaron Thomas (retail)MunisSmutney-IEPMunis and Florio were not on the call today, but I suspect both will be OK with our proposal.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.045454545454545456,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08583690987124463
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "Industry Group Likes Our Portfolio Approach",
        "Text": "nada.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.2
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:09:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "tim",
        "Subject": "Industry Group Likes Our Portfolio Approach",
        "Text": "NRDC, TURN, Edison, Sempra, CLECA (large industrial), AES (formerly NEV), Munis, PX, CMA, Enron.  Though TURN and Munis, while not opposed, are posturing at this point as \"noncommittal.\"",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.034482758620689655,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.034482758620689655,
        "Sentiment": 0.10714285714285714,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10215053763440861
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:37:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "paul",
        "Subject": "Industry Group Likes Our Portfolio Approach",
        "Text": "Just met with the industry group trying to come up with a solution for A portfolio approach is the right long-term solution.In the short run, our illustrative portfolios show that the utilities ought to immediately fill a modest portion of their requirements via fixed-price, long term contracts, and those contracts should be found reasonable, up front, so long as the utility uses a competitive auction.  To stimulate discussion we proposed that the utility fill 5% of its net short position with 5-year, fixed-price contracts and 5% from 10-year, fixed-price contracts.Everyone on the call liked the proposal.  After some discussion about whether 5%-5% was the right one, Edison agreed to come to Friday's meeting with its proposal for price/term/quantity that it ought to contract for immediately.  (Edison may want the number to be higher, and the baskets to be different.)Anything can happen between now and Friday, but thus far looks positive.  Thanks to everyone for the help in getting the proposal together, Steve Swain portfolios for the group.)  I'll report back on what happens at the meeting on Friday.  If there are any questions, etc., just let me know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.061855670103092786,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1134020618556701,
        "Sentiment": 0.17588383838383836,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0365025466893039
    }
],
"thread627": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dks@cpuc",
        "Subject": "info",
        "Text": "thanks.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 1.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14285714285714285
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:05:09 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "nmann@erac.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "info",
        "Text": "456-92-60149700 Bissonnet, Suite 2900Houston, TX 77036713-596-1800713-271-2166 fax11/09/53...just in case",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12380952380952381
    }
],
"thread628": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:54:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dks@cpuc",
        "Subject": "current events",
        "Text": "position on what?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.058823529411764705
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dks@cpuc",
        "Subject": "current events",
        "Text": "",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 1.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    }
],
"thread629": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:27:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Andrea Williams/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Jeff Dasovich",
        "Text": "Thanks very much to all for your assistance.  Is it possible to get some idea of exactly what the amount to be refunded is?  Thanks so much again for your help.Best,JeffAndrea Williams@ENRON08/24/2000 04:12 PMMichelle,We have corrected Mr. Dasovich's tuition reimbursement to non-taxable.  Due to SAP configuration, the system will not deduct any taxes from his pay until the total is refunded.  Therefore, on his 8/31 paycheck, he will not have a tax deduction for FICA/SS/MED.Thanks,AndreaMichelle Hargrave@ECT08/04/2000 04:41 PMHi Andrea,Jeff Dasovich (508152) received his latest tuition reimbursement on 7/31/00, unfortunately it was not supposed to be taxed.  A letter was sent with his tuition on 4/15/00 that was paid correctly - but I think Gwen forgot to send it with the July claim.   It is being required by his Managing Director, Rick Shapiro, and should therefore not be subject to income tax.  Can you please process a refund for the the taxes that were taken?  I will insure that we send the letter with all future claims.Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on ext 36023.Regards,Michelle ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10582010582010581,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12169312169312169,
        "Sentiment": 0.08763888888888889,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03982300884955752
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 2 Mar 2001 05:54:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Jeff Dasovich",
        "Text": "You're very sweet.  Thank you so much.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.125,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.25,
        "Sentiment": 0.3275,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07894736842105263
    }
],
"thread630": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 6 Sep 2000 02:58:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "NYT Article about Ex Commissioner Fessler",
        "Text": "don't apologize.  more interesting when your blood boils.Jessie Knight <JKnight@sdchamber.org> on 09/05/2000 08:04:54 PMSorry, I got worked up and my blood boiling.Jessie J. Knight Jr.President & CEOSan Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06060606060606061,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06751054852320675
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:23:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Jeff Dasovich'\" <jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "NYT Article about Ex Commissioner Fessler",
        "Text": "glad to hear that you're back, generalissimo.  we will follow you up the hill.seriously, though, you will start seeing/hearing from us quite soon., e.g., skilling's at the national press club this thursday.Jessie Knight <JKnight@sdchamber.org> on 09/05/2000 06:04:33 PMJeff,     I chuckled to read about Dan being the center of Dante's Inferno core,but quickly was overcome more by disdain of the simpleton Mr. Palast'swretched journalistic license.  Why don't you get Skillings, Michaels,McCrae, Levin et al to answer all the preposterous revisionist pablum thatis saturating the marketplace as we speak?  Is there or was there only oneJessie Knight who lived that 6-year hell to have crap like this spreadabout?  Where are all the direct access/bilateralcontract/anti-poolco/anti-Hogan/anti-Harvard Electricity Group/anti-command& control proponents?  It is sad for me to hear the deafening silence out ofa community that I helped lead to battle and to leave and see that most haveabandoned the cause to leave it the world to the government infidels thatwant to and will certainly re-create the Gulag.Jessie J. Knight Jr.President & CEOSan Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08287292817679558,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11602209944751381,
        "Sentiment": 0.05317460317460317,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04336734693877551
    }
],
"thread631": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 19 Dec 2000 04:33:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "bhillman@earthlink",
        "Subject": "Bob Hillman in Northern California",
        "Text": "I want to let you know that I stand in awe of someone who has the balls to open for someone as talented as Dan B.  It demonstrates that you're one talented guy yourself.  Congratulations.  Your show was great, and it was good to see you.   Best of luck on the rest of the tour.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11666666666666667,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15,
        "Sentiment": 0.7,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.027972027972027972
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:41:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "bhillman@earthlink",
        "Subject": "Bob Hillman in Northern California",
        "Text": "Dude, you may have taken her charger cord!  She can't find hers.  Do you have personality is way, way out front.  ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.24,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05263157894736842
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:32:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "bhillman@earthlink",
        "Subject": "Bob Hillman in Northern California",
        "Text": "see you at the freight.best,jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0625
    }
],
"thread632": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 4 May 2001 02:51:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "joe",
        "Subject": "Natural Gas Basis Differential - Why so Big?",
        "Text": "Thanks man.Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.5,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.05,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06666666666666667
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 2 May 2001 08:26:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "james",
        "Subject": "Natural Gas Basis Differential - Why so Big?",
        "Text": "Greetings:Joe, I just ran into some El Paso guys that I know (I'm in L.A.) and asked them about the Lukens study.  They said that they weren't sure that it had been released yet.  They intend to submit it with their testimony in the FERC case.Best,Jeff\tJames D Steffes\t05/02/2001 11:15 AM\t\t Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron\tJoe Hartsoe received a call from Commission staff at FERC to try and understand why basis differentials into California were so big and why the large basis continues.  Clearly with the new Electricity Order, natural gas is one of the primary factors on electricity prices in California.Our key fear, however small, is that FERC (or someone else) recognizes the huge implication of natural gas prices and seeks to cap natural gas sales for resale of P/L affiliates (such as ENA).  There is some fear that the real monopoly is the holder of LT firm capacity, not the gas production firms.We need to develop a good story as to why the basis gas continues and messaging it quietly into the right FERC staff to keep the pressure of additional Investigations from happening.  Joe is trying to get his hands on the Lukens study presented to the California study Committee on natural gas abuse to help guide our analysis.  Jim",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05263157894736842,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06578947368421052,
        "Sentiment": 0.2025844155844156,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.05,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0403899721448468
    }
],
"thread633": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "joe",
        "Subject": "More on FERC generator hearings",
        "Text": "It's a hell hole, whaddya think?  Be great if you stopped by.  Just let me know when you're going to be here.  Love to have dinner and catch up.You involved at all with the gas infrastructure stuff that's going on at the Cal PUC.  If not, I think that you should be.  Now that Fawcett has left TW and Susan Scott's in our shop in Houston with Christie, I'm a little concerned about TW (I don't have as much time to monitor anymore).  Be great if you got involved.Hope all is well with you and yours.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10784313725490197,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1568627450980392,
        "Sentiment": 0.5260416666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04133858267716536
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:19:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "joe",
        "Subject": "More on FERC generator hearings",
        "Text": "Appreciate it.  Take care.Best,Jeff\tJoe Hartsoe\t07/10/2001 06:42 AM\t\tJeff -- Thanks for the heads up.  I'll see what's cooking internally and see if we can get some help.  Two summers down one to go.  Joe",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.21621621621621623,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16216216216216217,
        "Sentiment": 0.022222222222222213,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06372549019607843
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:10:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "More on FERC generator hearings",
        "Text": "----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001 06:07 PM -----\t\"Delaney Hunter\" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>\t07/09/2001 06:08 PM\tPlease respond to dhunter\t\t ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05555555555555555,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.16666666666666666
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:46:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dhunter@s-k-w",
        "Subject": "More on FERC generator hearings",
        "Text": "anyone tries to make any other changes, please let me know first or have them call me directly, whichever you prefer.  Thanks for all your help.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2962962962962963,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14814814814814814,
        "Sentiment": 0.115625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.032679738562091505
    }
],
"thread634": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 18 Feb 2001 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "skean@enron",
        "Subject": "CDWR Short-Term Firm Energy Proposal",
        "Text": "FYI.  I told Chris that it looks fine with me.  Seems like a useful tactic, i.e., maybe if you pay me what you owe for power already delivered, I might consider doing a deal for power going forward....Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/18/2001 11:58 AM -----\tChristopher F Calger@ECT\t02/17/2001 07:21 PM\t\t Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bob BadeerAttached please find a draft letter to David Freeman.  Please review and provide any comments.  Jeff, do you have the adress and fax number for the LA Office?Tracy, Bob and Christian  -  do you approve?  I intend to send this out Monday.Regards,Chris",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14705882352941177,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10784313725490197,
        "Sentiment": 0.35833333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07272727272727272
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:57:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "christopher",
        "Subject": "CDWR Short-Term Firm Energy Proposal",
        "Text": "owes us?Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11764705882352941
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 18 Feb 2001 04:02:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "christopher",
        "Subject": "CDWR Short-Term Firm Energy Proposal",
        "Text": "Fax number (in LA) is 213.897.9560.  I don't have the address.  Did we use the LA address on the original response letter delivered on 2.6.01?  I can't recall.  Let me know.  I can call and get the address if necessary.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.022222222222222223,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06578947368421052
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:55:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy ",
        "Subject": "CDWR Short-Term Firm Energy Proposal",
        "Text": "Ken, fyiRegardsDave---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001 10:45 AM ---------------------------Christopher F Calger02/17/2001 07:21 PMNgo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bob BadeerAttached please find a draft letter to David Freeman.  Please review and provide any comments.  Jeff, do you have the adress and fax number for the LA Office?Tracy, Bob and Christian  -  do you approve?  I intend to send this out Monday.Regards,Chris",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15625,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09375,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1591928251121076
    }
],
"thread635": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "What is your brother's address?",
        "Text": "What is your brother's address?I don't have it.  do you need it soon?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2857142857142857,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.21428571428571427,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07246376811594203
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:16:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "What is your brother's address?",
        "Text": "Charry?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14285714285714285
    }
],
"thread636": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:58:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "IMPORTANT THINGS",
        "Text": "we'll get tuxes. however, folks won't be going leaving at the same time, so going to the airport together seems unlikely. and it being new year's eve, i would strongly suggest taking a cab from the airport to the hotel---gonna be a zoo.  but, on the other hand, if scott and cameron are in for picking folks up, god love 'em.\tNancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>\t12/22/2000 10:09 AM\t\t \"Prentice @ Berkeley\" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>you do not own a tux you will need to rent one or a peignoir!I think we should all try to depart at about the same time so we can go to the airport together.Can anyone pick us up at the airport when we arrive on Sunday?Nancy (707) 251-4870 (phone) (707) 265-5446 (fax) \"Plus je bois, mieux je chante\" ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05925925925925926,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1259259259259259,
        "Sentiment": 0.0180871212121212,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07142857142857142
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 22 Dec 2000 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "scottwl@hotmail",
        "Subject": "IMPORTANT THINGS",
        "Text": "Looks like scott and cameron are indeed game.  sounds like we should rent a big car--lincoln town or something.  \t\"Scott Laughlin\" <scottwl@hotmail.com>\t12/22/2000 11:08 AM\t\t Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com, PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu, PSellers@pacbell.netFirst, Eldon, I just want to tell you how psyched I am for New Year's. Thanks so much for arranging it. We'll have a great time--and Cameron and I have already ironed out a nice deal concerning eyeing the Playmates. (I suggest you do the same, Jeff, or are you above gawking at plastic tits?) Jeff and I have our fig leaves all picked out...As far as fetching you at LAX... Because Cameron and I (and PP and Jeff?) are going down on the 30th, we should rent a car then. When Eldon and Nancy come in, we'll already have a car, and so we can just collect you and go right to the hotel. Does that sound okay? That way, you guys won't have to rent a car when you get in. (I'll put Eldon on as a driver so that he can take over behind the wheel, if he wants to do that.) What kind of car should I get? Do we drive to the mansion? Now that I think about it, that would mean we need to squeeze 6 in one car. Anyway, let me know what your thought are on this.Have a great time with the Hopkins. Merry Christmas to PP and Jeff. I'll see the rest of you on the beach!>\"Prentice @ Berkeley\" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers  ><PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>>>Dad forgot to mention:>>Scott if you do not own a tux you will need to rent one or a peignoir!>>*   I think we should all try to depart at about the same time so we can go >to the airport together.>>*   Can anyone pick us up at the airport when we arrive on Sunday?>>>Nancy>(707) 251-4870 (phone)>(707) 265-5446 (fax)>\"Plus je bois, mieux je chante\">>_________________________________________________________________Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0701219512195122,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1524390243902439,
        "Sentiment": 0.17979659229659226,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10260416666666666
    }
],
"thread637": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:16:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "PP",
        "Text": "$1 million.i'll look for some.  you should, too.  if you find any, make sure it's \"organic\" and hasn't had any chemicals added to the seeds.thanks again for a fantastic time over Thanksgiving.  I had a lot of fun.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14634146341463414,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12195121951219512,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06572769953051644
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 28 Nov 2000 05:32:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "PP",
        "Text": "I'll need to ponder.  I'll try to get back to you pronto.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.3076923076923077,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07017543859649122
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 07:20:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "PP",
        "Text": "yes, i found that out yesterday, too.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08108108108108109
    }
],
"thread638": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 28 Nov 2000 05:32:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Articles left behind",
        "Text": "not sure, but i assume that the bluegrass songbook is mine.  is it for guitar?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1875,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": -0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.038461538461538464
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 28 Nov 2000 05:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Nancy Sellers ",
        "Recipient": "'Timmi Sellers' ; 'Eldon Sellers' ; 'Rory Sellers' ; 'Eldon Sellers' ; ",
        "Subject": "Articles left behind",
        "Text": "The black boots are mine.\t\"Rory Sellers\" <rory@carmelnet.com>\t11/28/2000 01:32 AM\tPlease respond to \"Rory Sellers\"\t\t <Timmi@universal-net.com>, \"'Eldon Sellers'\" <Eldon@interx.net>, \"'Rory Sellers'\" <Rory@universal-net.com>, \"Cameron\" <cameron@perfect.com>, \"Jeff Dasovich\" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, \"Prentice @ Berkeley\" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, \"Prentice Sellers\" <PSellers@pacbell.net>, \"Scott Laughlin\" <scottwl@hotmail.com>Regret the dancing gopher was not mine. Has he been claimed yet? R----- Original Message ----- Cameron ; Jeff Dasovich ; Prentice @ Berkeley ; Prentice Sellers ; Scott Laughlin There are several things at 1246 Olive Hill Lane that I do not believe belong to me - will the offending parties please identify themselves...1 pair of sexy black boots - made for walking 1 bluegrass song book 1 set of Italian prints - limited edition #2 I believe Book - Maestro by Bob Woodward 1/2 full bottle of Sierra Nevada Dancing Gopher Nancy (707) 251-4870 (phone) (707) 265-5446 (fax) \"Plus je bois, mieux je chante\" ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09929078014184398,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.028368794326241134,
        "Sentiment": -0.01284013605442176,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10896817743490839
    }
],
"thread639": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:05:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Wine Spectator - check out the review of the 1970 Cab!!",
        "Text": "thanks so much for dinner.  it was really, really good.  and SO sorry for beating the pants off of you in spades (tee hee).  and i JUST put your check for the wine in the mail!  have a great week.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1590909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11363636363636363,
        "Sentiment": 0.3,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04390243902439024
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:11:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Wine Spectator - check out the review of the 1970 Cab!!",
        "Text": "yes.  check for 576.29 is in the mail!  thanks so much for getting the coastal, and the champagne, and the opus!  can't thank you enough.  i've also mailed you a new bottle of oyster sauce.jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1282051282051282,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1282051282051282,
        "Sentiment": 0.18068181818181817,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05181347150259067
    }
],
"thread640": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:38:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Growing Coastal Grapes",
        "Text": "FYI.  Well if she ain't sweet....----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 06:36 PM -----\tSally Ottoson <pacstar@mcn.org>\t02/28/2001 05:05 PM\tPlease respond to pacstar\t\t Hi Jeff:I know a Jeff Dasovich, exact spelling, an attorney inOklahoma City...I'm looking forward to talking to you aboutthe potential for vineyard. Please call me at 707-964-1155,I zoom around pretty fast but should be able to get downthere soon. Do you have soil test results/temp profiles -were you referred to me by Alan Green of Greenwood Ridge?  Sally",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12195121951219512,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18292682926829268,
        "Sentiment": 0.10555555555555553,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07948243992606285
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:37:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "pacstar@mcn",
        "Subject": "Growing Coastal Grapes",
        "Text": "Thanks so much for responding, Sally.  Very interested in exploring the possibilities with you.  Greatly appreciated. Wow, that's the only other Jeff Dasovich I've ever heard of.  No kidding.  Referred to you by Lee Green. Don't yet have soil test or temp profiles, but am in the process of figuring out how to get them done.  Any suggestions are welcome and appreciated.  I'll be around the weekend of March 10th.  If that works for you, great; otherwise, we can try another date.  Again, can't thank you enough for responding.  I don't know where it'll lead, but I've got a hunch that it just might work out.Enjoy drinking your wine (had the syrah recently) and very much look forward to meeting you.All the best,Jeff\tSally Ottoson <pacstar@mcn.org>\t02/28/2001 05:05 PM\tPlease respond to pacstar\t\t Hi Jeff:I know a Jeff Dasovich, exact spelling, an attorney inOklahoma City...I'm looking forward to talking to you aboutthe potential for vineyard. Please call me at 707-964-1155,I zoom around pretty fast but should be able to get downthere soon. Do you have soil test results/temp profiles -were you referred to me by Alan Green of Greenwood Ridge?  Sally",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12121212121212122,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Sentiment": 0.2060833333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046672428694900604
    }
],
"thread333": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:39:52 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMarc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stewart@mallia",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "U suck! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, January 29, 2002 12:27 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\t http://www.houston-press.com/issues/2002-01-10/stirred.html/1/index.html",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.192090395480226
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:56:26 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMarc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stewart@mallia",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "ha ha ha -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, January 23, 2002 10:06 AMTo:\t'Allison Damon'; 'Andrea Walters'; Baughman Jr., Don; 'Eric Korth'; 'Glenda Rosales'; 'Heather Zubke'; 'Joy Korth'; 'Kelly Warner'; 'Kevin Walters'; 'Lalena Stavinoha'; 'Lisa Mudd'; 'Triolo, Tina'; 'Vic Stewart'Subject:\t Enron Executives Blamed For Missing Employee Donut FundHOUSTON- The Enron Corp. scandal widened Monday, when The HoustonChronicle reported that top company executives stole nearly $10 from theemployee donut fund sometime between June and August of last year.\"There should be at least $9.25 in the coffee can next to the filters,\"said Laurie Baker, a recently laid-off Enron employee. \"I personally put$2.50 into that fund, and now it's gone.\" Enron CEO Kenneth Lay isalready under grand-jury subpoena regarding $45 in Chinese-food-deliveryallocations that mysteriously vanished on Nov. 17, 2001.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.00819672131147541,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03278688524590164,
        "Sentiment": 0.0505952380952381,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09141583054626533
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:41:03 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMarc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stewart@mallia",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "That fuckin' SUCKS!  Call 'em and tell 'em you are suing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, February 05, 2002 11:18 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\t aahhhh!my computer shipping date has been \"revised\" by Dell.  Instead ofshipping today, it's to ship on 02/12.Fark! ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.075,
        "Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1836734693877551
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:37:46 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMarc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stewart@mallia",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "dbaughm -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 03, 2002 10:54 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tRE:hey dude -- what is your Yahoo messanger ID?  I'm logged on as\"marcthestewart\".",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08695652173913043,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13903743315508021
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:41:47 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMarc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stewart@mallia",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "yeah i saw it, that is a shame for the dawg!  I am very happy about Clinton's grief! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 03, 2002 10:38 AMTo:\tMarc Kutner; Monica Saldana; 'Reid Home'; 'Reid Work'; 'Triolo, Tina'; 'Vic Stewart'; 'Heather Zubke'; Baughman Jr., Don; 'Allison Damon'; 'Andrea Walters'; 'Kevin Walters'Subject:\t Thursday January 3 9:46 AM ETClinton's Beloved Dog Buddy Killed by CarNEW YORK (Reuters) - Buddy, the chocolate retriever once seen boundingaround the White House gardens with Bill Clinton, was killed by a carnear the former president's home in Chappaqua, N.Y., police saidThursday.A police officer said the dog was hit Wednesday afternoon but it was notclear whether it was being walked at the time or had wandered off theproperty owned by Clinton and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton``His dog was hit by a car ... we received a call yesterday afternoon,''said Sgt. Charles Ferry of the New Castle, N.Y., police that also coverssuburban Chappaqua in Westchester County north of New York City.The former president's spokeswoman Julia Payne said the Clintons ``aredeeply saddened by Buddy's death.'' In a statement issued by Payne, thefamily said, ``He was a loyal companion and brought us much joy. He willbe truly missed.''Payne said Buddy was 4-1/2 years old and was taken into the White Houseas Clinton's pet soon after he was born. Clinton left the White House inJanuary 2001 after serving two four-year terms. Hillary Clinton",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0391304347826087,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.034782608695652174,
        "Sentiment": 0.1950487012987013,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06720977596741344
    }
],
"thread341": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:12:47 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "susan.mara@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kcurry@bracepatt",
        "Subject": "Ex Parte Communications -- Mike Kahn and Pat Wood on 8/21",
        "Text": "Thanks for checking this out for me, Kim and Ron,What are our rights?  Is there an equal-time right?  Should we just let this go?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Sentiment": 0.24285714285714285,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046511627906976744
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:29:15 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "rcarroll@bracepatt.com",
        "Recipient": "curry",
        "Subject": "Ex Parte Communications -- Mike Kahn and Pat Wood on 8/21",
        "Text": "Sue,  There is no right to ex parte the Commission just because someone else has.  You could, I suppose, request to recuse Chairman Wood from this matter, but I don't think that would necessarily be in our interest, and could be politically disadvantageous.  A potentially more appropriate approach might be to request to respond to whatever Kahn told Chairman Wood.The mere fact that Chairman Wood revealed this matter, however, indicates to me that he was not overly sympathetic to Kahn.  Without knowing more as to the precise nature of the conversation, its hard to say, but my initial reaction is that this matter is probably best left to rest.  Ron>>> \"Mara, Susan\" <Susan.J.Mara@ENRON.com> 09/24/01 04:12PM >>>Thanks for checking this out for me, Kim and Ron,What are our rights?  Is there an equal-time right?  Should we just letthis go?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11724137931034483,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1310344827586207,
        "Sentiment": 0.1652281746031746,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046153846153846156
    }
],
"thread343": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:04:23 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com",
        "Recipient": "eldon@direcpc",
        "Subject": "Presents",
        "Text": "What I would like for my birthday is a cookbook by Paula Wolfert - \"TheCooking of South-West France\"Nancy(707) 251-4870 (phone)(707) 265-5446 (fax)\"Plus je bois, mieux je chante\"",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.037037037037037035,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07407407407407407,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09550561797752809
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com",
        "Recipient": "nancy",
        "Subject": "Presents",
        "Text": "I also bought this already too - I'm trying to be more like Eldon!  Anyway -what I really need is a new chef's knife made by Global.>  -----Original Message-----> Sent:\tMonday, October 08, 2001 5:04 PM> To:\t'Eldon Sellers'; Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley;> Prentice Sellers; Scott Laughlin> Subject:\tPresents> > What I would like for my birthday is a cookbook by Paula Wolfert - \"The> Cooking of South-West France\"> > > > Nancy> (707) 251-4870 (phone)> (707) 265-5446 (fax)> \"Plus je bois, mieux je chante\"> > > ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15730337078651685,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.056179775280898875,
        "Sentiment": 0.38058712121212124,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12380952380952381
    }
],
"thread344": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:05:28 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tShapiro, Richard  ",
        "Recipient": "joseph",
        "Subject": " Market Based Rate Review",
        "Text": "FYIGinger DernehlAdministrative CoordinatorGlobal Government AffairsPhone# 713-853-7751Fax# 713-646-8160 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, September 27, 2001 11:04 AMTo:\tDernehl, GingerFYI...in addition to earlier memo.The Commission discussed its market based rate policy at today's meeting.  They did not vote out an order today, but expect to take up this issue again next meeting.  The staff memo recommended the following:For an interim period, FERC will deal with pending requests for market based rates and with triennial reviews of those rate authorizations, using a new test called the \"Supply Margin Assessment\" (also called a jazzed up version of the hub and spoke test) where a seller's capacity will be reviewed against the generation reserve margin in a market.  The test takes into account constraints based on TTC.  If the capacity of a seller is not necessary to meet peak demand,the seller does not have market power.  This test is applicable to all markets that are not part of an existing RTO or ISO.  For those selling into an RTO/ISO, the FERC will continue to allow market based rates subject to the market monitor and mitigation.  Staff also recommends that FERC initiate a Section 206 investigation to require each seller with market based rate authority to change its tariff by adding a provision stating that if the seller acts in an anticompetitive manner, the FERC can require refunds.  Through questioning by Commissioner Massey, it was revealed that, even if a seller did not engage in bad behavior, but sold into a disfunctional market, refunds could be required.  In the staff memo, apparently staff had left vague the definition of anticompetitive behavior in order to be able to interpret it most broadly.  However, Commissioners asked staff to better define the anticompetitive actions that could trigger refunds.  This policy will be brought up again at the next Commission meeting on October 11.  It will be issued as a proposed action, giving parties an opportunity to comment within 15 days and then also file reply comments,  Final action is expected within 60-90 days.Last, for the long-term, FERC will hold outreach meetings looking for answers as to how to detect market power and what to do when it is detected.  Since the interim measure is only a \"snapshot\" approach according to Commissioner Massey, he is willing to support it only along with the above described tariff provision.  Commissioner Breathitt is very uncomfortable with an open refund requirement, stating that it adds to regulatory uncertainty at a time when the Commission is most interested in giving certainty to the industry in order to assure reliability.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05733944954128441,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09862385321100918,
        "Sentiment": 0.01908670033670036,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.026865671641791045
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:22:25 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "donna.fulton@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kenneth",
        "Subject": " Market Based Rate Review",
        "Text": "The Commission discussed its market based rate policy at today's meeting.  They did not vote out an order today, but expect to take up this issue again next meeting.  The staff memo recommended the following:For an interim period, FERC will deal with pending requests for market based rates and with triennial reviews of those rate authorizations, using a new test called the \"Supply Margin Assessment\" (also called a jazzed up version of the hub and spoke test) where a seller's capacity will be reviewed against the generation reserve margin in a market.  The test takes into account constraints based on TTC.  If the capacity of a seller is not necessary to meet peak demand,the seller does not have market power.  This test is applicable to all markets that are not part of an existing RTO or ISO.  For those selling into an RTO/ISO, the FERC will continue to allow market based rates subject to the market monitor and mitigation.  Staff also recommends that FERC initiate a Section 206 investigation to require each seller with market based rate authority to change its tariff by adding a provision stating that if the seller acts in an anticompetitive manner, the FERC can require refunds.  Through questioning by Commissioner Massey, it was revealed that, even if a seller did not engage in bad behavior, but sold into a disfunctional market, refunds could be required.  In the staff memo, apparently staff had left vague the definition of anticompetitive behavior in order to be able to interpret it most broadly.  However, Commissioners asked staff to better define the anticompetitive actions that could trigger refunds.  This policy will be brought up again at the next Commission meeting on October 11.  It will be issued as a proposed action, giving parties an opportunity to comment within 15 days and then also file reply comments,  Final action is expected within 60-90 days.Last, for the long-term, FERC will hold outreach meetings looking for answers as to how to detect market power and what to do when it is detected.  Since the interim measure is only a \"snapshot\" approach according to Commissioner Massey, he is willing to support it only along with the above described tariff provision.  Commissioner Breathitt is very uncomfortable with an open refund requirement, stating that it adds to regulatory uncertainty at a time when the Commission is most interested in giving certainty to the industry in order to assure reliability.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05980861244019139,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10047846889952153,
        "Sentiment": -0.0019649621212121035,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.018752547900529964
    }
],
"thread345": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "robert.frank@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "j",
        "Subject": "FERC refund investigation into Pacific Northwest spot power sales",
        "Text": "Attached is a memo outlining key aspects of the recommendation issued by the assigned Administrative Law Judge in the above-referenced case.  The recommendation is now before the full Commission, which we expect will rule by mid-October.  Please call me if you have any questions.       ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2641509433962264,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05660377358490566,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.020905923344947737
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 3 Oct 2001 03:50:24 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Frank, Robert ",
        "Recipient": "Kean, Steven J",
        "Subject": "FERC refund investigation into Pacific Northwest spot power sales",
        "Text": "Hey Jeff -see memo attached; it contains good quotes from the ruling on the key issues.  Let me know if you need anything else.  -Bob-----Original Message----- Attached is a memo outlining key aspects of the recommendation issued by the assigned Administrative Law Judge in the above-referenced case.  The recommendation is now before the full Commission, which we expect will rule by mid-October.  Please call me if you have any questions.       ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.24691358024691357,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09876543209876543,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04697986577181208
    }
],
"thread346": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:28:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "DRAFT of materials for Governor",
        "Text": "Greetings:Attached is the draft.  I've attempted to capture everyone's comments.  The only piece that is not likely to go this evening is the piece providing comments on the Governor's specific proposals.  That will likely go first thing tomorrow morning.  You'll note that only one of the Governor's proposals currently has any comments attached to it.  Comments on the Governor's proposals are appreciated.  The remainder of the materials will go to the Governor's staff later this evening; so any and all comments on those portions are welcomed and appreciated.  Thanks to all for the assistance, particularly in light of the holiday.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07476635514018691,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09345794392523364,
        "Sentiment": 0.18125000000000002,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029411764705882353
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:46:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "scott",
        "Subject": "DRAFT of materials for Governor",
        "Text": "muchos gracias",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:19:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "douglas",
        "Subject": "DRAFT of materials for Governor",
        "Text": "Thanks for the input.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.25,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.047619047619047616
    }
],
"thread350": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "AHP Case",
        "Text": "Gents:Here it is.  Please insert directly any proposed edits using strike-out-underline.  Need them no later than 10 AM tomorrow in order to have incorporated and ready to go for class tomorrow.  Dylan, just go ahead and put your operating cash flow nos. in (and any other changes you have) and Best,Jeff\tJeff Dasovich\t02/25/2001 11:57 AM\t\tJeff.Dasovich@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.eduGreetings:I'm going to finish this up in the next few hours and send out.  Dylan, go ahead and calculate using operating cash rather than income and send along and I'll incorporate.  I'll try to work Jimmy's stuff in a bit, too.Best,Jeff\tDylan Windham <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>\t02/22/2001 11:48 PM\t\t Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.eduJeff:I just got done ready your memo.  I really liked what you have done.  I did not want to make any direct changes, but rather just pose a few questions for discussion.First, when I calculated how long it would take to purchase the shares without debt I did use the net income number.  It might be better to change them to the operating cash flow number.  If you guys would like, I can recalculate them.I agree that having higher amounts of debt will fend off take overs.Are we planing to calculate the amount the tax shield will increase the value of the company.  If we assume that the debt will be held in perpetuity, we can directly compute the amount.  Let me know and I can run the numbers.Also, Jimmy when you do the color graphs you want to do.  Try some MM pie charts (just kidding)Good job,Let me know what I can do to help.Dylan",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11567164179104478,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1044776119402985,
        "Sentiment": 0.18935185185185185,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042794210195091255
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 03:57:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dwindham@uclink4",
        "Subject": "AHP Case",
        "Text": "Greetings:I'm going to finish this up in the next few hours and send out.  Dylan, go ahead and calculate using operating cash rather than income and send along and I'll incorporate.  I'll try to work Jimmy's stuff in a bit, too.Best,Jeff\tDylan Windham <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>\t02/22/2001 11:48 PM\t\t Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.eduJeff:I just got done ready your memo.  I really liked what you have done.  I did not want to make any direct changes, but rather just pose a few questions for discussion.First, when I calculated how long it would take to purchase the shares without debt I did use the net income number.  It might be better to change them to the operating cash flow number.  If you guys would like, I can recalculate them.I agree that having higher amounts of debt will fend off take overs.Are we planing to calculate the amount the tax shield will increase the value of the company.  If we assume that the debt will be held in perpetuity, we can directly compute the amount.  Let me know and I can run the numbers.Also, Jimmy when you do the color graphs you want to do.  Try some MM pie charts (just kidding)Good job,Let me know what I can do to help.Dylan",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10426540284360189,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10426540284360189,
        "Sentiment": 0.2160714285714286,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03923205342237062
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dwindham@uclink4",
        "Subject": "AHP Case",
        "Text": "quantify the value of the tax shield.  However, my day's completely out of control and resolving now may be more than we can manage.  I propose that I simply delete the one sentence quantifying the value of the shield and leave it as a qualitative statement.  If you folks would like to mess with with it some more, that's great with me, it's just that--and I apologize--I just won't be able to work on it today.  If you decide to do some more with it, go ahead and please bring copies to class.  Otherwise, I'll just delete the sentence referenced above, print out, and bring to class.  Just let me know.And Dylan, from someone whose surname gets butchered all the time, my apologies for having done the same to yours in the memo.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09352517985611511,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10071942446043165,
        "Sentiment": 0.40208333333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03648648648648649
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 04:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dwindham@uclink4",
        "Subject": "AHP Case",
        "Text": "This case is killing me!  1) I had to get before 10 AM today.  2) So much for that leisurely 2-hour coffee and morning paper at the neighborhood cafe---not today, thank you!  3) My nap!  Fahgetaboutit.  I'm going to be a wreck tonite.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.125,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14583333333333334,
        "Sentiment": 0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06584362139917696
    }
],
"thread352": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 06:07:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Next Financial Reporting Case",
        "Text": "Forgot to attach the file.  Here it is.\tJeff Dasovich\t09/24/2000 12:53 PM\t\tJeff.Dasovich@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.eduBeen having horrible computer problems.  (Just got switched over to Windows 2000---I hate Microsoft; break it up into a million itty bitty pieces.)  Haven't had a chance to read what you wrote.  Attaching what I cobbled together yesterday.  Will also take a look at what Mr. Jackson put together.  You should feel free to go ahead and meld mine and yours, etc.  I'm at work.  Will be here until  about 11-11:30.  After that, if you need me, page me at 888.916.7184.  And thanks a million for pulling it together.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14414414414414414,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14414414414414414,
        "Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06027820710973725
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 22 Sep 2000 06:38:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kkupiecki@arpartners",
        "Subject": "Next Financial Reporting Case",
        "Text": "Well, looks like it's that time again.  There only 2 questions.  Howzabout if the S.F. contingent takes #1 and the East Bay Gang takes #2 and we distribute around over the weekend?  Thoughts?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": -0.1,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05235602094240838
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:39:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kkupiecki@arpartners",
        "Subject": "Next Financial Reporting Case",
        "Text": "I'll be in town, though i'm going to the \"leading edge\" deal at haas on sat. morning.  home number is 415.621.8317.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.045454545454545456,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08695652173913043
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kkupiecki@arpartners",
        "Subject": "Next Financial Reporting Case",
        "Text": "Been having horrible computer problems.  (Just got switched over to Windows 2000---I hate Microsoft; break it up into a million itty bitty pieces.)  Haven't had a chance to read what you wrote.  Attaching what I cobbled together yesterday.  Will also take a look at what Mr. Jackson put together.  You should feel free to go ahead and meld mine and yours, etc.  I'm at work.  Will be here until  about 11-11:30.  After that, if you need me, page me at 888.916.7184.  And thanks a million for pulling it together.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1414141414141414,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15151515151515152,
        "Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05182341650671785
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 03:31:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kkupiecki@arpartners",
        "Subject": "Next Financial Reporting Case",
        "Text": "Hi. I'm ready to go postal with all the computer problems I'm having.  Did you get the document I sent yesterday morning? ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.040983606557377046
    }
],
"thread1521": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Georgia sites",
        "Text": "Wanna go?  Sounds like fun to me.  Michael will love it. Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 11:13 AM ---------------------------\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 09/25/2000 11:06:37 AMWe will have a great game this Sunday at 4:30 PM (the finals of the TexasOpen).  Please come as our guests (Neil and the young ones).",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10909090909090909,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07272727272727272,
        "Sentiment": 0.275,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.20891364902506965
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 04:15:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Georgia sites",
        "Text": "Sounds good to me.  I'll check with Neil.  I know Michael would love it.Thanks,Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 09/25/2000 11:06:37 AMWe will have a great game this Sunday at 4:30 PM (the finals of the TexasOpen).  Please come as our guests (Neil and the young ones).",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10416666666666667,
        "Sentiment": 0.3666666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08363636363636363
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Georgia sites",
        "Text": "I had the definite impression he was going to call you.  I also know he is working on a different deal on an impossible schedule. You know the drill.Bart is a Washington & Lee guy.  He is older than Ned, so he didn't go to school with him.  Just a little trivia...Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 09/27/2000 06:25:41 PMI haven't heard from Barton-have you?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10606060606060606,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Sentiment": -0.11805555555555554,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06868131868131869
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 01:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Georgia sites",
        "Text": "I've worked with Kilpatrick Stockton's North Carolina office quite a bit, mostly regulatory- they are so so.  It is my understanding that the Atlanta office messed up a simple thing for Lisa, and that's all I know about them.  I've worked extensively with King & Spalding, both their Houston office (multiple matters) and Atlanta (two matters), and have had good results.  I've always worked through John Keffer in Houston, who then hooked me up with the right folks in Atlanta.KayBarton Clark@ECT09/22/2000 12:39 PMThe Georgia sites have slid down hill and reached the bottom. I have to consult with local counsel re groundwater issues. I understand the options are King & Spaulding and Kilpatrick & Stockton. I've worked with neither. Can you evaluate/recommend either?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0873015873015873,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07936507936507936,
        "Sentiment": 0.2661375661375661,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042801556420233464
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 03:56:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Georgia sites",
        "Text": "713 751 3255Barton Clark@ECT09/25/2000 10:15 AMDo you have a phone number for Keffer?\tKay Mann@ENRON\t09/25/2000 08:59 AM\t\tI've worked with Kilpatrick Stockton's North Carolina office quite a bit, mostly regulatory- they are so so.  It is my understanding that the Atlanta office messed up a simple thing for Lisa, and that's all I know about them.  I've worked extensively with King & Spalding, both their Houston office (multiple matters) and Atlanta (two matters), and have had good results.  I've always worked through John Keffer in Houston, who then hooked me up with the right folks in Atlanta.KayBarton Clark@ECT09/22/2000 12:39 PMThe Georgia sites have slid down hill and reached the bottom. I have to consult with local counsel re groundwater issues. I understand the options are King & Spaulding and Kilpatrick & Stockton. I've worked with neither. Can you evaluate/recommend either?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0851063829787234,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09219858156028368,
        "Sentiment": 0.2661375661375661,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04703247480403135
    }
],
"thread1522": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 04:18:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Facility Agreement",
        "Text": "As I fix I was going to offer to let GE pick up 1/2 their bill....Kay\"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)\" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/10/2000 12:15:45 PMI was only joking!!  I appreciate their and your efforts",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06060606060606061,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10891089108910891
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Oct 2000 01:51:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kent",
        "Subject": "Facility Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi Kent,I was wondering if we could schedule a conference call to discuss the form of these agreements.  Are you available any time soon?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16,
        "Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.027210884353741496
    }
],
"thread1523": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:08:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "GE Agreement Redline",
        "Text": "Your suggestion is probably cheaper for Enron!\"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)\" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/13/2000 05:03:12 PMTell them to reverse the CompareWrite and redo (should be an easy fix).Otherwise, we can just agree to all of GE's suggested changes and call it aday!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.075,
        "Sentiment": 0.5416666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08058608058608059
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:44:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "GE Agreement Redline",
        "Text": "Looks like they have a rats nest to figure out.ckm---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 04:41 PM ---------------------------\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 04:13:35 PM<paulpipitone@akllp.com><paulpipitone@akllp.com>, \"Cobb, Christopher\" <chriscobb@akllp.com> I just opened the redline that I just forwarded to you all.  Iapologize, but it is still wrong.  The language I added shows up as astrike-through and ther language I deleted shows up as though added.  Iam desperately atempting to get this straightened out.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Sentiment": -0.55,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1545138888888889
    }
],
"thread1596": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:08:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lee",
        "Subject": "Change order #2,",
        "Text": "Lee,Here's a revised draft incorporating your two suggestions:I've forwarded what I have on the CO (#3) for South America to their lawyer, so I hope it will be wrapped up soon.I've seen reference to the Pleasanton CO, and I know it is in the works as well.  It is percolating through the system.  Do you have the electronic file for the LV CoGen change order (#4), extending the delivery dates?I'll be in on Monday, although I have a heavy conference call schedule.  I'll be easiest to catch towards the end of the day.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14583333333333334,
        "Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.044061302681992334
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:10:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lee",
        "Subject": "Change order #2,",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 04:09 PM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tLee,Here's a revised draft incorporating your two suggestions:I've forwarded what I have on the CO (#3) for South America to their lawyer, so I hope it will be wrapped up soon.I've seen reference to the Pleasanton CO, and I know it is in the works as well.  It is percolating through the system.  Do you have the electronic file for the LV CoGen change order (#4), extending the delivery dates?I'll be in on Monday, although I have a heavy conference call schedule.  I'll be easiest to catch towards the end of the day.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11711711711711711,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12612612612612611,
        "Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11836115326251896
    }
],
"thread1597": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 06:51:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi Gregg,Here is a new draft which incorporates comments that Boyd and I have made.  I haven't reviewed this version yet, but I wanted to get it to you asap. I would like to look at this draft before it goes to Peoples, and I'll give it priority for tomorrow am.I spoke with Dave Gorde (RAC).  He is prepared to discuss line of credit/DASH at your convenience, although tomorrow he is tied up with PRC.I'll go ahead and get a draft of a \"simple\" revolving line of credit doc started, unless you think otherwise.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/12/2000 01:48 PM ---------------------------\"David Tucker\" <dtucker@bracepatt.com> on 07/11/2000 05:13:51 PMPer your request . . . - #1127382 v10 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08943089430894309,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08943089430894309,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12032085561497326
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 8 Sep 2000 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "I'm reading it now. \"David Tucker\" <dtucker@bracepatt.com> on 09/08/2000 11:11:41 AMGreg called.  He mentioned that the agency agreement is ready to go to Peoples after we've incorporated any comments you may have on the draft I circulated yesterday.  I look forward to hearing from you at your convenience.Thanks!  DT",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05345911949685535
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Jun 2000 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi guys,Here are some quick thoughts:2.10  Suggest we delete \"specific\" from second line.  3.3  (i)To protect cash flow neutral status we need to get the money a couple of business days before date due.6.2  We need to discuss changes which could materially impact the value of the agreement to MEH, not just the risks/responsibilities.I'd bracket the concept of what the Admin Service Fee is supposed to cover.  Can we recover any additional costs, such as the cost of preparing/filing docs on their behalf (2.2) and collection (3.1)?  I think we probably need to limit our role to \"short of litigation\" type stuff.   Maybe \"reasonable efforts, short of litigation\", something like that?That's all for the first quick read.  Kay\"David Tucker\" <dtucker@bracepatt.com> on 06/21/2000 07:06:57 PMAs we discussed, in an effort to forward our internal discussions and memorialize the results of our discussions in Chicago last week, Boyd and I have produced a new draft of the Agency Agreement.  The changes can be inspected by launching the attachment in Word and then going to Tools --- Track Changes --- Highlight Changes to display and print the changes in the document.A number of questions must be addressed.  They include, in no particular order:Can we delete the confidentiality article?Is it commercially important to restore the langauge on displacement deliveries?What will the compensation arrangements be?Are we willing to deduct the administrative fee from the net cumulative revenues?  [Doing so \"loses\" us $10,000 a month.]Will we collect accounts receivable directly or have payments made to a deposit account in which we will retain a security interest?How should Section 2.9(ii) be recast to allay Boyd's regulatory approval concern?Is the new Section 2.10 acceptable?How must the agreement change to reflect the \"two county\" concern?I look forward to discussing this with you at your convenience.  DT - #1127382 v9 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0946372239747634,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10094637223974763,
        "Sentiment": 0.0640873015873016,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.043478260869565216
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 13 Jun 2000 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dtucker@bracepatt",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "FYI.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 08:52 AM ---------------------------\"Boyd J. Springer\" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM_______________________________________________________________This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entitynamed above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify thesender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.Thank you._______________________________________________________________Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections isto significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event thatgovernmental action related to the agreement is modified in a mannerunacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can comeat any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involveapproval  \"required\" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did notpropose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement whichrefers to adverse \"rate approval\". However, Peoples' intent may be toobtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decisionre the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of atermination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarilyrequired for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified \"in any mannerwhich is unacceptable\" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with theoriginal language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right tocircumstances when a \"required\" approval is revoked.) While the broadenedtermination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, Iwouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of amodified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agencyarrangement.2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenuedefinition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market HubSerivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, theproposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the termof the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to marketextended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination ofthe Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the lastsentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative netrevenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH'sperspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actuallyrefunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not requirea retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreementterminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would beneeded.3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it makenominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt ordelivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at asecondary point for displacement delivery. Northern Illinois Gas Co. didagree to these provision in the contract with its Hub Agent. I do not knowthe value of these commitments to MEH from a business standpoint.                         4. Sect. 1.13. Peoples proposes that the GTC bedefined to included changes made by Peoples in its sole discretion.Peoples, however, is not free to change the GTC as it sees fit. FERC mayelect to allow changes proposed by Peoples to become effective, but Peopleseffective general Terms and Conditions of the Operating Statament as may bemodified from time to time.\" Sect. 6.1 gives Peoples a right to proposechanges to the GTC, so there is no need to cover that here.                              5. Sect. 1.17. The GTC does not indicate thatParking and Loaning Service must be interruptible. I will review thisfurther.                      6. Sect. 2.2. Peoples has modified thelanguage giving it responsibility to ensure compliance with the GTC toassign this obligation to both parties. The intent was to comply withrequirements of FERC orders indicating that an agent need not becertificated as a \"natural gas company\", if there is another entity withclear responponsibilty to ensure compliance with the Natural Gas Act andFERC regulations. I suggest we stay with the origianl language indicatingthat Peoples, the certificate holder, has the responsibility to ensurecompliance with regulatory requirements.          7. Sect. 2.4b The thrid sentence is confusing in light of thesending sentence indicating that MEH must consent to a change ininformation re firm capacity. Perhaps \"in its sole discretion\" can bedelted and the last word of the third sentence changed to \"appropriate\".                              8. Sect. 2.5. New Item 3 of the list ofgrounds for refusal should be deleted. The GTC (Sect. 8.2) specifies thegrounds on which Hub Serivce can be denied. The Agency Agreement should notadd to this. Also, the GTC expressly requires that firm serivce providedunder the Operating Statement and firm serivce under peoples' Illinioistariffs have equal scheduling priority.                                   9. Sect. 2.10. This Section places therisk of non-payment on MEH, unless Peoples conducts the credit check. Thisis how risk was allocated in the NIGAS Hub Agreement. That agreement,however, provided for a 50/50 split of Hub revenue. As proposed by Peoples,MEH would receive only an agency fee and lesser percentage of revenue. Withthe changed allocation of revenue, a changed allocation of non-payment riskalso may be appropriate. Normally, the this risk should followresponsibility for accepting the transaction. At a minimum, non-paymentrisk should be assigned to Peoples if (i) it performs the credit check; or(ii) requires MEH to accept a Hub customer which MEH has rejected based ona credit analysis conducted under the GTC (Sect. 8.2).     10. Sect. 3.3. The required refunds could be large relative to theadministrative fee. The revised language requires MEH to finance refundsfor ten business days. Should there be an interest component?                                                        11. Sect. 3.4. ThisSection suggests that MEH will receive a fee for Extended Hub Services. I'mdon't see how this occurs under the revised language.   12. Sect. 3.5.Peoples proposes to delete the language requiring best efforts to minimizeimbalances. Compliance filings due this summer under FERC Order 637 areexpected to offer incentives related to avoidance of imbalances and Peoplesshould attempt to use these procedures. We should discuss this with them onWed.                    13. Sect. 5.1. Peoples has modified the warranties toindicate consistency of the Agency Agreement with \"material\" contractcs andJudgments or Laws not expected to have a material adverse effect. Is itsuffucuent to have minor contract violations and inconsistency with someLaws/Judgments?               14. Sect. 7.1 The NIGAS Hub Agreement did nothave a flat fee component.15. Sect. 10.1. Because the Governmental Approval must be acceptable toboth Peoples and MEH, People should not have \"sole\" authority to prepareand file all applications.                                         16. Sect. 10.2. See comments abovere Governmental Approval. Also, I don't think there is a need for the word\"expressly\" in the first sentence.            17. Sect. 11.1. Should theSection require consent for transfer by operation of law if we wish to havethis requirement in the event that the Hub facilities are sold?          18. Sect. 15.1 (a). If this type of provision is going to beincluded, should there at least be an initial period (say a year) to getstarted which doesn't trigger a termination right? The NIGAS Agreement hada section along these lines.          19. Sect. 15.1 (f). See comments above re Governmental Approval.                                                   20. Former 15.1 (f) nowdeleted. This provided that the Agency Agreement could be terminated is MEHis dissolved. This seems necessary to me.          21. 15.1 (g) Peopleswishes to have sole discretion to change its Facilities or the GTC, butproposes to limit MEH's termination right in the event that such a changeimpairs the HUB's marketability. It seems reasonably to allow MEH toterminate if it believes that HUB marketability is impaired, without a needto demonstrate reasonableness.                                         22. Sect. 17.1 I don't understandwhy Peoples wishes to require confidentiality for the compensationsections. The Illinois Commission Staff and interested parties would haveaccess to this information under a protective agreement. This wouldunnecessarily complicate the approval process and I don't know what thereis to gain from secrecy. These provisions were part of the public record inthe NIGAS approval case.                                     That's all.Let's discuss tomorrow.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2973124300111982,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07222844344904815,
        "Sentiment": 0.18914946660482373,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05358872269450124
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 13 Jun 2000 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dtucker@bracepatt",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "A little light reading.  Another will follow.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 09:08 AM ---------------------------\"Boyd J. Springer\" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM_______________________________________________________________This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entitynamed above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify thesender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.Thank you._______________________________________________________________Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections isto significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event thatgovernmental action related to the agreement is modified in a mannerunacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can comeat any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involveapproval  \"required\" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did notpropose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement whichrefers to adverse \"rate approval\". However, Peoples' intent may be toobtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decisionre the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of atermination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarilyrequired for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified \"in any mannerwhich is unacceptable\" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with theoriginal language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right tocircumstances when a \"required\" approval is revoked.) While the broadenedtermination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, Iwouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of amodified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agencyarrangement.2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenuedefinition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market HubSerivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, theproposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the termof the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to marketextended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination ofthe Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the lastsentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative netrevenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH'sperspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actuallyrefunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not requirea retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreementterminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would beneeded.3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it makenominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt ordelivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at asecondary point for displacement delivery. Northern Illinois Gas Co. didagree to these provision in the contract with its Hub Agent. I do not knowthe value of these commitments to MEH from a business standpoint.                         4. Sect. 1.13. Peoples proposes that the GTC bedefined to included changes made by Peoples in its sole discretion.Peoples, however, is not free to change the GTC as it sees fit. FERC mayelect to allow changes proposed by Peoples to become effective, but Peopleseffective general Terms and Conditions of the Operating Statament as may bemodified from time to time.\" Sect. 6.1 gives Peoples a right to proposechanges to the GTC, so there is no need to cover that here.                              5. Sect. 1.17. The GTC does not indicate thatParking and Loaning Service must be interruptible. I will review thisfurther.                      6. Sect. 2.2. Peoples has modified thelanguage giving it responsibility to ensure compliance with the GTC toassign this obligation to both parties. The intent was to comply withrequirements of FERC orders indicating that an agent need not becertificated as a \"natural gas company\", if there is another entity withclear responponsibilty to ensure compliance with the Natural Gas Act andFERC regulations. I suggest we stay with the origianl language indicatingthat Peoples, the certificate holder, has the responsibility to ensurecompliance with regulatory requirements.          7. Sect. 2.4b The thrid sentence is confusing in light of thesending sentence indicating that MEH must consent to a change ininformation re firm capacity. Perhaps \"in its sole discretion\" can bedelted and the last word of the third sentence changed to \"appropriate\".                              8. Sect. 2.5. New Item 3 of the list ofgrounds for refusal should be deleted. The GTC (Sect. 8.2) specifies thegrounds on which Hub Serivce can be denied. The Agency Agreement should notadd to this. Also, the GTC expressly requires that firm serivce providedunder the Operating Statement and firm serivce under peoples' Illinioistariffs have equal scheduling priority.                                   9. Sect. 2.10. This Section places therisk of non-payment on MEH, unless Peoples conducts the credit check. Thisis how risk was allocated in the NIGAS Hub Agreement. That agreement,however, provided for a 50/50 split of Hub revenue. As proposed by Peoples,MEH would receive only an agency fee and lesser percentage of revenue. Withthe changed allocation of revenue, a changed allocation of non-payment riskalso may be appropriate. Normally, the this risk should followresponsibility for accepting the transaction. At a minimum, non-paymentrisk should be assigned to Peoples if (i) it performs the credit check; or(ii) requires MEH to accept a Hub customer which MEH has rejected based ona credit analysis conducted under the GTC (Sect. 8.2).     10. Sect. 3.3. The required refunds could be large relative to theadministrative fee. The revised language requires MEH to finance refundsfor ten business days. Should there be an interest component?                                                        11. Sect. 3.4. ThisSection suggests that MEH will receive a fee for Extended Hub Services. I'mdon't see how this occurs under the revised language.   12. Sect. 3.5.Peoples proposes to delete the language requiring best efforts to minimizeimbalances. Compliance filings due this summer under FERC Order 637 areexpected to offer incentives related to avoidance of imbalances and Peoplesshould attempt to use these procedures. We should discuss this with them onWed.                    13. Sect. 5.1. Peoples has modified the warranties toindicate consistency of the Agency Agreement with \"material\" contractcs andJudgments or Laws not expected to have a material adverse effect. Is itsuffucuent to have minor contract violations and inconsistency with someLaws/Judgments?               14. Sect. 7.1 The NIGAS Hub Agreement did nothave a flat fee component.15. Sect. 10.1. Because the Governmental Approval must be acceptable toboth Peoples and MEH, People should not have \"sole\" authority to prepareand file all applications.                                         16. Sect. 10.2. See comments abovere Governmental Approval. Also, I don't think there is a need for the word\"expressly\" in the first sentence.            17. Sect. 11.1. Should theSection require consent for transfer by operation of law if we wish to havethis requirement in the event that the Hub facilities are sold?          18. Sect. 15.1 (a). If this type of provision is going to beincluded, should there at least be an initial period (say a year) to getstarted which doesn't trigger a termination right? The NIGAS Agreement hada section along these lines.          19. Sect. 15.1 (f). See comments above re Governmental Approval.                                                   20. Former 15.1 (f) nowdeleted. This provided that the Agency Agreement could be terminated is MEHis dissolved. This seems necessary to me.          21. 15.1 (g) Peopleswishes to have sole discretion to change its Facilities or the GTC, butproposes to limit MEH's termination right in the event that such a changeimpairs the HUB's marketability. It seems reasonably to allow MEH toterminate if it believes that HUB marketability is impaired, without a needto demonstrate reasonableness.                                         22. Sect. 17.1 I don't understandwhy Peoples wishes to require confidentiality for the compensationsections. The Illinois Commission Staff and interested parties would haveaccess to this information under a protective agreement. This wouldunnecessarily complicate the approval process and I don't know what thereis to gain from secrecy. These provisions were part of the public record inthe NIGAS approval case.                                     That's all.Let's discuss tomorrow.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2967094255437814,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07250418293363078,
        "Sentiment": 0.18629086430810568,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05346046710949218
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:09:35 -0500",
        "Sender": "s.halfin@pecorp.com",
        "Recipient": "dtucker@bracepatt",
        "Subject": "Agency Agreement",
        "Text": "We are very early in the process on this one, so you haven't missed out on any opportunities!Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 02:23 PM -------------------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000 01:30 PM -----\t\"David Tucker\" <dtucker@bracepatt.com>\t06/09/2000 11:29 AM\t\t <laura.luce@enron.com>, <lstoler@enron.com>, <stweed@enron.com>, <bjspringer@jonesday.com>I attach the new draft of the Agency Agreement I received from Peoples a few moments ago.Simon Helfrich called to comment on the credit provisions.  The essence of their proposal is that the LLC acts as a guarantor of all accounts receivable from parties for whom the LLC has performed the credit check.I look forward to discussing this draft with you.Thanks!  DTbracepatt.com; Fri, 09 Jun 2000 11:09:39 -050011:17:21 2000<23036@relay.pecorp.com>  for <dtucker@bracepatt.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:09:39 AM -0500 smtpmailfrom <s.halfin@pecorp.com><MNPT2M27>; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:09:39 -0500d.wear@pecorp.com, g.fox@pecorp.com, m.klyasheff@pecorp.com,  j.nassos@pecorp.com, roy.rodriquez@enron.com, tim.hermann@enron.comboundary=\"----_=_NextPart_000_01BFD22D.1B102F30\"David:Attached for MEH's review is a redlined draft of the Agency Agreement.  Allchanges are marked against your draft dated May 24, 2000.  Please note thatthis Agreement is still subject to further review by Peoples Gas.Once you and your clients have had a chance to review this draft, pleasecall me so that we can arrange a meeting to discuss any outstanding issues.Meanwhile, please call me with any questions.Simon Halfin(312) 240-4411 <<Hub.Agreement(v-2).doc>>----------------------------------------------------------------The information transmitted is intended only for the personor entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidentialand/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action inreliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than theintended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, pleasecontact the sender and delete the material from any computer. - Hub.Agreement(v-2).doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07246376811594203,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07608695652173914,
        "Sentiment": 0.038863636363636364,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12712253327214318
    }
],
"thread623": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:31:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "Sorry for delay.  Been mobile.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/21/2001 12:29 AM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t07/18/2001 06:42 PM\t\t Have you seen this?----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:38 PM -----\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>\t07/18/2001 05:32 PM\t\t (E-mail)\" <jdasovic@enron.com>, \"Jim Steffes (E-mail)\" <James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, \"Sue Mara (E-mail)\" <smara@enron.com>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06818181818181818,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.045454545454545456,
        "Sentiment": -0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.18092909535452323
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:42:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "michael",
        "Subject": "DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "Have you seen this?----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:38 PM -----\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>\t07/18/2001 05:32 PM\t\t (E-mail)\" <jdasovic@enron.com>, \"Jim Steffes (E-mail)\" <James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, \"Sue Mara (E-mail)\" <smara@enron.com>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.038461538461538464,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.20152091254752852
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:02:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "vjw@cleanpower",
        "Subject": "DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 07:00 PM -----\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>\t07/18/2001 05:32 PM\t\t (E-mail)\" <jdasovic@enron.com>, \"Jim Steffes (E-mail)\" <James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, \"Sue Mara (E-mail)\" <smara@enron.com>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.043478260869565216,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.21311475409836064
    }
],
"thread624": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:32:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "ditto.----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/21/2001 12:31 AM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t07/18/2001 06:43 PM\t\t ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:42 PM -----\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>\t07/18/2001 05:31 PM\t\t (E-mail)\" <jdasovic@enron.com>, \"Jim Steffes (E-mail)\" <James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, \"Sue Mara (E-mail)\" <smara@enron.com>Attached is an ACR issued today requesting comment on the Rate Agreementreached by the CPUC and DWR (which I will send under separate cover).  TheACR highlights certain aspects of the Agreement and asks for parties toevaluate the effects of the Agreement and indicate what they believe theconsequences of its adoption would be.  Comments are due by August 1st.The Agreement itself basically calls for DWR to set its revenue requirementbased on \"Bond Related Costs\" and \"Operating Expenses\" and for theCommission to implement such revenue requirement.  It is up to DWR todetermine whether the revenue requirement is just and reasonable prior tosubmitting it to the Commission.Please let me know if Enron is interested in Commenting on the Agreement.Jeanne Bennett",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.04516129032258064,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.04516129032258064,
        "Sentiment": 0.10753968253968253,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0741733690795353
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:54:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "Looks like Loretta's attempt to peel off the DWR contracts from the bonds at the PUC, which the Legislature has been contemplating but hasn't done anything about. Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03571428571428571,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029069767441860465
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Wong, John S. [mailto:jsw@cpuc.ca.gov]",
        "Recipient": "vjw@cleanpower",
        "Subject": "ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement",
        "Text": "John:I could be wrong about what I think Loretta's doing so make sure that somebody verifies before you pass on what I've said.  Could be totally wrong; but hope I'm right.Best,Jeff------Original Message-----Attached is an assigned Commissioner ruling (ACR) inviting comment on theproposed rate agreement between the California Dept. of Water Resources andthe California Public Utilities Commission.  Interested parties may filecomments with the Docket Office on or before August 1, 2001.Please note that there are three attachments to the ACR. Attachment A, theproposed rate agreement, is being forwarded to you as a separate PDFdocument.  Attachment B, the relevant Water Code sections, is contained inthe body of the attached Word document.  Attachment C is the two page letterfrom the DWR, the Dept. of Finance, and the Treasurer's Office to PresidentLynch dated July 2, 2001.  Attachment C was previously distributed to theA.00-11-038 et al service list in the Chief ALJ's ruling dated July 5, 2001.Today's ACR and all three of the attachments can also be accessed at theCPUC's web site.<<A0011038 Lynch Ruling.doc>>John S. WongCPUC - ALJ(415) 703-3130 - A0011038  Lynch Ruling.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07065217391304347,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07608695652173914,
        "Sentiment": -0.004166666666666659,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.049747048903878585
    }
],
"thread1779": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Oct 2000 05:07:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Roseann Engeldorf on 10/20/2000 11:12 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Electrobolt EPC Contract",
        "Text": "If I had a printer, I wouldn't ask you to print this, but since I don't....Thanks,KayPS  Don't worry too much about Ruthie.  You'll get her figured out.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 12:05 PM ---------------------------Per my voicemail.Rose----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 11:11 AM -----\t\"David Gohlke\" <DGOHLKE@skadden.com>\t10/19/2000 05:08 PM\t\t john.g.rigby@enron.com, john.guidry@enron.com, john.novak@enron.com, john.r.ayres@enron.com, jose.anson@enron.com, kevin.joyce@enron.com, laine.a.powell@enron.com, lisa.alfaro@enron.com, luiz.watanabe@enron.com, mary.cilia@enron.com, mary.kimball@enron.com, Mike.Morrison@enron.com, patricia.scholz@enron.com, Peter.N.Anderson@enron.com, roderick.blackham@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, roshena.ham@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com, sergio.nomura@enron.com, stephen.gray@enron.com<TWEIL@skadden.com>ESA, EECC and Finance Teams,Attached for your review is the Electrobolt EPC Contract (our doc # 39444.04), which incorporates the negotiated provisions of the Electrobolt MOU.  To assist you in your review, I have also attached (1) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all changes from the RioGen EPC Contract distributed October 17, and (2) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all revisions to the EECC form EPC contract.Please note that the comparison document, prepared by DeltaView, shows new text in blue double underscore, deleted text in red strikethrough, and moved text in green (double underscore at the new location, strikethrough from where moved).Please call if you have questions/comments.Regards,Dave GohlkeDavid E. GohlkeSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460Houston, Texas 77002direct (713) 655-5158fax - main (713) 655-5181dgohlke@skadden.com------------------------------------------------------This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their professional qualifications will be provided upon request. - 39444_4.doc - 39822_1.doc - 39820_1.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07232704402515723,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07232704402515723,
        "Sentiment": 0.11498316498316498,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11766960521272518
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Oct 2000 05:32:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Roseann Engeldorf on 10/20/2000 11:12 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Electrobolt EPC Contract",
        "Text": "Why don't you try feeding her again at night?  Maybe she will sleep better.  I feed Jack twice a day, and he is still skinny as a stick.  Isn't she on the thin side anyway?  All dogs go through adjustments.  She may be trying to find out who is the boss.  There are lots of little tricks I can tell you about to show her you are the boss.  I'll try to make you a list while you are gone.  CRATE TRAIN HER!!  It is one of the best things you will ever do for yourself.  She may fuss at first, but she will love it. Crating her will calm her down. I believe the Pointer Rescue people agree.  ckmI think I'll try the treat approach and see if that helps.  I scold her and then tell her I love her and pet and kiss her and she pops right back.  She's not a dumb dog, just a stubborn dog!I'm not feeling very good again today, probably lack of sleep!  She was looking pretty drowsy herself this morning too, she didn't get her 10 hours of sleep.  I bet the neighbors are just loving us.  Oh well!I'll print this out now.  How many of those pigs ears can I give her at night.  We feed her in the morning and she's hungry again at night.  Although dogs are pigs and always want more.  Help!\tKay Mann@ENRON\t10/20/2000 12:07 PM\t\t If I had a printer, I wouldn't ask you to print this, but since I don't....Thanks,KayPS  Don't worry too much about Ruthie.  You'll get her figured out.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 12:05 PM ---------------------------Per my voicemail.Rose----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 11:11 AM -----\t\"David Gohlke\" <DGOHLKE@skadden.com>\t10/19/2000 05:08 PM\t\t john.g.rigby@enron.com, john.guidry@enron.com, john.novak@enron.com, john.r.ayres@enron.com, jose.anson@enron.com, kevin.joyce@enron.com, laine.a.powell@enron.com, lisa.alfaro@enron.com, luiz.watanabe@enron.com, mary.cilia@enron.com, mary.kimball@enron.com, Mike.Morrison@enron.com, patricia.scholz@enron.com, Peter.N.Anderson@enron.com, roderick.blackham@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, roshena.ham@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com, sergio.nomura@enron.com, stephen.gray@enron.com<TWEIL@skadden.com>ESA, EECC and Finance Teams,Attached for your review is the Electrobolt EPC Contract (our doc # 39444.04), which incorporates the negotiated provisions of the Electrobolt MOU.  To assist you in your review, I have also attached (1) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all changes from the RioGen EPC Contract distributed October 17, and (2) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all revisions to the EECC form EPC contract.Please note that the comparison document, prepared by DeltaView, shows new text in blue double underscore, deleted text in red strikethrough, and moved text in green (double underscore at the new location, strikethrough from where moved).Please call if you have questions/comments.Regards,Dave GohlkeDavid E. GohlkeSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460Houston, Texas 77002direct (713) 655-5158fax - main (713) 655-5181dgohlke@skadden.com------------------------------------------------------This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their professional qualifications will be provided upon request. - 39444_4.doc - 39822_1.doc - 39820_1.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08695652173913043,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08869565217391304,
        "Sentiment": 0.2940217652717653,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09164490861618799
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:00:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Roseann Engeldorf on 10/20/2000 11:12 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Electrobolt EPC Contract",
        "Text": "fyi.  This form came from Global Finance. ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 03:00 PM ---------------------------Per my voicemail.Rose----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 11:11 AM -----\t\"David Gohlke\" <DGOHLKE@skadden.com>\t10/19/2000 05:08 PM\t\t john.g.rigby@enron.com, john.guidry@enron.com, john.novak@enron.com, john.r.ayres@enron.com, jose.anson@enron.com, kevin.joyce@enron.com, laine.a.powell@enron.com, lisa.alfaro@enron.com, luiz.watanabe@enron.com, mary.cilia@enron.com, mary.kimball@enron.com, Mike.Morrison@enron.com, patricia.scholz@enron.com, Peter.N.Anderson@enron.com, roderick.blackham@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, roshena.ham@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com, sergio.nomura@enron.com, stephen.gray@enron.com<TWEIL@skadden.com>ESA, EECC and Finance Teams,Attached for your review is the Electrobolt EPC Contract (our doc # 39444.04), which incorporates the negotiated provisions of the Electrobolt MOU.  To assist you in your review, I have also attached (1) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all changes from the RioGen EPC Contract distributed October 17, and (2) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all revisions to the EECC form EPC contract.Please note that the comparison document, prepared by DeltaView, shows new text in blue double underscore, deleted text in red strikethrough, and moved text in green (double underscore at the new location, strikethrough from where moved).Please call if you have questions/comments.Regards,Dave GohlkeDavid E. GohlkeSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460Houston, Texas 77002direct (713) 655-5158fax - main (713) 655-5181dgohlke@skadden.com------------------------------------------------------This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their professional qualifications will be provided upon request. - 39444_4.doc - 39822_1.doc - 39820_1.doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0738255033557047,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07046979865771812,
        "Sentiment": 0.07247474747474748,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11844737895158063
    }
],
"thread1780": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 05:39:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM",
        "Recipient": "kwiemer@milbank",
        "Subject": "E-Next Generation Docs",
        "Text": "I didn't go back and check, but I believe the bills of sale or the assignment/assumption agreement may help, as one of these should have the serial number.  I think you may have a spread sheet that ties serial numbers to unit numbers.  At least I hope so!Let me know if this doesn't get you what you need.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001 01:37 PM ---------------------------Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronAttached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13580246913580246,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14814814814814814,
        "Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13163064833005894
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:46:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM",
        "Recipient": "kwiemer@milbank",
        "Subject": "E-Next Generation Docs",
        "Text": "As promissed.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 01:46 PM ---------------------------Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronAttached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08695652173913043,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13043478260869565,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.2757009345794392
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM",
        "Recipient": "kwiemer@milbank",
        "Subject": "E-Next Generation Docs",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 05:00 PM ---------------------------Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronAttached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.2885572139303483
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Mar 2001 03:53:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM",
        "Recipient": "kwiemer@milbank",
        "Subject": "E-Next Generation Docs",
        "Text": "I'll have to send the notice separately.John's number is 713 751-3254.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:53 AM ---------------------------Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronAttached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.22992700729927007
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:06:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM",
        "Recipient": "kwiemer@milbank",
        "Subject": "E-Next Generation Docs",
        "Text": "I didn't redact it, but Ben might have a copy.  I can email you the electronic file of the intact document.Thanks!  I really could use a copy of the Blue Dog contract, especially if you redacted it to give out to bidders.  Thanks!\tKay Mann@ENRON\t03/16/2001 11:53 AM\t\t I'll have to send the notice separately.John's number is 713 751-3254.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:53 AM ---------------------------Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronAttached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09876543209876543,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14814814814814814,
        "Sentiment": 0.15833333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13837638376383765
    }
],
"thread1782": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:16:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 11:14 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Meeting between EE&CC and ENA",
        "Text": "Sounds fine to me.KayKay,Lisa asked me to see if you would represent ENA Legal at the meeting between EE&CC and ENA on Monday, Jan 29th.  Having worked at both companies, you would add a lot of insight to the crafting of a \"new project development process\".  The agenda is for Ozzie, Mike Coleman, Lisa and you to give brief presentations (5-10 minutes each) on the project development process, with recommendations on changes to be made.  You've already seen the notes, but I'm attaching an updated version.  Please let me know if you will be available and if you want to change any discussion bullets and/or recommendations.  The most recent message had the meeting taking place on Monday, January 29th from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm (with lunch provided).  Megan will let everyone know which room will be reserved.  There is also a pre-meeting tomorrow (Wed) at 10:30 am in EB 2868 (it should only last 30 minutes).  Thank you in advance for your help.-Catherinex3-9943",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09883720930232558,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13372093023255813,
        "Sentiment": 0.27367424242424243,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.040372670807453416
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "catherine",
        "Subject": "Meeting between EE&CC and ENA",
        "Text": "Could you forward the attachment referenced in your email?  (we all do that)",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07142857142857142,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.039473684210526314
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:40:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": " Clark, Catherine  ",
        "Recipient": "Mann, Kay",
        "Subject": "Meeting between EE&CC and ENA",
        "Text": "FYI---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 11:40 AM ---------------------------Sorry about that. -----Original Message-----Kay,Lisa asked me to see if you would represent ENA Legal at the meeting between EE&CC and ENA on Monday, Jan 29th.  Having worked at both companies, you would add a lot of insight to the crafting of a \"new project development process\".  The agenda is for Ozzie, Mike Coleman, Lisa and you to give brief presentations (5-10 minutes each) on the project development process, with recommendations on changes to be made.  You've already seen the notes, but I'm attaching an updated version.  Please let me know if you will be available and if you want to change any discussion bullets and/or recommendations.  The most recent message had the meeting taking place on Monday, January 29th from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm (with lunch provided).  Megan will let everyone know which room will be reserved.  There is also a pre-meeting tomorrow (Wed) at 10:30 am in EB 2868 (it should only last 30 minutes).  Thank you in advance for your help.-Catherinex3-9943",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0989010989010989,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Sentiment": 0.11477272727272728,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09380692167577413
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:45:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": " Clark, Catherine  ",
        "Recipient": "Mann, Kay",
        "Subject": "Meeting between EE&CC and ENA",
        "Text": "Hi Ben,Has anyone asked you to take a look at this?  If not, I would be interested in your comments.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 11:42 AM ---------------------------Sorry about that. -----Original Message-----Kay,Lisa asked me to see if you would represent ENA Legal at the meeting between EE&CC and ENA on Monday, Jan 29th.  Having worked at both companies, you would add a lot of insight to the crafting of a \"new project development process\".  The agenda is for Ozzie, Mike Coleman, Lisa and you to give brief presentations (5-10 minutes each) on the project development process, with recommendations on changes to be made.  You've already seen the notes, but I'm attaching an updated version.  Please let me know if you will be available and if you want to change any discussion bullets and/or recommendations.  The most recent message had the meeting taking place on Monday, January 29th from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm (with lunch provided).  Megan will let everyone know which room will be reserved.  There is also a pre-meeting tomorrow (Wed) at 10:30 am in EB 2868 (it should only last 30 minutes).  Thank you in advance for your help.-Catherinex3-9943",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09405940594059406,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12871287128712872,
        "Sentiment": 0.18977272727272726,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08931552587646077
    }
],
"thread2014": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:46:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/21/2000 05:43 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "A small task  ",
        "Text": "I'm going to miss you really badly. Are you sure you want to go to the cool air, unwind, sip wine and eat delicious food?  And miss all this???????I believe this task is complete.  \tKay Mann@ENRON\t08/21/2000 04:19 PM\t\t Could you please go through the option agreement I have in my directory on O.  It is under Option Agreements, and it is the only document there.  It should be called Fehr land option, or something similiar.  Please go search and make Optionor plural throughout, and make the grammar match.  I started making the changes, but got distracted from the task.  Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1588785046728972,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.102803738317757,
        "Sentiment": 0.005555555555555619,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.25,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046153846153846156
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/21/2000 05:43 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "A small task  ",
        "Text": "Just being out of this nasty smog will be great.  Plus, I bet it is nice there when the sun goes down.  What a great time of year to make that trip.Can you hear my heavy sighs?  It is time for me to plan something fun, even a short trip.  Planning and looking forward to it is 1/2 the fun.Oh, it's nice to know I'll be missed.  It's pretty warm and humid over there right now, but I'm sure we'll unwind, sip wine and eat our way through the valley.  Don't forget we have to go so we can bring you wine that's not sold in Texas!!!!!!!\tKay Mann@ENRON\t08/21/2000 05:46 PM\t\tI'm going to miss you really badly. Are you sure you want to go to the cool air, unwind, sip wine and eat delicious food?  And miss all this???????I believe this task is complete.  \tKay Mann@ENRON\t08/21/2000 04:19 PM\t\t Could you please go through the option agreement I have in my directory on O.  It is under Option Agreements, and it is the only document there.  It should be called Fehr land option, or something similiar.  Please go search and make Optionor plural throughout, and make the grammar match.  I started making the changes, but got distracted from the task.  Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13963963963963963,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13063063063063063,
        "Sentiment": 0.17753527336860675,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.25,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05108225108225108
    }
],
"thread100": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:11:36 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "john.kinser@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Manitoba Services Deal",
        "Text": "An extension of the Services contract with Manitoba (MHEB) has been signed =and begins tomorrow, November 1st.  In addition to purchasing from MHEB, we= need to focus heavily on selling to MHEB.  With the change of season, MHEB= may frequently be short.  As with purchases, EPMI will split any net savin=gs with MHEB and adjust their Reference Price accordingly- see 'M:Eservices=/MIDWEST SERVICE DEALS/Manitoba/Manitoba Hydro Services Deal Procedures.doc=. I realize that  market conditions have not been favorable for doing much =business with MHEB, but we need to give this deal more attention.  We are w=orking on other business opportunities with MHEB, and how we handle this de=al will affect future relationships with them.    In an effort to generate =information with which to formulate strategies to better service MHEB, plea=itoba/MHEB Price Log/MHEB November'01.doc. In addition to prices, both hour=ly and next day, record any relevant market information (see the log for ex=amples). Include responsibility for handling MHEB in the daily transition t=o the night shift.  Dean will coordinate these efforts. Please call me (cel=l - 713-962-0526) with any questions.  Thank you!=20JD",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Sentiment": 0.15749999999999997,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04773869346733668
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:04:09 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "don.baughman@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jason",
        "Subject": "Manitoba Services Deal",
        "Text": "Hey y'all,Please, comply with the following request from Eservices.  Let's run throug=h the paces every a.m.  In addition, please review the previous Manitoba Bu=siness Procedures. =20Thanks,DonAn extension of the Services contract with Manitoba (MHEB) has been signed =and begins tomorrow, November 1st.  In addition to purchasing from MHEB, we= need to focus heavily on selling to MHEB.  With the change of season, MHEB= may frequently be short.  As with purchases, EPMI will split any net savin=gs with MHEB and adjust their Reference Price accordingly- see 'M:Eservices=/MIDWEST SERVICE DEALS/Manitoba/Manitoba Hydro Services Deal Procedures.doc=. I realize that  market conditions have not been favorable for doing much =business with MHEB, but we need to give this deal more attention.  We are w=orking on other business opportunities with MHEB, and how we handle this de=al will affect future relationships with them.    In an effort to generate =information with which to formulate strategies to better service MHEB, plea=itoba/MHEB Price Log/MHEB November'01.doc. In addition to prices, both hour=ly and next day, record any relevant market information (see the log for ex=amples). Include responsibility for handling MHEB in the daily transition t=o the night shift.  Dean will coordinate these efforts. Please call me (cel=l - 713-962-0526) with any questions.  Thank you!=20JD",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11574074074074074,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09259259259259259,
        "Sentiment": 0.10347222222222223,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05043227665706052
    }
],
"thread101": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 1 Nov 2001 20:17:01 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "daniel.muschar@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Mapp machine",
        "Text": "Hey Don,I need a little bit of info.  What time can the Mapp machine/printer go down the move weekend and how long can it stay down?Daniel A. MuscharECS Project Team Leaddaniel.muschar@enron.comCCNA, MCSE, CNA, A+",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08571428571428572,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Sentiment": -0.1451388888888889,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.056338028169014086
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:07:59 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMuschar, Daniel  ",
        "Recipient": "daniel",
        "Subject": "Mapp machine",
        "Text": "Daniel,Sunday afternoon sometime.  Can be down for an hour or so.  Drop me a line if you need anything else.-Don -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, November 01, 2001 10:17 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonCc:\tMcnair, Jason; Sieckman, JohnSubject:\tMapp machineHey Don,I need a little bit of info.  What time can the Mapp machine/printer go down the move weekend and how long can it stay down?Daniel A. MuscharECS Project Team Leaddaniel.muschar@enron.comCCNA, MCSE, CNA, A+",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10144927536231885,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13043478260869565,
        "Sentiment": -0.05486111111111113,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08315565031982942
    }
],
"thread102": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:00:07 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tLarkworthy, Lyle  ",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Great Duck Hunting",
        "Text": "Don, the duck hunting went great.  We bagged over 30 ducks (between 6 guys).  They were a combination of pintail, teal, buffalo head, and blue bills.  The guides provide the dog, decoys, blinds, transportation, and they call them in for you.  They will let you call if you want, but the guides are top notch.My uncle and I are thinking of going down this weekend or the next.  Let me know if you are interested, and we will reserve you a spot with us. Lyle -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, November 06, 2001 2:28 PMTo:\tLarkworthy, LyleLyle,Thanks for the note.  How did the hunt go?  Did you have to bring decoys?  How did the guides do callin' in the ducks?Looking forward to hearing from you.Thanks,Don BaughmanCommercial ManagerEnron Power Marketing, Inc.800-349-5527 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 2:09 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tGreat Duck HuntingI am heading down there tomorrow for a hunt with my uncle.  I will let you know how we do.  If you are interested I can arrange hunt on a future Saturday or Sunday morning.  Regards, Lylehttp://www.centralflywayoutfitters.com/Lyle LarkworthyEnron Broadband ServicesProject Manager713-345-4557 office877-628-7054 skytel pager713-301-6296 cell",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09895833333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15104166666666666,
        "Sentiment": 0.334104938271605,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06574675324675325
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:27:35 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tLarkworthy, Lyle  ",
        "Recipient": "lyle",
        "Subject": "Great Duck Hunting",
        "Text": "Lyle,Thanks for the note.  How did the hunt go?  Did you have to bring decoys?  How did the guides do callin' in the ducks?Looking forward to hearing from you.Thanks,Don BaughmanCommercial ManagerEnron Power Marketing, Inc.800-349-5527 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 2:09 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tGreat Duck HuntingI am heading down there tomorrow for a hunt with my uncle.  I will let you know how we do.  If you are interested I can arrange hunt on a future Saturday or Sunday morning.  Regards, Lylehttp://www.centralflywayoutfitters.com/Lyle LarkworthyEnron Broadband ServicesProject Manager713-345-4557 office877-628-7054 skytel pager713-301-6296 cell",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08421052631578947,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17894736842105263,
        "Sentiment": 0.2324074074074074,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06676342525399129
    }
],
"thread104": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:32:44 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBentley, Corry  ",
        "Recipient": "kathy",
        "Subject": "New UBS Phone Number Requests",
        "Text": "Just to be clear, there is no final decision yet on if UBS PDX will do the contracted back work (in part in in whole) for West Power Estate.  Until a decision is made, please do not make any changes to the current numbers in Portland.I will be the on site contact and can be reached at 503.464.3701 desk,,, or 503.703.1553 cell.ThanksDave -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, February 04, 2002 3:11 PMTo:\tBentley, Corry; Will, Lloyd; Black, Tamara Jae; Baughman Jr., Don; Steiner, DavidCc:\tBailey, Debra; Cummings, David A.Corry:I have not heard any more on whether new numbers will be assigned, but I don't expect that to happen right away.  I'll let you know if I hear anything to the contrary.  Thanks! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PMTo:\tWill, Lloyd; Black, Tamara Jae; Baughman Jr., Don; Steiner, DavidCc:\tLink, Kathy; Bailey, Debra; Cummings, David A.Subject:\tNew UBS Phone Number RequestsSeveral discussions have been circulating regarding current Enron phone numbers and the need for new toll-free numbers the UBS East Power Group.For the UBS Power Trading group (EAST):  We can request new toll-free numbers (24 Hour, Fax and Scheduling) as per Kathy Link (UBS Houston 5-5418).  \ta. \tDon Baughman and I have discussed a few options for these numbers, but would welcome any input or related requirements you may be \t\t\t\taware of prior to us initiating this.\tb.\tWe will establish these for East Power ASAP.   David Steiner (503-464-3701) will be the contact to facilitate this effort for the West Desk   \t   Our current \"853\" numbers will probably be replaced by new \"584\" numbers(Kathy Link is working on this).  If this occurs, new numbers will be assigned to us.   Our Current \"800\" numbers for 24-Hour, \"Fax, and Scheduling can be forwarded  / transferred by the IT group to the Estate from our current phone turrets.Let's discuss these numbers tomorrow, Tuesday morning (February 4th).Thanks,Corry Bentley3-0421",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Sentiment": 0.14155019583591014,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06537282941777324
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:10:52 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBentley, Corry  ",
        "Recipient": "corry",
        "Subject": "New UBS Phone Number Requests",
        "Text": "Corry:I have not heard any more on whether new numbers will be assigned, but I don't expect that to happen right away.  I'll let you know if I hear anything to the contrary.  Thanks! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PMTo:\tWill, Lloyd; Black, Tamara Jae; Baughman Jr., Don; Steiner, DavidCc:\tLink, Kathy; Bailey, Debra; Cummings, David A.Subject:\tNew UBS Phone Number RequestsSeveral discussions have been circulating regarding current Enron phone numbers and the need for new toll-free numbers the UBS East Power Group.For the UBS Power Trading group (EAST):  We can request new toll-free numbers (24 Hour, Fax and Scheduling) as per Kathy Link (UBS Houston 5-5418).  \ta. \tDon Baughman and I have discussed a few options for these numbers, but would welcome any input or related requirements you may be \t\t\t\taware of prior to us initiating this.\tb.\tWe will establish these for East Power ASAP.   David Steiner (503-464-3701) will be the contact to facilitate this effort for the West Desk   \t   Our current \"853\" numbers will probably be replaced by new \"584\" numbers(Kathy Link is working on this).  If this occurs, new numbers will be assigned to us.   Our Current \"800\" numbers for 24-Hour, \"Fax, and Scheduling can be forwarded  / transferred by the IT group to the Estate from our current phone turrets.Let's discuss these numbers tomorrow, Tuesday morning (February 4th).Thanks,Corry Bentley3-0421",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10212765957446808,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09361702127659574,
        "Sentiment": 0.17246813371813374,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05865921787709497
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:51:49 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "corry.bentley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lloyd",
        "Subject": "New UBS Phone Number Requests",
        "Text": "Several discussions have been circulating regarding current Enron phone numbers and the need for new toll-free numbers the UBS East Power Group.For the UBS Power Trading group (EAST):  We can request new toll-free numbers (24 Hour, Fax and Scheduling) as per Kathy Link (UBS Houston 5-5418).  \ta. \tDon Baughman and I have discussed a few options for these numbers, but would welcome any input or related requirements you may be \t\t\t\taware of prior to us initiating this.\tb.\tWe will establish these for East Power ASAP.   David Steiner (503-464-3701) will be the contact to facilitate this effort for the West Desk   \t   Our current \"853\" numbers will probably be replaced by new \"584\" numbers(Kathy Link is working on this).  If this occurs, new numbers will be assigned to us.   Our Current \"800\" numbers for 24-Hour, \"Fax, and Scheduling can be forwarded  / transferred by the IT group to the Estate from our current phone turrets.Let's discuss these numbers tomorrow, Tuesday morning (February 4th).Thanks,Corry Bentley3-0421",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10919540229885058,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08620689655172414,
        "Sentiment": 0.11068181818181819,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Punctuation %": 0.044790652385589096
    }
],
"thread105": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:44:35 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "daniel.muschar@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "24 hr 1-800 phone",
        "Text": "TJ:How many 1-800 phone numbers does power have? ( If any other than 24 Hr trading, please advise)What is the number for 24 HR group? ( I will need to coordinate a cutover for this)Do you know of any special phone needs for the weekend trading?  (The people on turrets will be fine, they pin in anywhere)Any other thoughts or concerns are appreciated.Thank you,Daniel A. MuscharECS Project Team Leaddaniel.muschar@enron.comCCNA, MCSE, CNA, A+",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0958904109589041,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1232876712328767,
        "Sentiment": 0.21949404761904764,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05203619909502263
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:38:01 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMuschar, Daniel  ",
        "Recipient": "daniel",
        "Subject": "24 hr 1-800 phone",
        "Text": "Real time 24 hour 1-800-349-5527 and 1-877-367-6601Genco 1-877-294-3900Services 1-800-611-1282How will the cutover work.  If a trader, operator logins in at the new building will the 800 numbers not follow.  If so then we will bring in an extra crew at noon to login and get set up in the new building with a planned cut over around 3pm.  Once the transfer is done you will relocate the mapp equipment as well as the remaining ercot, midwest, southeast and northeast equipment to the new building.The night shift will report to the new building at 6pm.Thanks. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 9:45 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., Don; Black, Tamara Jae; Will, LloydSubject:\t24 hr 1-800 phoneTJ:How many 1-800 phone numbers does power have? ( If any other than 24 Hr trading, please advise)What is the number for 24 HR group? ( I will need to coordinate a cutover for this)Do you know of any special phone needs for the weekend trading?  (The people on turrets will be fine, they pin in anywhere)Any other thoughts or concerns are appreciated.Thank you,Daniel A. MuscharECS Project Team Leaddaniel.muschar@enron.comCCNA, MCSE, CNA, A+",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06451612903225806,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0967741935483871,
        "Sentiment": 0.14437454906204905,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05846422338568935
    }
],
"thread106": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:20:53 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBaughman Jr., Don [mailto:Don.Baughman@enron.com]",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "When do you get your Dynegy badge for the front door?How have you been?How is your woman?Matt DoggettDell Sales Manager -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 1:09 PMTo:\tBat Oggero (E-mail); Bob Poston (E-mail); David Nobles (E-mail);Gerald Snapka (E-mail); Jay Purdom (E-mail); Joe Kuehler (E-mail); LalenaStavinoha (E-mail); Marc Stewart (E-mail); Mark Doggett (E-mail); MattDoggett (E-mail); Mike Newman (E-mail); Patty Polensky (E-mail); RandyDoggett (E-mail); Reid Stavinoha (E-mail); Richard Hrabal (E-mail); RobertPearson (E-mail); Scott Smith (E-mail); Scott Tichavsky (E-mail); WayneHerndon (E-mail); Kenneth Schall (E-mail); Laurent, Dean; Garcia, Miguel L.;Acevedo, Rudy; Stepenovitch, Joe; Lorenz, Matt; Campbell, Larry F.> Dear Friends and Family>> Come Join the Fun!>> Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!>> Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.>> Baughman Home- Iowa Colony>> Bar -B-Q by Travis>>>> See Ya'll Soon!>>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.024193548387096774,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.04838709677419355,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14909478168264112
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:05:03 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "lalena@flow-zone.com",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "We will be there.  Isn't today your actual birthday?  I think it is.  If so,HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15789473684210525,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15789473684210525,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10526315789473684
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:21:44 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\"Baughman Jr., Don\" <Don.Baughman@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "\"Bat Oggero (E-mail)\" <batoggero@yahoo",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "I shall be there.  Is that good enough for an RSVP?----- Original Message -----<rdposton@duke-energy.com>; \"David Nobles (E-mail)\"<david_nobles@ewingcc.com>; \"Gerald Snapka (E-mail)\" <snapka@pdq.net>; \"JayPurdom (E-mail)\" <j.purdom@worldnet.att.net>; \"Joe Kuehler (E-mail)\"<jkuehler@wecon.com>; \"Lalena Stavinoha (E-mail)\" <lalena@flow-zone.com>;\"Marc Stewart (E-mail)\" <stewart@mallia.com>; \"Mark Doggett (E-mail)\"<doggettmark@hotmail.com>; \"Matt Doggett (E-mail)\" <matt_doggett@dell.com>;\"Mike Newman (E-mail)\" <michael_j_newman@reliantenergy.com>; \"Patty Polensky(E-mail)\" <patpol@aol.com>; \"Randy Doggett (E-mail)\"<randy.doggett@pantellos.com>; \"Reid Stavinoha (E-mail)\"<reidstav@houston.rr.com>; \"Richard Hrabal (E-mail)\" <richardhrabal@cs.com>;\"Robert Pearson (E-mail)\" <rpearson@oilstates.com>; \"Scott Smith (E-mail)\"<scottsmith@masterword.com>; \"Scott Tichavsky (E-mail)\"<stichavsky@pct-inc.com>; \"Wayne Herndon (E-mail)\"<wherndon@tractebelusa.com>; \"Kenneth Schall (E-mail)\"<Kenneth.d.schall@US.ArthurAndersen.com>; \"Laurent, Dean\"<Dean.Laurent@ENRON.com>; \"Garcia, Miguel L.\" <Miguel.L.Garcia@ENRON.com>;\"Acevedo, Rudy\" <Rudy.Acevedo@ENRON.com>; \"Stepenovitch, Joe\"<Joe.Stepenovitch@ENRON.com>; \"Lorenz, Matt\" <Matt.Lorenz@ENRON.com>;\"Campbell, Larry F.\" <Larry.F.Campbell@ENRON.com>> Dear Friends and Family>> Come Join the Fun!>> Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!>> Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.>> Baughman Home- Iowa Colony>> Bar -B-Q by Travis>>>> See Ya'll Soon!>>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.025,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.041666666666666664,
        "Sentiment": 0.35833333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.20081135902636918
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:43:22 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david_nobles@ewingcc.com",
        "Recipient": "don",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "Plan a weekend to come down anytime.  We can take it to the cabin in theland cut for the weekend.  The weather is perfect for it right now, pluswe can duck hunt and fish.Anyway, have a good one and we'll talk to you later.DnDavid NoblesEwing Construction Co., Inc.(361) 882-6525david_nobles@ewingcc.com\t-----Original Message-----\tFrom:\tDon.Baughman@enron.com [SMTP:Don.Baughman@enron.com]\tSent:\tThursday, November 15, 2001 1:16 PM\tTo:\tdavid_nobles@ewingcc.com\tI'm ready for the fishing!  I was able to ride on Joe's boatafter he got\tit, very nice.  It should run very skinny.\tI hope all is well.\tLater,\tDB\t    -----Original Message-----\t   Thanks for the invite.  I wish I could make it.  You need toplan a trip\t   down here for a little fin and feather.  Joe got himself anice custom\t   flats and we need to break it in right.  A lot of geese andducks are\t   being killed on lake Mathis right now and I'm sure we canmanage to find\t   some trout somewhere.\t   Happy birthday and drink one for me.\t   Dn\t   David Nobles\t   Ewing Construction Co., Inc.\t   (361) 882-6525\t   david_nobles@ewingcc.com\t      -----Original Message-----Nobles\t   (E-mail); Gerald Snapka (E-mail); Jay Purdom (E-mail); JoeKuehler\t   (E-mail); Lalena Stavinoha (E-mail); Marc Stewart (E-mail);Mark Doggett\t   (E-mail); Matt Doggett (E-mail); Mike Newman (E-mail); PattyPolensky\t   (E-mail); Randy Doggett (E-mail); Reid Stavinoha (E-mail);Richard\t   Hrabal (E-mail); Robert Pearson (E-mail); Scott Smith(E-mail); Scott\t   Tichavsky (E-mail); Wayne Herndon (E-mail); Kenneth Schall(E-mail);\t   Laurent, Dean; Garcia, Miguel L.; Acevedo, Rudy;Stepenovitch, Joe;\t   Lorenz, Matt; Campbell, Larry F.\t      > Dear Friends and Family\t      >\t      > Come Join the Fun!\t      >\t      > Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!\t      >\t      > Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.\t      >\t      > Baughman Home- Iowa Colony\t      >\t      > Bar -B-Q by Travis\t      >\t      >\t      >\t      > See Ya'll Soon!\t      >\t      >",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.061274509803921566,
        "Sentiment": 0.28826785714285713,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10233029381965553
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:30:04 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBaughman Jr., Don [mailto:Don.Baughman@enron.com]",
        "Recipient": "matt_doggett@dell",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "Deal will not close until Q3 2002.  Good, just got back from Mexico, hunting dove.  Shannon got an apt. We are still talking, trying to figure things out.How have you been?Talk to you soon.Don -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 1:21 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonWhen do you get your Dynegy badge for the front door?How have you been?How is your woman?Matt DoggettDell Sales Manager -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 1:09 PMTo:\tBat Oggero (E-mail); Bob Poston (E-mail); David Nobles (E-mail);Gerald Snapka (E-mail); Jay Purdom (E-mail); Joe Kuehler (E-mail); LalenaStavinoha (E-mail); Marc Stewart (E-mail); Mark Doggett (E-mail); MattDoggett (E-mail); Mike Newman (E-mail); Patty Polensky (E-mail); RandyDoggett (E-mail); Reid Stavinoha (E-mail); Richard Hrabal (E-mail); RobertPearson (E-mail); Scott Smith (E-mail); Scott Tichavsky (E-mail); WayneHerndon (E-mail); Kenneth Schall (E-mail); Laurent, Dean; Garcia, Miguel L.;Acevedo, Rudy; Stepenovitch, Joe; Lorenz, Matt; Campbell, Larry F.> Dear Friends and Family>> Come Join the Fun!>> Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!>> Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.>> Baughman Home- Iowa Colony>> Bar -B-Q by Travis>>>> See Ya'll Soon!>>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041666666666666664,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.44166666666666665,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13628899835796388
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:08:32 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "don.baughman@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "e-mail <",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "Dear Friends and FamilyCome Join the Fun!Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.Baughman Home- Iowa ColonyBar -B-Q by TravisSee Ya'll Soon!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.04,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07407407407407407
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:15:35 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tDavid Nobles <david_nobles@ewingcc.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "david_nobles@ewingcc",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "I'm ready for the fishing!  I was able to ride on Joe's boat after he got it, very nice.  It should run very skinny.I hope all is well.Later,DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, November 13, 2001 9:21 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonThanks for the invite.  I wish I could make it.  You need to plan a tripdown here for a little fin and feather.  Joe got himself a nice customflats and we need to break it in right.  A lot of geese and ducks arebeing killed on lake Mathis right now and I'm sure we can manage to findsome trout somewhere.Happy birthday and drink one for me.DnDavid NoblesEwing Construction Co., Inc.(361) 882-6525david_nobles@ewingcc.com\t-----Original Message-----\tFrom:\tBaughman Jr., Don [SMTP:Don.Baughman@ENRON.com]\tSent:\tMonday, November 12, 2001 1:09 PM\tTo:\tBat Oggero (E-mail); Bob Poston (E-mail); David Nobles(E-mail); Gerald Snapka (E-mail); Jay Purdom (E-mail); Joe Kuehler(E-mail); Lalena Stavinoha (E-mail); Marc Stewart (E-mail); Mark Doggett(E-mail); Matt Doggett (E-mail); Mike Newman (E-mail); Patty Polensky(E-mail); Randy Doggett (E-mail); Reid Stavinoha (E-mail); RichardHrabal (E-mail); Robert Pearson (E-mail); Scott Smith (E-mail); ScottTichavsky (E-mail); Wayne Herndon (E-mail); Kenneth Schall (E-mail);Laurent, Dean; Garcia, Miguel L.; Acevedo, Rudy; Stepenovitch, Joe;Lorenz, Matt; Campbell, Larry F.\t> Dear Friends and Family\t>\t> Come Join the Fun!\t>\t> Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!\t>\t> Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.\t>\t> Baughman Home- Iowa Colony\t>\t> Bar -B-Q by Travis\t>\t>\t>\t> See Ya'll Soon!\t>\t>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05045871559633028,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06880733944954129,
        "Sentiment": 0.2833333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12119248217757615
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:27:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "don.baughman@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "wayne",
        "Subject": "Happy Birthday Don Jr.",
        "Text": "\t> Dear Friends and Family\t>\t> Come Join the Fun!\t>\t> Don Baughman Jr. Will be 31!\t>\t> Sunday November 18, 2001 3:00 P.M.\t>\t> Baughman Home- Iowa Colony\t>\t> Bar -B-Q by Travis\t>\t>\t>\t> See Ya'll Soon!\t",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03125,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0625,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Punctuation %": 0.135
    }
],
"thread107": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:15:18 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "chairman.ken@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dl-ga-all_enron_worldwide1@enron",
        "Subject": "Change of Control Provisions",
        "Text": "As many of you know, I have a provision in my employment contract which provides for a payment of $20 million per year for the remaining term of my contract in the event of a change of control of Enron.  The merger with Dynegy, or a similar transaction with any other company, would trigger this provision on closing.  Assuming the merger with Dynegy is closed within 6-9 months, as we expect, this provision would entitle me to total payments of slightly more than $60 million.Many CEOs have change of control provisions in their employment contracts and mine has been in place since 1989.  But given the current circumstances facing the company and our employees, I have been giving a lot of thought these last few days to what to do about this payment.  Initially, I thought I would use part of the funds for a foundation for our employees and take the remainder in stock and cash.  However, after talking to a number of employees this afternoon, I have decided that the best course of action would be for me to waive my right to any of this payment.  Therefore, at closing, I will receive no payments under this provision.I know this action does not remedy the uncertainty that you and your families face.  But please know that I will continue to do everything in my power to serve the best interests of Enron's employees and shareholders.  I am still very proud of what we have built at Enron, and I want to continue working with all of you to correct the problems and restore Enron to its rightful place in the energy industry.Thank you.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10954063604240283,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10600706713780919,
        "Sentiment": 0.38325892857142857,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01814646791963707
    }
],
"thread108": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:26:42 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "chairman.ken@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dl-ga-all_enron_worldwide1@enron",
        "Subject": "Overview of Investor Conference Call",
        "Text": "Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview =of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their inter=ests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit qualit=y, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued succe=ss and expansion of our wholesale businesses.It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot =of significant events that led to our current situation:-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-co=re businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azu=rix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have eve=r imagined when we made these investments;-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a compa=ny. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the ex=tensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of in=vestor confidence, which has been very damaging;-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-under=stand financial and operating disclosures; and-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as d=iscussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previo=usly reported earnings.We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three=Core BusinessesOur core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant ear=nings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. Th=ese include:-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on ou=r projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this ti=me what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering= these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002=.I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple =of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity =concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen i=mprovement in our counterparty relationships.Non-Core BusinessesOur non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband d=ivision. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the= return from them has been dismal.We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect =that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash= that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We alre=ady have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. Th=ey include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LN=G receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and ga=s properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale= is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.Businesses Under ReviewThese businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and ga=s wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While sev=eral of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to dete=rmine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are suff=icient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make= reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it b=ecomes available.Credit Rating/10-Q FilingWe continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that =our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our ba=lance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current cr=edit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:-- Moody's at Baa3       \"Under Review for Further Downgrade\"-- Fitch at BBB-             \"Evolving Status\"-- S&P at BBB-              \"CreditWatch Negative\"We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin= and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 1=0-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. =19.We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as we=ll as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference =call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next =few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/inve=stors under \"SEC Filings.\"=20=20In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a =joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commissio=n. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint pro=xy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes= available, because it will contain important information. Investors and se=curity holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospect=us (when it is available) and other documents containing information about =Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Cop=ies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will b=e incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may als=713) 646-3302.In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be consi=dered \"participants in the solicitation\" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders i=n connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their d=irect or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are availab=le in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06863780359028511,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06969376979936642,
        "Sentiment": 0.06410973370064281,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03699402786994028
    }
],
"thread144": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:45:25 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\t\"Angie Gillikin\" <angiegillikin@hotmail.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "angiegillikin@hotmail",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Hola senorita,What's goin on with you? Just trying to get this business cranked up!  Yeah I've been busier that an one legged man in an ass kickin' contest!  The weekend was great, I'm pretty sure that I'll join the Krewe of Gambrinus, after Mardi Gras.  What have you been up to?  How was your weekend?  What's goin' on this week.  Find a night when I can cook you supper and have some beer & cider. I've got my sister's birthday party at Mom & Dad's tonight, but open the rest of the week.  Drop me a line when you have a chance.Take care,DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, February 05, 2002 8:44 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tHello!Hey There!! What's going on?  How was your weekend? You busy with new company stuff about to kick off?Angie",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12318840579710146,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14492753623188406,
        "Sentiment": 0.4069286616161616,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06905710491367861
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Jun 2000 06:45:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "mike.carson@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "elizabethrhood@hotmail",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "what is up with you??  the baby is doing great!   Are you still at Power with smelly hands??  still partying like a rock-starCARSON!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14814814814814814,
        "Sentiment": 1.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05303030303030303
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Jun 2000 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "mike.carson@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "elizabethrhood@hotmail",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "It's a boy...........and he is hung like a horse!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.2653061224489796
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:41:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jkelly@fairisaac",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Here's the exec sum draft that distributed hard copies of today.  it's going to change quite a bit based on today's work.  i'll try to turn it around by tomorrow for folks to look at.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10810810810810811,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13513513513513514,
        "Sentiment": -0.2916666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03825136612021858
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:45:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jkelly@fairisaac",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "you're cash flow spreadsheet is freakin' awesome.  nice job.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Sentiment": 0.8,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06666666666666667
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:54:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jkelly@fairisaac",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "can you please call me?  i'm trying to input the numbers from the spreadsheet into the exec sum, and have a question.  thanks.  415.782.7822.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.25925925925925924,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05673758865248227
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:24:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chrisjneale@hotmail",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Not sure that you were on the email list for this.  Who's \"Chris Fair?\"  I don't think that's you.----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 10:24 AM -----\tJeff Dasovich\t12/03/2000 08:41 PM\t\t<dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>, \"Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail)\" <kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu>, \"Ted Chin (E-mail)\" <tedchin@hotmail.com>Here's the exec sum draft that distributed hard copies of today.  it's going to change quite a bit based on today's work.  i'll try to turn it around by tomorrow for folks to look at.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Sentiment": 0.05277777777777776,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1138996138996139
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:35:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "ddelain2@enron",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Kay, can you set up some time - perhaps in the new year for a lunch - my office should be fine.RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/17/2000 06:34 PM ---------------------------Li Sun@ENRON12/15/2000 11:19 AMDear Dave,Very nice meeting and talking to you last Saturday at the party!  This is Li Sun, hopefully you still remember me as I said:\" I know you and you don't know me, that is always the case.\"  Actually I talked to you at the other party in Kevin Hannon's house for summer associates last year, the conversation was quite enjoyable and I was greatly impressed by your experience with Enron.  Just want to say hello and please accept my best wishes in this holiday season! And I wonder whether you would be kind enough to have time for lunch or coffee sometime.All the best!Li",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09859154929577464,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13380281690140844,
        "Sentiment": 0.4551136363636364,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0927710843373494
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:04:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "I think Piazza sped up to try to get close to the bat.  He's a sly one.  Roger's first story was ok (\"I didn't think he was running, I was tossing the bat to our bat boy\").  Second version was a little iffy (\"I didn't know if I had the bat or the ball\" - why the hell would he throw the ball towards the dugout?)The Turner wedding was amazing.  Jim and Betty Boyd sat behind us at the wedding. Mauricio and his wife were there, and showed no signs of leaving.  When Neil and I left at 130 (Michael was with grandparents)  the band was still playing, and the bride and groom were still there.  Unbelievable.  I wonder how late it went.I'm out of town this weekend - Neil's officer's meeting at the Hyatt Hill Country, then up to see Paige on Saturday, back on Sunday.  Let me know if it reschedules.Did you change jobs?What do you hear from Ben?  Anthony called me last week, just to chat.  They are looking forward to hunting before the baby gets here.KayAndrea Dowlen <dowlena@camerondiv.com> on 10/23/2000 01:15:56 PMHow are you?  Catherine is trying to get you, Honey, Pam, and metogether this Sunday - brunch to look at the pics I took at Dawn'swedding.Are you available? I had such a great time in New Orleans.  Drove over Fri the 13th.  Nosweat either way. Mrs T told me Turner's wedding was a spectacular.Hey - tell that St. Francis boy of yours - Roger - to quit throwingbroken bats!!!!!!!!!!!!!Let me know.Andrea",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12222222222222222,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1037037037037037,
        "Sentiment": 0.09917140151515152,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05629838142153413
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:37:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Speaking of tennis, Michael asked Neil if he can teach him how to play.  Neil said no, since he doesn't know how.  I told him I can play, and now Michael thinks I should play with him, then he will teach Neil.  Very elaborate plan!Remember how we used to hit tennis balls against the house?  Can you believe we never broke a window?  We have a detached garage, but the door is metal.  I can't imagine how loud that would be!I remember trying to encourage Paige to swim, bike, whatever.  Pushing NEVER helped.  She can swim and ride, so I guess it worked out ok.  She never showed any interest in playing on a sports team, even though she used to go to my softball games.  Whatever.Time to go home!Love,  Kay\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 02/20/2001 05:05:50 PMHi! It's good to hear from you. This is just a quick note, that I'm not sureyou'll even get in time. But, I just got off the phone with Mother and sheasked me to ask you to call her when you get home, or she'll call you around6:30.Dad's sonogram is scheduled for next Tuesday at 3:45. I think that's whatshe wants to tell you.Well, Annie is outside pounding the tennis ball against the wall. I guess Ishould go and give her a glove to pitch to. Oh, by the way. When she wasMichael's age we signed her up for t-ball. She spent the first practice intears. So, we pulled her off and waited before we started her. Now she lovesplaying the game.Enjoy the beautiful afternoon!I love you!lisa---------->>> Hi!>> I was off work yesterday, so I just got your email.  You gotta love> President's Day.  We went to the rodeo last night, and I'm really tired> today.  I'm too old to go out on a school night!>> Mom said that the dr wants to do a sonogram on Dad's neck to check out the> blockage.  When I talked to her they didn't know when it would be> scheduled.  Evidently there is some unclogging procedure they can do.> Sounds dangerous to me, but I don't really know anything about it.>> Too bad about Katie's asthma.  I was worried that Paige has it, but she> went through a bunch of tests and they said she doesn't have it.  Just> really bad allergies that make her wheeze.  I'm not sure of the difference,> but I believe this dr.>> Michael still isn't interested in playing team sports.  We asked this> spring and he said not yet.  I don't know why he doesn't want to play, but> I don't want to push him either.  Maybe I should take him to watch some> little kids play.  Maybe we can come watch Annie play.>> Neil's rodeo stuff will be over next week. Everything else is business as> usual around here.>> Say \"hey\" to everyone.>> Love,>> Kay>> ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10441767068273092,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10642570281124498,
        "Sentiment": 0.1452380952380953,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05972434915773354
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 17 Jul 2000 01:49:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann <Kay",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Mom was asking my about cake, and I don't know what is on the menu for dessert.  Guess we can ask for cake.  Neil thought we should have cake at the PH.  Guess that makes sense, too.You want to coordinate on when to get there? That may be too out of character for all of us, but we can aspire to organization.It is hot here, too.  The wind in the afternoon is really oppressive.  Dry heat - HA!  It is still darn hot.I cringe at the thought of Six Flags.  I'm sure Paige can be bought.  She went recently and had a big time.Hope your week is quiet.Love/hugs, etc, to all,Kay\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 07/16/2000 09:54:56 PMHi!We are back from Six Flags. I don't know what it is about us, but we alwaysseem to end up in Theme Parks when the temperature is over 103. We call thatCrowd Bustin' Temps! We had a great time and we are completely exhausted.The girls are getting ready for bed without even complaining. It was fun togo, but if I were you I would hire Paige to take Michael there! It haschanged since we were kids, but it is really a teenage heaven -- I thinkthere are like 8 HUGE roller coasters. Did you know that it isn't fungetting nauseated anymore?? Pink Things still taste great and the GunslingerShow is still funny!We didn't really see much of mom and dad until today. It was nice chattingwith them. I can tell that Mama is getting a little bit of cabin fever.Tomorrow she starts her exercise class and she's going out for lunch. When Icalled her when we got home she said that Daddy's leg was feeling muchbetter. I could tell that the knee incident on Friday really upset themboth. I think they were afraid that it wouldn't get better. But, it seemslike it is better now. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.Mother is really looking forward to the surprise birthday. We gave dad acopy of the movie My Dog Skip for his present while we were there, completewith his birthday card. (Just to muddy the water a bit!)Now, let me see if I can remember the things Mama wanted me to tell you. Iknow that she wanted me to tell you that she won't be able to stock up onsoft drinks, juice or other things like that since it would make Daddysuspicious. I'll probably bring Pop Tarts for the kids breakfast on Sunday.Plus drinks and juice.  Also, do you know if we will be having birthday cakefor desert? If not, let me know and I can always bring one. I'll bring Budand wine and kid drinks. Anything else?I can't believe we were able to go and visit and not spill the beans. That'spretty good for us!I wish we were still on \"vacation\", but I guess you have to come back to thereal world sometime. When we got home we had phone messages from Bobby'ssister and aunt and a note from his dad. I think I'll wait and talk to themtomorrow. They take a lot of energy you know!Tell your family hello for me. We are all looking forward to seeing you guysat the pink house!Love you!Lisa",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07606679035250463,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10575139146567718,
        "Sentiment": 0.20438596491228073,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.037357315807679
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:19:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dowlena@camerondiv",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Did you hear Candy is moving to Holland?  She looked great.  I didn't know she was married until I saw her.  She seems happy.Sounds like Ben found a good head hunter.  It can be hard to get positive after being in that environment.Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10638297872340426,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14893617021276595,
        "Sentiment": 0.42945075757575757,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029914529914529916
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Feb 2001 01:26:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lisa@casa-de-clarke",
        "Subject": "Hello!",
        "Text": "Hi!I was off work yesterday, so I just got your email.  You gotta love President's Day.  We went to the rodeo last night, and I'm really tired today.  I'm too old to go out on a school night!Mom said that the dr wants to do a sonogram on Dad's neck to check out the blockage.  When I talked to her they didn't know when it would be scheduled.  Evidently there is some unclogging procedure they can do.  Sounds dangerous to me, but I don't really know anything about it.Too bad about Katie's asthma.  I was worried that Paige has it, but she went through a bunch of tests and they said she doesn't have it.  Just really bad allergies that make her wheeze.  I'm not sure of the difference, but I believe this dr.Michael still isn't interested in playing team sports.  We asked this spring and he said not yet.  I don't know why he doesn't want to play, but I don't want to push him either.  Maybe I should take him to watch some little kids play.  Maybe we can come watch Annie play.Neil's rodeo stuff will be over next week. Everything else is business as usual around here.  Say \"hey\" to everyone.Love,Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14220183486238533,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10091743119266056,
        "Sentiment": -0.10052083333333331,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.039819004524886875
    }
],
"thread145": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:35:54 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBaughman Jr., Don  ",
        "Recipient": "stichavsky@pct-inc",
        "Subject": "Scotty Ts X-mas Party 2",
        "Text": " -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 24, 2002 9:06 AMTo:\tScott Tichavsky (E-mail)Did u get this 1?DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, January 23, 2002 5:21 PMTo:\tScott Tichavsky (E-mail)Subject:\tScotty Ts X-mas Party 2      ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.21212121212121213,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.15725806451612903
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 07:05:48 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tBaughman Jr., Don  ",
        "Recipient": "stichavsky@pct-inc",
        "Subject": "Scotty Ts X-mas Party 2",
        "Text": "Did u get this 1?DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, January 23, 2002 5:21 PMTo:\tScott Tichavsky (E-mail)Subject:\tScotty Ts X-mas Party 2      ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.25,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13725490196078433
    }
],
"thread146": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:09:27 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\t\"SCOTT TICHAVSKY\" <STICHAVSKY@PCT-INC.COM>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "stichavsky@pct-inc",
        "Subject": "Hey Man",
        "Text": "I'm in for Wed. night Kick Off Dance, tell me when & where to meet you!DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, January 08, 2002 8:00 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tHey ManThree interesting things.   1.  The Steer Starletts Fundraiser we think is  going on this Thursday night.  It is a very good Rodeo social  event.  Lots of honies, free drinks and free food.  I will keep you  posted.  I should find out for sure today that it is going on. 2.  The Rodeo Kickoff dance is going on next  Wednesday the 16th.  You and Travis are invited to come with me if ya'll  would like.  Or meet me somewhere in the area.  It starts at 7:30 or  something like that. 3.  On Friday night some of us are going to  the Firehouse to celebrate Barbara Prukop's 35th birthday.  Ya'll are  invited to that also. So let me know something about joining us for any  of the above social events. Scott",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16477272727272727,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07386363636363637,
        "Sentiment": 0.36516666666666664,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:40:12 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "<Don.Baughman@enron.com>",
        "Recipient": "<STICHAVSKY@PCT-INC",
        "Subject": "Hey Man",
        "Text": "cool, no Trav has a thing.  I'll see ya there! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, January 15, 2002 12:44 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonTomorrow we will meet at Pappasito's over by the dome around 6:30 if that isgood for you.  That is the plan.  We can grab a little bite there drink arita and then head over to the dance.  Is Travis coming also?----- Original Message -----> I'm in for Wed. night Kick Off Dance, tell me when & where to meet you!>> DB>>     -----Original Message----->>>    Three interesting things.>>    1.  The Steer Starletts Fundraiser we think is  going on this Thursday>    night.  It is a very good Rodeo social  event.  Lots of honies, free>    drinks and free food.  I will keep you  posted.  I should find out for>    sure today that it is going on.>>    2.  The Rodeo Kickoff dance is going on next  Wednesday the 16th.  You>    and Travis are invited to come with me if ya'll  would like.  Or meetme>    somewhere in the area.  It starts at 7:30 or  something like that.>>    3.  On Friday night some of us are going to  the Firehouse to celebrate>    Barbara Prukop's 35th birthday.  Ya'll are  invited to that also.>>    So let me know something about joining us for any  of the above social>    events.>>    Scott>>>> **********************************************************************> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliateand may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of theintended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure byothers is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (orauthorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or replyto Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete allcopies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are notintended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence abinding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of itsaffiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not berelied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.Thank you.> **********************************************************************>>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.20199501246882792,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06733167082294264,
        "Sentiment": 0.25935185185185183,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12494320763289414
    }
],
"thread147": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:59:08 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSturm, Fletcher J.  ",
        "Recipient": "l",
        "Subject": "Midwest/Southeast Trading Meeting",
        "Text": " -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 17, 2002 10:58 AMTo:\tSturm, Fletcher J.; Valdes, Maria; Kaniss, Jason; Baughman Jr., Don; Ballato, Russell; Suarez, John; Carson, Mike -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 17, 2002 10:52 AMTo:\tValdes, Maria; Kaniss, Jason; Baughman Jr., Don; Ballato, Russell; Suarez, John; Carson, MikeCc:\tBlack, Tamara JaeSubject:\tMidwest/Southeast Trading MeetingPlease plan to attend a meeting today at 1pm to discuss the UBS transaction and what it means to our operation.  TJ will reply with the room information.  Thanks,Fletch",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05263157894736842,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05263157894736842,
        "Sentiment": 0.19444444444444445,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11015490533562823
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSturm, Fletcher J.  ",
        "Recipient": "john",
        "Subject": "Midwest/Southeast Trading Meeting",
        "Text": " -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, January 17, 2002 10:52 AMTo:\tValdes, Maria; Kaniss, Jason; Baughman Jr., Don; Ballato, Russell; Suarez, John; Carson, MikeCc:\tBlack, Tamara JaeSubject:\tMidwest/Southeast Trading MeetingPlease plan to attend a meeting today at 1pm to discuss the UBS transaction and what it means to our operation.  TJ will reply with the room information.  Thanks,Fletch",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07407407407407407,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07407407407407407,
        "Sentiment": 0.10416666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08585858585858586
    }
],
"thread148": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:40:06 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tJoe Ebert <jebert@eadslink.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "jebert@eadslink",
        "Subject": "My Baby's Page",
        "Text": "The word is that we are being purchased from the Enron estate and give Enron 1/3 profits for some term.  The deal goes in front of the bankruptcy judge on Friday.  Supposed to be a good deal.  Do you need tix for the concert?  Do you have to work Friday?  What's the weather like?  Any good fishin hole to wade or drift?DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonNoble is gone this weekend if you want to make another trip to Corpus.  Itlooks like I will be a good weekend for fishing and nighttime entertainment.Charlie and Bruce Robison are going to be in town for this Thursday -hopefully it will be a good show.Everthing is going great.  I heard that you division got purchased by aSwiss bank or something to that effect.  Please verify?Are you doing OK?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0945945945945946,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.20270270270270271,
        "Sentiment": 0.6177083333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04228855721393035
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:32:34 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tJoe Ebert <jebert@eadslink.com>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "jebert,eadslink",
        "Subject": "My Baby's Page",
        "Text": "Yeah, it rocks, I can tell a HELLUVA difference!  I Can bark those back tires!  How's life in CC?  Thanks for lettin us stay at your house, hell of a lot better than a stinky motel.  You coming to Hou. for the rodeo?Talk to ya soon,DB  -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, January 15, 2002 12:49 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonHey,I heard that you got a chip for the diesel.  Does it make a big differencein performance.Later,Joe",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1038961038961039,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Sentiment": 0.3625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07529411764705882
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:02:57 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\t\"Andrea Williams\" <TWILLIAMS@EVI.NET>@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "My Baby's Page",
        "Text": "Here is my sister Andrea's new baby.  We are proud to present the new edition to the Baughman/Williams family, Katheryn Morgan Williams.DB -----Original Message-----Sent:\tSaturday, January 05, 2002 6:53 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonSubject:\tMy Baby's PageJust a note to let you know thatBaby Katheryn has a web page.Please check it out and leave hera message - we would like to sharethis wonderful time with her inthe years to come.Love, Troy, Andrea, Shelby, andKatherynhttp://www.growingfamily.com/webnursery/babypage.asp?URLID=4O1Z1U0D5SMake sure you highlight the entire link, copy it, and paste it in your Webbrowser.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07058823529411765,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12941176470588237,
        "Sentiment": 0.2689935064935065,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07142857142857142
    }
],
"thread150": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:38:38 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "don.baughman@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lisa_lawson@platts",
        "Subject": "MWD Hourly Index",
        "Text": "Lisa,As per our conversation on Monday, don.baughman@enron.com will be valid for another week or so.  As soon as I find out what the new email address will be, I'll send you an email.Thanks for sending the daily MWD Hourly Index and historicals (if possible) for Dec.2001 and Jan.2002.I am looking forward to a mutually beneficial relationship between UBS Warburg Energy and Platts.Don BaughmanAssociate DirectorUBS Warburg Energy",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.029850746268656716,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11940298507462686,
        "Sentiment": 0.04545454545454545,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03488372093023256
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:39:03 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tlisa_lawson@platts.com@ENRON  ",
        "Recipient": "lisa_lawson@platts",
        "Subject": "MWD Hourly Index",
        "Text": "Got it!Thanks,Don -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, February 04, 2002 10:50 AMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonDon,This is a test e-mail ... I have you on my list and you should have beenrecieveing the index daily.I want to make sure that this e-mail get through.Lisa    -----Original Message-----   Lisa,   As per our conversation on Monday, don.baughman@enron.com will be valid for   another week or so.  As soon as I find out what the new email address will   be, I'll send you an email.   Thanks for sending the daily MWD Hourly Index and historicals (if possible)   for Dec.2001 and Jan.2002.   I am looking forward to a mutually beneficial relationship between UBS   Warburg Energy and Platts.   Don Baughman   Associate Director   UBS Warburg Energy   **********************************************************************   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others   is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized   to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron   Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of   the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be   an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and   enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the   intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as   the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.   **********************************************************************",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.20930232558139536,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08970099667774087,
        "Sentiment": 0.1817550505050505,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12730414746543778
    }
],
"thread151": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:16:21 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tLindberg, Susan  ",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "MISO proposed tariff change",
        "Text": "I hope that we are planning to contest this proposed amendment. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AMTo:\tMigden, Janine; Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Ballato, Russell; Baughman Jr., Don; Baughman, Edward D.; Benson, Robert; Brown, Jeff; Choate, Jason; Clynes, Terri; Compean, Karla; Dalton III, Oscar; Forster, David; Hanse, Patrick; Justice, Gary; Kelly, Mike E.; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Lorenz, Matt; Makkai, Peter; Mangskau, David; Misra, Narsimha; Morse, Brad; Sewell, Doug; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Valderrama, Larry; Valdes, Maria; Wang, Steve; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Black, Don; Furrow, Dale; Herndon, Rogers; Kingerski, HarryCc:\tFulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.Subject:\tMISO proposed tariff changeOn October 15, 2001, the Midwest ISO filed an amendment to Section 17.5 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff to charge a fee for non-confirmed transmission service requests for transmission service greater than one week. Midwest ISO has requested an effective date December 15, 2001.Interventions and protests are due November 5.Let me know if you need further information.Susan Lindberg713.853.0596 ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.037267080745341616,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.055900621118012424,
        "Sentiment": 0.16770833333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09262435677530018
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:30:26 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tLindberg, Susan  ",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "MISO proposed tariff change",
        "Text": "Awesome! -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 22, 2001 12:21 PMTo:\tBaughman Jr., DonYes, I believe we will.  It is a $1000 penalty -- ridiculous.  We will oppose the concept of a penalty in general, as well as the amount, which seems very arbitrary.  We are also requesting, in a separate proceeding, a moratorium on tariff filings by MISO until the Midwest RTO process has progressed sufficiently to allow meaningful consideration of the tariff.I am not sure who is doing the writing but we'll run a draft by you.   -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 22, 2001 12:16 PMTo:\tLindberg, SusanI hope that we are planning to contest this proposed amendment. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AMTo:\tMigden, Janine; Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Ballato, Russell; Baughman Jr., Don; Baughman, Edward D.; Benson, Robert; Brown, Jeff; Choate, Jason; Clynes, Terri; Compean, Karla; Dalton III, Oscar; Forster, David; Hanse, Patrick; Justice, Gary; Kelly, Mike E.; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Lorenz, Matt; Makkai, Peter; Mangskau, David; Misra, Narsimha; Morse, Brad; Sewell, Doug; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Valderrama, Larry; Valdes, Maria; Wang, Steve; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Black, Don; Furrow, Dale; Herndon, Rogers; Kingerski, HarryCc:\tFulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.Subject:\tMISO proposed tariff changeOn October 15, 2001, the Midwest ISO filed an amendment to Section 17.5 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff to charge a fee for non-confirmed transmission service requests for transmission service greater than one week. Midwest ISO has requested an effective date December 15, 2001.Interventions and protests are due November 5.Let me know if you need further information.Susan Lindberg713.853.0596 ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05426356589147287,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07364341085271318,
        "Sentiment": 0.22963541666666665,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08773903262092239
    }
],
"thread13426": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:27:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "stephen",
        "Subject": "Successful Defense of the RMT Audit",
        "Text": "great job!!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.5,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.5,
        "Sentiment": 1.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.75,
        "Punctuation %": 0.18181818181818182
    }
],
"thread13427": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 2 Jan 2001 08:22:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "david",
        "Subject": "John Arnold Access to Crude",
        "Text": "No problem----Original Message-----   >   >Greg,   >   >At his request, John was set up this morning with the ability to do internal transactions through EnronOnline against crude.   >   >Please advise if you have any objections.   >   >Thanks,   >   >Dave",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.5,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08620689655172414,
        "Sentiment": -0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.7,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09375
    }
],
"thread13428": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:03:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Basil Karampelas/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 11:55 AM",
        "Recipient": "Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT",
        "Subject": "Resume of Randy Balhorn",
        "Text": "would you have any interest?---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2001 06:02 PM ---------------------------Greg - here is Randy's resume. He is the guy I was telling you about on Friday as we were walking out of the building. I think he could make Enron a lot of money.Basil",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1986754966887417
    }
],
"thread13429": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:07:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "wgramm@gmu",
        "Subject": "Andrew Lawrence @ Longitude",
        "Text": "I am sorry that I have not talked to Andrew, though I have called twice.  As I'm sure you know, lately I have been a little distracted.  I'll try to contact him next week.Greg",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.19444444444444445,
        "Sentiment": -0.24791666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04
    },
    {
        "Text": ">Hi Greg,   > Just bugging you again about whether or not you'd called Andrew Lawrence at   >Longitude.  This is a very interesting and different approach to trading   >products (I'm on the board of Longitude, for your information, and I got on   >the board because of the very intriguing proposal they have).  I hope you   >get a chance to talk with him.  Cheers.  Wendy  PS I have a board meeting   >tomorrow afternoon -- we meet every month.   >   >Wendy Gramm, Regulatory Studies Program   >Mercatus Center   >George Mason University   >703-993-4884   >",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2966101694915254,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09322033898305085,
        "Sentiment": 0.12333333333333334,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05385996409335727
    }
],
"thread13430": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:07:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "christie",
        "Subject": "Speaker for GSB",
        "Text": "Sorry I took so long to respond, but if they are still interested, I would like to learn more about it.----Original Message-----Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron,Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron,Paul LeBeau/NA/Enron@Enron   >   >Hi Greg!   >   >Would you consider doing this?  If so, I'll have John McMillan call you directly.   >   >Thanks!   >   >--Christie.   >---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 01:35 PM ---------------------------   >   >   >\"McMillan, John\" <mcmillan_john@gsb.stanford.edu> on 12/01/2000 01:14:14 PM   >   >   >Dear Christie:   >   >John Roberts suggested I contact you. As I believe he told you, I am running   >an MBA course next quarter entitled \"Market Design,\" in which I will examine   >how markets are built (ranging from eBay to reforming Russia). Enron, of   >course, is a leader in creating markets, so it would be great if someone   >from Enron could lead a session.  (650 724 4549) .   >   >Thank you very much.   >   >Regards,   >John   >   >   >   >John McMillan   >Graduate School of Business   >Stanford University   >Stanford CA 94305-5105   >   >   >mcmillan_john@gsb.stanford.edu   >http://faculty-gsb.stanford.edu/mcm   >   ><truncated...>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.43388429752066116,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08677685950413223,
        "Sentiment": 0.34825000000000006,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14285714285714285
    }
],
"thread13431": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 01:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "tabish",
        "Subject": "Request for a Recommendation",
        "Text": "I'll try to give you a call tomorrow----Original Message-----   >   >Greg,   >   > I'm sure that Liz has alaredy informed you that I've called a couple   >of times to speak with you.  My reason for calling is that I am currently   >working on my applications for business school and as I'm sure you can   >appreciate, recommendations are a very important part - since you attended   >Stanford yourself.  I remember speaking with you about graduate school a   >while back when I was in Houston, and the words \"it's a crap shoot\" still   >stick in my head.  That's what you called the application process and I'll   >never forget the quote.  As I plan to apply, I will most definitely see   >first-hand how true these words are.   >   > In any event, I need three people with whom I have forged great   >relationships with in my professional and academic career(s) who would be   >able to write me a \"first-class\" recommendation.  I feel that you are   >definitely one of these people.  I still hope that Enron would open an   >extensive presence in New York; I would must rather be there.  I really   >liked what I did; u   >   ><truncated...>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.27459016393442626,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11475409836065574,
        "Sentiment": 0.1845021645021645,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05779334500875657
    }
],
"thread13432": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:10:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "ben",
        "Subject": "power companies",
        "Text": "heard a rumor that EIX may file for bankruptcy on wednesday.----Original Message-----<gregwhalley@yahoo.com>,\"'greg.whalley@Enron.com'\" <greg.whalley@enron.com>   >   >Greg, Fitch is reducing credit ratings on the CA utilities, EIX and PCG, Moody's is considering it. The news wire said PG&E(PCG) is going to be at 6 Billion by the end of December in the whole. More should be available in the AM. Ben",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07936507936507936,
        "Sentiment": 0.325,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09725685785536159
    }
],
"thread13433": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "ben",
        "Subject": "account",
        "Text": "I'm not still short QQQ.  I covered at 68 1/2 in the after market while we were on the phone, after the Florida supreme court statement.The world has gone truly crazy about CA energy prices.Not expecting any job changes due to the Skilling/Lay thing.  But a lot of people are giving me shit anyway.  The recent reorganization that gave me my current job was done so that Skilling wouldn't have to put anyone in the COO position.----Original Message-----<gregwhalley@yahoo.com>,\"'greg.whalley@Enron.com'\" <greg.whalley@enron.com>   >   >Greg, how big was that last check you told me to watch for. I will transfer the remaining to the LIR. QQQ improved for your short today to close at 68 47/64. Nothing good out of CA utilities and power. Nat Gas lower today. I will watch tonight the new President and the vanquished. Also, will today's announcement about ENE effect you? Ben",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10666666666666667,
        "Sentiment": 0.06846590909090908,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05714285714285714
    }
],
"thread13434": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "john",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "They do look tight.  But after a $2 drop, you'd have to expect it to pinch.  Seems like, unless things really fall out of bed, this spread should widen from here.  Even if the front stays relatively unchanged.----Original Message-----   >   >remember when you said there is a reason they call them bear spreads?   >   >bring up a chart of f/g or g/h.      >f/g is tighter now than anytime since march 99 when ff1 was worth 2.50   >   >   >amazing",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2871287128712871,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07920792079207921,
        "Sentiment": 0.10714285714285714,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07174887892376682
    }
],
"thread13435": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "eric",
        "Subject": "Texas eComm Ten Awards",
        "Text": "Sounds like a good idea to me----Original Message-----Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON   >   >The Texas eCommerce Association, in partnership with the The Texas Business Journals and BusinessWeek, plan to recognize and honor Texas' ten most innovative and influential eCommerce leaders.  Nominations are due by February 2, 2001 and the recipients will be announced at a banquet on March 24, 2001.   >   >I believe it would be appropriate to nominate Louise Kitchen for her work with EnronOnline.  If you are in agreement, please advise, so I can begin the process of completing the application.  The application consists of a 250-word abstract describing the nominee's direct contribution to the eCommerce industry in Texas, along with the nominee's contact information and a 100-word biography.   >   >If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1724137931034483,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12413793103448276,
        "Sentiment": 0.225,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.048863636363636366
    }
],
"thread13436": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:46:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "zimin",
        "Subject": "EOL WTI Historical Trade Simulation - more profitable trading",
        "Text": "Volume won't affect relative profitability.  It just scales the profit or loss.  Increasing the number of transactions always results in more profit.  Increasing volume just makes the numbers bigger.----Original Message-----strategy   >   >Please ignor my previous mail regarding the same issue, which contains some typos.   >   >   >   >Greg and John,   >   >I found that by reducing the volume per trade and increasing daily number of trades ( keeping the    >total volume per day constant), we can be more profitable.  This is partially because in a trending market   >we lose less money by following the market more closely. For example, suppose market move from   >$30 to $35. If per trade volume is 10,000 BBL and the half bid-offer spread is $1 for simplicity, we take 5   > trades of short positions, the total MTM for that day is (-5-4-3-2-1)*10,000=-$150,000 and total trading    >volume is 50,000 BBL short.  If per trade volume is 50,000 BBL, we take one trade, the total MTM is    >-5*50,000= -$250,000.   Thus the net difference between the two trading strategies is $10,000 for that   >particular day.   >   >Therefore it seems that by reducing per trade volume and increasing the number of trades, we can be more   >profitable as a market maker.     >   >I rerun a scenario that   >   ><truncated...>",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.25842696629213485,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03745318352059925,
        "Sentiment": 0.18472222222222223,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.25,
        "Punctuation %": 0.067629179331307
    }
],
"thread13437": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 01:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "john",
        "Subject": "Portland General",
        "Text": "We looked into this, and I have another call with them tomorrow.  So far it looks like they are long the balance of the year.----Original Message-----   >   >With the severe draught in Oregon my guess is PGE is shorter than 500MW this year. You may   >want to ask Stan Horton about their status.   >   >John",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.22727272727272727,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07575757575757576,
        "Sentiment": 0.025,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.05000000000000002,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06188925081433225
    }
],
"thread13438": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 2 Jun 2001 03:07:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jennifer",
        "Subject": "Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort",
        "Text": "your volume comparison chart is off by a factor of 10.  each contract is 1000 bbls.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.7,
        "Punctuation %": 0.024096385542168676
    }
],
"thread13439": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Jun 2001 04:53:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jennifer",
        "Subject": "Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort",
        "Text": "i assumed it was intentional, but wanted to make sure.  for the moment it works, but if our volumes continue to rise, we need to move to absolute numbers",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.7,
        "Punctuation %": 0.026143790849673203
    }
],
"thread13440": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Jun 2001 04:57:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "liz.taylor@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "joe",
        "Subject": "Meeting Confirmation",
        "Text": "Joe,I have slotted you 90 minutes w/Greg on Wednesday @ 4:00 p.m.  Greg is scheduled to participate in a Houston conference call @ 5:30 p.m.  You guys are connecting again for dinner.  Please let me know the time and location for dinner on Wednesday night.  Also, Greg says his schedule is open enough that he would like to hang out on the floor w/you and your guys.  He will be officing over by John Sherriff and the mobile number he's carrying is +44  7901516638.Many Thanks,Liz Taylor ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16129032258064516,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08602150537634409,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0389344262295082
    }
],
"thread13403": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 18 Dec 2000 01:08:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "greg.whalley@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "greg",
        "Subject": "RE:",
        "Text": "Looks like it's going to 0.----Original Message-----   >   >You can pick up ICGE today for $4 to $5 per share or about $1.4 billion.   >   >GP",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.29411764705882354,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14084507042253522
    }
],
"thread13404": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "liz.taylor@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "richard",
        "Subject": "Whalley's Visit to London",
        "Text": "Hi Richard,Per my voicemail, are you available for at least an hour to meet w/Greg Whalley while he is in London?  He is wide open on Thursday.  Please advise.Many Thanks,Liz Taylor - E.A. to Greg Whalley",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Sentiment": 6.938893903907228e-18,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.049019607843137254
    }
],
"thread10245": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:34:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chris",
        "Subject": "Asset management",
        "Text": "Hi Chris,Happy New Year.  Hope all is going well with you.  We miss you!I heard a rumor that the UI deal had an asset management aspect to it.  The guys around here are kicking around some different asset management ideas, so I'm trying to get my hands on any docs which might give some insight into some  different approaches.  Do you have anything you can email me?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1388888888888889,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.026525198938992044
    }
],
"thread10246": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:23:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"C",
        "Subject": "Dinner",
        "Text": "John,I appreciated your help.  I'm glad we got to do a real deal, even if it was a strange one.  More to come!I'll check on the sitter, but dinner on the 2nd sounds great.Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 01/18/2001 03:54:44 PMKay-thanks again for the opportunity to work with ENA on the InterGEn deal-Ihope you were satisfied with us.Could you and Neil come to our house for dinner on Feb. 2?                    Confidentiality NoticeThis message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1837837837837838,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11891891891891893,
        "Sentiment": 0.2375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03763987792472025
    }
],
"thread8213": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 03:30:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Conference Call",
        "Text": "Chris,Please do not ask outside counsel to participate in a call, undertake a task, or do anything without talking to me, Carlos, or another Enron lawyer first.   You do not need to call Carolyn and tell her not to participate.  Carlos has taken care of this already.Kay     \t\t\tKay,Are you available for a conference call today at 1:00 PM to discuss the NorthWestern deal/issues.  If so, I will ask Carolyn Campbell not to participate in the call.Thanks,Chris",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.19047619047619047,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13095238095238096,
        "Sentiment": 0.2625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.032679738562091505
    }
],
"thread8214": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:06:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "",
        "Text": "you can open it and hold it.  I know what it is.Gloria Cruz10/25/2000 02:03 PMKay, there is a FedEx from Ken Sevigny (ENSR Consulting & Engineering, 35 Nagog Park, Acton, MD).  Let me know if you want me to open it and advise you as to what it is or if it can hold until tomorrow when you come in.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11290322580645161,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12903225806451613,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04713804713804714
    }
],
"thread8170": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:09:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Do you have a minute?",
        "Text": "I'm not leaving town...   \t\t\tokay.  Just wanted to touch base with you on some of our to do items and for certain wanted to catch you before you go out of town.KathleenKay Mann02/06/2001 03:04 PMI will have a minute in about an hour.   \t\t\t",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12244897959183673,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16326530612244897,
        "Sentiment": 0.10357142857142856,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04184100418410042
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:43:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Do you have a minute?",
        "Text": "Yeah well.  Next week!   \t\t\tI thought you were going to New York.Kay Mann02/06/2001 03:09 PMI'm not leaving town...   \t\t\tokay.  Just wanted to touch base with you on some of our to do items and for certain wanted to catch you before you go out of town.KathleenKay Mann02/06/2001 03:04 PMI will have a minute in about an hour.   \t\t\t",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Sentiment": 0.012662337662337653,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04833836858006042
    }
],
"thread8162": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:55:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "NRG Conference call - GE 7EA",
        "Text": "OK.  Friday was going to be really difficult for me anyway.  Kay   \t\t\tFred:I think it's premature to have legal on the line. If they have specific comments on the docs, they need to send them to us and we can quickly get back to them. If they want to have a commercial discussion, we can proceed without legal.Thanks,BenFred Mitro01/31/2001 10:28 AMKay:I spoke to NRG this morning.  They would like to arrange a conference call for Friday (most likely in the morning) to discuss the proposed transaction involving the GE 7EA.  Are you available to call in from New York?  If not, can Carolyn Campbell sit in for you on the call?Let me know sometime today.  Thanks,Fred",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1532258064516129,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1774193548387097,
        "Sentiment": 0.20732323232323233,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0344311377245509
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:03:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "NRG Conference call - GE 7EA",
        "Text": "Please email me whatever version of the doc you sent to them.  When it is time for discussions meaningful discussions I would like to be involved.  Thanks,KayFred Mitro@ECT01/31/2001 11:17 AMI asked Scott Maggie (NRG-CA) to see if their comments could be forwarded to us tomorrow so that we can better prepare for Friday's call.  The NRG-Pittsburg personell are a commercial business person, a developer, and NRG legal.  I am OK proceeding without legal on the line.  I can handle the questions that come up on the transaction structure.Fred   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tFred:I think it's premature to have legal on the line. If they have specific comments on the docs, they need to send them to us and we can quickly get back to them. If they want to have a commercial discussion, we can proceed without legal.Thanks,BenFred Mitro01/31/2001 10:28 AMKay:I spoke to NRG this morning.  They would like to arrange a conference call for Friday (most likely in the morning) to discuss the proposed transaction involving the GE 7EA.  Are you available to call in from New York?  If not, can Carolyn Campbell sit in for you on the call?Let me know sometime today.  Thanks,Fred",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13106796116504854,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15048543689320387,
        "Sentiment": 0.28491161616161614,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03418803418803419
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:42:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "NRG Conference call - GE 7EA",
        "Text": "I agree that we don't need outside counsel on the call at this point.  If I'm available, I'm happy to participate.  The scheduling problem is due to my travel plans.  I'll join in if the call is at a time I can fit in.  Otherwise, I'll catch up with you later about the results of the call.Kay   \t\t\tMy comment was really directed toward outside counsel. As you know, you're always welcome...Kay Mann@ENRON02/01/2001 06:55 AMOK.  Friday was going to be really difficult for me anyway.  Kay   \t\t\tFred:I think it's premature to have legal on the line. If they have specific comments on the docs, they need to send them to us and we can quickly get back to them. If they want to have a commercial discussion, we can proceed without legal.Thanks,BenFred Mitro01/31/2001 10:28 AMKay:I spoke to NRG this morning.  They would like to arrange a conference call for Friday (most likely in the morning) to discuss the proposed transaction involving the GE 7EA.  Are you available to call in from New York?  If not, can Carolyn Campbell sit in for you on the call?Let me know sometime today.  Thanks,Fred",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15763546798029557,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13793103448275862,
        "Sentiment": 0.1412177328843996,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04120879120879121
    }
],
"thread8147": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Jan 2001 03:33:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Rodeo Tickets",
        "Text": "We have 4 of each of these available at $19 (or whatever face value is).  Just let me know what you want to do.Thanks,KayCarolyn George01/23/2001 02:08 PMThe performances I am interested in are:Clay WalkerDestiny's ChildLeanne WomakThanks,Carolyn GeorgeSr. Administrative AssistantEnron Wholesale ServicesEnron Industrial Markets LLC1400 Smith, EB3836AHouston, TX  77002",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08,
        "Sentiment": 0.325,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04054054054054054
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:39:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Rodeo Tickets  ",
        "Text": "Well?---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/25/2001 03:39 PM ---------------------------Carolyn George01/25/2001 03:26 PMKay,If you still have 4 tickets for March 2 (Martina McBride & Lee Ann Womack) I would like to purchase those.Do you mind checking to see if you have 2 tickets for March 1 (Def Leppard), if you do I would like to purchase those also.Just let me know.Thanks so much!Carolyn GeorgeSr. Administrative AssistantEnron Wholesale ServicesEnron Industrial Markets LLC1400 Smith, EB3836AHouston, TX  77002",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14473684210526316,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13333333333333333
    }
],
"thread8144": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:42:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Illinois Project Entities  ",
        "Text": "Well, I hope this won't be too complicated.  Did you hire Cory, and if so, what did you think?Lisa Mellencamp@ECT01/24/2001 05:40 PMdo i see your hand raised?? thank you.Lisa J. MellencampEnron North America Corp. - Legal1400 Smith St.Houston, TX  77002\tKay Mann@ENRON\t01/24/2001 05:27 PM\t\t I presume that you would just as soon continue to follow this?Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 05:26 PM ---------------------------Fred Mitro@ECT01/24/2001 05:26 PMKay:As we discussed, I have been working with a counterparty interested in purchasing one or both of ENA's Illinois development project LLC's.  The counterparty is listed below:  PSEG Americas Development Company, L.L.C.  35 Waterview Blvd.  Parsippany, NJ  94105The key points of the proposed transaction are:1.  The transaction would be an outright purchase of 100% of the member interests in one or both of the following project entities: Kendall New Century Development, L.L.C. Titan Land Development Company, L.L.C.2.  The purchase price of 100% of the member interests would be:Lisa Mellancamp was the ENA attorney who handled the CA between ENA and PSEG before Christmas.  At the end of November, Lisa engaged Corey Brown at Bracewell & Patterson to handle the preparation of a draft Securities Purchase Agreement in conjunction with our discussions with Coastal Power.  Corey prepared a draft SPA based upon an option to purchase structure, but Coastal Power backed away from the transaction in early December.I have received a letter from PSEG Power LLC indicating their interest in proceeding with a transaction in the near future.  I will forward you a copy of this letter for your records.  They have verbally indicated that the Purchase Price(s) of $3 MM and $6 MM respectively, are acceptable to them.I believe that this is the appropriate time to bring you into the process and transfer things from Lisa to yourself.  Please call me to discuss the SPA once you have reviewed the appropriate documents.  I will be in Chicago tomorrow.  I can be reached by cell at (713) 412-4612 or leave me a voicemail.  I will be in the Houston office by noon on Friday.Thanks,Fred",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09550561797752809,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11235955056179775,
        "Sentiment": 0.1058080808080808,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06022988505747127
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Jan 2001 01:28:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Illinois Project Entities  ",
        "Text": "I'm all for getting as much booked in Q1 as possible. Fred Mitro@ECT01/24/2001 06:07 PMthanks.  velocity of profits is my new mantra!!FredKay Mann@ENRON01/24/2001 05:31 PMNo TurboPark?  No GE or ABB issues?  I feel like I'm missing something....I'll get up to speed asap.KayFred Mitro@ECT01/24/2001 05:26 PMKay:As we discussed, I have been working with a counterparty interested in purchasing one or both of ENA's Illinois development project LLC's.  The counterparty is listed below:  PSEG Americas Development Company, L.L.C.  35 Waterview Blvd.  Parsippany, NJ  94105The key points of the proposed transaction are:1.  The transaction would be an outright purchase of 100% of the member interests in one or both of the following project entities: Kendall New Century Development, L.L.C. Titan Land Development Company, L.L.C.2.  The purchase price of 100% of the member interests would be:Lisa Mellancamp was the ENA attorney who handled the CA between ENA and PSEG before Christmas.  At the end of November, Lisa engaged Corey Brown at Bracewell & Patterson to handle the preparation of a draft Securities Purchase Agreement in conjunction with our discussions with Coastal Power.  Corey prepared a draft SPA based upon an option to purchase structure, but Coastal Power backed away from the transaction in early December.I have received a letter from PSEG Power LLC indicating their interest in proceeding with a transaction in the near future.  I will forward you a copy of this letter for your records.  They have verbally indicated that the Purchase Price(s) of $3 MM and $6 MM respectively, are acceptable to them.I believe that this is the appropriate time to bring you into the process and transfer things from Lisa to yourself.  Please call me to discuss the SPA once you have reviewed the appropriate documents.  I will be in Chicago tomorrow.  I can be reached by cell at (713) 412-4612 or leave me a voicemail.  I will be in the Houston office by noon on Friday.Thanks,Fred",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09850746268656717,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09253731343283582,
        "Sentiment": 0.1686147186147186,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03824861600402617
    }
],
"thread4": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:47:55 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "<Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>",
        "Recipient": "<wise",
        "Subject": "Huntley/question",
        "Text": "Phillip,Have you found the title policy?Thanks,Bob Huntley----- Original Message -----",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1511627906976744
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:49:57 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "wise.counsel@lpl.com",
        "Recipient": "k",
        "Subject": "Huntley/question",
        "Text": "Phillip, Could you please do me a favor?  I would like  to read your current title policy to see what it says about easements.  You  should have received a copy during your closing.  I don't know how many  pages it will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy  made.  I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for  you. Thanks, Bob Huntley",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.24691358024691357,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2222222222222222,
        "Sentiment": 0.4388888888888889,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.026881720430107527
    }
],
"thread663": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 02:59:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com\tsandra.mccubbin@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "richard",
        "Subject": "Industrial Users' Proposal to California's Woes",
        "Text": "Here is CLECA's (Barbara Barkovich's) current thinking. - CLECA proposal.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09210526315789473
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 07:19:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "karen",
        "Subject": "Industrial Users' Proposal to California's Woes",
        "Text": "California Large Energy Consumers Association",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.21428571428571427,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0
    }
],
"thread1368": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 2:12 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "If the wire transfer is completed today (11/26), the amount is $5,064,535.  If the wire goes through tomorrow, the amount is $5,065,607 and the paperwork would need to be changed to reflect the 11/27 date.  I just need to know what day we plan on sending the wire.  Theresa has advised that we need to give the approval by 3 pm today (Houston time) for the wire to happen today.  If Dave is okay with deal and Kay believes all the document are in place, why not today.Chris -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 2:12 PMTo:\tBooth, Chris; Jacoby, BenCc:\tVos, TheresaSubject:\tNorthwesternJerry DeBerry called, and asked that Chris call Liz Evans to get a handle on the correct number for the wire transfer.  Once it is agreed, please send me an email with the revised number.We were working off of different receipt dates.  I received the fax on Monday, and they believe it was delivered here the Friday before.  That is the reason for the different expectation on the closing date.Dave Duran would like to be advised before the transfer is made.  I presume that Chris or Ben will take care of talking to Dave so that the transfer can be made tomorrow.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08173076923076923,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0673076923076923,
        "Sentiment": 0.4375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04410517387616624
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:38:58 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 2:12 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "I have talked with Liz Evans at NorthWestern and we both agreed that the wire transfer will happed TOMORROW (Tuesday 11/27).  The correct amount is $5,065,607.Theresa,  Please wait until Ben Jacoby gives the go ahead before releasing the wire.  I expect an afternoon release, so stay tuned...Chris -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 2:27 PMTo:\tMann, Kay; Booth, Chris; Jacoby, BenI have asked for something from GE indicating that Jeff D. had the authority to sign the consent.  I would think that this shouldn't take very long. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 2:12 PMTo:\tBooth, Chris; Jacoby, BenCc:\tVos, TheresaSubject:\tNorthwesternJerry DeBerry called, and asked that Chris call Liz Evans to get a handle on the correct number for the wire transfer.  Once it is agreed, please send me an email with the revised number.We were working off of different receipt dates.  I received the fax on Monday, and they believe it was delivered here the Friday before.  That is the reason for the different expectation on the closing date.Dave Duran would like to be advised before the transfer is made.  I presume that Chris or Ben will take care of talking to Dave so that the transfer can be made tomorrow.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08292682926829269,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05365853658536585,
        "Sentiment": 0.22833333333333336,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05568814638027048
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:43:06 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tJacoby, Ben  Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 5:58 PM",
        "Recipient": "ben",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "The documents give us a choice between paying the Remaining Purchase Amount Refund Amount ($5.099 million) to the LLC or paying the GE Accelerated Payment ($?) to GE.  As you know cash is extremely tight at the moment - have we done all we can to negotiate a lower payoff amount with GE?  The Remaining Purchase Amount Refund Amount allows us to deduct interest, a benefit of ~2.24%.  Can GE give us any discount in excess of 2.24%?  If so, we should opt for the GE Accelerated Payment.  We can discuss this further tomorrow.-Catherinex3-9943 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 5:58 PMTo:\tMann, Kay; Booth, Chris; Clark, CatherineSubject:\tNorthwesternMike Young from NW called to advise me that they received GE's consent. NW plans to send us notice of this tomorrow. I believe this will trigger our obligation to pay NW the balance of payments we hold, discounted at 7.5 % p.a. I believe this means that we will need to pay NW $5.1 million of the $5.2 million we have been prepaid.Let's talk about this in the AM.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09444444444444444,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09444444444444444,
        "Sentiment": -0.010119047619047625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.057692307692307696
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:45:16 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jkeffer@kslaw.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "If the fair market value of the LLC's assets is less than $50 million (whichseems to be the case), then no filing is required.  If more than $50million, then NorthWestern needs to make a filing, but Enron does not (as itonly owns 20%).",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Sentiment": 0.3833333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05531914893617021
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:22:24 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 8:54 AM",
        "Recipient": "paul",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Paul/Nera - please hold the wire for Montana Megawatts I, LLC for $5,064,535.00 that was scheduled for pmt today.  I will let you know when it is ok to release it.thanks!theresa -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 8:54 AMTo:\tBooth, Chris; Vos, Theresa; Jacoby, BenSubject:\tNorthwesternBy my calculation this payment is not due today.  I have advised Northwestern's attorney of this fact.Dave Duran wants to be advised prior to this money being sent.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.20625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07484407484407485
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:35:17 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 8:54 AM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Kay,When is the payment due and what is the triggers the payment?  Has Dave Duran been advised of the deal?Chris -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 26, 2001 8:54 AMTo:\tBooth, Chris; Vos, Theresa; Jacoby, BenSubject:\tNorthwesternBy my calculation this payment is not due today.  I have advised Northwestern's attorney of this fact.Dave Duran wants to be advised prior to this money being sent.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13114754098360656,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06557377049180328,
        "Sentiment": 0.06458333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06971153846153846
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:30:21 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ben.jacoby@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "When do you think the payment's due?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Sentiment": -0.125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05555555555555555
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 04:59:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chris",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "We need a name for the LLC for this transaction.  Any suggestions?Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.028985507246376812
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:39:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "I kinda like Coyote LLC and Black Hills LLC (no spruce).   \t\t\tRushmore LLC (Mt Rushmore)Rose Quartz LLC (State mineral)Humming Bee LLC (State insect)Coyote LLC (University of SD mascot)Black Hills Spruce LLC (State tree)Walleye LLC (State Fish)This is already more than I ever wanted to know about SD.Kay Mann03/12/2001 12:59 PMWe need a name for the LLC for this transaction.  Any suggestions?Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.109375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03125,
        "Sentiment": 0.16666666666666669,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05289672544080604
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:17:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kathleen",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Kathleen, We need to set up an LLC for the Blue Dog turbines.  Chris had proposed some names at some point, then Ben had come up with something.  I now can't remember what it is.  Anyway, it needs to be on the list for next week.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08163265306122448,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.061224489795918366,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03765690376569038
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:26:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "I really like that one.   \t\t\tMerchant Energy Ventures, L.L.C. (if it's available)Kay Mann@ENRON03/16/2001 06:17 PMKathleen, We need to set up an LLC for the Blue Dog turbines.  Chris had proposed some names at some point, then Ben had come up with something.  I now can't remember what it is.  Anyway, it needs to be on the list for next week.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09230769230769231,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.046153846153846156,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.059490084985835696
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/Enron@EnronXGate",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 04:22 PM ---------------------------   \t\t\tManis/Enron@EnronXGateFolks:With respect to the Northwestern transaction, I'd like to understand what it would take in the letter agreement to allow us to recognize the entire $8MM upon execution of the letter agreement. In my conversation today with Kay, we talked about making sure we could at least recognize the $8MM in equal instalments between the execution of the letter agreement and September 1, 2001 (the outside date for closing). If at all possible, I'd like to take this one step further so that the entire amount could be recognized in Q2. Let's plan to talk about this on Monday. Any thoughts on this prior to Monday would be appreciated.Regards,Ben ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.04918032786885246,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08196721311475409,
        "Sentiment": 0.05,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09523809523809523
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:30:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/Enron@EnronXGate",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "I've raised some of the issues with NW.  We are working on some of it.  A meeting is a good idea.Kay   \t\t\tManis/Enron@EnronXGateFolks:With respect to the Northwestern transaction, I'd like to understand what it would take in the letter agreement to allow us to recognize the entire $8MM upon execution of the letter agreement. In my conversation today with Kay, we talked about making sure we could at least recognize the $8MM in equal instalments between the execution of the letter agreement and September 1, 2001 (the outside date for closing). If at all possible, I'd like to take this one step further so that the entire amount could be recognized in Q2. Let's plan to talk about this on Monday. Any thoughts on this prior to Monday would be appreciated.Regards,Ben ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.044444444444444446,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1037037037037037,
        "Sentiment": 0.19999999999999998,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0311284046692607
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:36:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": " Jacoby, Ben   On Behalf Of Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT",
        "Recipient": "Mann, Kay; Booth, Chris; Manis, HermanFolks:",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 04:36 PM ---------------------------KayWe still need to contemplate the scenarios and discussions held today surrounding revenue recognition and counterparty's ability to clawback on payments they make to us. -----Original Message-----Folks:With respect to the Northwestern transaction, I'd like to understand what it would take in the letter agreement to allow us to recognize the entire $8MM upon execution of the letter agreement. In my conversation today with Kay, we talked about making sure we could at least recognize the $8MM in equal instalments between the execution of the letter agreement and September 1, 2001 (the outside date for closing). If at all possible, I'd like to take this one step further so that the entire amount could be recognized in Q2. Let's plan to talk about this on Monday. Any thoughts on this prior to Monday would be appreciated.Regards,Ben ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041379310344827586,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0896551724137931,
        "Sentiment": 0.11875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08860759493670886
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:28:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "roseann",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Here's the electronic file.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07407407407407407
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "mreuter@kslaw",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Hi there,I am meeting with Ben tomorrow to discuss NWestern.  I'm fairly confident that he will be willing to extend the letter agreement, but he hasn't called me back today to confirm.Ms. Kahn and I have exchanged voice mail.  Could one of you return her call for me?  I'm tied up.  You might get an idea on some times tomorrow for a call.  I'm booked until around 130 for anything which would last more than a few minutes.  I'll check with Ben.Thank you,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15730337078651685,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10112359550561797,
        "Sentiment": 0.175,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.037037037037037035
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Thanks.  I'll prepare Ben.Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/16/2001 06:17:32 PM<MReuter@KSLAW.com>I've talked to Marguerite.  She agreed to a call tomorrow at 2 PM central.She is sending to you and me a draft of an extension.  No need to doanything with it tonight, but I suspect that Mike will begin calling Benabout it in the morning.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14035087719298245,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15789473684210525,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06936416184971098
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]",
        "Recipient": "mreuter@kslaw",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 04:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Ben is ok with the extension.Ben and I have a meeting with the accountants at 200 (just got scheduled - got to take the apptment when we can).  I'm happy for you guys to go forward with the call. Ben and I will join later if we finish in time.Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/16/2001 06:17:32 PM<MReuter@KSLAW.com>I've talked to Marguerite.  She agreed to a call tomorrow at 2 PM central.She is sending to you and me a draft of an extension.  No need to doanything with it tonight, but I suspect that Mike will begin calling Benabout it in the morning.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11650485436893204,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14563106796116504,
        "Sentiment": 0.65,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05150976909413854
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 05:44:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "I say go ahead with the call to work through any nits etc.  We will need a follow up call anyway, once we know what to do to meet the accting objectives.  This means you won't be available at 200 to talk with the accts, but that's ok.  Finalizing the extension sounds good to me.Kay\"Keffer, John\" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/17/2001 11:24:51 AM<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>Do you want me to postpone the call (I expect they are flexible)?.  Do youwant me to listen in on the meeting with the accountants?Do you want me to communicate with Marguerite to get the extension in shapefor signing?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14563106796116504,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18446601941747573,
        "Sentiment": 0.5333333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05008635578583765
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chris",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Hi Chris,We need to coordinate the setting up of an escrow account with Treasury.  We will use Citibank. I believe either Rebecca and/or Kathleen worked on this on the Intergen deal.  Can you help?Also, do you have an address for the location of turbine 1?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0851063829787234,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0851063829787234,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03383458646616541
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 03:52:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Hi there,Have you had a chance to look at this yet?Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2001 10:52 AM ---------------------------Kay Mann04/12/2001 06:28 PMHere's the electronic file.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.28054298642533937
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 23:33:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "roseann",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Hi Rose,I hate to be a pain, but we are trying to sign up Northwestern this week, and the last thing we have to do is the assignment and assumption agreement.  Any break in the log jam with McKay?Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.175,
        "Sentiment": -0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02512562814070352
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 17 May 2001 02:23:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kathleen",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Hi KC,It would be a big help if you could take the NorthWestern guaranty sig pages to Marissa after D Duran has signed them.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041666666666666664,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.20833333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.022388059701492536
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 22 May 2001 07:53:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 02:41 PMCatherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate ",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT",
        "Subject": "Northwestern",
        "Text": "Lisa,I haven't gotten the executed docs back, but I'll send you the electronic version if that works for you.Timing is as follows:Northwestern gives 30 days notice of readiness to close.  If the closing does not occur before July 16, they make another $5m payment.10 days after notice, they fund the balance into escrow, and we close 20 days later.  If they fail to close on or before Sept 1, they forfeit their previous payments, unless we have failed to provide the GE consent to assignment, which we are working on now.I've given this timeline without looking at the doc, so I will let you know if I missed something.Hopes this helps.KayCatherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate Please provide an update as to the status of the execution of the PSA with Northwestern for the forward purchase of two turbines.  It has been some time since I saw any documents or was involved in any meetings on this transaction.  If executed, please insure that we have a copy for our files and a tickler of what the action plan is with respect to having the documents for purchase from E-next prepared and timing of execution/purchase.Lisa",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08762886597938144,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08762886597938144,
        "Sentiment": -0.14444444444444443,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.025985663082437275
    }
],
"thread1369": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:18:54 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "rahil.jafry@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Confidentiality Agreement",
        "Text": "Kay,I just checked our first presentation to them, and it didn't have the \"confidential stamp on them.  Ideally, we'd like to have that covered, but don't think it is critical if the information there is not.Going forward, I believe our revised proposal already has the stamp on every page.  If not, we will ensure that it is marked.Are you guys okay with everything else?- R",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1044776119402985,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08955223880597014,
        "Sentiment": 0.39999999999999997,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042666666666666665
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Butch Solomon [mailto:BUTCHS@gdsassoc.com]",
        "Recipient": "Emmons, Suzette",
        "Subject": "Confidentiality Agreement",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:48:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jstineba@newpower",
        "Subject": "Confidentiality Agreement",
        "Text": "At Mark Bernstein's request I am forwarding a confidentiality agreement for your review.  If it meets with your approval, please sign and fax back to me at 713-646-3491.  If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 713 345 7566.Thanks,Kay ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.20833333333333334,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03461538461538462
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 10:35:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "John Stinebaugh/HOU/EES@EES",
        "Subject": "Confidentiality Agreement",
        "Text": "Mark,How do you feel about their changes?  Note that we MUST mark everything confidential and they don't want to agree to the non-circumvent.  KayMark Bernstein@ECT12/21/2000 06:32 PMthanks!!!---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 06:32 PM ---------------------------John Stinebaugh@EES12/21/2000 03:08 PMMark,Here are comments from Joe Halprin, our in house lawyer.  If  your legal counsel has any comments, please contact Joe directly at 203-531-0400.  I will be out on vacation next week.---------------------- Forwarded by John Stinebaugh/HOU/EES on 12/21/2000 04:05 PM ---------------------------Joe Halprin12/20/2000 03:39 PMhere is the c/a",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0898876404494382,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06741573033707865,
        "Sentiment": 0.15000000000000002,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.2
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 19 Sep 2000 04:23:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "heather",
        "Subject": "Confidentiality Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi Heather,The confidentiality agreement signed by Enron/Vepco states as follows:Except as required by law, neither party hereto nor their representatives will disclose to any person either the fact that discussions or negotiations are taking place between them not any terms, conditions or other fact with respect to any transaction that may be proposed or undertaken, including the status thereof.  -------------------------------------------------------------We can loosen up the terms in the contract so that we can disclose certain terms to potential investors (I'll make that change), or we can discuss amending this agreement.  Additionally, it looks like we have the testimony and application filed with the Public Staff to work with.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07339449541284404,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08256880733944955,
        "Sentiment": -0.008928571428571432,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10067114093959731
    }
],
"thread1370": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, Oct 23, 2001, 6:21 AM",
        "Sender": "\"Mann, Kay\" <Kay.Mann@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke",
        "Subject": "<no subject>",
        "Text": "I had told Mama that I might not come, but since they know they are going todo the test, I'm coming. I'm hoping to leave Austin around 10 ( I have to goup to school and do a couple of things).Drive safely!Lisa----------Our anniversary was the 18th.  Number 9.We will head north around 8ish this am.  See you there. -----Original Message----- Cc:   Is it your anniversary? Isn't it right around now? How manyyears? Congrats!  I think I have decided that I am going to head up to Ft Worth inthe morning, after I get the kids to school and wrap up a couple ofthings at my school.  Do you know your plans yet?  LC **********************************************************************This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate andmay contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of theintended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure byothers is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (orauthorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or replyto Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete allcopies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are notintended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence abinding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of itsaffiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not berelied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.Thank you.**********************************************************************",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06995884773662552,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09876543209876543,
        "Sentiment": 0.20714285714285713,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13560411311053985
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:21:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann <Kay",
        "Subject": "<no subject>",
        "Text": "Hi there. This came in while I was on the road.Mac mentioned his girlfriend, but he didn't mention the Rice thing.  Hmmm.  We would love to have him at UH, since he won't aim any higher, and we thing it beats SWTS.  He and his friend were wonderful house guests.  I hope no one got worse on your b day.  Many happy returns!Love,Kay\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 02/02/2001 08:51:47 AMHi Kay! How are you guys doing? We had hoped that maybe we would be comingover to Houston Saturday to see UT play baseball and then maybe try to seeyall Sunday before we drove back. BUT! As luck would have it, Annie, Katieand Bobby are all various degrees of sick.So, unless there is miraculous improvement in the next 24 hours, it lookslike we will be staying in Austin. Oh well. We hope to make another tripdown there before too long.Well, I'm due at school, but I wanted to say hi and tell you that we won'tbe coming down. I hear that Mac is coming down? That's great. I hope that helikes what he sees at UH. You know his girlfriend has been offered ascholarship to Rice, I think.Anyway, Have a great Ground Hogs Day. It doesn't feel too different to be40, rather than 39 and 364 days, so I guess I'll make it through the day.Take care and tell everyone hello!Love you!Lisa",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07234042553191489,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1276595744680851,
        "Sentiment": 0.37864583333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04559748427672956
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Apr 2001 02:03:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "<no subject>",
        "Text": "I remember that the longer I played softball, the bigger the women were.  When I was in my late 20's and early 30's, I played men's league, and I think they were smaller than the women!\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 04/03/2001 09:02:24 AMGood Morning! Yes, that's the big girls. But, she's not as tall as the picture makes her look. The player standing right behind her is only 5 feettall. Some of the other girls are only about my height. There's a reason whywe encourage her to play softball and not volleyball. If genetics meansanything, I think her build will be more along the softball player lines! Itmay also be the angle the picture was taken.I think Annie is probably getting close to 5 feet tall, but I wouldn't swearon it. Probably 4'10\" or so.Have a good morning!Love you!Lisa----------",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.02877697841726619,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06474820143884892,
        "Sentiment": 0.23154761904761903,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06419753086419754
    }
],
"thread1371": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:26:45 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "GT",
        "Text": "how much do we owe them? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PMTo:\tClark, Barton; Tweed, Sheila; Pais, RandyCc:\tHodge, Jeffrey T.; Jacoby, Ben; Krause, Greg; Krimsky, StevenSubject:\tGTI have suggested to Greenburg Traurig that they stand down for the next few days until the path forward becomes more clear.   Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08,
        "Sentiment": 0.15162037037037038,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09329446064139942
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:39:49 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "GT",
        "Text": "OUCH!  I guess Kerri won't be inviting me to go to a Dolphins game next month. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 3:38 PMTo:\tKrause, GregI suspect (don't know) over $100k (or 200k) considering the burn rate. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 3:27 PMTo:\tMann, Kayhow much do we owe them? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PMTo:\tClark, Barton; Tweed, Sheila; Pais, RandyCc:\tHodge, Jeffrey T.; Jacoby, Ben; Krause, Greg; Krimsky, StevenSubject:\tGTI have suggested to Greenburg Traurig that they stand down for the next few days until the path forward becomes more clear.   Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06451612903225806,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07526881720430108,
        "Sentiment": 0.14143518518518516,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11246200607902736
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:51:33 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "GT",
        "Text": "How current are we with Greenburg's invoices? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 PMTo:\tClark, Barton; Tweed, Sheila; Pais, RandyCc:\tHodge, Jeffrey T.; Jacoby, Ben; Krause, Greg; Krimsky, StevenSubject:\tGTI have suggested to Greenburg Traurig that they stand down for the next few days until the path forward becomes more clear.   Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09803921568627451,
        "Sentiment": 0.10324074074074073,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09065934065934066
    }
],
"thread1372": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:58:48 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "todd.rimmer@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "USTeleNet Transaction",
        "Text": "Just to follow-up on our discussion yesterday regarding the accounting treatment assuming that USTeleNet owns the switch and that we purchase the switch and lease it back to them under a \"capital\" lease, the following would occur:The asset would stay on their books (however it would be \"marked-up\" to FMV as evidenced by the purchase price)They would defer the gain, if any, over the asset's life.They would record a payable on their balance sheet and recognize interest expense in their P&L as payments are madeWe would record the payment of cash to them and book a receivable and deferred interest income (to be recognized over the lease term)Essentially we are lending them money equal to the FMV of their asset and receiving interest payments in return (i.e. direct financing lease)I would be happy to go into more detail at your request.  Please let me know as issues develop and I will assist as necessary.Regards, Todd RimmerDirector - EWS Transaction SupportPhone - 713-345-2803Fax - 713-646-3347Cell - 713-560-6493",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08383233532934131,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09580838323353294,
        "Sentiment": 0.4666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.033203125
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:02:28 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tRimmer, Todd  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 2:59 PM",
        "Recipient": "todd",
        "Subject": "USTeleNet Transaction",
        "Text": "What if we purchase the switch from a 3rd party, i.e. CES?  How would that affect your 1st 2 bullets? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 2:59 PMTo:\tMann, Kay; Raab, EricSubject:\tUSTeleNet TransactionJust to follow-up on our discussion yesterday regarding the accounting treatment assuming that USTeleNet owns the switch and that we purchase the switch and lease it back to them under a \"capital\" lease, the following would occur:The asset would stay on their books (however it would be \"marked-up\" to FMV as evidenced by the purchase price)They would defer the gain, if any, over the asset's life.They would record a payable on their balance sheet and recognize interest expense in their P&L as payments are madeWe would record the payment of cash to them and book a receivable and deferred interest income (to be recognized over the lease term)Essentially we are lending them money equal to the FMV of their asset and receiving interest payments in return (i.e. direct financing lease)I would be happy to go into more detail at your request.  Please let me know as issues develop and I will assist as necessary.Regards, Todd RimmerDirector - EWS Transaction SupportPhone - 713-345-2803Fax - 713-646-3347Cell - 713-560-6493",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07575757575757576,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09595959595959595,
        "Sentiment": 0.2802083333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04654895666131621
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:19:49 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tRimmer, Todd  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 2:59 PM",
        "Recipient": "eric",
        "Subject": "USTeleNet Transaction",
        "Text": "If we purchased the switch from an outside party and then leased it to USTeleNet under a capital lease, the asset would still be booked on UST's books at its FMV.  There would be no associated gain as the asset was never theirs (the third party would get the gain on sale).  Bullets 3 and 4 would be basically the same, except for the cash going to a third party.Todd RimmerDirector - EWS Transaction SupportPhone - 713-345-2803Fax - 713-646-3347Cell - 713-560-6493 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PMTo:\tRimmer, ToddCc:\tMann, KayWhat if we purchase the switch from a 3rd party, i.e. CES?  How would that affect your 1st 2 bullets? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 2:59 PMTo:\tMann, Kay; Raab, EricSubject:\tUSTeleNet TransactionJust to follow-up on our discussion yesterday regarding the accounting treatment assuming that USTeleNet owns the switch and that we purchase the switch and lease it back to them under a \"capital\" lease, the following would occur:The asset would stay on their books (however it would be \"marked-up\" to FMV as evidenced by the purchase price)They would defer the gain, if any, over the asset's life.They would record a payable on their balance sheet and recognize interest expense in their P&L as payments are madeWe would record the payment of cash to them and book a receivable and deferred interest income (to be recognized over the lease term)Essentially we are lending them money equal to the FMV of their asset and receiving interest payments in return (i.e. direct financing lease)I would be happy to go into more detail at your request.  Please let me know as issues develop and I will assist as necessary.Regards, Todd RimmerDirector - EWS Transaction SupportPhone - 713-345-2803Fax - 713-646-3347Cell - 713-560-6493",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07958477508650519,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09342560553633218,
        "Sentiment": 0.21805555555555553,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05204872646733112
    }
],
"thread1373": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:15:49 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tCarnahan, Kathleen  Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 10:38 AM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Deerfield landowner!!!!!",
        "Text": "I gave Raimund his number and asked him to follow up. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 11:58 AMTo:\tCarnahan, Kathleen; Jacoby, BenI am familiar with the Mancini option, but I don't know who this person might be.  Any ideas? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 10:38 AMTo:\tMann, Kay; Jacoby, BenSubject:\tDeerfield landowner!!!!!Paul Jankowsky just called and wanted to talk to the attorney in charge of the Deerfield project.  He sounded a tad irate.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05555555555555555,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.645263671875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.098
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:38:06 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kathleen.carnahan@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Deerfield landowner!!!!!",
        "Text": "Paul Jankowsky just called and wanted to talk to the attorney in charge of the Deerfield project.  He sounded a tad irate.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.043478260869565216,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17391304347826086,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01639344262295082
    }
],
"thread1375": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:18:02 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "dan.lyons@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Your call",
        "Text": "XOXOXO--------------------------Dan Lyons",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.6341463414634146
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Mann, Kay <Kay.Mann@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "Lyons, Dan <Dan",
        "Subject": "Your call",
        "Text": "hank you for your call. I'm very sad, a bit angry with the doctors, and tired. Your voice cheered me up. Love, Kay",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13043478260869565,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08695652173913043,
        "Sentiment": -0.008333333333333304,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06140350877192982
    }
],
"thread13756": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:55:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "john",
        "Subject": "Your call",
        "Text": "Hi John,I took very poor notes from your phone call.  Did you want to see a form of LOI?  For what type of transaction?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.19230769230769232,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.19230769230769232,
        "Sentiment": -0.52,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03875968992248062
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 07:04:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "marguerite",
        "Subject": "Your call",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/12/2001 03:03 PM ---------------------------Kay Mann03/12/2001 01:50 PMHi Marguerite,I'm on a telephone conference which is not likely to end before I have to rush out to take my son to an appointment.  Obviously, I have access to email.  Is there something I can answer for you by email?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10909090909090909,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16363636363636364,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.17777777777777778
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 2 Apr 2001 04:03:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole on 04/02/2001 10:45 AM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Your call",
        "Text": "I didn't tell them, so the rumor mill must be working.  I'm multitasking and on a PSEG call, but thanks for telling everyone about fall, even Piper Rudnick is giving my grief about it.  You should be pleased.Carlos Sole'Senior CounselEnron North America Corp.1400 Smith StreetHouston, Texas 77002-7361(713) 345-8191 (phone)713 646-3393 (fax)",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09433962264150944,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09433962264150944,
        "Sentiment": -0.30000000000000004,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05865102639296188
    }
],
"thread1376": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:16:01 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 11:58 AM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "EEPC",
        "Text": "Cool. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 11:58 AMTo:\tTapscott, Ron; Jacoby, Ben; Zisman, StuartSubject:\tEEPCThere are no immediate plans to put EEPC into Chap. 11. Due diligence is underway to see what's there. Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Sentiment": 0.19999999999999998,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1087866108786611
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:05:37 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 11:58 AM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "EEPC",
        "Text": "do you plan to continue to arrange for a meeting with the bankruptcy expert?Thanks, Ron. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 11:58 AMTo:\tTapscott, Ron; Jacoby, Ben; Zisman, StuartSubject:\tEEPCThere are no immediate plans to put EEPC into Chap. 11. Due diligence is underway to see what's there. Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06521739130434782,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17391304347826086,
        "Sentiment": 0.125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08695652173913043
    }
],
"thread1378": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 28 Oct 2001 14:53:11 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "recordp@southwestern.edu",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Sympathy",
        "Text": "I got this email from my professor who didn't seem at all affected when Itold him my grandfather was going in for surgery. You never know who isgoing to be touched. Also, my girls here gave me flowers when I got home.It's really strange to be here where everyone is really concentrated onhomework and listening to music, etc... I cried a lot on the way back here,and I turned off the radio for a long time. I never do that, but I felt likeI needed to talk to PopPop in quiet. This stinks. My heart hurts. I knowit'll get better, but it was so recently that we were all laughing in thehospital room. I just have so many questions that will never be answered.Well I need to get moving on my group project. Keep in touch.Love,Paige",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.051470588235294115,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11029411764705882,
        "Sentiment": 0.040000000000000015,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03159340659340659
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 08:14:56 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "recordp@southwestern.edu",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Sympathy",
        "Text": "The attachment wasn't the important part. He always attaches something toemails...It might be the syllabus or something. I just thought what he wrotein the body of the letter was really sweet. Oh, if you do happen by HulenMall, could you pick me up one of those nail things? I have showed it toeveryone, and they think it's amazing. If not, no biggie. I'll be up theresometime, and I can take care of it. How are you two doing? Are you gettingstuff done? Is there anything I need to do to help you or Mimi? Just let meknow. I have to get ready for my tour now.Love,Paige",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0660377358490566,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16037735849056603,
        "Sentiment": 0.3875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042105263157894736
    }
],
"thread1381": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:22:05 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ben.jacoby@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "Kay:I'd like to talk to you about the attached letter. Thanks. ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.4166666666666667,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06349206349206349
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:41:46 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:32 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "I have my files (that I borrowed from Carlos' office the other day) here with me.  For what it is worth, I review Ben's letter and changed it to comport with the requirements of the agreement.  Would it be easier for me to send you copies or do you need both binders? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:32 PMTo:\tZisman, StuartSubject:\tHaywoodDo you have the Haywood file that was in Carlos' office?  I need it or a copy of it.  Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12048192771084337,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13253012048192772,
        "Sentiment": 0.18333333333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06223175965665236
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:20:42 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tMann, Kay  Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:32 PM",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "Lorie Leigh has agreed to help me by making a copy of the binder and delivering it to you.  It should get to you sometime tomorrow.Stuart -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:47 PMTo:\tZisman, StuartI think it would be a good idea to have the files copied.  Kay -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:42 PMTo:\tMann, KayI have my files (that I borrowed from Carlos' office the other day) here with me.  For what it is worth, I review Ben's letter and changed it to comport with the requirements of the agreement.  Would it be easier for me to send you copies or do you need both binders? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, December 13, 2001 12:32 PMTo:\tZisman, StuartSubject:\tHaywoodDo you have the Haywood file that was in Carlos' office?  I need it or a copy of it.  Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1079136690647482,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16546762589928057,
        "Sentiment": 0.334375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07673860911270983
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:28:45 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ben.jacoby@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chip",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "Chip:As we discussed a couple of days ago, we have prepared a payment direction letter regarding our final payment from AES on the Haywood deal. The letter directs AES to make payment directly to our consultant ($100k) with the balance to us by check ($2,010k).Please let Kay, Staurt and I know if you're OK with this (via return e-mail), and we will send it to AES. Stuart, Kay and I have each reviewed the letter.I expect that we should be in a position to receive these funds hopefully late next week.Thanks,Ben",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10989010989010989,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13186813186813187,
        "Sentiment": 0.075,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042801556420233464
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 20 Dec 2001 07:55:39 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ben.jacoby@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "david",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "Thanks Dave. We'll send the letter out today.Regards,--------------------------Ben Jacoby(713) 853-6173",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.32038834951456313
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:36:21 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ben.jacoby@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Haywood",
        "Text": "Kay:I didn't get a chance to send the letter out today, but will do so tomorrow. Is it OK for me to send it out to AES without your initials, but with you intialing the copy we retain for our records? In the past, we typically provided payment direction to AES by e-mail.Let me know.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12727272727272726,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10909090909090909,
        "Sentiment": 0.14583333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0353356890459364
    }
],
"thread1382": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:28:49 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "heather.kroll@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Paralegal resume",
        "Text": "Anything else I can do, and I mean Anything, let me know and it's done!  Take care. Heather Kroll",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05,
        "Sentiment": -0.390625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05154639175257732
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Mann, Kay <Kay.Mann@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "Kroll, Heather <Heather",
        "Subject": "Paralegal resume",
        "Text": "It is really hard. Like you, I was very close to my dad. Thanks for the flowers. Those type of things help.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.045454545454545456,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18181818181818182,
        "Sentiment": 0.036111111111111115,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04672897196261682
    }
],
"thread250": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:49:44 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tMDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>@ENRON  Sent:\tFriday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM",
        "Recipient": "d",
        "Subject": "PG&E",
        "Text": " -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 19, 2001 3:49 PMTo:\tMellencamp, Lisa -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PMTo:\tSimmons, Linda J.Here is our settlement sheet on the one cent surcharge, attached below.Mike Day - X28655.DOC ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.030303030303030304,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14015151515151514
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:56:59 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "=09MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>@ENRON =20Sent:=09Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM",
        "Recipient": "wanda",
        "Subject": "PG&E",
        "Text": "I reviewed the document and it seems fairly accurate.  I have a slight disa=rcharge\" can be interpreted to mean both the one cent and three cent surcha=rges given that both surcharges were granted similar treatment in D.01-03-0=82.\"  I don't agree that this is so black and white.  One can also take the= interpretation that it was meant to apply only to the 3 cent and not to th=e 1 cent surcharge.  Obviously, SCE took the former interpretation and PG&E= the latter.  That is one reason why we have been very careful about attack=ing this issue.   AReM has protested PG&E charging the one cent surcharge a=nd supported Edison's approach in responding to the advice letters filed mo=nths ago.  AReM continues to work with the CPUC staff to get the staff to s=upport AReM when it responds to the advice letters.  Be aware that there ar=e strong forces working against ESPs and anything potentially favorable to =them. The more we can accomplish this under the radar screen, the better of=f we will be. Commissioner Wood is still attacking retroactivity and many h=ave raised the \"cost shifting\" issue.  In other words, we can still lose th=e 3 cent exclusion.  We have to be careful how we proceed. -----Original Message-----Sent:=09Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:28 PMTo:=09Mara, SusanLisa had asked that I give you a call re the attached file.  I think you ar=e the most knowledgeable to review it and provide comments.  We will be usi=ng this in the meeting with PG&E on Thursday.Thanks,Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:=09Monday, October  22, 2001 9:49 AMTo:=09Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C=.; Sanders, Richard B.please let me know if any of you disagree/have comments -----Original Message-----Sent:=09Friday, October 19, 2001 3:49 PMTo:=09Mellencamp, Lisa -----Original Message-----Sent:=09Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PMTo:=09Simmons, Linda J.Here is our settlement sheet on the one cent surcharge, attached below.Mike Day",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0877742946708464,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10344827586206896,
        "Sentiment": 0.20420940170940172,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06900050735667174
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:04:09 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "leslie.lawner@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "barry",
        "Subject": "PG&E",
        "Text": "Steffes and I were just chatting and an idea came up, that we try to offer our El Paso capacity to PG&E in their bankruptcy suit (in which a settlement is being negotiated) and perhaps we can, in turn, reduce our claim against PG&E in that case.  Maybe this is already being done, but if not, it is a thought.  Lisa Mellencamp and Michael Tribolet are doing the bankruptcy case. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0684931506849315,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0821917808219178,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0316622691292876
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:17:26 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "douglass@earthlink.net\trobert.neustaedter@enron.com, coffing.timothy@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "PG&E",
        "Text": "Attached are summaries of several recent PG&E advice letters.  No protest material here.DanLaw Offices of Daniel W. Douglass5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244Woodland Hills, CA 91367douglass@energyattorney.com",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10714285714285714,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03571428571428571,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.037914691943127965
    }
],
"thread254": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:47:13 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "ek@a-klaw.com Suspension Date",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Angelides Oct. 19th Letter to L. Lynch Urging July 1 DA",
        "Text": "Yes, yes, but the CPA wants to build plants to fill that net short, so it's NOT good.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05555555555555555,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Sentiment": -0.03749999999999999,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.058823529411764705
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:45:44 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "ek@a-klaw.com Suspension Date",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Angelides Oct. 19th Letter to L. Lynch Urging July 1 DA",
        "Text": "Has anyone ever stopped to ask Loretta whether the letters are helpful or not?  Two things occur to me.  First, it is not becoming for a commissioner to be taking actions consistent with the urgings of industry -- particularly if you're a Democrat.  Second, it has always struck me that what she needs is some form of record support, not political pats on the back in one-page letters.  I am asking you these questions not judging the proposal to send a letter .... but I've never understood what they're supposed to do for her and I honestly would like to understand.E",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08571428571428572,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.35520833333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03163444639718805
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:16:58 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "ek@a-klaw.com Suspension Date",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Angelides Oct. 19th Letter to L. Lynch Urging July 1 DA",
        "Text": "Thank you for your explanation.  Often I think too literally and narrowlyand forget about the importance of spin.  All the same, I think we shouldknow if Loretta appreciates the open support of evil industry or not...I'dsay it's worth a call.E",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.047619047619047616,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Sentiment": -0.175,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.037037037037037035
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 20:09:37 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jrredding@aol.com Suspension Date",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Angelides Oct. 19th Letter to L. Lynch Urging July 1 DA",
        "Text": "Jeff,The SV Manufacturing Group intends to sign the \"business coalition\" letter making many of these points. The $8B is a number pulled out of thin air, right?Have you given any thought to how we go about systematically restoring a de-regulated market....sans DWR and the State Power Authority....in California? Regards,John",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12244897959183673,
        "Sentiment": 0.04999999999999999,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05555555555555555
    }
],
"thread256": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:34:43 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "drothrock@cmta.net\tdjsmith@s-k-w.com, dhunter@s-k-w.com, derek.naten@roche.com, ",
        "Recipient": "wbooth@booth-law",
        "Subject": "Reponse to Angelides",
        "Text": "Wanna sign onto this letter to Loretta? Any suggestions? We could make it a CEA thing.(I am copying Jeff D. as a courtesy...I think we need this to be just a customer deal).Dot498-3319",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06060606060606061,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18181818181818182,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.059782608695652176
    }
],
"thread255": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "wbooth@booth-law.com\tek@a-klaw.com, mikahl@ka-pow.com, djsmith@s-k-w.com, ",
        "Recipient": "drothrock@cmta",
        "Subject": "Reponse to Angelides",
        "Text": "Dorothy -- Attached is a another version of the letter that takes a littledifferent approach.  What do you think?  I worried that your first letterlooks a little like an invitation to pile on the exit fees, of all types andin any magnitude.  I think we need to attack the premise that any DA causesan increase in DWR costs for other customers.  Bill",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Sentiment": -0.046875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02005730659025788
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:06:17 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "drothrock@cmta.net\te-mail <.keith@enron.com>, e-mail <.dan@enron.com>, ",
        "Recipient": "wbooth@booth-law",
        "Subject": "Reponse to Angelides",
        "Text": "I agree with Bill's additions, with the exception of the sentence on DWR beingterribly misguided and therefore no one should have to pay the costs of going100% to long contracts. Not sure who else we recommend pay for DWR power besidescustomers.I've attached the AReM letter in case you haven't seen it.....they go on quite arant.DotWilliam Booth wrote:",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05263157894736842,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07017543859649122,
        "Sentiment": -0.15,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.039660056657223795
    }
],
"thread257": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:26:59 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com] Sent:\tMonday, October 22, 2001 3:49 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Meeting with Perfect Commerce",
        "Text": "Cool.Cameron SellersVice President, Business DevelopmentPERFECT1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210Palo Alto, CA 94303cameron@perfect.com650.798.3366 (direct dial)650.269.3366 (cell)650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 22, 2001 3:49 PMTo:\tCameron SellersJeez, nice company.  Putting you up for 10 days at the Waldorf.  I lovethat neighborhood.  Anywho, I'll check those dates and get back to you.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09615384615384616,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Sentiment": 0.35833333333333334,
        "Subject Sentiment": 1.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09456264775413711
    }
],
"thread258": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:36:03 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "michael.etringer@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "QF Presentation",
        "Text": "Here you go... Mike Etringer                         503.464.3836 (w)Enron North America                            503.701.4516 (c)West Power Origination                       503.464.3740 (fax)121 SW Salmon Street 3WTC0306       michael.etringer@enron.comPortland, OR 97232                               ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.8333333333333334,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.007575757575757576,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06209150326797386
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "tomb@crossborderenergy.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "QF Presentation",
        "Text": "510-649-9790",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.16666666666666666
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Dasovich, Jeff <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "tomb@crossborderenergy",
        "Timestamp": "Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:41 AM",
        "Subject": "QF Presentation",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "tomb@crossborderenergy.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "QF Presentation",
        "Text": "Jeff --As always, your proposal is creative.  After reviewing your presentation,here are some tough questions that we can discuss tomorrow:1.    Would the replacement energy from the market be obtained undercontracts of similar length and firmness as the QF contracts that the energyreplaces?  If not, why would the CPUC want to replace long-term, committedQF power with short-term firm energy?2.    Why would the CPUC want to replace long-term QF power over which ithas substantial regulatory leverage (through SRAC pricing) with marketenergy from sources over which it may have less control?3.    Are there 8,000 MWs of low-cost replacement energy available inCalifornia, or in the WSCC with firm transmission to California?  How steepis the supply curve for replacement energy?4.    After a QF is bought out, I assume that it would simply operate in theelectric market as a merchant plant, if it continues to operate to provideon-site power and thermal energy.  Is this correct?5.    How sensitive are your calculated ratepayer and QF benefits to changesin the relationship between SRAC (i.e. gas) and electric market prices?6.    Assuming that there are both ratepayer and QF benefits from QFcontract buyouts, why is there a need for a formalized auction process, whenthe same benefits might be captured through bilateral negotiations (such asthe QF buyouts done to date)?7.    Doesn't your proposal require the utilities to be back in the powerprocurement business?  If not, why not?As you perhaps can tell, my questions focus on whether now is the right timefor such a broad plan to buyout QF contracts.Talk to you tomorrow,Tom",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10507246376811594,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11231884057971014,
        "Sentiment": 0.008645124716553291,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03061849357011635
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Dasovich, Jeff <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>",
        "Recipient": "tomb@crossborderenergy",
        "Timestamp": "Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:41 AM",
        "Subject": "QF Presentation",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    }
],
"thread261": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:05:10 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "Jeff --How would we calculate EES' \"contribution\" to SCE undercollection?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.025,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09722222222222222,
        "Sentiment": -0.06555555555555555,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04742362061103511
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:44:03 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October  23, 2001 5:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "wes",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": " Wes,If Edison sticks to their plan, they will want to meet before November 7th.  They are wanting to discuss completely different issues than PG&E   To date, PG&E issues have been focused around the outcome of the FERC refund case. I have worked through a couple of examples of this under collection issue with Jeff and we agree, Edison's  argument  that the DA load contributed to the under collection is \"technically\" correct.   We will have to work with Jeff to build a compelling argument that ESP's should not be required to continue to contribute to the under collection, especially as of March 31, 2002, the end of the rate freeze as required in AB 1890.   Somehow we have to convince \"the regulators\"  that the original intent of the de-reg bill, that utilities recover what they can through no later than March, 02,  stay in place for the current DA load.  Will keep you posted. Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October  23, 2001 5:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0637065637065637,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10810810810810811,
        "Sentiment": -0.020432098765432092,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04083665338645418
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:56:10 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "Jeff,Do we know how much Edison's total under collection is?  Would it be as simple as to determine their total (around $3 billion?) and  gross receivable (before any payments - 145 million) and calculate the % (around 5%)?  This would result in a pretty small percentage.  Another way to look at it would be on a % of load basis.  If you use the DA load information Sue forwarded to us on October 1st,   this % (5.7%)  would also be very small.  How do you think they will look at it?  I think we would all agree to a 5% haircut, if they would JUST PAY US!Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October  23, 2001 5:19 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.; Curry, Wanda; Tribolet, MichaelBest,Jeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:05 PMTo:\tDasovich, JeffJeff --How would we calculate EES' \"contribution\" to SCE undercollection?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.050200803212851405,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09839357429718876,
        "Sentiment": -0.06209876543209877,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05759514988211519
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:13:30 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "yes please...Thank you JeffDanFrom:\tJeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/23/2001 05:04 PMTo:\tDan Leff/HOU/EES@EEScc:\t Dan:Is this also information that you'd like to be kept apprised of.  Just let me know.Best,Jeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:?\tThey plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.?\tEdison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.?\tIn addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)?\tI recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.?\tHe said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.?\tFielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.?\tIt was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.029177718832891247,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09549071618037135,
        "Sentiment": -0.06722222222222221,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05287846481876333
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "I don't understand the netting that you are referring to.  Does it mean that they will pay negative ctc's up to some just and reasonable amount and anything above the j&r level will be paid out when all of the other people are paid.  How do they define the \"ESP's share of the undercollection?\" -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.027093596059113302,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09852216748768473,
        "Sentiment": -0.07079861111111109,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.044379925342181666
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:51:52 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "503-464-3740 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, October 24, 2001 7:52 AMTo:\tBelden, TimWhat's your fax number? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, October 24, 2001 8:39 AMTo:\tDasovich, JeffI don't understand the netting that you are referring to.  Does it mean that they will pay negative ctc's up to some just and reasonable amount and anything above the j&r level will be paid out when all of the other people are paid.  How do they define the \"ESP's share of the undercollection?\" -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 3:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.02588235294117647,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09411764705882353,
        "Sentiment": 0.018361111111111113,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.054684512428298276
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:12:32 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Getting Negative CTC Paid",
        "Text": "I know that SCE is taking this position.  They are simple wrong.  Unless and until we get all of our \"positive\" CTC back from the Utility, why should I even begin to consider their \"goofy\" arguments.  In addition, SCE is receiving $3.3 B which is a full payment of all Negative CTC.  If their issue is to have a Undercollection charge against all customers, that's a different policy matter.  The CPUC agreed to the idea of Negative CTC and SCE needs to pay.  Also, if we are 5% of load and the Undercollection is $3.3 B, I think that SCE would be looking for $165 MM - our entire claim.  They aren't talking about 5% from our view $150 MM claim.Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 6:18 PMTo:\tCurry, WandaCc:\tSteffes, James D.; Tribolet, MichaelNeed to think about it a bit.  Here's some of what we know based on the settlement:Total debt = 6.35 BAfter they contribute all cash on their books and agree to eat a little, the PUC is allowing them to collect somewhere between $3.0-3.3B--depends on who you talk to.The total owed to ESPs is $243 MM. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:56 PMTo:\tDasovich, JeffCc:\tSteffes, James D.; Tribolet, MichaelJeff,Do we know how much Edison's total under collection is?  Would it be as simple as to determine their total (around $3 billion?) and  gross receivable (before any payments - 145 million) and calculate the % (around 5%)?  This would result in a pretty small percentage.  Another way to look at it would be on a % of load basis.  If you use the DA load information Sue forwarded to us on October 1st,   this % (5.7%)  would also be very small.  How do you think they will look at it?  I think we would all agree to a 5% haircut, if they would JUST PAY US!Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October  23, 2001 5:19 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.; Curry, Wanda; Tribolet, MichaelBest,Jeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:05 PMTo:\tDasovich, JeffJeff --How would we calculate EES' \"contribution\" to SCE undercollection?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PMTo:\tShapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, JanetI talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:They plan to \"settle\" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison \"meet and confer\" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.Fielder is also the point person on \"getting ESPs paid\" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.If you have any questions, let us know.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06099290780141844,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10070921985815603,
        "Sentiment": -0.031236531986531986,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.3,
        "Punctuation %": 0.061464585834333736
    }
],
"thread262": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 26 Dec 2001 05:45:10 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "leslie",
        "Subject": "Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K",
        "Text": "Leslie - Please have someone in your group follow up.  Thks. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PMTo:\tSacks, Edward; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.Subject:\tNeed info on where to have check sent from customer for $800KAn EPMI customer is trying to find out where to send a check for power services rendered for $800K.  Can you let me know where I should have him send it.  Thanks.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.17142857142857143,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12857142857142856,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07494145199063232
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:52:20 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K",
        "Text": "Jeff - Could you please forward the name of the customer to me so settlements can follow up on this payment.  Thank you,Leslie Reevesext.  37962 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 1:00 PMTo:\tReeves, LeslieI don't, sorry. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 12:11 PMTo:\tSacks, EdwardEd - do you know who the customer is so we can follow up with them.  Thanks, Leslie -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 7:45 AMTo:\tReeves, LeslieCc:\tDasovich, Jeff; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.Leslie - Please have someone in your group follow up.  Thks. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PMTo:\tSacks, Edward; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.Subject:\tNeed info on where to have check sent from customer for $800KAn EPMI customer is trying to find out where to send a check for power services rendered for $800K.  Can you let me know where I should have him send it.  Thanks.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14965986394557823,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10204081632653061,
        "Sentiment": 0.24375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09889001009081735
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:58:31 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff  Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K",
        "Text": "Our fax # is 713-646-2443.  Thanks, Leslie -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, January 02, 2002 12:57 PMTo:\tReeves, LeslieJeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 2:52 PMTo:\tDasovich, JeffJeff - Could you please forward the name of the customer to me so settlements can follow up on this payment.  Thank you,Leslie Reevesext.  37962 -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 1:00 PMTo:\tReeves, LeslieI don't, sorry. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 12:11 PMTo:\tSacks, EdwardEd - do you know who the customer is so we can follow up with them.  Thanks, Leslie -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, December 26, 2001 7:45 AMTo:\tReeves, LeslieCc:\tDasovich, Jeff; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.Leslie - Please have someone in your group follow up.  Thks. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PMTo:\tSacks, Edward; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.Subject:\tNeed info on where to have check sent from customer for $800KAn EPMI customer is trying to find out where to send a check for power services rendered for $800K.  Can you let me know where I should have him send it.  Thanks.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1411764705882353,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09411764705882353,
        "Sentiment": 0.2583333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11147811725846409
    }
],
"thread264": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:26:19 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tMara, Susan  Sent:\tMonday, October  1, 2001 2:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31",
        "Text": "Yeah.  Guess we do have to worry about that.   I was thinking it would apply to our receivable, not the total under collection, but that would not make sense.  Maybe the other idea will work.  It gets difficult to continue to think of ways around some of these problems.  Thanks,Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October  23, 2001 6:16 PMTo:\tCurry, WandaDo we run the risk of them saying, Enron, on average your customers represented 5% of the load, therefore you owe us 5% of the undercollection, or $3B * 0.05 = $150M?  That's my biggest concern.  Thoughts? -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 23, 2001 5:58 PMTo:\tDasovich, JeffWhat do you think about the % of load argument?  This is Sue's e-mail.  Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October  1, 2001 2:25 PMTo:\tKean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, JeffSubject:\tTotal DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31The new data are out from the CPUC.  Only reported as of 8/31/01.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0881057268722467,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.048458149779735685,
        "Sentiment": -0.006923400673400667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10743801652892562
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:24:55 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "susan.mara@enron.com\tjeremy.blachman@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "j",
        "Subject": "Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31",
        "Text": "The new data are out from the CPUC.  Only reported as of 8/31/01. ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06060606060606061
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:00:54 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tSwain, Steve  Sent:\tTuesday, October  2, 2001 10:21 AM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31",
        "Text": " -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October 02, 2001 8:53 AMTo:\tTribolet, Michael; Steffes, James D.; Mara, SusanFYII asked Steve to compare the information from Sue's email re the CPUC estimate of DA load to Enron's forecast of retail load.  His response is below.   -----Original Message-----Sent:\tTuesday, October  2, 2001 10:21 AMTo:\tCurry, WandaCc:\tLewchuk, KenSubject:\tTotal DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31Wanda,Given the current state of our systems, it is not possible to tell with precision which of the categories below all of our customers fall into.  For example, in the current position report the largest volumes by far in Calif appear in the rate class labelled \"?\".Still, we have a total volume for 2002 of 8,331,762 MWH, or about 83% of the total reported.  Not bad.  Also, it appears from my quick review of the categorical breakout that our volumes are weighted towards the Commercial and Industrial customers, which indicates that we likely own > 90% of those volumes.  Let me know if you have any other questions.\tActivities\t\tResidential  Commercial    Commercial   Industrial \t\t\t\t   <20kW           <500kW       >500kW     >500 kW      Agricultural     Unknown       Total4)  Total Direct Access Load (KWH)  \t    488,246,354\t    160,111,329\t   3,707,713,770\t   5,576,608,164\t     78,690,129\t            0\t10,011,369,746\t",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.32452830188679244,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03773584905660377,
        "Sentiment": 0.16284722222222223,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06701414743112435
    }
],
"thread266": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:26:41 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "d..steffes@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "ALL PARTY MEETING A.00-11-038, et al. Wed. 9/12/01 @ 11:00 a.m.",
        "Text": "Your call.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.5,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 07:53:17 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jbennett@gmssr.com\te-mail <.sue@enron.com>",
        "Recipient": "e-mail <",
        "Subject": "ALL PARTY MEETING A.00-11-038, et al. Wed. 9/12/01 @ 11:00 a.m.",
        "Text": "Cmmr. Wood is holding an all-party meeting on Wednesday to address theproposed decision on DWR's revenue requirement (and the concurrentallocation of that revenue requirement among the UDCs). The Commission isdue to vote on this proposed decision at its continuation meeting onThursday (the 13th)  Please let me know by tomorrow if you would like anyonefrom our offices to attend.  Jeanne Bennett  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.109375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.022613065326633167
    }
],
"thread268": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:50:15 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "barry.tycholiz@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "DWR - Gas Daily",
        "Text": "Jeff, Gas Daily has an article on DWR activities for purchasing gas.... do you know Pete Garris and is he the guy we want to get together with... or is Balwin's co. going to carry the ball. I remain unclear as to who actually is doing the gas buying..Further to our conversation of last week... let's meet with these guys soonest. BT ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.047619047619047616,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05389221556886228
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:54:17 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Tycholiz, Barry ",
        "Recipient": "Dasovich, Jeff ",
        "Subject": "DWR - Gas Daily",
        "Text": "you are up early.... This Friday, Monday a.m. or Tues will be fine. Mark is in San Fransisco... who were we going to see in Sacremento. BT [Tycholiz, Barry]  -----Original Message-----It's Baldwin.  Let me know what dates you want to meet and I'll set it up. Best,Jeff-----Original Message----- Jeff, Gas Daily has an article on DWR activities for purchasing gas.... do you know Pete Garris and is he the guy we want to get together with... or is Balwin's co. going to carry the ball. I remain unclear as to who actually is doing the gas buying..Further to our conversation of last week... let's meet with these guys soonest. BT ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07079646017699115,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11504424778761062,
        "Sentiment": 0.2972222222222222,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09220985691573927
    }
],
"thread269": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:34:36 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "rmp@cpuc.ca.gov",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas",
        "Text": "\tHistorically, I don't think it was an issue before Wheeler Ridge andthe increased flows at that receipt point.  Basically there is no minimumBlythe flows set in the BCAP or by the Commission.  It is mainly anoperational issue for SoCalGas that they've somewhat managed withoutgetting into any Commission mandated procedure.  Actually, Florio raised theissue as it impacts the core but the Commission never addressed it.Typically, SoCalGas has managed the issue by having the core maintainedflows at Blythe.  As I recall there is some manner in which it is indirectlyaddressed in the Comprehensive Settlement.      ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14705882352941177,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01788617886178862
    }
],
"thread270": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "professional"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:09:15 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "julie.kearney@enron.com\tgray.calvert@enron.com, octavio.carranza@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "joseph",
        "Subject": "Open Enrollment for Benefits",
        "Text": "\t\t\tOpen Enrollment for your 2002 Health Benefits begins Monday, October 29, 2001!  Q. \tWHAT DOES THIS MEAN?A. \tIf you plan to make changes to your existing benefit coverage, you will need to make changes during Open Enrollment which begins Monday, October 29, 2001 at 8:00 AM (Central) and ends on November 12, 2001 at 5:00 PM (Central)\tTo facilitate these changes, you received an Open Enrollment Benefit Packet at your home address.  This packet contains a personalized [Julie Kearney]    worksheet and the Enron Instruction Guide to help you make your selections.  \t(If you have not received your Info Packet, please let us know ASAP! ) Q.\tWHAT DO I NEED TO DO?1.  If you are satisfied with your current elections and do not need to make changes, do nothing.  Your current choices will automatically roll over to 2002. or at home at  www.Enron.BenefitsNow.com   or call the Phone Enrollment Line at (800) 332-7979, Option 5.Q. \tI HAVE MORE QUESTIONS.  I NEED MORE INFORMATION. A.\tIf you have more questions or need more information, you may  call in to our  Open Enrollment \"Brown Bag\" Info Session being held on Friday,October 26 @ 11:30 PM in the Mt Hood Conference Room.  EWS Portland HR OfficeJulie Kearney x7404Grace Rodriguez x8321",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16055045871559634,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10091743119266056,
        "Sentiment": 0.3958333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04032258064516129
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:44:46 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tKearney, Julie  Sent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 8:41 AM",
        "Recipient": "joseph",
        "Subject": "Open Enrollment for Benefits",
        "Text": "Good Morning Everyone. If you would like to listen to the meeting about open enrollment today, please meet in the small conference room at 11:30 AM.Please print out the following presentation to follow along with during the meeting.  If you have any questions please ask Cristina (7819).Here's to your health,Cheers,April   -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, October 26, 2001 8:41 AMTo:\tHrach, AprilCc:\tRodriguez, Grace; Jarnagin, JosieSubject:\tOpen Enrollment PresentationApril,Here's the presentation.  We'll talk w/ you soon! Julie Kx7404",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17105263157894737,
        "Sentiment": 0.26805555555555555,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0695970695970696
    }
],
"thread271": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "professional"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:07:33 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "shirleen.glasin@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "ICSC conference",
        "Text": "Just to be clear, this is the how the presentation is set up.Laurie MaloneIntroductionSlides 2-4Jeff DasovichSlides 5-10LaurieSlides 11-19Laurie and JeffSlide 20 -- Q&AGood luck!Shirleen",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041666666666666664,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Sentiment": 0.10000000000000002,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04838709677419355
    }
],
"thread272": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "professional"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:17:26 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "darran.binns@enron.com\tjanet.butler@enron.com, guillermo.canovas@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "lynnette",
        "Subject": "California Power Issues",
        "Text": " FERC extends $1,000 price cap on NY ISO powerDow Jones InteractiveOctober 24, 2001  Dow Jones InteractiveOctober 24, 2001  Calif Resells Surplus Power At A Loss In Second QuarterDow Jones InteractiveOctober 24, 2001          FERC extends $1,000 price cap on NY ISO power WASHINGTON, Oct 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Wednesday agreed to extend a price cap of $1,000 per megawatt hour for wholesale electricity bids handled by the New York Independent System Operator. The New York ISO asked FERC to approve an extension through April 30, 2002, for the price cap, which first went into effect in July of last year. However, FERC said it expected power supplies in New York City and Long Island to remain tight through the summer of 2002. The ISO would likely request another bid cap extension at that time. Therefore, FERC said the price cap will last as an interim measure until the new Northeast Regional Transmission Organization is up and running. \"We believe that our decision ... will promote price certainty and market participants' confidence in the New York ISO-administered markets, which will increase supply, improve reliability and ... lower energy prices,\" the agency said in its order. The New York ISO operates one of the nation's biggest wholesale electric markets with billions of dollars in transactions. The $1,000 price cap was first adopted to control market manipulation and prevent artificially inflated prices. The cap is supported by several large utilities, such as Consolidated Edison Inc. , which were concerned about high wholesale power prices that occurred after the New York ISO took control of the state's power grid. FERC aims to create four huge Regional Transmission Organizations to replace the New York ISO and similar groups in managing the nation's power grid. Federal regulators see the RTOs as a way to avoid a repeat of the power crisis in California last winter, in which the antiquated U.S. grid prevented more power from flowing into the state. Under FERC's plan, the RTOs would be for-profit groups in the U.S. Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and West. Each region would combine public utility transmission facilities to provide open access, more reliable power and lower rates for consumers. However, some utilities have been hesitant to join an RTO because they will some lose control over the rates they charge other companies to use their power lines. USING scare and bully tactics, the federal government is trying to force Maryland electricity consumers into paying higher prices for less reliable service and less local control. That's the outlook for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's plan to create four new large regional power transmission groups to manage the nation's electric grid. The efficient, stable, economical PJM Interconnection grid system that's taken over 70 years to refine would be twisted and subverted to serve the needs of high-cost New York. Maryland's carefully crafted deregulation plan to benefit consumers and utilities is also threatened by the FERC order to create a Northeast regional transmission organization within three years. Challenges by Maryland, Virginia and Washington to the federal agency's mandate have been ignored. So have protests from Vermont and New Hampshire. Curiously, FERC cited the PJM network, which includes Maryland, as a model for the nation. Then it ordered a hasty merger of PJM with less able New York and New England systems. Warning of California -type energy problems for the rest of the nation, FERC has pressed its theory that bigger is always better. It ignores the fact that California is the largest U.S. electric market and still failed due to arrogant mismanagement. Some opposition to the FERC plan is based on loss of control by state regulators and existing regional systems. States opposed to deregulation fear the plan will force that change on them. Even within PJM, which serves five states and Washington, members hold differing positions on forming mega-regional networks. But PJM is the largest competitive wholesale power market in the world and has served its 22 million customers well. There's little benefit and a lot of risk in forcing it into a shotgun marriage with less capable Northeastern partners. Calif Resells Surplus Power At A Loss In Second Quarter LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California agency buying power in lieu of the state's ailing utilities resold electricity in the spot market during the second quarter at an average price of $45 a megawatt-hour, the agency said Wednesday. The announcement by the California Department of Water Resources was an answer to critics who blasted the department this summer for having to resell surplus power for as little as $1 a megawatt-hour because it secured too much electricity under long-term contracts negotiated by the administration of Gov. Gray Davis, the department said. In a press release, the department's California Energy Resources Scheduling division, its power-marketing arm, said it resold 224,871 megawatt-hours, or 1.1% of its total purchases. That power generally was first bought on the spot market or through monthly or quarterly contracts, not the long-term contracts, the department said. Such sales are typical of any power-buying operation, as demand for electricity can vary in unpredictable ways, the department said. The DWR is responsible for buying all the power needed by the customers of the state's three main utilities beyond what the utilities generate themselves or have secured under their own long-term contracts - or about one-third of the total. According to the DWR, power secured under Davis' long-term contracts covers one-third to one-half of the electricity it must supply. Short-term deals, such as monthly or quarterly contracts, represent one-third of the portfolio. The rest is bought in the spot market. The state has put its average cost of power under the long-term contracts at 7.9 cents per kilowatt-hour for the first five years and 6.9 cents per kilowatt-hour for the next five years. Davis has taken heat for locking up too much electricity at high prices. Similarly, the Department of Water Resources has been criticized for amateurish purchasing practices. The DWR releases information on its power transactions quarterly to protect its negotiating position, the department said. The DWR buys power for customers of PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric, Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison and Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.036931818181818184,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.048295454545454544,
        "Sentiment": 0.0340002886002886,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02708048075460216
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "darran.binns@enron.com\tlondon.brown@enron.com, janet.butler@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "lynnette",
        "Subject": "California Power Issues",
        "Text": "Calif. seen facing next power crunch in May 2002Dow Jones InteractiveOctober 16, 2001 Texas Ready For Jan 1 Start For Deregulation -OfficialDow Jones InteractiveOctober 16, 2001    Calif Will Have Enough Power On Hand This Winter -ReportDow Jones Interactive October 16, 2001 CPUC Approves Transmission Project.Dow Jones InteractiveOctober 15, 2001   WestConnect Established as Framework for Regional Transmission OrganizationDow Jones InteractiveOctober 15, 2001      Calif. seen facing next power crunch in May 2002 LOS ANGELES, Oct 15 (Reuters) - California looks to have sufficient power supplies to get through the winter without blackouts, with its next supply challenge likely to occur next May, according to a report issued by the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) on Monday. \"Based on currently available data with the possible exception of May 2002, the CAISO anticipates sufficient capacity margins throughout the winter season..,\" the agency, which controls most of the state's power grid, said in its winter assessment report. The report, which covered October 2001 through May 2002, projected that resources would cover expected load each month with the exception of May, when demand rises significantly as the region starts to heat up. \"Operating margins for May 2002 are slim with the current level of planned outages. However, the May peak generally occurs late in the month and planned outage levels usually decline significantly throughout the month,\" the report noted. The report also said that new generation should play a key role in helping to avert blackouts in May. \"It is expected that sufficient new generation will become available such that the projected deficiency for May 2002 can be avoided,\" the report said. An additional 1,612 megawatts is expected to be operational by the end of 2001. During 2002, an additional 6,490 MW of new generation capacity is expected to be added based on currently announced plans. \"This additional generation is in varying phases of development and it is uncertain how much of this new capacity will become available during the January through May 2002 period,\" the report said. Forecast peak load was seen mostly running slightly below an average covering 1998-2001. In December, for example, a peak load of 33,586 MW was projected versus an average of 33,937 MW, ISO figures show. Demand has been running below year earlier levels each month this year. \"The CAISO foresees that there will be some lasting effects due to conservation efforts, but anticipates that the magnitude of conservation may decrease over time,\" the report said. California, hit with a severe power shortage linked partly to a flawed law deregulating its electricity market, endured the year's sixth and so far last rolling blackout on May 8. The lights stayed on throughout the summer, when the threat of blackouts was seen to be greatest due to heavy use of power hungry air conditioning systems. Conservation and new power plants are believed to have played important roles in preventing blackouts.  Texas Ready For Jan 1 Start For Deregulation -Official  CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Texas will be ready to implement full-scale deregulation of the retail electricity business at the beginning of next year, despite challenges from critics, the top official at the state's power-grid operator said Monday . \"We believe that we've come a long way,\" said Tom Noel, chief executive officer of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. \"My confidence is very high that the Ercot system will be ready to go Jan. 1, 2002.\" A coalition of Texas consumer groups filed with the state's Public Utility Commission last week to urge a delay. A pilot program for 5% of Texas' investor-owned utility customers has been in effect since late July, and it started after a nearly two-month delay linked to system glitches. The consumer groups, including AARP and Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, want to delay the start of full competition until Ercot proves its systems are up to the task. The groups cited problems with switching customers from their utility to alternate suppliers, among other issues. \"It is in the best interests of consumers and the industry to be sure that when the market is open it is also functional,\" the groups said in comments filed with the PSC. But Noel said most glitches have been fixed or will be fixed in time to meet the Jan. 1 deadline. So far 11,952 of 78,825 customers that requested a switch to a new provider have been switched, and the others are moving through the planned 45-day switching process, he said. There was a backlog of customers waiting to switch in August, caused by system malfunctions, but those have mostly been resolved, he said. Ercot has had other trouble making sure its system gets customer information to the new power supplier, but it believes those systems will be fixed by mid November, Noel said. Noel also said Ercot's settlement system will become more accurate over time as more data is collected to provide better cost estimates. The settlement system calculates costs for large and small wholesale power customers and has been a source of dispute in the state. \"The market's working very well,\" Noel said. \"What we have is a data problem.\" Ercot's systems are designed to handle about 20,000 customer switches a day. So far, the system has received and processed a peak volume of between 10,000 and 15,000 switches, Noel said. -By Jon Kamp, Dow Jones Newswires; 312-750-4129; jon.kamp@dowjones.com  Calif Will Have Enough Power On Hand This Winter -Report LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California may be able to chill out a bit this winter. New power plants and continued conservation should give the state enough of a margin to head off the soaring prices and rolling blackouts that plagued it a year ago, according to a forecast released last week by the state's power grid operator \"In general, it looks like a pretty good forecast through the winter months into 2002,\" said Gregg Fishman, spokesman for the California Independent System Operator. Last winter, California experienced an unprecedented electricity shortage that resulted in more than 30 days of power emergencies and scattered rolling blackouts. The situation was partly due to the deteriorating financial condition of the state's two largest utilities, high prices of natural gas and maintenance outages. This winter, however, the state should have an adequate supply of electricity , due in part to new generation coming online and a statewide conservation effort. Power-plant maintenance will be minimal during the 2001-2002 winter season compared with last year, and new power plants operating since Sept. 30 will produce 2,231 megawatts in new supply, according to the ISO report. The ISO, charged with keeping power supply and demand in balance on the grid and operating the state's spot electricity market, expects demand for power to peak at 34,359 megawatts in October and about 32,000 megawatts from November through May. That would leave operating reserves of between 2,000 and 2,200 megawatts - roughly a 7% reserve margin - the minimum amount required by the Western Systems Coordinating Council, which maintains grid reliability throughout the West. The ISO said the reserve margin is enough to avert the disaster the state experienced last winter, according to the report. In addition, the ISO expects there will be enough natural gas in storage to meet demand. Last winter, the price of natural gas skyrocketed to $60 a million British thermal unit. Currently, the average price of natural gas is about $2/MMBtu. \"Natural-gas storage is looking very, very strong,\" Fishman said. \"There's far more in storage and available in general than we saw last year at this same time.\" The ISO doesn't know whether generators have firm fuel contracts in place to cover demand. But the grid operator doesn't expect limits on gas supplies to hurt its ability to keep the lights on, according to the report. The ISO forecast assumes Californians will continue to conserve about 12% of their electrical consumption, Fishman said. The state also relies heavily on imports from the Pacific Northwest in order to get through without any power emergencies or rolling blackouts. The state expects to import about 3,000 MW this winter. As a result, the ISO forecast could change in the coming months, if the state is unable to import power. Currently, the forecast for the Pacific Northwest calls for a wet winter in the Northwest, according to the National Weather Service. Jerry Rust, president of the Northwest Power Pool, told Dow Jones Newswires the region expects to cover peak demand this winter. The agency is currently preparing its own report, he added. New generation upgrades in northern California will help minimize congestion on the transmission link known as Path 15, the key north-south interconnection, although bottlenecks could still occur, according to the report. \"Depending on actual Pacific Northwest import levels and Northern California hydro levels, potential overloads on Path 15 could occur again this winter as a result of south-to-north power transfers,\" according to the report. Some areas of northern California , particularly Humboldt County and the Bay Area, could encounter some difficulties if local generation isn't available due to power plant maintenance or breakdowns. For 2002, the ISO said there are 40 new power plant projects totaling 6,490 megawatts that are in different phases of hooking up to the grid, but it's unclear how much of that capacity will be added before May 2002, according to the report.   CPUC Approves Transmission Project SAN FRANCISCO, California - The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) last week approved a transmission project to increase capacity to several cities in the San Francisco metropolitan area, that will be built by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). The 230-kilovolt transmission line would serve the cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, San Ramon, and unincorporated areas of Alameda and Contra Costa counties. The CPUC placed a cap of $118 million on the project costs for the 8.8-mile line. As a condition for approval, the CPUC also required PG&E to remove an existing 60-kilovolt line.   WestConnect Established as Framework for Regional Transmission Organization TUCSON, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 15, 2001--A broad group of electric transmission line owners in the Southwest has taken initial steps to form WestConnect, a for-profit regional transmission organization (RTO). Founding members believe WestConnect will form the framework for an RTO for the entire Western United States. Agreements and operating protocols for the RTO were filed today with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) by Arizona Public Service Co., El Paso Electric Co., Public Service Co. of New Mexico, and Tucson Electric Power Co., each of which is subject to FERC oversight. These utilities, along with Salt River Project in Arizona, have agreed to fund start-up of WestConnect operations, which are projected to begin in 2004. Other utilities in the Desert Southwest and adjoining areas have been actively involved in the process and are expected to continue to be involved as WestConnect gets underway. FERC has proposed RTOs to facilitate development and operation of transmission on a regional basis. WestConnect will strengthen reliability for customers and ease the transfer of electricity between regions. It will do so by focusing on transmission line reliability, non-discriminatory open access to use of the lines, support for a robust wholesale market, and governance that is independent of market participants. WestConnect evolved from an earlier Southwestern RTO development project named DesertSTAR, and it has used the operating protocols developed by DesertSTAR stakeholders through extensive negotiations during the last four years. DesertSTAR Chairman of the Board Jack King said, \"WestConnect is a logical step. I am encouraged by the actions of the WestConnect members in building upon the work of DesertSTAR to move toward an RTO for the West.\" The group turned to the for-profit governance structure, in lieu of the not-for-profit DesertSTAR model, in response to recent FERC rulings and a desire to create a governance structure that will encourage innovation and creativity in the operation and further development of the Western transmission grid. WestConnect has been structured to permit involvement by investor-owned utilities, cooperatives, public-power entities and federal power marketing agencies, so it can transition into the RTO for the West. WestConnect is working closely with other utility companies and provisional RTO projects to explore expanding WestConnect's service area. WestConnect utilities say they are confident their filing with FERC conforms to the regulatory agency's established organizational and operating guidelines.   ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03741496598639456,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07968901846452867,
        "Sentiment": 0.10325967806140218,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.027316922602052627
    }
],
"thread273": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "professional"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:08:51 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "douglass@energyattorney.com\tcoffing.timothy@enron.com, steve.swain@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "johnson",
        "Subject": "SoCalGas Advice Letter Summary",
        "Text": "Attached is a summary of several recent SoCalGas advice letters.  AL 3096, dealing with various rate adjustments, may be of interest.Happy Holidays!DanLaw Offices of Daniel W. Douglass5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244Woodland Hills, CA 91367douglass@energyattorney.com",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05405405405405406,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05405405405405406,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03690036900369004
    }
],
"thread274": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "professional"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:39:10 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "susan.mara@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "d",
        "Subject": "Angelides Letter",
        "Text": "Here is AReM's response to the 10-19 Angelides letter. I drafted it with some help from Dan.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17647058823529413,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.043478260869565216
    }
],
"thread277": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:08:54 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "d..steffes@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "CPUC Questions on DA",
        "Text": "Sue -Received your voice mail.  Having AReM only file is ok with me.  Spoke with Lamar Frazier - Jeremy sounds worried.  Let's make sure that the contract question is vetted with internal and external lawyers - agree not to give CPUC any info.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.17391304347826086,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.043478260869565216,
        "Sentiment": 0.20833333333333331,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03557312252964427
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tThursday, October 25, 2001 11:09 AM",
        "Recipient": "d",
        "Subject": "CPUC Questions on DA",
        "Text": "Will do. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, October 25, 2001 11:09 AMTo:\tMara, Susan; Dasovich, JeffSubject:\tCPUC Questions on DASue -Received your voice mail.  Having AReM only file is ok with me.  Spoke with Lamar Frazier - Jeremy sounds worried.  Let's make sure that the contract question is vetted with internal and external lawyers - agree not to give CPUC any info.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.03333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.2638888888888889,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07455012853470437
    }
],
"thread278": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:34:53 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "d..steffes@enron.com\tjeff.dasovich@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeremy",
        "Subject": "CPUC Questions on DA Suspension",
        "Text": "Jeremy --To let you know where we stand on the CPUC's Investigation on DA Suspension.  1.\tSue Mara is leading the effort to respond to the CPUC for Enron.2.\tWe knew that the CPUC was at a minimum going to investigate how and/or whether to allow extensions of contracts and the application of other surcharge $$ to DA load given their earlier statements.  The issue on retroactivity is open primarily because they can ask these questions and (I believe) as leverage for other issues.3.\tWe are coordinating with the big customers who recently left.  They are marshalling forces to oppose any retroactivity.  This is as much their fight as it is ours.4.\tAt this time, Enron will file as a member of AReM.  We intend to oppose the CPUC's request for our contracts and transaction information.If you want any other info or want to discuss further, let me know.Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10666666666666667,
        "Sentiment": 0.04166666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029137529137529136
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:15:17 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeremy.blachman@enron.com\tt..adams@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "angela",
        "Subject": "CPUC Questions on DA Suspension",
        "Text": "FYI. Please keep me posted as we hear from clients.Thanks, Jeremy Sent:\tThursday, October 25, 2001 1:35 PMTo:\tBlachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, MikeCc:\tLeff, Dan; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, DavidSubject:\tCPUC Questions on DA Suspension Jeremy --To let you know where we stand on the CPUC's Investigation on DA Suspension.  1.\tSue Mara is leading the effort to respond to the CPUC for Enron.2.\tWe knew that the CPUC was at a minimum going to investigate how and/or whether to allow extensions of contracts and the application of other surcharge $$ to DA load given their earlier statements.  The issue on retroactivity is open primarily because they can ask these questions and (I believe) as leverage for other issues.3.\tWe are coordinating with the big customers who recently left.  They are marshalling forces to oppose any retroactivity.  This is as much their fight as it is ours.4.\tAt this time, Enron will file as a member of AReM.  We intend to oppose the CPUC's request for our contracts and transaction information.If you want any other info or want to discuss further, let me know.Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0748663101604278,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0962566844919786,
        "Sentiment": 0.008333333333333337,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.044580419580419584
    }
],
"thread279": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "cameron@perfect.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "meeting with enron",
        "Text": "Cool!Cameron--------------------------Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.34177215189873417
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tDasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com] Sent:\tThursday, October 25, 2001 2:27 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "meeting with enron",
        "Text": "That date is perfect.  Ian will be joining us.  Marc will be also(possibly).  When do you think you'll have more specifics on timing and theexact people we will be meeting with (can you send along their titles also).Thanks so much!!Hope you guys have a great weekend with your family.  Wish me luck in SantaBarbara.Just to warn you, my mom is inviting Linda and Keith for Christmas.Cameron SellersVice President, Business DevelopmentPERFECT1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210Palo Alto, CA 94303cameron@perfect.com650.798.3366 (direct dial)650.269.3366 (cell)650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message-----Sent:\tThursday, October 25, 2001 2:27 PMTo:\tcameron@perfect.comSubject:\tmeeting with enronIt's going to be sometime in the afternoon on the 13th.**********************************************************************This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate andmay contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of theintended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure byothers is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (orauthorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or replyto Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete allcopies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are notintended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence abinding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of itsaffiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not berelied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.Thank you. **********************************************************************",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05263157894736842,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10087719298245613,
        "Sentiment": 0.40138888888888885,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1305375073833432
    }
],
"thread280": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 8 Sep 2001 13:40:29 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "josephtambornino@yahoo.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Real Estate Finance",
        "Text": "I'm on vacation myself right now, in Mpls, for myDad's 70th birthday.  I will have to get back to youtomorrow, but she gave us the first four chapters ofFabozzi to read, and then recommended a number ofproblems from Chapters 2 and 3.  She has posted theanswers on Izio.  If I can get to a computer that, Iwill try and download the material and send it to you.Yes, the course is tight.  All fixed income stuff. Wallace has carefully prepared her material.  Theeveryone understands what they're in for, but youshould fit in nicely.JT--- \"Dasovich, Jeff\" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com> wrote:",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07920792079207921,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09900990099009901,
        "Sentiment": 0.10535714285714286,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05136986301369863
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sun, 9 Sep 2001 09:54:18 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "josephtambornino@yahoo.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Real Estate Finance",
        "Text": "Hi Jeff,Wallace wants us to do problems 5 and 8-11 fromChapter 2 in Fabozzi.  She also posted all the answersto the first four chapters' practice questions onIzio.  If you are still not signed up for the class onthe system, feel free to use my name and password toget access the class info.  Lecture notes and syllabusare also available there.  See you Tuesday.JT--- \"Dasovich, Jeff\" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com> wrote:",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08571428571428572,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08571428571428572,
        "Sentiment": 0.3125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05048076923076923
    }
],
"thread282": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:12:48 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "douglass@energyattorney.com\tcoffing.timothy@enron.com, steve.swain@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "johnson",
        "Subject": "PG&E Advice Letter Summary",
        "Text": "Attached are summaries of 13 recent PG&E advice letters.Dan Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244Woodland Hills, CA 91367douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.04,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.055299539170506916
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:17:24 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "douglass@energyattorney.com\trobert.neustaedter@enron.com, coffing.timothy@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "PG&E Advice Letter Summary",
        "Text": "Attached is a summary of a routine PG&E advice letter.DanLaw Offices of Daniel W. Douglass5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244Woodland Hills, CA 91367douglass@energyattorney.com",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.041666666666666664,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03954802259887006
    }
],
"thread283": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 06:03:34 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "d..steffes@enron.com\tlisa.mellencamp@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy",
        "Text": "Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.1.\tForm Enron Negotiation Team\tMy recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.2.\tMeet & Confer (10/29)\tSue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.  3.\tReformed Stipulation\tI would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.4.\tMeeting\tMy understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13291139240506328,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08860759493670886,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.034972677595628415
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:33:09 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 6:04 AM",
        "Recipient": "d",
        "Subject": "Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy",
        "Text": "The Meet & Confer will be meetings and teleconfs held simultaneously at the three utilities' offices. The plan is that I am going over to the meeting at PG&E along with Jeanne Bennett and Dian Grueneich (who represents UC/CSU). AReM's attorney will be at the SCE meeting.  AReM has put together a proposal for implementing the suspension (attached) -- that has been sent to all the parties.  I think we have New West under control.  New West will be at the SCE meeting. Jeff plans to listen in.  -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 6:04 AMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)Cc:\tShapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, VickiSubject:\tProposed SCE Negotiation StrategyFollowing last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.1.\tForm Enron Negotiation Team\tMy recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.2.\tMeet & Confer (10/29)\tSue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.  3.\tReformed Stipulation\tI would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.4.\tMeeting\tMy understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08571428571428572,
        "Sentiment": 0.11868686868686867,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0525383707201889
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:54:51 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy",
        "Text": "Couple of additional pieces of information:In conjunction with the issue paying ESPs past due PX amounts, Edison has affirmed that it will be making a proposal regarding how it wants to calculate the PX credit going forward.It remains unclear whether Edison will try to fold controversial issues into negotiations on getting paid past due PX credit amounts(e.g., PX credit contributed to undercollection and therefore DA customers should help pay down the undercollection; DA customers must pay for stranded DWR contracts, etc.).  So while Edison is making good noises about wanting to settle (which is a certainly a step in the right direction), it's still unclear whether they intend to attach terms to the deal that make the whole thing a nonstarter.Got a call into John Fielder to try to get answers to some of these questions.Will report back when (and if) we get some answers.Best,Jeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 5:27 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; 'Mike Day (E-mail)'Cc:\tShapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, VickiWith respect to past due PX credit amounts, Edison has told folks today that:Edison will distribute a one-pager by mid-day tomorrow laying out its proposal for how to handle payment of past due PX credit amounts.Edison is trying to meet individually with all ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th prehearing conference at the PUC to discuss and hopefully reach agreement with ESPs on its proposal.Edison hopes to make progress with the ESPs between now and the Nov. 7th prehearing conference, and if so, intends to tell the judge that the PUC should delay action on the complaints pending settlement.We'll distribute Edison's proposal as soon as we get it.Best,Jeff -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)Cc:\tShapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, VickiSubject:\tProposed SCE Negotiation StrategyFollowing last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.1.\tForm Enron Negotiation Team\tMy recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.2.\tMeet & Confer (10/29)\tSue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.  3.\tReformed Stipulation\tI would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.4.\tMeeting\tMy understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08085106382978724,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09361702127659574,
        "Sentiment": 0.025653594771241833,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04981611501170177
    }
],
"thread284": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:51:57 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "ccma@foundryccma.org",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "Direct Access Application for Rehearing",
        "Text": "Susan:    Please keep me posted on the appeal process.  The California CastMetals Association encompasses over 80% of the casting tonnage poured inCalifornia and is a heavy consumer of electricity.  We're definitelyinterested in any work being done of DA.Thanks,James\"Dasovich, Jeff\" wrote:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.17777777777777778,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06666666666666667,
        "Sentiment": -0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03793103448275862
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:09:11 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "susan.mara@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Direct Access Application for Rehearing",
        "Text": "Please forward this to those who agreed to sign on",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.3,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0
    }
],
"thread289": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:26:51 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "\tMDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-MDay+20+3CMDay+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent:\tMonday, September 10, 2001 3:06 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "A.00-11-038 et al. RSP - SCE's Notice of Scheduled Individual",
        "Text": "Let's set up the meetings.  Don't you think?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, September 10, 2001 3:06 PMTo:\t'Jim Steffes, Enron'; 'Harry Kingerski'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'; 'Sue Mara at Enron SF'Cc:\tJBennettAs indicated by this ex parte notice, Edison is planning to meet with Bilasthis week before the continuation meeting on Thursday presumably to try toweaken his opposition to the July 1 cut off of direct access.  Edison'scomments on the proposed decision say that over 6% of their load hasswitched to direct access during the July 1 to September 6 time frame,resulting in a total of over 7% of load being served by direct access overtheir entire system at present.  While it appears Bilas is still a strongproponent of allowing direct access and should still advocate reducing theDWR contract commitements instead of restricting customer options, shouldEnron, or AReM get in to see Bilas (and possibly Brown) to try to preventany backsliding on the 13th.  We have a right to a meeting with Bilas.  Ameeting with Brown would have to be noticed today or be held only with hisadvisor, Dave Gamson. I would recommend we try for both.Mike Day",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0582010582010582,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Sentiment": 0.14913690476190475,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04155844155844156
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:05:32 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "mday@gmssr.com\tjdasovic@enron.com, smara@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "'jim",
        "Subject": "A.00-11-038 et al. RSP - SCE's Notice of Scheduled Individual",
        "Text": "As indicated by this ex parte notice, Edison is planning to meet with Bilasthis week before the continuation meeting on Thursday presumably to try toweaken his opposition to the July 1 cut off of direct access.  Edison'scomments on the proposed decision say that over 6% of their load hasswitched to direct access during the July 1 to September 6 time frame,resulting in a total of over 7% of load being served by direct access overtheir entire system at present.  While it appears Bilas is still a strongproponent of allowing direct access and should still advocate reducing theDWR contract commitements instead of restricting customer options, shouldEnron, or AReM get in to see Bilas (and possibly Brown) to try to preventany backsliding on the 13th.  We have a right to a meeting with Bilas.  Ameeting with Brown would have to be noticed today or be held only with hisadvisor, Dave Gamson. I would recommend we try for both.  Mike Day",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06748466257668712,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12269938650306748,
        "Sentiment": 0.11476190476190476,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.017057569296375266
    }
],
"thread290": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:48:13 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AM",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "PG&E PX Credit Calculation -- CONFIDENTIAL ATTY CLIENT WORK",
        "Text": "Except that my understanding of the SCE model is that the CTC structure will continue beyond 3/31/02 (and may then apply for PG&E).  I agree that if you were to go to a bottom's up, it would require the CPUC to put in place a surcharge for remaining stranded costs (non-generation, for example QFs) and a second surcharge for Negative CTC \"overpayment\".  Key question is who will pay the Negative CTC \"overpayment\"?  On trying to understand the PX Credit algorithim, my concern is that to understand how much the \"overpayment\" was during Oct - Feb, we need to understand how costs hit the structure during that time period.  Otherwise we don't know what form or amount of discount is required in the Settlement talks.Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:24 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.After 3/31/02, the CTC should no longer be a function of the PX credit, no?  So a customer's CTC payments should not be affected by refunds. If refunds are distributed prospectively, we do not need to really know the PX credt algorithm and can instead simply estimate PG&E's expected refunds, divide it by total load, and assume that the PX credit will be depressed by that amount.  This is more akin to a lower shopping credit than a higher CTC. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 4:32 PMTo:\tComnes, AlanAlan --The only way to collect the \"overpayment\" is to artificially reduce the PX Credit going forward to thereby allow for more CTC.Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 6:15 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.I am not sure I understand your second paragraph.  If PG&E reduces going-forward procurement costs to reflect FERC-ordered refunds, I do not understand why it would affect already-issued CTC charges.  The cost of power would be cheaper going forward. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 3:24 PMTo:\tComnes, Alan; Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'Jan Paul Acton (E-mail)'; Swain, Steve; Mara, SusanCc:\tAlvarez, RayThanks for the thoughts.  I fully agree on BF costs and DWR costs.  I believe that you are right on Est RT$ = CAISOM Imbalance, but I need to check.On the question of retroactive ratemaking, it is my understanding that you are correct.  PG&E probably won't rebill, but will need to put in place an adjustment to the going forward PX Credit to \"collect\" the overpayment of Negative CTC.All of this means that the impact of the FERC refund is less than 100c on the $ for the Negative CTC.Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 4:35 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'Jan Paul Acton (E-mail)'; Swain, Steve; Mara, SusanCc:\tAlvarez, RayI assume that if an hourly PX market clearing price is mitigated per a FERC order it would affect variable \"HC\" in the formula laid out in the attachment.It is not clear to me which  variable represents hourly ISO imbalance energy costs, but I assume its \"Est RT$\".  If I am right, that variable would be affected by  the mitigated market price (MMP) for CAISO imbalance energy.My comments are:The FERC is able to only order refunds to jurisdictional entities and, given appeals, it may take years before the full extent of thre refunds are known.  Therefore there will be a significant difference between the change in the mitigated market price (MMP) as declared by FERC and the PX credit.  That is, a 10% reduction in the MMP should not be construed as having a 10% effect on the PX credit, assuming it can be recalculated at all.  Specifically, only some of the \"HC\" or  \"Est RT$\"  costs can  be adjusted per FERC refund orders.Also, the PX credit is a tariffed rate.  I do not believe the PU code allows for retroactive adjustments to tariffed rates unless there was an explicit cost tracking account (e.g. a balancing A/C).  To my knowledge, no such account exists here.  Finally, I do not see a relationship between MMPs and (1) block forward costs on any date and (2) PG&E and/or DWR's procurement costs for the net short position post January 19.  So, those PX credit costs should be unaffected by any FERC refund order.Alan Comnes -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Jan Paul Acton (E-mail); Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan; Comnes, AlanSubject:\tPG&E PX Credit Calculation Attached is a summary of PG&E's notes on how they calculate the PX Credit (until January 19, 2001 when they hardwired $150/mwh).  We continue to try and get a handle on how the FERC Refund case will impact the PX Credit and Negative CTC.  If anyone has any issues or comments, please let me know.  Thanks.Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06844106463878327,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08111533586818757,
        "Sentiment": 0.1304251700680272,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06114273666455829
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:34:57 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AM",
        "Recipient": "d",
        "Subject": "PG&E PX Credit Calculation -- CONFIDENTIAL ATTY CLIENT WORK",
        "Text": "I assume that if an hourly PX market clearing price is mitigated per a FERC order it would affect variable \"HC\" in the formula laid out in the attachment.It is not clear to me which  variable represents hourly ISO imbalance energy costs, but I assume its \"Est RT$\".  If I am right, that variable would be affected by  the mitigated market price (MMP) for CAISO imbalance energy.My comments are:The FERC is able to only order refunds to jurisdictional entities and, given appeals, it may take years before the full extent of thre refunds are known.  Therefore there will be a significant difference between the change in the mitigated market price (MMP) as declared by FERC and the PX credit.  That is, a 10% reduction in the MMP should not be construed as having a 10% effect on the PX credit, assuming it can be recalculated at all.  Specifically, only some of the \"HC\" or  \"Est RT$\"  costs can  be adjusted per FERC refund orders.Also, the PX credit is a tariffed rate.  I do not believe the PU code allows for retroactive adjustments to tariffed rates unless there was an explicit cost tracking account (e.g. a balancing A/C).  To my knowledge, no such account exists here.  Finally, I do not see a relationship between MMPs and (1) block forward costs on any date and (2) PG&E and/or DWR's procurement costs for the net short position post January 19.  So, those PX credit costs should be unaffected by any FERC refund order.Alan Comnes -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Jan Paul Acton (E-mail); Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan; Comnes, AlanSubject:\tPG&E PX Credit Calculation Attached is a summary of PG&E's notes on how they calculate the PX Credit (until January 19, 2001 when they hardwired $150/mwh).  We continue to try and get a handle on how the FERC Refund case will impact the PX Credit and Negative CTC.  If anyone has any issues or comments, please let me know.  Thanks.Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07428571428571429,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07428571428571429,
        "Sentiment": 0.09428571428571428,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04929577464788732
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:24:08 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tSteffes, James D.  Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AM",
        "Recipient": "alan",
        "Subject": "PG&E PX Credit Calculation -- CONFIDENTIAL ATTY CLIENT WORK",
        "Text": "Thanks for the thoughts.  I fully agree on BF costs and DWR costs.  I believe that you are right on Est RT$ = CAISOM Imbalance, but I need to check.On the question of retroactive ratemaking, it is my understanding that you are correct.  PG&E probably won't rebill, but will need to put in place an adjustment to the going forward PX Credit to \"collect\" the overpayment of Negative CTC.All of this means that the impact of the FERC refund is less than 100c on the $ for the Negative CTC.Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 4:35 PMTo:\tSteffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; 'Jan Paul Acton (E-mail)'; Swain, Steve; Mara, SusanCc:\tAlvarez, RayI assume that if an hourly PX market clearing price is mitigated per a FERC order it would affect variable \"HC\" in the formula laid out in the attachment.It is not clear to me which  variable represents hourly ISO imbalance energy costs, but I assume its \"Est RT$\".  If I am right, that variable would be affected by  the mitigated market price (MMP) for CAISO imbalance energy.My comments are:The FERC is able to only order refunds to jurisdictional entities and, given appeals, it may take years before the full extent of thre refunds are known.  Therefore there will be a significant difference between the change in the mitigated market price (MMP) as declared by FERC and the PX credit.  That is, a 10% reduction in the MMP should not be construed as having a 10% effect on the PX credit, assuming it can be recalculated at all.  Specifically, only some of the \"HC\" or  \"Est RT$\"  costs can  be adjusted per FERC refund orders.Also, the PX credit is a tariffed rate.  I do not believe the PU code allows for retroactive adjustments to tariffed rates unless there was an explicit cost tracking account (e.g. a balancing A/C).  To my knowledge, no such account exists here.  Finally, I do not see a relationship between MMPs and (1) block forward costs on any date and (2) PG&E and/or DWR's procurement costs for the net short position post January 19.  So, those PX credit costs should be unaffected by any FERC refund order.Alan Comnes -----Original Message-----Sent:\tWednesday, November 14, 2001 7:22 AMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Jan Paul Acton (E-mail); Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan; Comnes, AlanSubject:\tPG&E PX Credit Calculation Attached is a summary of PG&E's notes on how they calculate the PX Credit (until January 19, 2001 when they hardwired $150/mwh).  We continue to try and get a handle on how the FERC Refund case will impact the PX Credit and Negative CTC.  If anyone has any issues or comments, please let me know.  Thanks.Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07692307692307693,
        "Sentiment": 0.13125850340136055,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05584319526627219
    }
],
"thread291": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "    November 15, 2001",
        "Sender": "   Gino DiCaro             Communications Director, CMTA",
        "Recipient": "       CMTA Members",
        "Subject": "Turning California Around",
        "Text": "             Communications Director, CMTAproposalsCMTA released at both the Governor's Economic Summit and an Assemblyinformational hearing last week its three proposals that will empowermanufacturers to grow and create new jobs.to see the proposals and download a sample letter to send to GovernorGray Davis and your local legislator, asking them to seriously considerthese investments in California that will keep and grow jobs and producemore revenue for the state.  Also fax us a copy of your letter at916-447-9401or e-mail at gdicaro@cmta.net.We need as many letters as possible, so please pass along.Thank You.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0784313725490196,
        "Sentiment": 0.1253030303030303,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.022690437601296597
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:10:40 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "susan.mara@enron.com\tm..landwehr@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "vicki",
        "Subject": "Turning California Around",
        "Text": "CA Manufacturers and Technology Association (CMTA) has continuing customer choice as a key proposal for the state.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02631578947368421
    }
],
"thread293": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:07:52 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "rory@carmelnet.com",
        "Recipient": "avramsiegel@home",
        "Subject": "More DAW",
        "Text": "Hi again,Well, here is the reply (somewhat terse!) from my friend Chris:http://www.sonicstate.comhttp://www.hyperreal.com/music-machineshttp://www.sweetater.com(this is a good site to order from)http://www.sonicstate.comChrisDoes this help?? -- Rory>Hi Chris,",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.20833333333333334,
        "Sentiment": 0.7,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.138996138996139
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:15:34 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "avramsiegel@home.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "More DAW",
        "Text": "Hi everybody,I happened on an addition to my search for info while doing a little research last night. There just might not be anything on this out there yet, but I was at Asus' website last night and it seems they have a new dual-processer motherboard out called a CUV266-DLS and I can't find anything about it anywhere. Maybe it's too new or too expensive for anyone to have bothered with up to this point but I'm snooping around so if you've heard anything...Avram",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.047619047619047616,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10714285714285714,
        "Sentiment": -0.06912878787878789,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029978586723768737
    }
],
"thread294": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:35:32 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "darran.binns@enron.com\t/o=enron/ou=na/cn=recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=f21d9b15-25189ad0-8625653f-482bf6@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "\tlynnette",
        "Subject": "California/National Power Issues",
        "Text": "Governor's greased lighting Davis criticized for accepting money from power companiesSF Gate NewsNovember 16, 2001  India Dabhol Project Due Diligence To Start Next WeekDow Jones InteractiveNovember 16, 2001  Ontario mulls alternative to Hydro deregulationDow Jones InteractiveNovember 16, 2001          Governor's greased lighting Davis criticized for accepting money from power companies Sacramento -- After having sworn off campaign contributions from energy companies, Gov. Gray Davis has started taking money from power providers seeking to do business with the state. The two $25,000 contributions came during a series of fund-raisers the governor held when he made a trip last month to the East Coast to view the damage at the World Trade Center and Pentagon. The Democratic governor, who has raised more than $30 million for his re- election campaign, has been criticized for taking money from groups that have interests before the administration. Yesterday, Davis defended the decision to take the money, saying the worst of the energy crisis is behind us. \"My concern was in not taking money from people who were actively selling us power during the difficult early months in 2001,\" he said of his decision in January to stop taking contributions from utilities and power companies. \"To my knowledge neither of those companies are active players in that process. \" But consumer advocate Harvey Rosenfield blasted Davis for accepting the money and said it should be returned. \"If it was dirty money before, it is even dirtier now,\" said Rosenfield, who heads the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. Davis is mistaken to think that the energy crisis is over, Rosenfield said. \"Tell that to the 20 million Californians who have seen their rates increase an average of 50 percent,\" he said. The two companies -- FPL Energy LLC and Caithness Energy LLC -- each gave $25,000 to Davis' campaign fund. Both contributors have proposed projects pending in California. Caithness Energy, a New York-based generator, is expected to file plans to build a power plant with the California Energy Commission later this month. The company wants to build a 560-megawatt natural gas fired plant in Riverside County. And subsidiaries of FPL Energy, a Florida generator that operates power plants across the country, are in negotiations with the state's new Power Authority to construct wind turbines in Southern California. The state would buy energy from the turbines and have the option to own them. In addition, Caithness and FPL are working together to building another power plant in Riverside County. That project was approved by the state's Energy Commission in March. Garry South, Davis' political adviser, said the campaign's position had not changed with regard to collecting money from energy interests. South said that the two companies had not been gouging the state and that the fact they had business pending with the state was irrelevant. \"It is not against the law to take money from a company that does business with the state,\" he said. South said the contributions had no bearing on any decisions made.   India Dabhol Project Due Diligence To Start Next Week NEW DELHI -(Dow Jones)- Prospective buyers of the 85% foreign equity in India's 2,184-megawatt Dabhol Power Co. will start due diligence of the project next week, A.K. Doda, executive director of Industrial Development Bank of India (P.IDB), told Dow Jones Newswires Friday. The possible buyers are Tata Power Co. Ltd. (P.TPW) and BSES Ltd. (P.BSX) \"After the due diligence is completed, price negotiations will start and thereafter, the transfer of shares and transfer of ownership will take place,\" Doda said. U.S. energy company Enron Corp. (ENE) has a controlling 65% equity stake in Dabhol and wants to sell it because of payment defaults by the plant's sole customer - the Maharashtra State Electricity Board - and the Indian federal government's failure to honor payment guarantees. In August the U.S. company said it was willing to sell its equity at cost. Dabhol is India's largest single foreign investment to date. MSEB has 15%, while U.S.-based companies General Electric Co. (GE) and Bechtel (X.BTL) own 10% each in DPC. \"The share price of the shareholding of Enron and its associates in DPC would be decided by the concerned parties, through mutual negotiations. Indian financial institutions propose to continue their efforts to ensure quick resolution of all issues at the earliest,\" Doda said. Doda denied local media reports saying that India's state-owned firm National Thermal Power Corp. (P.NTP) was also a potential buyer of the foreign equity in Dabhol. \"So far, I am aware of only two companies - Tata Power and BSES. NTPC haven't sent us any expression of interest yet for the Dabhol project,\" he said. Ontario mulls alternative to Hydro deregulation The planned deregulation of the $35-billion Ontario electricity sector has been thrown in doubt by a radical proposal that would shackle the province's electricity transmission company, preventing it from becoming a significant player in an open North American power market. The plan, known only to Ontario Premier Mike Harris and a few government and Bay Street insiders, would turn Hydro One into a not-for-profit entity instead of a fully commercial, privatized company. If this happens, Hydro One would lack the flexibility to raise equity capital, make acquisitions and form partnerships in an effort to become one of continent's premier transmission companies -- a goal plainly set out by chief executive officer Eleanor Clitheroe. David Lindsay, the president and chief executive officer of Ontario SuperBuild Corp., the government's privatization adviser, confirmed that turning Hydro One into a not-for-profit organization, similar to Nav Canada, the civil air navigation service, is under serious consideration. \"We've been asked to evaluate all options for Hydro One's future, including this one,\" he said yesterday. He would not provide details, though it is thought that the government wants to make a decision on Hydro One's future ownership structure by the conclusion of the year. A senior official in the Ontario government, who did not want to be identified, said the proposal \"is a step backward to the old days of Ontario Hydro.\" He was referring to the debt-laden utility that was split into Ontario Power Generation, the electricity generating arm, and Hydro One, whose network of high-voltage transmission lines spans 30,000 kilometres. The Premier's office would not comment. A spokeswoman for Energy Minister Jim Wilson would say only that \"there are a number of options on the table.\" Sources on Bay Street and at Queen's Park said the idea of turning Hydro One into a not-for-profit entity is being propelled by Anthony Fell, the chairman of Royal Bank-owned RBC Dominion Securities, Bay Street's largest dealer. If the new Hydro One took this shape, it would raise about $10-billion through the sale of bonds to investors. The dealers' commission on the sale of the bonds, which would rank among the biggest debt issues in history, would range from $25-million to $40-million, one Bay Street executive said. Mr. Harris is said to be keen on the concept partly because all the money would go back to the government to help pay down the $21-billion in \"stranded debt\" racked up by the old Ontario Hydro. The generating and transmission giant's decades-long spending spree on nuclear plants and other assets tore a huge hole in the province's balance sheet. Hydro One's cash flow, derived from sales to electricity users, would be used to pay the interest on the $10-billion of bonds. Presumably, consumers would face higher electricity charges if Hydro One lacked sufficient cash to pay the interest. If Hydro One were a private company instead, its financial risk would be borne by shareholders, not ratepayers. The United States has embraced deregulation partly because it shifts the financial risk of the electricity market from taxpayers to shareholders. Executives at RBC Dominion declined to comment on the plan, citing client confidentiality concerns. Mr. Fell first proposed it to the government in the spring. The government wants to open up the Ontario electricity market, in which buyers and sellers can negotiate prices, by next spring. The market overhaul contemplated turning Ontario Power Generation and Hydro One, both of which are 100 per cent owned by the government, into commercial companies. In Hydro One's case, the leading options were thought to be an outright sale, in which the utility would be bought by another company (presumably a rival utility), or an initial public offering, where the shares would be owned by private investors and traded on the stock exchange. The third option -- converting Hydro One into a not-for-profit organization -- has come as a surprise. There has been no debate on this option, though rumours of its existence have jolted Bay Street and Hydro One, both of which were working on the assumption that the transmission business would eventually become a commercial enterprise. Sources said that Hydro One management opposes the not-for-profit structure because it would deny Hydro One the flexibility and discipline of a typical commercial business. The not-for-profit structure would mean it would not have to pay taxes, which raises potential trade issues with the United States. American transmission companies might argue that Hydro One's non-taxable status gives it an unfair competitive advantage. It would also deny Hydro One management the benefit of potentially lucrative share options. Rod Taylor, Hydro One's executive vice-president, would not comment on the not-for-profit option being contemplated by the government. He said, however, that the company's strategy hinges on its ability to become a major player in the deregulated North American electricity market. \"Our vision of the company is to become a fully commercial entity, and become in the transmission sector what Canadian National is to the rail sector,\" he said in a phone interview. Stanley Hartt, the chairman of the Canadian office of Wall Street's Salomon Smith Barney, is among the Bay Street executives who opposes a not-for-profit structure for Hydro One (Salomon has a small role as an adviser to Hydro One's strategic business plan). In a three-page letter sent this week to the top executives of several large power-using Ontario companies, he said that \"this idea is short-sighted and bad for Ontario.\" He argued that \"the absence of an equity component in the capital structure of the not-for-profit corporation essentially transfers the equity risk to the ratepayers.\" He also said that, without financial flexibility, Hydro One would lack the resources to invest in \"new bottleneck-eliminating connections\" that would allow the company to become a significant electricity exporter. \"Ontario would lose the prospect of becoming a true hub for North American Energy transmission,\" he said. In a recent report on the power industry, TD Newcrest analyst David McCracken wrote, \"With its operating expertise and strong balance sheet, Hydro One is well positioned to act as a consolidator of transmission grids in the northern United States, where ownership tends to be fragmented.\" He noted that Hydro One is expected to be privatized in the next few years, and he said the utility has \"the opportunity to lever strengths from traditional wires businesses into competitive high-growth initiatives.\" According to sources familiar with the not-for-profit proposal, Hydro One would be governed in the best interests of all electricity users by stocking the board of directors with appointees from corporations that are heavy power users, such as auto and steel makers and paper companies. Such a structure exists at Nav Canada, with airline executives on the board, and the company has been able to cut the fees it charges customers. Restructuring Hydro One with debt, rather than equity, is also presented as the most efficient way to capitalize the company. \"The problem with a Canadian National Rail-style IPO is that equity is much more expensive than debt,\" said one financier familiar with the proposal. \"With a debt-based structure, every dollar earned is available to pay interest, while an equity-based structure means you pay federal taxes, provide a return to shareholders and make debt payments.\" Dofasco Inc., the big Ontario steel producer that consumes about $100-million of electricity a year, supports the not-for-profit proposal. Gord Forstner, head of communications, said a bond sale would reduce Ontario Hydro's stranded debt by $10-billion immediately, paving the way for lower electricity charges. Currently, a special levy on all electricity bills is being used to whittle down the debt. The charge costs Dofasco alone about $15-million a year. \"We want to see the stranded debt paid down first,\" Mr. Forstner said. \"Until that happens, we don't favour Hydro One going to the expense of expanding outside of Ontario's boundaries.\" Hydro One at a glance Ontario's electricity transmission system split off from the former Ontario Hydro in May, 2000. It is the largest power distribution network in Canada and serves 1.2 million people. ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.033946251768033946,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0810938236680811,
        "Sentiment": 0.011159990558138698,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03133001958126224
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:26 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "darran.binns@enron.com\t/o=enron/ou=na/cn=recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=f21d9b15-25189ad0-8625653f-482bf6@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "\tlynnette",
        "Subject": "California/National Power Issues",
        "Text": "Top Electricity and Natural Gas Executives To Address Tumultuous Changes in Deregulated Markets at Platts' 8th Annual Day of the Trader ConferenceDow Jones InteractiveNovember 19, 2001    Pushing for public power / Backers say they'll have issue on next ballotDow Jones InterractiveNovember 19, 2001  PG&E CLEANING CONTAMINATED MARTINEZ SITE  - TWO FAMILIES LIVING ADJACENT TO THE SITE HAVE FILED CLAIMS AGAINST THE UTILITY, BLAMING POLLUTION FOR ILLNESSES AND DEATHSDow Jones InteractiveNovember 17, 2001   Reliant to slash rates 17 % when deregulation beginsDow Jones InteractiveNovember 17, 2001          Top Electricity and Natural Gas Executives To Address Tumultuous Changes in Deregulated Markets at Platts' 8th Annual Day of the Trader ConferenceFERC Commissioner Nora Mead Brownell to Deliver Keynote Executives with some of the most dynamic companies in deregulated electricity and natural gas markets will address the 8th Annual Day of the Trader Conference, December 5-7 at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, NV. The conference is sponsored by Platts, the energy information, research, consulting and market services division of The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE:MHP). Featured speakers include top officers from Duke Energy, Reliant Energy, Aquila, Williams Energy, Coral Energy, Calpine, Allegheny Energy Global Markets, PG&E, Southern California Gas, the New York Mercantile Exchange and others, along with the industry's top strategic analysts. The conference also includes a panel that will take an in-depth look at how federal regulators are rewriting the rules for the trading market and what that means for trading companies. The keynote address will be delivered by the Honorable Nora Mead Brownell, a commissioner with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The conference is sponsored by the Platts family of electricity and natural gas market products including Power Markets Week, Inside FERC's Gas Market Report, Gas Daily, Megawatt Daily, Platts Energy Trader and Global Energy Business. For more information or to register, go to www.platts.com and hit the Day of the Trader banner. You can also call Custom Meetings International at 718-317-6737 or e-mail mailtocmi@aol.com. Platts is the world's largest and most authoritative provider of energy information and market services, with 17 offices worldwide. Products range from real-time and Internet-based news and price assessment services, to newsletters, market reports, databases, magazines, conferences, research services, geospatial tools and consulting. Platts offerings cover the oil, petrochemical, natural gas, electricity , nuclear power, coal, bandwidth and metals markets. Every day more than $10 billion of trading activity and term contract sales are based on Platts' price assessments. Additional information is available at www.platts.com and www.plattsmetals.com. Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in financial services, education and business-to-business information through leading brands such as Standard & Poor's, BusinessWeek and McGraw-Hill Education. The Corporation has more than 300 offices in 33 countries. Sales in 2000 were $4.3 billion. Additional information is available at www.mcgraw-hill.com <http://www.mcgraw-hill.com>.    Pushing for public power / Backers say they'll have issue on next ballotPublic power advocates in San Francisco will have to convince people like Tim Colen that their idea is a good one if they want to go back to the ballot next year and win. Colen, who lives in the West Portal area, voted against two measures on the Nov. 6 ballot that would have paved the way for a public power system in San Francisco and ended PG&E's monopoly in the local energy market. The company and other corporate interests spent more than $2 million to defeat the effort. Colen's vote reflected the sentiment throughout the city's conservative strongholds -- among them West Portal and other West of Twin Peaks neighborhoods -- and in the wealthier pockets of Pacific Heights and Sea Cliff. In those neighborhoods, Proposition F and Measure I lost almost 2 to 1. In the city's more liberal neighborhoods -- Haight-Ashbury, Bernal Heights, South of Market and Noe Valley -- the reverse was true. And in the Mission, support for public power was almost 3 to 1. \"Those were the districts that were focused on because of limited resources,\" said Board of Supervisors President Tom Ammiano, a public power booster. \"Once we engaged people, talked to them, they were very responsive. I think the same thing would have to happen in the other districts when we go forward again.\" For Colen, an environmental geologist and consultant, the proposals were poorly drafted, more intent to take a whack at the corporate giant PG&E than to make sure that electricity is delivered to city residents and businesses at a lower cost and more reliably -- as backers of the measures promised. \"San Francisco can get into the energy business,\" said Colen. \"But it should be incremental, with a sound policy, and with people in charge who are experts.\" In addition, he doesn't want an elected board running the operation, as both Measure I and Proposition F required, and he wants the city to explore working with PG&E instead of ousting the private utility competely. Then, Colen said, he may support public power. Proposition F called for replacing the city's existing water and power department with a new, expanded agency to deliver publicly owned electricity to consumers. It lost by 533 votes, or less than 1 percentage point. Measure I, the more far-reaching of the two, lost by 4,361 votes, or 3.5 percentage points. It would have set up a municipal utilities district in San Francisco and neighboring Brisbane. It made a target of PG&E but also had the power to take over the garbage, cable and phone operations. Despite the loss, supporters of municipal power expect to resurrect the idea. Ammiano and other backers are exploring how far the city can go to begin public power without voter approval. At the same time, they are considering a way to put the issue before voters again next year. Bob Lipman, a retiree who lives in Cow Hollow, voted against the two ballot proposals two weeks ago. His chief concern was the lack of documentation detailing the cost of creating a new public power system. \"It was a blank check,\" he said. He also wanted more than a promise that rates would go down. Supervisor Tony Hall, the West of Twin Peaks representative who opposed the ballot measures, agreed that with more hard facts his constituents might buy into public power if the findings tilted in favor of sound fiscal policy. \"People want to know how much this is going to cost,\" Hall said. Ammiano, the author of Proposition F, said he expected the city to conduct feasibility studies that outline costs, generation capabilities, financing options and the benefits and disadvantages of various public power scenarios. \"While I believe we made a strong case for a municipal water and power agency, I think we can take the time between now and next November to provide further study on the issue, explain to voters exactly why public power will work in San Francisco and expand the coalition to include consumer interests, business owners and property owners backing the idea,\" Ammiano said. Another factor, he said, is voter turnout. \"If we had 1 percent higher turnout we probably would have won,\" Ammiano said. For example, several neighborhoods -- among them the Western Addition, Civic Center and the South of Market -- had turnout lower than the citywide average, which was just less than 30 percent. Supervisor Chris Daly said the key to win was turning out liberal voters -- not putting efforts into wooing conservatives. \"I truly believe I don't have to change people's minds,\" said Daly, who favors local control of the electrical system. \"I represent the majority opinion. But the majority doesn't necessarily come out to vote. That's what we have to work on.\"  PG&E CLEANING CONTAMINATED MARTINEZ SITE  - TWO FAMILIES LIVING ADJACENT TO THE SITE HAVE FILED CLAIMS AGAINST THE UTILITY, BLAMING POLLUTION FOR ILLNESSES AND DEATHS MARTINEZ -- PG&E crews have begun cleaning up the site of a former substation in Martinez, which had high levels of arsenic and lead in the soil. Crews will begin cleaning up two adjacent properties after the Thanksgiving weekend. The adjacent property owners and their families blame the contaminants for the illnesses and deaths of family members and filed a claim against Pacific Gas & Electric in bankruptcy court. The substation cleanup should be completed by mid-December at a cost of $225,000, said PG&E spokesman Jason Alderman. Cleaning up Tom Billecci's and Vince Aiello's properties will cost about $64,000. Once the substation site is free of contaminants, the utility will sell the property to a developer, who plans to build apartments. The cost of the cleanup is significantly more than the utility will make selling the property, Alderman said. \"The reason it's expensive is that this is the gold standard of how an environmental cleanup should be done,\" he said. The utility operated a substation at the site from 1910 to 1990. The Billecci and Aiello families have been in discussions with PG&E about the cleanup for a year. They claim that the contaminants contributed to family illness including cancer, asthma and skin disorders. The utility will remove soil on both properties and test the ground to make sure it is free of high levels of lead and arsenic. Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Program will oversee the cleanup. PG&E will clean the area around a shed on Billecci's property, something it had not planned to do before. Billecci said he is pleased that PG&E agreed to increase the scope of the cleanup Reliant to slash rates 17 % when deregulation beginsResidential customers who stick with Reliant Energy when electricity deregulation begins in January could see a drop in power rates of about 17 percent. That's according to figures filed Friday by Reliant with the Texas Public Utility Commission. Under the new so-called price-to-beat rate - which still needs PUC approval - someone using an average of 1,200 kilowatt-hours a month could save $257 over the course of a year, while someone using an average of 2,000 kilowatt-hours a month could save $426 annually. The big drop is being propelled significantly by lower natural gas prices. Consumers saw two electricity increases in the latter half of 2000 and another this year because natural gas prices had climbed. This year's increase, though, was rescinded as gas prices came down. The rate Reliant offers residential consumers and certain small businesses come Jan. 1 - when Texas opens its electricity market to competition - is known as the \"price to beat.\" Larger consumers can negotiate contracts with providers. The price to beat will serve as a benchmark for other competitors, which in turn are expected to offer lower rates. Other incumbent electric companies, including Dallas-based TXU Energy, will charge their own price-to-beat rates in their service territories. The PUC wants the price to beat low enough so consumers benefit from deregulation, but high enough so competitors can offer lower rates but make enough profit to stay in the market. Consumer groups have said the PUC is paying too much attention to competitors' profits and not enough to ensuring consumers get the lowest prices. Under the deregulation law, consumers automatically get a 6 percent cut in the base portion starting Jan. 1, which, depending on usage, can make up 60 percent of a consumer's costs. The PUC and Reliant have been trying to agree on the so-called fuel-factor portion of the price to beat. The figure Reliant filed Friday was to agreed to by the PUC staff and the company. The three-member commission still must give its approval, which it could do Tuesday or at a Dec. 3 meeting. The current rate for a residential Reliant customer who uses 14,400 kilowatt-hours of electricity in a year - or an average of 1,200 a month - is 10.42 cents per kilowatt-hour. Under the numbers Reliant filed Friday, the cost would be 8.64 cents per kilowatt-hour. That's a drop of 17 percent. Those per kilowatt-hour figures are calculated to take into account that customers use more electricity in the summer when prices are higher. Reliant charges different rates for summer and non- summer months and will keep doing so after deregulation begins. The per kilowatt-hour comparisons compiled for the PUC are annualized, average rates. All providers will break their electricity offers into similar rates so consumers will have an apples-to-apples way to compare them. Reliant and other existing companies are prohibited from cutting the base-rate portion of the price to beat for three years or until they lose 40 percent of their customers. The price to beat can be adjusted twice a year for fuel costs. Earlier this week, consumer groups said they were worried that an option being considered by the PUC, if adopted, could artificially raise the price to beat and cause residential consumers to pick up costs that should be borne by larger customers. That option, which involves fuel costs that utilities are still owed, isn't included in Reliant's filing. A PUC spokesman said one commissioner simply wanted more information about the idea, and it's unknown whether the PUC will ever take an up-or-down vote. Competitors of Reliant and other existing companies are obviously interested in what the price to beat will be. In a filing Thursday with the PUC, the New Power Co., which is offering residential service in Houston and elsewhere, said the price to beat will ultimately determine if deregulation succeeds in Texas. Because there was a sufficient difference between current prices and rates offered by competitors during a pilot test of deregulation, a relatively high number of consumers signed up for new providers during the program, New Power said. \"New Power is optimistic that the Texas market will support vigorous competition, but, like everyone else, we will have to wait and see how the future unfolds,\" it said.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.047701647875108416,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07805724197745013,
        "Sentiment": 0.13728230970418476,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02929399367755532
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:31:32 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "darran.binns@enron.com\t/o=enron/ou=na/cn=recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=f21d9b15-25189ad0-8625653f-482bf6@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "\tlynnette",
        "Subject": "California/National Power Issues",
        "Text": "Enron Direct and the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (\"AUMA\") Seal a Natural Gas Supply DealYahooNovember 13, 2001  Dow  Jones InteractiveNovember 13, 2001  Media to get access to state power pactsR TumbleNovember 13, 2001   State energy spending plunges Water official trumpets decline as cost controlSF Gate NewsNovember 13, 2001     Enron Direct and the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (\"AUMA\") Seal a Natural Gas Supply Deal AUMA regular and associate members have looked to Enron Direct's innovative and flexible energy solutions to answer AUMA's requirements of excellent customer service, competitive pricing and contract flexibility. \"Enron Direct is providing AUMA's regular and associate members with a natural gas supply and energy services plan to help them better manage their energy costs. Enron Direct is pleased to be assisting the AUMA and its members by providing energy solutions that will deliver significant financial security.\" said Darren Cross, Chief Operating Officer of Enron Direct Canada Corp. \"In this time of uncertainty, municipalities were very interested in attaining a stable price for their utility needs. Predictable gas price will ensure stability, so crucial to municipal budgets.\" said Lorne Olsvik, President of Alberta Urban Municipalities Association. \"The AUMA was looking for a supplier who understood the need for competitive pricing as well as membership flexibility and independence. Alberta municipalities, both small and large, understand how a volatile energy market can affect their bottom line and needed to find a solution to help them manage their gas costs. Enron Direct's innovative products and services meet AUMA's goals and provide the value we are looking for,\" said John McGowan, Executive Director of the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association. Regular and associate members of the AUMA include over 200 cities, towns, villages and summer villages as well as municipally related non-profit organizations, boards and commissions. The Alberta Urban Municipalities Association provides leadership in advocating local government interests to the provincial government and other organizations in addition to providing services that address the needs of its membership. Enron is one of the world's leading energy, commodities and services companies. The company markets electricity and natural gas, delivers energy and other physical commodities, and provides financial and risk management services to customers around the world. Enron's Internet address is www.enron.com <http://www.enron.com/>. The stock is traded under the ticker symbol \"ENE.\" Visit Enron Direct's website at www.enrondirect.com <http://www.enrondirect.com>.   NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- \"Noah's Ark\" should be the name of the company that emerges from the planned combination of Enron Corp. (ENE) and Dynegy Inc. (DYN), according to energy markets lore these days. After all, the logic goes, there will be two of everyone. Enron traders aren't so sure of that, as energy firms can attest. \"In the past 60 days, the number of resumes from Enron personnel has increased substantially,\" said William Begley, head of the energy and utilities practice at Heidrick & Struggles (HSII), an executive recruiting firm in Houston. Resumes are coming from all units at Enron, but the number of those from traders has grown significantly during the period, he added. Other recruiting firms said that Enron traders have become more receptive to unsolicitied headhunting calls lately. No one knows for sure how jobs will shake out at Enron, as the company goes through hard times and faces a merger with Dynegy. Recruiters and Enron employees are mixed over how much actual fallout there will be. One thing they agree on, though, is that if Enron traders do leave, they aren't guaranteed to find new jobs quickly despite their credentials -- which are regarded as sterling in the energy industry. If energy markets contract as a result of Enron's troubles, the job market for traders could flood. Dynegy plans to acquire Enron in a stock swap currently valued at $10.12 billion. The companies confirmed the deal late last week. Shares in both companies rose in heavy trading Monday as investors weighed the planned deal. Some uncertainty remains around the fate of the merger, partly because of the numerous regulatory hurdles it faces. Enron, still the largest energy trading company in the world, has suffered a massive setback in the past month. Four weeks ago, a $1.2 billion reduction of shareholder equity kicked off a slide in the company's share price, and prompted a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. Recruiters started seeing more resumes from Enron before the company's troubles came to a head. As early as this summer when former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling left the company, employees at the company's non-core units have been looking for jobs, recruiters said. Electricity and natural gas traders at Enron have long been considered some of the smartest participants in U.S. energy markets. The company is a market maker in both gas and electricity, meaning that its prices for both commodities are benchmarks for traders throughout the markets. Enron led the effort to deregulate U.S. power markets, and has been one of the most vocal lobbyists for deregulation at the state and federal levels over the years. \"Because Enron is such a large counterparty in the energy trading sector, all of its trading partners, everyone, is hoping the thing gets resolved,\" said Bruce Peterson, managing director at Korn/Ferry Intl (KFY) in Houston, an executive search company. \"The whole industry is definitely affected by what has happened at Enron. Until it's sorted out, you have a tremendous amount of uneasiness. It needs to get resolved.\" It will be essential for Dynegy to keep some of the core leadership from Enron, analysts say. By retaining the best, Dynegy should be able to secure other strong Enron employees. \"In our view, Enron's energy trading and marketing personnel are arguably the most talented and definitely the most profitable group in the industry,\" Prudential Securities analyst M. Carol Coale said in a research note Monday. \"We believe that Dynegy must focus on retaining these valuable traders and marketers if the new company is to realize its full potential in the wholesale segment.\" Enron President and Chief Operating Officer Greg Whalley, who will be at Dynegy after the merger as an executive vice president, said in a conference call on Monday that he believes the new company will retain its traders. \"Most traders want to be part of the winning team,\" he said. Some recruiters believe that although many Enron employees are floating resumes, there won't be much actual fallout. Enron's trading operation employs between 1,000 and 1,500 people in North America; Dynegy's operation is staffed by 300. \"But with a few trimmings here and there you won't see a lot of Enron traders on the street, unless they don't like what they hear from Dynegy,\" said Jack Carr managing director of Prime Energy Partnership, a search and recruiting company based in the UK, with an office in Greenwich, Connecticut. An experienced energy trader with four years of experience can earn $125,000-$150,000 plus a bonus, according to Carr. Right now, Enron traders are feeling disappointed and confused, according to one trader at another company who wouldn't allow his name to be used. \"I think they're very nervous,\" the trader said. \"The Enron people think they're better than the Dynegy people, and the Dynegy people think 'we're buying them, so we can just pick through their stuff.'\"  Media to get access to state power pactsA coalition of news organizations settled with the governor's office on the only remaining issue in a lawsuit seeking access to the state's contracts with power generators. The settlement will require the state to release short-term and spot-market energy contracts within 47 days of the end of each contract period. \"It's not as soon as we wanted, but it's not the lengthy delay the governor wanted. It's somewhere in between,\" said Alonzo Wickers, the attorney for the news organizations. Spot-market contracts are agreements for 90 days or less, and short-term contracts last 91 days to a year. The legal battle began in February, when a handful of news organizations, including The San Diego Union-Tribune, sued Gov. Gray Davis to get information about the contracts under the California Public Records Act. Davis' spokesman could not be reached for comment yesterday. In June, a Superior Court judge ordered the state to release its long-term contracts, which revealed that the contracts the governor negotiated had bound the state to huge electricity costs through the end of the decade. \"All the self-congratulatory proclamations from the governor's office about how beneficial these contracts were for the state of California didn't pan out,\" Wickers said. \"It certainly seems the public had a right to know.\" State energy spending plunges Water official trumpets decline as cost control Sacramento -- The state's spending on energy plummeted in October to its lowest level this year, according to figures released yesterday by the Department of Water Resources. California spent $415 million on power purchases in October, half of what it spent in August and $264 million less than in September. Since January, the state has been purchasing power for the three investor- owned utilities. At the market's peak, the cost of power was an average of $65 million a day. October's average was $13.4 million a day. \"These steep declines in our overall power expenses are an obvious signal that California has accomplished the task of controlling what were once runaway costs in the spot market,\" said Pete Garris, acting deputy director of the Department of Water Resources, which is in charge of buying the state's power. \"Each month since May, California has been able to slash hundreds of millions of dollars off its costs,\" Garris said. \"These overall costs are a good measure of how successful we've been in lowering the price of energy.\" However, the department said it did not have figures for how much power the state sold last month. Without those numbers, consumer advocates say, it is impossible to know how well the state is doing. \"We need to know the entire picture,\" said Nettie Hoge, executive director of The Utility Reform Network. \"If we bought too much and are selling it at a loss, we need to know that.\" Hoge said this is especially important as the state begins to try to renegotiate long-term power contracts. Gov. Gray Davis and his administration began negotiating and signing long- term contracts during the height of the energy crisis. Davis and others say the contracts helped drive down the price of power, but critics say the state locked in too much power at too high a price. For the three months ending in June, the state sold about $25 million worth of power, at times even giving electricity away. \"We may need to take a broader look at the contracts,\" Hoge said. \"The downturn in natural gas prices has made a huge difference.\" That's because much of the electricity on the market is produced by plants that run on natural gas. Although the Davis administration has said it is open to renegotiating the contracts, it has made no progress thus far. A spokesman for the department said numbers detailing how much power the state has sold will be available later this month. ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03405405405405405,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08432432432432432,
        "Sentiment": 0.16125484057687448,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.031355858594632156
    }
],
"thread295": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:47:39 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "deverell@fluid.com",
        "Recipient": "jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "Favor",
        "Text": "Hi Jeff,Hope you are doing well. Got your email from Scott. I'm hoping you cando me a favor.  We are doing a  research project for a client and aretrying to identify key technical management at a variety of companies,including Enron.Specifically, we are looking for names and addresses of the following:CIO/CTOVP, Directors and/or Sr. Managers responsible for the company'snetwork.  They'll typically have titles like VP of Network Operationsand Senior Network Architect.Any chance you can get me this info for Enron? I'd be forever in yourdebt.thanks, kent--Kent DeverellFluiddeverell@fluid.comw (415) 369-3204f (415) 369-3290www.fluid.com",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08602150537634409,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.17204301075268819,
        "Sentiment": -0.049999999999999996,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0515625
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:23:55 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "deverell@fluid.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Favor",
        "Text": "Awesome.  I really appreciate it.  I'd love to get 'em by early next week if possible.thanks,kent\"Dasovich, Jeff\" wrote:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1,
        "Sentiment": 0.4666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08333333333333333
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:05:53 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "deverell@fluid.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Favor",
        "Text": "Thanks for the help.  I'll take whatever I can get.  Are you going to bein Napa for Thanksgiving?  I think we're coming up Saturday and watchingsome ball on Sunday.\"Dasovich, Jeff\" wrote:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14705882352941177,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.053475935828877004
    }
],
"thread296": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:33:59 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tTribolet, Michael  Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "PG&E settlement offer",
        "Text": "Ken Lay called Rick Buy and I up to his office talk about settlement just now.   He would like to settle for liquidity/good news.   Rick Buy is going to discuss with Whalley. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PMTo:\tBuy, RickSubject:\tPG&E settlement offer\tBelow are the proposed discounts we discussed with Ken Lay this afternoon:                          Cash from 85       P+L with 85 cent              Discount   cent sale of claim    sale of claimEnron      $ 85.0 (17%)       $361.8             +$129.1      PG&E       $237.0 (46%)       $232.6             -$  0.1 Midpoint   $161.0 (32%)       $297.2             +$ 64.5If the midpoint (value between PG&E and Enron settlement offers) is acceptable from a liquidity and P+L standpoint, propose countering at a discount of $123 million (move half way to midpoint) to provoke a counter offer.   Intent is to settle at midpoint discount of $161 million.  The Excel file is attached.    ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.5149253731343284,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05223880597014925,
        "Sentiment": 0.10277777777777779,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06928645294725956
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:36:47 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tTribolet, Michael  Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PM",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "PG&E settlement offer",
        "Text": "Jim and Jeff,The P& L numbers represented below includes a reserve of $40 million attributable to the FERC Refund exposure specific to wholesale.   Thanks,Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November  16, 2001 3:34 PMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, WandaKen Lay called Rick Buy and I up to his office talk about settlement just now.   He would like to settle for liquidity/good news.   Rick Buy is going to discuss with Whalley. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PMTo:\tBuy, RickSubject:\tPG&E settlement offer\tBelow are the proposed discounts we discussed with Ken Lay this afternoon:                          Cash from 85       P+L with 85 cent              Discount   cent sale of claim    sale of claimEnron      $ 85.0 (17%)       $361.8             +$129.1      PG&E       $237.0 (46%)       $232.6             -$  0.1 Midpoint   $161.0 (32%)       $297.2             +$ 64.5If the midpoint (value between PG&E and Enron settlement offers) is acceptable from a liquidity and P+L standpoint, propose countering at a discount of $123 million (move half way to midpoint) to provoke a counter offer.   Intent is to settle at midpoint discount of $161 million.  The Excel file is attached.   ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.45454545454545453,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05519480519480519,
        "Sentiment": 0.2388888888888889,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07527733755942947
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Sat, 17 Nov 2001 07:35:26 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "michael.tribolet@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "PG&E settlement offer",
        "Text": "Big week coming up.  Bank meeting on Monday in New York and 10-Q on Monday.   Can't wait to read it.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.24,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.04,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.049019607843137254
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 05:17:56 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tTribolet, Michael  Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PM",
        "Recipient": "wanda",
        "Subject": "PG&E settlement offer",
        "Text": "Thanks. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 4:37 PMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.Jim and Jeff,The P& L numbers represented below includes a reserve of $40 million attributable to the FERC Refund exposure specific to wholesale.   Thanks,Wanda -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November  16, 2001 3:34 PMTo:\tDasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, WandaKen Lay called Rick Buy and I up to his office talk about settlement just now.   He would like to settle for liquidity/good news.   Rick Buy is going to discuss with Whalley. -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PMTo:\tBuy, RickSubject:\tPG&E settlement offer\tBelow are the proposed discounts we discussed with Ken Lay this afternoon:                          Cash from 85       P+L with 85 cent              Discount   cent sale of claim    sale of claimEnron      $ 85.0 (17%)       $361.8             +$129.1      PG&E       $237.0 (46%)       $232.6             -$  0.1 Midpoint   $161.0 (32%)       $297.2             +$ 64.5If the midpoint (value between PG&E and Enron settlement offers) is acceptable from a liquidity and P+L standpoint, propose countering at a discount of $123 million (move half way to midpoint) to provoke a counter offer.   Intent is to settle at midpoint discount of $161 million.  The Excel file is attached.   ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.438871473354232,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05642633228840126,
        "Sentiment": 0.21631944444444443,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08381924198250729
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:06:31 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tTribolet, Michael  Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PM",
        "Recipient": "greg",
        "Subject": "PG&E settlement offer",
        "Text": "Greg- we plan to counter at indicated discount. Let me know if you disagree. Rick -----Original Message-----Sent:\tFriday, November 16, 2001 3:30 PMTo:\tBuy, RickSubject:\tPG&E settlement offer\tBelow are the proposed discounts we discussed with Ken Lay this afternoon:                          Cash from 85       P+L with 85 cent              Discount   cent sale of claim    sale of claimEnron      $ 85.0 (17%)       $361.8             +$129.1      PG&E       $237.0 (46%)       $232.6             -$  0.1 Midpoint   $161.0 (32%)       $297.2             +$ 64.5If the midpoint (value between PG&E and Enron settlement offers) is acceptable from a liquidity and P+L standpoint, propose countering at a discount of $123 million (move half way to midpoint) to provoke a counter offer.   Intent is to settle at midpoint discount of $161 million.  The Excel file is attached.    ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.5465587044534413,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.044534412955465584,
        "Sentiment": 0.10277777777777779,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07551487414187644
    }
],
"thread297": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:43:16 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "sgovenar@govadv.com",
        "Recipient": "jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "Water",
        "Text": "Assembly Member Tim Leslie is interested in sponsoring a bill which wouldgrant air credits to prospective power plant owners in exchange for usingreclaimed water.  The bill is in its infancy and none of the details havebeen worked out.  His office would like to know if Enron would be interestedin providing technical assistance with the measure.  They approached Enronbecause of the Roseville plant, recognizing that Roseville already has itsair credits and is already scheduled to use reclaimed water.Thoughts?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.075,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.075,
        "Sentiment": 0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01171875
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:05:34 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david.parquet@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jeff",
        "Subject": "Water",
        "Text": "I like it for 2 reasons: 1.    The dust has not yet settled on all of our ERCs for Roseville.  There are still fantasy issues that EPA and others are thinking about, which if implemented, will  make some of the ERC deals we have at best uneconomical. 2.    If we got this \"gift\", it would be nice to be able to sell the ERCs we have so that we can reduce our out of pocket exposure during these fun times.  Frankly, if Leslie's idea became law, these ERCs could be sold to projects who did not have access to the waste water that we do, thus facilitating additional new power plant devleopment for the benefit of the state. Having said all of the above, I have my doubts that something like this would have a chance of working out.  The little people in the environmental community have absolutely no concept of the big picture, being instead more worried about detail process over global results.  I think that this thing would get bogged down in the reality that projects would get ERCs, but the net result would be a short term decrease in air quality in the local air basin due to not applying specific, coincident ERCs to specific projects.  The little people probably cannot get their head around that, even though the very clean modern plants one day would put out of business dirtier, less efficient plants, thus resulting in a net improvement in air quality in the state.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09195402298850575,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09195402298850575,
        "Sentiment": 0.24696317340067342,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01956521739130435
    }
],
"thread300": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:11:28 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jbennett@gmssr.com",
        "Recipient": "jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "Implementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' Plan",
        "Text": "On Friday, November 16th, the UDCs submitted their joint plan forimplementing the suspension of direct access.  Parties have until,Wednesday, November 28th, to comment.The following are proposed implementation rules for which the UDCs seekCommission approval:1.  A  DASR can only be processed if the customer name appears on the ESPList submitted to the UDCs on October 5, 2001.2. In order to submit an ESP List the ESP must have a valid ESP/UDC ServiceAgreement as of September 20, 2001 and , for ESPs serving small customers,they must have in effect a valid Commission registration as of September 20,2001.3. For a DASR to be processed for a residential or small commercial customeraccount, the ESP must be able to demonstrate that the required third partyverification took place prior to September 20, 2001.4.  Customers should not be allowed to switch from one ESP to another afterSeptember 20 unless the new ESP had a valid ESP- customer contract in placeon or before Sept. 20th.5.  Seamless moves within a UDC's service territory will be allowed.6. For customers on bundled service as of September 20, 2001 (but stillunder a DA contract), the UDCs are proposing not to allow such customers toprocess DASRs even if their names are on the October 5 list.           7.  If all  accounts of one ESP transferred to another as a result of amerger, then the situation is okay because no new DASR would be required;requests for one customer to switch from one ESP to another only allowed ifthe new ESP-customer relationship had a contract prior to Sept. 20, 2001.8. Changes in customer identity allowed on  case by case basis (e.g., if acustomer changes its type of business it would not be allowed).9. One  customer can not transfer or assign its direct access service rightsto another.10.  Processing of DASRs submitted for customers who attempt to opt into acommunity aggregation program after the suspension date should not beallowed.In addition to the above, the UDCs proposed three additional options forimplementing the suspension.1.  The Commission should impose a DASR cut-off date (received andaccepted).2.  If the Commission does not impose a strict DASR cut off, it shouldrequire that any ESP which wishes to have a DASR processed after the cut offto submit their account specific DASR information and ESP contract to theCommission along with an explanation of why the customer is eligible toreceive DA.  The UDC will not process the DASR until it receives an okayfrom the Commission.3.  The ESP certifies through an affidavit that a particular DASR wasassociated with a contract in existence on September 20, 2001 (the UDCs setforth a proposed affidavit.) If you have any questions, please callJeanne        ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09719222462203024,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11231101511879049,
        "Sentiment": 0.06458333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.025744759102611255
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:18:04 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON  Sent:\tMonday, November 19, 2001 11:11 AM",
        "Recipient": "b",
        "Subject": "Implementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' Plan",
        "Text": "Can we talk this week on our response?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 19, 2001 11:11 AMTo:\tJeff Dasovich (E-mail); Jim Steffes (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)Cc:\tMDaySubject:\tImplementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' PlanOn Friday, November 16th, the UDCs submitted their joint plan forimplementing the suspension of direct access.  Parties have until,Wednesday, November 28th, to comment.The following are proposed implementation rules for which the UDCs seekCommission approval:1.  A  DASR can only be processed if the customer name appears on the ESPList submitted to the UDCs on October 5, 2001.2. In order to submit an ESP List the ESP must have a valid ESP/UDC ServiceAgreement as of September 20, 2001 and , for ESPs serving small customers,they must have in effect a valid Commission registration as of September 20,2001.3. For a DASR to be processed for a residential or small commercial customeraccount, the ESP must be able to demonstrate that the required third partyverification took place prior to September 20, 2001.4.  Customers should not be allowed to switch from one ESP to another afterSeptember 20 unless the new ESP had a valid ESP- customer contract in placeon or before Sept. 20th.5.  Seamless moves within a UDC's service territory will be allowed.6. For customers on bundled service as of September 20, 2001 (but stillunder a DA contract), the UDCs are proposing not to allow such customers toprocess DASRs even if their names are on the October 5 list.7.  If all  accounts of one ESP transferred to another as a result of amerger, then the situation is okay because no new DASR would be required;requests for one customer to switch from one ESP to another only allowed ifthe new ESP-customer relationship had a contract prior to Sept. 20, 2001.8. Changes in customer identity allowed on  case by case basis (e.g., if acustomer changes its type of business it would not be allowed).9. One  customer can not transfer or assign its direct access service rightsto another.10.  Processing of DASRs submitted for customers who attempt to opt into acommunity aggregation program after the suspension date should not beallowed.In addition to the above, the UDCs proposed three additional options forimplementing the suspension.1.  The Commission should impose a DASR cut-off date (received andaccepted).2.  If the Commission does not impose a strict DASR cut off, it shouldrequire that any ESP which wishes to have a DASR processed after the cut offto submit their account specific DASR information and ESP contract to theCommission along with an explanation of why the customer is eligible toreceive DA.  The UDC will not process the DASR until it receives an okayfrom the Commission.3.  The ESP certifies through an affidavit that a particular DASR wasassociated with a contract in existence on September 20, 2001 (the UDCs setforth a proposed affidavit.)If you have any questions, please callJeanne        ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07484407484407485,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1101871101871102,
        "Sentiment": 0.07604166666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03447110510307536
    }
],
"thread300": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:11:28 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jbennett@gmssr.com",
        "Recipient": "jdasovic@enron",
        "Subject": "Implementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' Plan",
        "Text": "On Friday, November 16th, the UDCs submitted their joint plan forimplementing the suspension of direct access.  Parties have until,Wednesday, November 28th, to comment.The following are proposed implementation rules for which the UDCs seekCommission approval:1.  A  DASR can only be processed if the customer name appears on the ESPList submitted to the UDCs on October 5, 2001.2. In order to submit an ESP List the ESP must have a valid ESP/UDC ServiceAgreement as of September 20, 2001 and , for ESPs serving small customers,they must have in effect a valid Commission registration as of September 20,2001.3. For a DASR to be processed for a residential or small commercial customeraccount, the ESP must be able to demonstrate that the required third partyverification took place prior to September 20, 2001.4.  Customers should not be allowed to switch from one ESP to another afterSeptember 20 unless the new ESP had a valid ESP- customer contract in placeon or before Sept. 20th.5.  Seamless moves within a UDC's service territory will be allowed.6. For customers on bundled service as of September 20, 2001 (but stillunder a DA contract), the UDCs are proposing not to allow such customers toprocess DASRs even if their names are on the October 5 list.           7.  If all  accounts of one ESP transferred to another as a result of amerger, then the situation is okay because no new DASR would be required;requests for one customer to switch from one ESP to another only allowed ifthe new ESP-customer relationship had a contract prior to Sept. 20, 2001.8. Changes in customer identity allowed on  case by case basis (e.g., if acustomer changes its type of business it would not be allowed).9. One  customer can not transfer or assign its direct access service rightsto another.10.  Processing of DASRs submitted for customers who attempt to opt into acommunity aggregation program after the suspension date should not beallowed.In addition to the above, the UDCs proposed three additional options forimplementing the suspension.1.  The Commission should impose a DASR cut-off date (received andaccepted).2.  If the Commission does not impose a strict DASR cut off, it shouldrequire that any ESP which wishes to have a DASR processed after the cut offto submit their account specific DASR information and ESP contract to theCommission along with an explanation of why the customer is eligible toreceive DA.  The UDC will not process the DASR until it receives an okayfrom the Commission.3.  The ESP certifies through an affidavit that a particular DASR wasassociated with a contract in existence on September 20, 2001 (the UDCs setforth a proposed affidavit.) If you have any questions, please callJeanne        ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09719222462203024,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11231101511879049,
        "Sentiment": 0.06458333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.025744759102611255
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:18:04 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "\tJBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON  Sent:\tMonday, November 19, 2001 11:11 AM",
        "Recipient": "b",
        "Subject": "Implementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' Plan",
        "Text": "Can we talk this week on our response?Jim -----Original Message-----Sent:\tMonday, November 19, 2001 11:11 AMTo:\tJeff Dasovich (E-mail); Jim Steffes (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)Cc:\tMDaySubject:\tImplementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' PlanOn Friday, November 16th, the UDCs submitted their joint plan forimplementing the suspension of direct access.  Parties have until,Wednesday, November 28th, to comment.The following are proposed implementation rules for which the UDCs seekCommission approval:1.  A  DASR can only be processed if the customer name appears on the ESPList submitted to the UDCs on October 5, 2001.2. In order to submit an ESP List the ESP must have a valid ESP/UDC ServiceAgreement as of September 20, 2001 and , for ESPs serving small customers,they must have in effect a valid Commission registration as of September 20,2001.3. For a DASR to be processed for a residential or small commercial customeraccount, the ESP must be able to demonstrate that the required third partyverification took place prior to September 20, 2001.4.  Customers should not be allowed to switch from one ESP to another afterSeptember 20 unless the new ESP had a valid ESP- customer contract in placeon or before Sept. 20th.5.  Seamless moves within a UDC's service territory will be allowed.6. For customers on bundled service as of September 20, 2001 (but stillunder a DA contract), the UDCs are proposing not to allow such customers toprocess DASRs even if their names are on the October 5 list.7.  If all  accounts of one ESP transferred to another as a result of amerger, then the situation is okay because no new DASR would be required;requests for one customer to switch from one ESP to another only allowed ifthe new ESP-customer relationship had a contract prior to Sept. 20, 2001.8. Changes in customer identity allowed on  case by case basis (e.g., if acustomer changes its type of business it would not be allowed).9. One  customer can not transfer or assign its direct access service rightsto another.10.  Processing of DASRs submitted for customers who attempt to opt into acommunity aggregation program after the suspension date should not beallowed.In addition to the above, the UDCs proposed three additional options forimplementing the suspension.1.  The Commission should impose a DASR cut-off date (received andaccepted).2.  If the Commission does not impose a strict DASR cut off, it shouldrequire that any ESP which wishes to have a DASR processed after the cut offto submit their account specific DASR information and ESP contract to theCommission along with an explanation of why the customer is eligible toreceive DA.  The UDC will not process the DASR until it receives an okayfrom the Commission.3.  The ESP certifies through an affidavit that a particular DASR wasassociated with a contract in existence on September 20, 2001 (the UDCs setforth a proposed affidavit.)If you have any questions, please callJeanne        ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07484407484407485,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1101871101871102,
        "Sentiment": 0.07604166666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03447110510307536
    }
],
"thread766": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:57:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com\tsmara@enron.com, wgang@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "sgovenar@govadv",
        "Subject": "Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access]",
        "Text": "I think we ought to \"share it\" with folks.  Bill Gang, do you have any objections?Jeff\tScott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>\t03/20/2001 04:52 PM\t\t Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com>We can use the Air Force DA document under the Freedom of InformationAct.  We could also distribute it to the Administration and Legislatureanonymously.   Please advise.----- Message from Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:18:12 -0600 -----To:\tScott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>If you had filed a Freedom of Information Act request, I would have sent itto you, so I treated your request as the functional equivalent of a FOIArequest.  That basically means that it is in the pubic domain.  While youcan not say you are distributing it on the behalf of the Air Force, you cancertainly share it with anyone you wish.Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAFChief, Utility Litigation TeamDSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347Note new e-mail address:    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06995073891625615
    }
],
"thread767": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:53:16 -0600",
        "Sender": "Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil>boundary=\"----_=_NextPart_000_01C0AE5B.1F96B000\"",
        "Recipient": "\"Govenar Scott (E-mail)\" <sgovenar@govadv",
        "Subject": "Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access",
        "Text": "FYI.  We've been given permission to distribute, but no \"on behalf of\" the Air Force.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 05:20 PM -----\tScott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>\t03/21/2001 02:11 PM\t\t As requested.with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 21:15:38 -0000tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA25406; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:52:48 -0600 (CST)[131.55.249.98]) by tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA25402; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:52:45 -0600 (CST)id <HB840M6F>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:53:18 -0600boundary=\"----_=_NextPart_000_01C0AE5B.1F96B000\"As requested <<Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc>>Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAFChief, Utility Litigation TeamDSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347Note new e-mail address:    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil - Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07216494845360824,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.010309278350515464,
        "Sentiment": 0.11818181818181818,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13513513513513514
    }
],
"thread768": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "can you send info",
        "Text": " - Hertzberg final.docHere it is darlin'.  It's an attachment to the main text of the document. If you have any questions, or need anything else.  Don't hesitate.Best,Jeff----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 04:59 PM -----\tSusan M Landwehr\t03/20/2001 04:06 PM\t\t JEff--I was just on the phone with Kaufman and he asked if you could send me a great document that you put together on a demand buy down program (and he said it was the one you put together for Hertberg).  Could you send either via e mail or fax?  612-339-4392",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11458333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.24444444444444446,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06839186691312385
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:07:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "can you send info",
        "Text": "talks like marge, looks like elle mcpherson.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.045454545454545456
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:35:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "can you send info",
        "Text": "Sounds great.  Could you touch base with Paul and coordinate?  Muchas gracias.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04597701149425287
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:00:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "jeff.dasovich@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "susan",
        "Subject": "can you send info",
        "Text": "CEO of Edison.\tSusan M Landwehr\t04/26/2001 03:37 PM\t\tJust put a call in to him.  Who is John Bryson?  \tJeff Dasovich\t04/26/2001 03:35 PM\t\tSounds great.  Could you touch base with Paul and coordinate?  Muchas gracias.Best,Jeff",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1388888888888889,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.057777777777777775
    }
],
"thread1352": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:06:37 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "mike.grigsby@enron.com\tsuzanne.christiansen@enron.com, frank.ermis@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "kam",
        "Subject": "DEC physical",
        "Text": "We will hold off transferring any physical positions desk to desk until the end of bidweek.  After NX1, we will transfer positions at a daily EOL Index mid price.  Please monitor my book and others to make certain DEC deals are not being transferred prior to NX1 at an IF monthly or GD daily mid price.Thanks,Mike",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06896551724137931,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08620689655172414,
        "Sentiment": 0.05357142857142857,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01597444089456869
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:06:37 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "mike.grigsby@enron.com\tsuzanne.christiansen@enron.com, frank.ermis@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "kam",
        "Subject": "DEC physical",
        "Text": "We will hold off transferring any physical positions desk to desk until the end of bidweek.  After NX1, we will transfer positions at a daily EOL Index mid price.  Please monitor my book and others to make certain DEC deals are not being transferred prior to NX1 at an IF monthly or GD daily mid price.Thanks,Mike",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06896551724137931,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08620689655172414,
        "Sentiment": 0.05357142857142857,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.01597444089456869
    }
],
"thread1356": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:36:32 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "crystal.dobson@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "keith",
        "Subject": "Hi!",
        "Text": "Hi Keith,Just thought I would see if you are still with Enron, and lo and behold! there is your name.  I hope that all is going well for you.  I haven't looked closely, but I assume that you are still in Houston.  Do you like it?All is well with me.  I'm living in Oxford, England, and am now working part time with a little company called Enron Direct.  The part time comes because I have a beautiful little 2 year old daughter, and she keeps me very busy.Write back if you get a chance.Crystalps  what is (little) Jon's last name?  Does he still work for Enron in Houston also?  CrystalAnd I don't mean Lavorato!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1557377049180328,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13114754098360656,
        "Sentiment": -0.10788690476190477,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03908794788273615
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann <Kay",
        "Subject": "Hi!",
        "Text": "SU was fun, but there was  a little incident with a streaker (more like a stroller on stage).  Otherwise, it was great.  Paige did really well, and she was front and center for most of their act.I don't know what we are going to do about Thanksgiving.  Neil and I are negotiating. I neglected to discuss it with Paige this weekend, of course.  It is hard to believe it is only a few weeks away.Michael and I are both better, although he didn't get better until Friday night. Hi to all!Love,Kay\"Lisa Clarke\" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 10/30/2000 04:21:28 PMHello!How did things go in Georgetown? I just wanted to see how it went and tellyou again how sorry I am that things did not work out so that we could seeyou. Also, are yall going to Palacios for Thanksgiving? Are you staying atthe bed and breakfast? I think we are going to come down on Saturday morningand we were thinking about getting a room for that night. Bobby claims thatthe pink house becomes the house of snores when we all stay there. He mayhave a point!Are you and Michael feeling better??Love you!Lisa",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05670103092783505,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14432989690721648,
        "Sentiment": 0.17225308641975307,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04011194029850746
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:01:03 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "tabish.rizvi@capco.com",
        "Recipient": "whalley@enron",
        "Subject": "Hi!",
        "Text": "Greg,\tI'm sure these days have been tremendously busy for you and I hopethat, whatever the outcome, it turns out to be the best for you, your familyand colleagues.  I've been following the news very closely and it reallyunfortunate to read about it.  I am still shocked how a handful of peoplecan cause so much trouble.  Hope everything pulls through; if anyone is theright for the job, it's got to be you.\tWith this said, I realize that you probably have very little\"bandwidth\" for matters outside of Enron these days.  However, it is thatseason again where MBA  applications are due and I would be honored if Icould get another recommendation from you.  Unfortunately, I did not getinto Harvard last year.  To make your life easier, I WILL DO ALL OF THE WORK- i.e. write the letter and fill out the forms, etc. - and only ask for yourJohn Hancock (signature).\tSince I have a rather extensive list of applications, it will beperfectly appropriate to draft a general letter of recommendation thataddresses topics from all of the schools.  I will write this letter and ifyou accept my request, I would send you ten-personalized copies (one foreach school that I am applying to) for you signatures.  That's all!  Thisway, you will spend very little time in providing me superb letters ofrecommendations, and both you and I will be very happy.  \tAnyway, I would actually like to speak with you about this and just\"life in general\" if possible.  I know your schedule at work probablydoesn't permit you to have free-time (god forbid).  I do have your homenumber, but I like to save it only for special occaisions.  I think thismight be one!\tPlease advise.-Tabish************************************************************************The information in this email is confidential and is intended solelyfor the addressee(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are notan intended recipient, please notify the sender of this email immediately. You should not copy, use or disseminate the information contained in the email.Any views expressed in this message are those of the individualsender, except where the sender specifically states them to bethe views of Capco.http://www.capco.com***********************************************************************",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1329639889196676,
        "Sentiment": 0.06504464285714287,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0945054945054945
    }
],
"thread1357": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:11:56 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "keith.holst@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "peter",
        "Subject": "Enron trades]",
        "Text": "Peter, Credit just blessed these transactions.  Give me a call in the morning and we can confirm them. Thanks.Keith",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.034782608695652174
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:02:05 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "keith.holst@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "peter",
        "Subject": "Enron trades]",
        "Text": "Peter, Enron's credit department is reviewing the proposed transactions.  We will have a response tonight. Keith713-853-7069",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04838709677419355
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:36:23 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "keith.holst@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "max",
        "Subject": "Enron trades]",
        "Text": " ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 1.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0
    }
],
"thread1359": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:03:13 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "keith.holst@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "'nagle@enron",
        "Subject": "enron risk remaining natgas position",
        "Text": "Rita:In an effort to handle these matters in an efficient and coordinated manner, we have assigned Geoff Storey as the Enron point person.  I am forwarding your request to him.  Geoff can be reached at 713-853-7058.  Please let me know if I can help in any way.ThanksKeith",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.18,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.029411764705882353
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Lesin, Alex ",
        "Recipient": "Bachman, Paul; Griffith, Mark; Nagle, Rita; Petry, Herb",
        "Subject": "enron risk remaining natgas position",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:12:32 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "keith.holst@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "geoff",
        "Subject": "enron risk remaining natgas position",
        "Text": "Geoff:Attached is J.Aron's request and their exposure to Enron.  Rita has not already found a suitable offset as she felt it was most appropriate to get our permission first.  PLease make go away.Also, I received a similar request from David Dutch at Entergy-Koch.  Please call him at 713-544-5580.  Make this go away too.Finally, find paper I put on your desk from Harrison wtih Sempra.Have fun Sweet Pea!!!",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16901408450704225,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08450704225352113,
        "Sentiment": 0.43671875000000004,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04411764705882353
    },
    {
        "Sender": "Lesin, Alex ",
        "Recipient": "Bachman, Paul; Griffith, Mark; Nagle, Rita; Petry, Herb",
        "Subject": "enron risk remaining natgas position",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0
    }
],
"thread2138": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 23 Aug 2000 06:07:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Mitch Robinson@Enron, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John ",
        "Subject": "Westinghouse/Gleason Meeting Agenda",
        "Text": "There's a meeting with a cast of characters to discuss the Westinhouse warranty issues.  It is tomorrow (Thurs) at 1230.  Do you have any interest in sitting in?Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:06 PM ---------------------------John Normand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT08/23/2000 01:03 PMNewlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann@ENRON, Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENTThe proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting is as follow:Low frequency sound issueMegawatt limit @ 182 MwUse of evap coolerHeat Rate deficiencyLate equipment deliveries We can also talk about Wheatland performance.Let me know if there is anything else we need to add to the agenda.Thanks,   John",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10679611650485436,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07766990291262135,
        "Sentiment": 0.4,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10918367346938776
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 25 Aug 2000 03:39:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Richard B Sanders@ECT on 08/25/2000 06:49 AM",
        "Recipient": "Mitch Robinson@Enron, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John ",
        "Subject": "Westinghouse/Gleason Meeting Agenda",
        "Text": "Sounds good.  Early in the week is better for me.Can we get together next week so I can get an update? Twanda will schedule.\tKay Mann@ENRON\t08/23/2000 01:07 PM\t\t There's a meeting with a cast of characters to discuss the Westinhouse warranty issues.  It is tomorrow (Thurs) at 1230.  Do you have any interest in sitting in?Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:06 PM ---------------------------John Normand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT08/23/2000 01:03 PMNewlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann@ENRON, Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENTThe proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting is as follow:Low frequency sound issueMegawatt limit @ 182 MwUse of evap coolerHeat Rate deficiencyLate equipment deliveries We can also talk about Wheatland performance.Let me know if there is anything else we need to add to the agenda.Thanks,   John",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0916030534351145,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08396946564885496,
        "Sentiment": 0.4333333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10070052539404553
    }
],
"thread2139": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Jun 2000 03:30:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tsjensen@bracepatt.com, jeff.blumenthal@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "brian",
        "Subject": "Vitro consolidation agreement",
        "Text": "Team Vitro:I wanted to run these changes by you before sending them to Jeff Smith.Jeff S. has lobbied for deleting the language on assignment, and state that assignment of the consolidation agreement will be subject to the same terms, etc. as the other 2 contracts.  He also provide alternative language which appears to be close to what was in the previous draft. Since I didn't know the genesis of the language in the consolidation agreement, so I thought I would check with you first.I eliminated 5 (a) because the contracts allow for partial termination.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06315789473684211,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Sentiment": -0.11875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.025089605734767026
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Jun 2000 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tjeff.blumenthal@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, sjensen@bracepatt",
        "Subject": "Vitro consolidation agreement",
        "Text": "This time I'll include the attachment.  It must be Monday.Kay   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tBanczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, sjensen@bracepatt.com, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECTTeam Vitro:I wanted to run these changes by you before sending them to Jeff Smith.Jeff S. has lobbied for deleting the language on assignment, and state that assignment of the consolidation agreement will be subject to the same terms, etc. as the other 2 contracts.  He also provide alternative language which appears to be close to what was in the previous draft. Since I didn't know the genesis of the language in the consolidation agreement, so I thought I would check with you first.I eliminated 5 (a) because the contracts allow for partial termination.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09482758620689655,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09482758620689655,
        "Sentiment": -0.11875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04289544235924933
    }
],
"thread2140": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jswank@graceschool",
        "Subject": "Kindergarten",
        "Text": "Hi Jo,I left you a voice mail, but being an email addict I thought I would send you a note as well.  Our son, Michael is in a Montessori kindergarten, which we have decided may not be most suitable for him.  We discussed it with Vivian Shudde, and she suggested that I give you a call about the Grace School.  My husband and I would like to visit Grace.  We are wondering if it might be possible to visit tomorrow.  Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Kay Mann",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11827956989247312,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16129032258064516,
        "Sentiment": 0.525,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.025806451612903226
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 25 Aug 2000 02:33:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "Kindergarten",
        "Text": "Jo,We had some unexpected complications with scheduling today.  We'll have to reschedule.Thanks for such a prompt reply.KayJo Swank <JSwank@graceschool.org> on 08/24/2000 05:21:10 PMDear Kay,I would be delighted to visit with you and your husband tomorrow.  I willbe free at 10:30 a.m.  Will this work for you?  I will call a leave amessage as well.  Hope to meet you tomorrow.JoAt 12:25 PM 8/24/00 -0500, you wrote:>Hi Jo,",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11267605633802817,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2112676056338028,
        "Sentiment": 0.2833333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06855791962174941
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 25 Aug 2000 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "Kindergarten",
        "Text": "That would be great.Kay Mann29 Inverness Park WayHouston 77055Thanks,KayJo Swank <JSwank@graceschool.org> on 08/25/2000 12:44:42 PMDear Kay,Just let me know a convenient day and time for you.  In the meantime,perhaps you would like for us to go ahead and mail an admissions packet toyou.  If so, please give me your address and it will go out in today's mail.Thanks!JoAt 09:33 AM 8/25/00 -0500, you wrote:",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10606060606060606,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10606060606060606,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05925925925925926
    }
],
"thread2141": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 25 Aug 2000 03:55:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\theather.kroll@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "\"Fine, Jonathan\" <JFine@kilstock",
        "Subject": "Response to Public Staff Data Request",
        "Text": "Here's a suggestion for the equipment question:ENA and its affiliates have contractual rights to numerous turbines, several of which can satisfy the technical and scheduling requirements of this project, and some of which are already manufactured.  In the case of turbines still in the manufacturing process, ENA has firm commitments for delivery, backed by liquidated damages clauses and other financial incentives.\"Duncan, Allyson\" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/25/2000 07:40:52 AM\"'John Moore'\" <John.Moore@enron.com>, \"'Heather Kroll'\" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>, \"'Kay Mann'\" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, \"'Ozzie Pagan'\" <Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com>, \"'Tom Chapman'\" <Tom.Chapman@enron.com>, \"'Jeffrey Keenan'\" <Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com>, \"'Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com'\" <Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com>I have received material from Reagan in response to Question No. 5--thanks.Reagan, do you have problems providing the total project cost under seal?We can file as is, but I expect the public Staff will want to follow up.Also, we do have the cost data, and are filing that under seal.  I haveindicated that we will file the supporting documentation next Tuesday.   Theonly thing we are awaiting to day is the paragraph explaining that turbinesare indeed available. I did want to call your attention to the fact that I took a sentence out ofthe response to No. 17 regarding Enron's intent to operate the plant as amerchant facility after the expiration of the PPA.  You have been verystraightforward about that and it is clear from the rest of the answer.However, given the Commission's skittishness about merchant facilities, Iwould rather not highlight it.We would like to file the responses by the end of the day, with theexception of the supporting documentation on the cost data.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07509881422924901,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09881422924901186,
        "Sentiment": 0.14791666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06437041219649915
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 25 Aug 2000 05:14:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\trorschak@enron.com, john.moore@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "aduncan@kilstock",
        "Subject": "Response to Public Staff Data Request",
        "Text": "Here are my comments to the draft response:4.  I'm a bit troubled by the first sentence, since I really don't know what may have been on the drawing board earlier.  Maybe someone else can vouch for this statement. Otherwise, I suggest deleting it.17.  The reference to NC Power utilizing the plant should be Applicant (third sentence).18.  I would change the second sentence to begin \"It is intended that the plant will be designed, constructed and operated....\"Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0875,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1125,
        "Sentiment": -0.012499999999999997,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04516129032258064
    }
],
"thread2142": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 3 Nov 2000 05:29:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 11/03/2000 01:31 PMHeinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, ",
        "Recipient": "Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette ",
        "Subject": "Vacation Day",
        "Text": "I think it is a great day to work!Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECTIf no one has any objections, I would like to take off Monday, November 27, 2000.  My motherinlaw and sisterinlaw will be in from Tulsa, and I think it would be nice to take off.  Brenda, please get me a temporary for this day.  Thanks.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18181818181818182,
        "Sentiment": 0.5333333333333333,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07728337236533958
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 3 Nov 2000 05:39:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "suzanne",
        "Subject": "Vacation Day",
        "Text": "I could nap in this weather.  Maybe I'll leave early.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09090909090909091,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Sentiment": 0.1,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05660377358490566
    }
],
"thread2143": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Jun 2000 06:36:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tsjansen@bracepatt.com",
        "Recipient": "Brian",
        "Subject": "Tax Language Changes to On/Off Shore Contracts for Vitro",
        "Text": "Hello again,If these contracts are going to be assigned immediately to Mitsui, isn't the issue of a guaranty a Mitsui issue? Is this addressed in the EPC contracts?If an Enron entity must give a guaranty, I would think we would want ENA to give it, to be replaced by a Mitsui guaranty unless we have some safeguard against the possibility of paying Mitsui and Mitsui not paying GE, so that we would have to pay twice.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000 01:31 PM ---------------------------jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/12/2000 01:06:56 PMBrian,Thanks.  The changes to the on & off-shore contracts are OK.I have replied to an e-mail from Kay concerning the \"letter agreement\", ofearlier today.  As far as I am concerned, we are ready to go there (you werecopied).Kay indicated that the consolidation agreement would be today's focus ofattention.  I have not seen any feedback pursuant to my 1/Jun/00 e-mail.      <<Enron Monterrey/Vitro>> Your comment about the parent company guaranty reminds me that the abovee-mail also called for such a guaranty from Enron, as Enron NA is no longerthe purchaser.Regards,Jeff Smith",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10270270270270271,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14594594594594595,
        "Sentiment": 0.15000000000000002,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08658008658008658
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 12 Jun 2000 06:37:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Brian",
        "Subject": "Tax Language Changes to On/Off Shore Contracts for Vitro",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000 01:37 PM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tBarto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, sjansen@bracepatt.comHello again,If these contracts are going to be assigned immediately to Mitsui, isn't the issue of a guaranty a Mitsui issue? Is this addressed in the EPC contracts?If an Enron entity must give a guaranty, I would think we would want ENA to give it, to be replaced by a Mitsui guaranty unless we have some safeguard against the possibility of paying Mitsui and Mitsui not paying GE, so that we would have to pay twice.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000 01:31 PM ---------------------------jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/12/2000 01:06:56 PMBrian,Thanks.  The changes to the on & off-shore contracts are OK.I have replied to an e-mail from Kay concerning the \"letter agreement\", ofearlier today.  As far as I am concerned, we are ready to go there (you werecopied).Kay indicated that the consolidation agreement would be today's focus ofattention.  I have not seen any feedback pursuant to my 1/Jun/00 e-mail.      <<Enron Monterrey/Vitro>> Your comment about the parent company guaranty reminds me that the abovee-mail also called for such a guaranty from Enron, as Enron NA is no longerthe purchaser.Regards,Jeff Smith",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11442786069651742,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13432835820895522,
        "Sentiment": 0.15000000000000002,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11946902654867257
    }
],
"thread2229": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:13:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\troseann.engeldorf@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "chris",
        "Subject": "Revised Change Order",
        "Text": "Here's the latest revision inserting the drawing numbers.  Is it ready to go to GE?Scott, payment for change orders is addressed in the contract.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.18518518518518517,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07407407407407407,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.034013605442176874
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott ",
        "Subject": "Revised Change Order",
        "Text": "Sorry, didn't mean to forget you.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000 02:10 PM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tBills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENtHere's the latest revision inserting the drawing numbers.  Is it ready to go to GE?Scott, payment for change orders is addressed in the contract.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.17647058823529413,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0784313725490196,
        "Sentiment": 0.04791666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.176056338028169
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:03:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott ",
        "Subject": "Revised Change Order",
        "Text": "This is for the PSCO project, and Ben wants Chris to sign it.  I'm thinking that this is Dale's project, so I'm sending him a copy.If it looks ok to you I will clean it up and send it to GE for their review.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000 05:01 PM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tBills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENtHere's the latest revision inserting the drawing numbers.  Is it ready to go to GE?Scott, payment for change orders is addressed in the contract.  ",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08888888888888889,
        "Sentiment": 0.2851851851851852,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13266998341625208
    }
],
"thread2230": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:02:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "ben",
        "Subject": "LM 6000 GSU's",
        "Text": "FYI.  When do you think you'll be done?Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 02:00 PM ---------------------------   \t\t\tMann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com@ENRON, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com@ENRON Mike:Yes, please proceed with the orders referenced below. Please make sure Harry is on board with all the details regarding the spec sheets which I understand are still being worked out. Thanks for all your help.Regards,Benmichael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/20/2000 11:15:15 AMBen,I would like to confirm our conversation of this morning.  The requirments areas follows:two (2) 138 KV units City of Austin shown on data sheet dated April 6 2000HU-Enron - 2Ctwo (2) 138 KV units Las Vegas shown on dats sheet dated May 17 2000 HU - Enron2Dsix (6) 115/230 flexible units as shown on data sheet dated May 17 2000 HU-Enron -1CThe factrory ex-work dates are as agreed in the option extension agreement dated19 June 2000.Please let us know via return e-mail that our understanding is correct.  We arepresently changing the units 03 and 04 (same as City of Austin) that had beenpreviously released to agree with the requirments above.I will be out of town for the rest of the week, however, I will have my computerand my cell phone with me.  If you need me please contact me via e-mail or cellphone.Thanks,MIKE",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10849056603773585,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05188679245283019,
        "Sentiment": 0.35,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08683068017366136
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Kay Mann@ENRON on 06/20/2000 02:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "ben",
        "Subject": "LM 6000 GSU's",
        "Text": "Hi Kathy,Please let me know if you get to the point where the exhibits are all that need work.  If you are there now, please send me the current version electronically.Thanks,KayKay:FYI - in case Ben wants to know.Kathy---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/21/2000 10:28 AM ---------------------------Harry Okabayashi06/21/2000 10:03 AMBob,Please follow up with Frank Chmiel at ABB St. Louis on getting the our purchaser data sheets marked up so that we can finish the LM6000 GSU transformer P.O.TksHarry Okabayashi---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Okabayashi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/21/2000 10:06 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron Engineering & Construction Company\t---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/21/2000 07:49 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron Engineering & Construction Company\tHarry:What is the status?Thanks.Kathy---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/21/2000 07:48 AM ---------------------------FYI.  When do you think you'll be done?Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 02:00 PM ---------------------------   \t\t\tMann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com@ENRON, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com@ENRON Mike:Yes, please proceed with the orders referenced below. Please make sure Harry is on board with all the details regarding the spec sheets which I understand are still being worked out. Thanks for all your help.Regards,Benmichael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/20/2000 11:15:15 AMBen,I would like to confirm our conversation of this morning.  The requirments areas follows:two (2) 138 KV units City of Austin shown on data sheet dated April 6 2000HU-Enron - 2Ctwo (2) 138 KV units Las Vegas shown on dats sheet dated May 17 2000 HU - Enron2Dsix (6) 115/230 flexible units as shown on data sheet dated May 17 2000 HU-Enron -1CThe factrory ex-work dates are as agreed in the option extension agreement dated19 June 2000.Please let us know via return e-mail that our understanding is correct.  We arepresently changing the units 03 and 04 (same as City of Austin) that had beenpreviously released to agree with the requirments above.I will be out of town for the rest of the week, however, I will have my computerand my cell phone with me.  If you need me please contact me via e-mail or cellphone.Thanks,MIKE",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11641791044776119,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05373134328358209,
        "Sentiment": 0.26666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.14710743801652892
    }
],
"thread2231": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/03/2000 12:01 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Need Advice",
        "Text": "I would think cocktail attire.  What time are the receptions?This seminar that Ric is going to in Las Vegas is having cocktail receptions each evening and special shows by Dana Carvey and Penn and Teller.  There's no dress specified, so I'm assuming something nice but not overdone.  What would you think?  ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07142857142857142,
        "Sentiment": 0.47857142857142854,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.026058631921824105
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 05:18:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/03/2000 12:01 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Need Advice",
        "Text": "Tough time of day to dress for, but I think  you have it figured out.6:00 p.m.-7pm with dinner at 7pm.\tKay Mann@ENRON\t10/03/2000 12:05 PM\t\tI would think cocktail attire.  What time are the receptions?This seminar that Ric is going to in Las Vegas is having cocktail receptions each evening and special shows by Dana Carvey and Penn and Teller.  There's no dress specified, so I'm assuming something nice but not overdone.  What would you think?  ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1518987341772152,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10126582278481013,
        "Sentiment": 0.1894179894179894,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.042600896860986545
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 05:35:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/03/2000 12:01 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Need Advice",
        "Text": "I don't have a lot of formal stuff that fits me now - I've gained weight in the past 18 months.  I may do a little shopping.The last conference Ric went to in Vegas he didn't really bring dress clothes.  We'll see.  They would have said black tie if it was a formal affair (like your trip with Neil).  What are you going to wear?  Do you have lots of formal attire?  \tKay Mann@ENRON\t10/03/2000 12:18 PM\t\tTough time of day to dress for, but I think  you have it figured out.6:00 p.m.-7pm with dinner at 7pm.\tKay Mann@ENRON\t10/03/2000 12:05 PM\t\tI would think cocktail attire.  What time are the receptions?This seminar that Ric is going to in Las Vegas is having cocktail receptions each evening and special shows by Dana Carvey and Penn and Teller.  There's no dress specified, so I'm assuming something nice but not overdone.  What would you think?  ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13125,
        "Sentiment": 0.0259589947089947,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04352941176470588
    }
],
"thread2232": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 05:50:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kent",
        "Subject": "LM 6000 change order #2",
        "Text": "Kent,Here's a revised change order #2.  Please let me know if you have any comments:Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.375,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06382978723404255
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:35:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kent",
        "Subject": "LM 6000 change order #2",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 05:35 PM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tKent,Here's a revised change order #2.  Please let me know if you have any comments:Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.3225806451612903,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0967741935483871,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.26406926406926406
    }
],
"thread2233": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:20:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "  Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto",
        "Subject": " Form Contract, Rev Minus 1",
        "Text": "Here is the current rev of the EECC \"standard\" form which I am reviewing/massaging in connection with the 97 10 exercise.  It includes the exhibits, where I think you can find something useful.If this doesn't help, please let me know and I will check elsewhere.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 01:19 PM ---------------------------John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com on 09/21/2000 06:29:19 PMKay, here's the near to last draft of the  form. Sorry of the delay andthanks for being a sport about it, especially when your dvelope rtypes areneedig to get on down the road.. Please feel free to work on this, butplease  don't distribute this as our form, as you can see from the notebelow that we still have a way to go before it is  the \"form',but remainingwork is limited to speific content here and there, typos ,and somelitigation sturff. The structure will remain, so you can safely work intothis the West LB stuff.John R. asked that  you and he have a chat about the directionyou areheadedand hwo to coordinate the changes that need to be made - in terms ofsubstance as awell as drafting - to get to an standard set of changes forthe off balance sheet work. I would be glad to participate.---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENTon 09/21/2000 06:23 PM ---------------------------John Schwartzenburg09/21/2000 01:57 PM      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENTcc:Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christenit officially \"FORM 2000 - Rev. 00\",clean and compared. John R will need totake this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisisapplications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as \"Form 2000\" Iwoanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuningfrom  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resolutonmaterials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty upformat and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it nexttime.You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was torevise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibitswithbaited breath.Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me. - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15311004784688995,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10047846889952153,
        "Sentiment": 0.17516534391534394,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07883658629927287
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:02:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "  Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto",
        "Subject": " Form Contract, Rev Minus 1",
        "Text": "Per your request.Is the contract supposed to be an off balance sheet contract?  I'm supposed to be working on the changes necessary to make this one 97-10 compliant, but I haven't done it yet.  Maybe you will beat me to it, which is fine by me.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 12:00 PM ---------------------------John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com on 10/09/2000 05:41:13 PMForm contract plus exhibits, per request---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENTon 10/09/2000 05:40 PM ---------------------------John Schwartzenburg09/21/2000 01:57 PM      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENTcc:Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christenit officially \"FORM 2000 - Rev. 00\",clean and compared. John R will need totake this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisisapplications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as \"Form 2000\" Iwoanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuningfrom  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resolutonmaterials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty upformat and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it nexttime.You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was torevise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibitswithbaited breath.Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me. - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc - ENRON EPC - 0921 REV0-1 CMP.DOC",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.176056338028169,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07746478873239436,
        "Sentiment": 0.28194444444444444,
        "Subject Sentiment": -0.1,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10080428954423593
    }
],
"thread2234": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:57:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'kay",
        "Subject": "Livingston County Approval Issues - ISSUES FOR TODAY",
        "Text": "Mark,I've reviewed the fax sent yesterday with the Proposed Conditions to Special Use for Livingston Energy Center.  Is Titan Land Development the Owner?  Will it be necessary for Titan to make the escrow payment prior to exercising the relevant land options and the commencement of construction?I do not know whether these agreements and/or the making of the deposit would impact the balance sheet treatment, but I understand from Fred that we are not concerned about the balance sheet treatment for this project.Kay\"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI\" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on 10/04/2000 12:29:24 PM<rusty.stevens@enron.com>, \"'fred.mitro@enron.com'\" <fred.mitro@enron.com>Karen S. - CHI\" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> As you know we are scheduled to appear before the Livingston County ZoningBoard of Appeals (\"ZBA\") tomorrow evening for initial approval of theLivingston Energy Center (the \"Facility\").  Assuming, we receive a vote toapprove the Facility, the ZBA will be approving the Conditions of Approvalof the Special Use sent out yesterday for everyone's final approval andsign-off.   Please note that we have incorporated into these conditions thestormwater management conditions, township and county highway roadwayconditions, and other matters. If there are any changes or modifications tothese conditions, our ability to incorporate may be limited if they are notreceived by 4pm today.  Of course, if necessary, we will attempt to makemodifications after that time.  It is possible based on on-going negotiations with the County and ourneighbors that additional changes may be required today or tomorrow.  Wewill of course contact you immediately if that occurs.  If you have anyquestions, please do not hesitate to call or email Karen or me.  Thanks.Mark A. GershonPiper Marbury Rudnick & WolfeMark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com____________________________________________________________________________The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system.Thank you.For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at http://www.piperrudnick.com/____________________________________________________________________________",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0948509485094851,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08672086720867209,
        "Sentiment": 0.08727678571428571,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09613928841786526
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:37:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Rusty",
        "Subject": "Livingston County Approval Issues - ISSUES FOR TODAY",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 05:37 PM ---------------------------\"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI\" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on 10/04/2000 05:13:00 PM- CHI\" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com><fred.mitro@enron.com>, \"Way, Karen S. - CHI\" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> Thank you for the heads up on the Schaeffer parcel.  Just a reminder that ifwe want to use that site for a laydown parcel it may be necessary to obtainapproval from the County to do so.  After Thursday night we can discuss theproper method of confirming this with the County.  Please keep in mind thatwhile a we hope to obtain approval of a motion on Thursday night, formalapproval will not occur until next month's ZBA hearing when written findingswill be adopted. Mark A. GershonPiper Marbury Rudnick & WolfeMark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com   -----Original Message-----'fred.mitro@enron.com'; Way, Karen S. - CHITODAY   Mark,  FYI  -  I plan to approach Mr. Schaeffer (the 28 acre tractto the   immediate west of the site) to option that tract as well once we getdone   with the ZBA on Thursday (assuming it goes off without a hitch).   We want to option that tract so it could be used as constructionlaydown,   and more importantly to control the parcel across from the plantsite.  The   plan would be to buy the tract, but let him have rights to farmingit -   once we're done using it for laydown.  This gives us a buffer tractfor   sound mitigation etc. as well.   \"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI\" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on10/04/2000   04:09:26 PM         \"'fred.mitro@enron.com'\" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, \"Way, KarenS. -         CHI\" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>   Titan Land Development Co., L.L.C.  holds the options on the  3properties   in Livingston County. If  you were to acquire those properties anddevelop   the Facility it is my understanding that Titan would be the entitythat   would be the owner of the Property and the Facility.  The proposed   Conditions were drafted to apply to the party defined as the \"Owner\"and   not   specifically to Titan or ENA.  Proposed Condition No. 12 providesthat:             The Special Use approved by this ordinance and all of the   conditions, obligations and rights provided for herein shall runwith the   ownership of the land and the Facility.  For purposes of thisSpecial Use,   \"Owner\" shall include the owner of the Property and the owner and/or   operator of the Facility.   Therefore, the conditions of the Special Use, including theobligation to   make the Escrow payment, should not apply to Titan until acquisitionof the   Property or development of the Facility.  In the unlikely scenariothat   Titan was to acquire the Property but not develop it, failure tosatisfy   the   Conditions should only relate to the right to use the Property forthe   Facility.  I am working with the County to get a copy of the final   ordinance   or resolution (they have not completed it yet) to confirm that it is   consistent with this proposal.   Please let me know if I should pursue the balance sheet treatmentwith your   tax department.  If you have any questions or I can be of anyfurther   assistance please let me know.   Mark A. Gershon   Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe   Mark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com        -----Original Message-----   TODAY        Mark,        I've reviewed the fax sent yesterday with the ProposedConditions to        Special Use for Livingston Energy Center.  Is Titan LandDevelopment   the        Owner?  Will it be necessary for Titan to make the escrowpayment   prior to        exercising the relevant land options and the commencement of   construction?        I do not know whether these agreements and/or the making of the   deposit        would impact the balance sheet treatment, but I understand fromFred   that        we are not concerned about the balance sheet treatment for this   project.        Kay        \"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI\" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on   10/04/2000        12:29:24 PM              \"'rusty.stevens@enron.com'\" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>,              \"'fred.mitro@enron.com'\" <fred.mitro@enron.com>   <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,              \"Way, Karen S. - CHI\" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>        As you know we are scheduled to appear before the LivingstonCounty   Zoning        Board of Appeals (\"ZBA\") tomorrow evening for initial approvalof   the        Livingston Energy Center (the \"Facility\").  Assuming, wereceive a   vote to        approve the Facility, the ZBA will be approving the Conditionsof   Approval        of the Special Use sent out yesterday for everyone's finalapproval   and        sign-off.   Please note that we have incorporated into these   conditions the        stormwater management conditions, township and county highway   roadway        conditions, and other matters. If there are any changes or   modifications to        these conditions, our ability to incorporate may be limited ifthey   are not        received by 4pm today.  Of course, if necessary, we willattempt to   make        modifications after that time.        It is possible based on on-going negotiations with the Countyand   our        neighbors that additional changes may be required today ortomorrow.   We        will of course contact you immediately if that occurs.  If youhave   any        questions, please do not hesitate to call or email Karen or me.   Thanks.        Mark A. Gershon        Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe        Mark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com   ____________________________________________________________________________        The information contained in this communication may beconfidential,   is        intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and maybe   legally        privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended   recipient,        you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,or   copying of        this communication, or any of its contents, is strictlyprohibited.   If you        have received this communication in error, please re-send this        communication to the sender and delete the original message andany   copy of        it from your computer system.        Thank you.        For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe,please   visit us        at http://www.piperrudnick.com/   ____________________________________________________________________________   ____________________________________________________________________________   The information contained in this communication may be confidential,is   intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may belegally   privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intendedrecipient,   you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, orcopying of   this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited.If you   have received this communication in error, please re-send this   communication to the sender and delete the original message and anycopy of   it from your computer system.   Thank you.   For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, pleasevisit us   at http://www.piperrudnick.com/   ____________________________________________________________________________   ____________________________________________________________________________The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system.Thank you.For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at http://www.piperrudnick.com/____________________________________________________________________________",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.3825,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06375,
        "Sentiment": 0.20910714285714285,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10375715352077632
    }
], "thread2235": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kathleen",
        "Subject": "Dual Fuel Option Availability for Enron",
        "Text": "FYI.  I'll send a copy of the executed original change order once I get it.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 05:43 PM ---------------------------david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com on 06/02/2000 05:27:37 PMBen.F.Jacoby@enron.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, james.bonnett@ss.ps.ge.com, pault.armstrong@ss.ps.ge.com  - Enron004.pdf",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11428571428571428,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.02857142857142857,
        "Sentiment": 0.375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.25280898876404495
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Ben",
        "Subject": "Dual Fuel Option Availability for Enron",
        "Text": "fyi.  I faxed it to David, originals being sent to you.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 04:17 PM ---------------------------   \t\t\tMann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Hulse/Corp/Enron@ENRON David:We have executed the change order and Kay Mann is faxing it to you. I trust you will find it in order, and would appreciate a confirmation at your earliest convenience. Kay's extension is 713-345-7566. Thanks much.Ben Jacobydavid.davis@ss.ps.ge.com on 05/31/2000 07:53:28 PMBen,Thanks for replying so fast.  My numbers are:office 281-457-8444fax 281-452-1585cell 713-806-3908I look forward to hearing from you.  Regards, David Davis",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0898876404494382,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1797752808988764,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1415525114155251
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 5 Jun 2000 01:54:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kathleen",
        "Subject": "Dual Fuel Option Availability for Enron",
        "Text": "fyi---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/05/2000 08:54 AM ---------------------------david.davis@ss.ps.ge.com on 06/02/2000 05:27:37 PMBen.F.Jacoby@enron.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, james.bonnett@ss.ps.ge.com, pault.armstrong@ss.ps.ge.com  - Enron004.pdf",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.3096085409252669
    }
],
"thread2239": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 9 Nov 2000 06:33:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 12:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA",
        "Text": "Jeff,I don't know if our group needs anyone, but I wanted to pass this resume along.  I worked with Carlos when I was at EECC, and I rate him highly.  He'll take on anything, has good people skills, works hard, and has a varied transactional background.  As an added bonus, he is fluent in Spanish.EECC is being plopped into EES, and Carlos would prefer to make the move to ENA (or EA, whatever we are called). He discussed this with Vicky, so she is aware that he is checking out opportunities here.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 02:24 PM ---------------------------Kay, as we've discussed before, I'm interested in pursuing the opportunities available in the ENA legal group.  As you know, my experience at EECC in addition to focusing on traditional EPC contracts and joint venture agreements, has also included cross-border financing agreements and merger and acquisition activity.  Before coming to Enron as you recall, I worked with a New york based firm here in Houston where I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemex on their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreements and CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC and IPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs in DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactions such as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work, partnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for your help.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05928853754940711,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07114624505928854,
        "Sentiment": 0.15979256854256854,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06514657980456026
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:27:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 12:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA",
        "Text": "I wanted to pass along the resume of Carlos Sole. Carlos and I worked together extensively at EECC.  The \"reorganization\" of EECC has him moving to EES, but he would prefer to work here.  He recently met with V. Sharp, and she understands that he wants to explore opportunities at EWS (I'm learning the new nomenclature).  John Schwartzenburg understands this as well.I can recommend Carlos as a solid, intelligent, hard working lawyer. He's a great guy and I believe he would fit in well here.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 10:17 AM ---------------------------Kay, as we've discussed before, I'm interested in pursuing the opportunities available in the ENA legal group.  As you know, my experience at EECC in addition to focusing on traditional EPC contracts and joint venture agreements, has also included cross-border financing agreements and merger and acquisition activity.  Before coming to Enron as you recall, I worked with a New york based firm here in Houston where I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemex on their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreements and CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC and IPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs in DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactions such as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work, partnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for your help.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.056910569105691054,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08130081300813008,
        "Sentiment": 0.15864568302068302,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06409417920209287
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:30:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 12:02 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA",
        "Text": "Hi,Got your voice mail, and it reminded me to sent this out.  I don't know what is up with Jeff, so why wait to send this?Next comes Finance/M&A (Lance and Travis).I'm having lunch with Dan today - want to join us?  We are going to Fox Diner.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 10:28 AM ---------------------------Kay Mann11/20/2000 10:27 AMI wanted to pass along the resume of Carlos Sole. Carlos and I worked together extensively at EECC.  The \"reorganization\" of EECC has him moving to EES, but he would prefer to work here.  He recently met with V. Sharp, and she understands that he wants to explore opportunities at EWS (I'm learning the new nomenclature).  John Schwartzenburg understands this as well.I can recommend Carlos as a solid, intelligent, hard working lawyer. He's a great guy and I believe he would fit in well here.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 10:17 AM ---------------------------Kay, as we've discussed before, I'm interested in pursuing the opportunities available in the ENA legal group.  As you know, my experience at EECC in addition to focusing on traditional EPC contracts and joint venture agreements, has also included cross-border financing agreements and merger and acquisition activity.  Before coming to Enron as you recall, I worked with a New york based firm here in Houston where I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemex on their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreements and CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC and IPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs in DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactions such as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work, partnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for your help.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06535947712418301,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08169934640522876,
        "Sentiment": 0.15864568302068302,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08914525432616675
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 1 Dec 2000 01:41:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Michelle",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA",
        "Text": "Michelle,Carlos would be a great addition at ENA in any transactional capacity.  I worked with him extensively (actually, I hired him), and he is terrific.  Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 09:37 AM ---------------------------Carlos.Sole@enron.com on 12/01/2000 09:36:10 AMMichelle, per my voicemail as I indicated, I am trying to pursue whatopportunities may be available at EWS and both Julia Murray and Kay Mannrecommended that I contact you.  As background, I have been at EECC sinceOctober last year where I have focused on traditional EPC contracts andjoint venture agreements with construction partners, cross-border financingagreements principally in Mexico and merger and acquisition/strategicinvestment transactions.  Before coming to Enron, I worked with the Houstonoffice of a New York based firm (Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle)where I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemexon their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreementsand CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC andIPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs inWashington, DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactionssuch as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work,partnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for yourconsideration and I look forward to talking with you when you return fromvacation (my extension is 6-6127). - EECC Resume.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05454545454545454,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07272727272727272,
        "Sentiment": 0.3057575757575758,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06871727748691099
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:24:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "carlos",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA",
        "Text": "I think that him leaving word for Michele might be more palatable.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08333333333333333,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.015151515151515152
    }
],
"thread2240": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:13:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 03:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "I thrive on pressure.  My birthday is January 11th.  Is that close to her due date?KayThanks.  Depending on your success as a headhunter for me, I will propose to Kendall that if our expectant child is a girl then she should be named Cynthia or Kay.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10204081632653061,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12244897959183673,
        "Sentiment": 0.0875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.024096385542168676
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:21:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 03:25 PM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "Oh well.Jeff is in London, but will be here on Monday.  Kaylate March\tKay Mann@ENRON\t11/10/2000 09:13 AM\t\tI thrive on pressure.  My birthday is January 11th.  Is that close to her due date?KayThanks.  Depending on your success as a headhunter for me, I will propose to Kendall that if our expectant child is a girl then she should be named Cynthia or Kay.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1076923076923077,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1076923076923077,
        "Sentiment": 0.0875,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.036619718309859155
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:29:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/10/2000 09:25 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "De nada.Thanks for your help.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.2,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06896551724137931
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:35:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 10:34 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "I'm packing my office (yes, another move), so I'm generally avialable.  Do you want to come over here around 1130, and we'll load up Dan and go.  This will be a car trip, as FD is on Taft.Sounds goood.  What time (I'll get there early) and where do we met as I have no idea where the Fox Diner is?",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09523809523809523,
        "Sentiment": 0.07500000000000001,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.05723905723905724
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 02:53:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 10:38 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "Dan just dumped me, so we can go any where you want.  Do you have a preference?Kaysee you then",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.031914893617021274
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 03:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 10:38 AM",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON",
        "Subject": "Opportunities at ENA  ",
        "Text": "You'll like it.  Do you want to meet by the garage?KayFox Diner as it's peaked my curiosity.  Unless you suggest otherwise\tKay Mann@ENRON\t11/20/2000 10:53 AM\t\tDan just dumped me, so we can go any where you want.  Do you have a preference?Kaysee you then",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1111111111111111,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04743083003952569
    }
],
"thread2241": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:20:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Suzanne Adams@ECT on 11/09/2000 04:08 PMBills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott ",
        "Recipient": "Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Stephen",
        "Subject": "GE CONFERENCE CALL FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2000",
        "Text": "Hi Guys,We don't expect to deal with the facility agreement until around 130, so there isn't a need for Lee to listen to the rest unless he wants to.  Lee, you are more than welcome to come in person, in which case I can give you some exectued change orders.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 09:14 AM ---------------------------Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Michael.barnas@ps.ge.com, Kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.comThe conference call will be held at 1:00 p.m. CT tomorrow, November 10, 2000.  For the people in Houston, I have reserved EB38C1.  The dial-in information follows:If you have any questions, please give me a call at 713-853-7340.  Thanks, Suzanne",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10810810810810811,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13513513513513514,
        "Sentiment": 0.35000000000000003,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13507109004739337
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:34:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay",
        "Subject": "GE CONFERENCE CALL FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2000",
        "Text": "I know the feeling.lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 11/10/2000 09:30:19 AMI think I will, so I can get out of here. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10526315789473684,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.10810810810810811
    }
],
"thread2242": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:14:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tsheila.tweed@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronLuce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT ",
        "Subject": "PERC Negotiations",
        "Text": "Rusty,Let's meet at your convenience.  We need to identify some of the tripping points and critical path items, especially since our goal (I assume) will be to keep equipment, EPC contracts, land (?), etc off Enron's balance sheet while things are developing.  Talking through the process should help.KayRusty Stevens06/28/2000 10:51 AMLuce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT Attached is a proposal that was shared with PERC last week.  We are now awaiting PERC's response.  I am assuming that they will agree to the terms since their alternative is to lose $ on the units at resale with no opportunity for recapture.  I wanted to give you a \"heads-up\" since the timing will be is tight once I get the green light to proceed with legal docs.  Please let me know what documents we will need and how you suggest we expedite the process (LOI or otherwise).Calumet Project Participation (with ABB's):ENA has verbally told them we will not participate in Calumet and the LLC term to get to execution has expired.Upon release by Laura/Ben - need to send them formal notice under the PDA that we are withdrawing our notice of interest to participate in Calumet.Going Forward:We need to put the general terms in the proposal into a formal document.  Letter of Intent authorizing us to take control of the development/site sales process at our expense - if they the deal unwinds we get reimbursed for our direct costs spent to further perfect/sell their sites.Assess PERC's legal position with ABB (was it fraud or gross negligence that ABB failed to mention this problem they've known about for 10 years?).Authorization/indemnification from PERC to negotiate with ABB to grant contract concessions that will benefit Enron Canada as subsequent owner.Enron Canada will likely be involved as lead negotiater with ABB - who in legal will work with ENA/Enron Canada on this ?Enron Canada - To meet their 2001 schedule we need to have legal authorization to engage ABB by early-July.\"Pitch Book\" - In its current form includes Calumet/Torrence we need authorization from PERC - Bruce is expecting to begin circulation by week of July 10th.EPC contractors -  They bid Calumet using ABB, and we want them to re-bid for LM 6000's.  Need authorization from PERC (July 14th or sooner) with cost coverage provisions, since the EPC contractors are likely to want to charge us $50-$100k to re-bid the deal. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08478802992518704,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10723192019950124,
        "Sentiment": 0.03883928571428572,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.035102381947346425
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 6 Jul 2000 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tlaura.luce@enron.com, sheila.tweed@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@EnronLuce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT ",
        "Subject": "PERC Negotiations",
        "Text": "No problem.   \t\t\tJacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron FYI, Debbie advised me that the Canadian group has asked that she interface on the turbine acquisition. Please make sure, as best you can, that the appropriate persons are involved in the negotiations with Peoples and ABB. I don't have a preference as to who is doing what, just want to make sure we're all coordinated.Thanks,Ben   \t\t\tLuce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT Rusty,Let's meet at your convenience.  We need to identify some of the tripping points and critical path items, especially since our goal (I assume) will be to keep equipment, EPC contracts, land (?), etc off Enron's balance sheet while things are developing.  Talking through the process should help.KayRusty Stevens06/28/2000 10:51 AMLuce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT Attached is a proposal that was shared with PERC last week.  We are now awaiting PERC's response.  I am assuming that they will agree to the terms since their alternative is to lose $ on the units at resale with no opportunity for recapture.  I wanted to give you a \"heads-up\" since the timing will be is tight once I get the green light to proceed with legal docs.  Please let me know what documents we will need and how you suggest we expedite the process (LOI or otherwise).Calumet Project Participation (with ABB's):ENA has verbally told them we will not participate in Calumet and the LLC term to get to execution has expired.Upon release by Laura/Ben - need to send them formal notice under the PDA that we are withdrawing our notice of interest to participate in Calumet.Going Forward:We need to put the general terms in the proposal into a formal document.  Letter of Intent authorizing us to take control of the development/site sales process at our expense - if they the deal unwinds we get reimbursed for our direct costs spent to further perfect/sell their sites.Assess PERC's legal position with ABB (was it fraud or gross negligence that ABB failed to mention this problem they've known about for 10 years?).Authorization/indemnification from PERC to negotiate with ABB to grant contract concessions that will benefit Enron Canada as subsequent owner.Enron Canada will likely be involved as lead negotiater with ABB - who in legal will work with ENA/Enron Canada on this ?Enron Canada - To meet their 2001 schedule we need to have legal authorization to engage ABB by early-July.\"Pitch Book\" - In its current form includes Calumet/Torrence we need authorization from PERC - Bruce is expecting to begin circulation by week of July 10th.EPC contractors -  They bid Calumet using ABB, and we want them to re-bid for LM 6000's.  Need authorization from PERC (July 14th or sooner) with cost coverage provisions, since the EPC contractors are likely to want to charge us $50-$100k to re-bid the deal. ",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09725158562367865,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10570824524312897,
        "Sentiment": 0.22033730158730158,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04035874439461883
    }
],
"thread2243": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:55:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "SWPC Agreement",
        "Text": "As usual, the lawyers are the last to know.Stuart is working on a transaction to sell the asset (Gleason), and therefore this ageement needs to be documented asap, which means in the next few days.  Please review the attached and give me a call.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 09:52 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tKay -I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal standpoint?  Call me with questions.Thanks,Mitch",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11956521739130435,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13043478260869565,
        "Sentiment": 0.043750000000000004,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12141652613827993
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:56:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "SWPC Agreement",
        "Text": "Thanks for the info.  I'll give it a look.Kay   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tKay -I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal standpoint?  Call me with questions.Thanks,Mitch",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14583333333333334,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.04332129963898917
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "SWPC Agreement",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 10:00 AM ---------------------------Kay Mann11/10/2000 09:55 AMAs usual, the lawyers are the last to know.Stuart is working on a transaction to sell the asset (Gleason), and therefore this ageement needs to be documented asap, which means in the next few days.  Please review the attached and give me a call.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 09:52 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tKay -I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal standpoint?  Call me with questions.Thanks,Mitch",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Sentiment": 0.043750000000000004,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.17768595041322313
    }
],
"thread2244": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:00:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "jscheib@rc",
        "Subject": "FuelCell / Enron",
        "Text": "Jackie,Would it be possible for you to mark up the list of comments, highlighting which are outstanding?  Marked by hand and faxed would be great.Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.038461538461538464,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.19230769230769232,
        "Sentiment": 0.175,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03205128205128205
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:48:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Jerry Leitman (E-mail)\" <jleitman@fce",
        "Subject": "FuelCell / Enron",
        "Text": "I wasn't sure from your email if you wanted to review it now, or wait until Jackie and I sort through some things.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 10:47 AM ---------------------------\"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino\" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/10/2000 08:54:15 AM<rlevine@fce.com>, \"'kay.mann@enron.com'\" <kay.mann@enron.com>Our server is back up - sorry for the delay in your receipt of thesecomments which were initially sent out last night.  A message from oursystem administrator indicates that Kay already received the message belowbut Ross and Jerry did not.  Just to be safe I am resending to all of you.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07526881720430108,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10752688172043011,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.13862928348909656
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:38:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'kay",
        "Subject": "FuelCell / Enron",
        "Text": "Heather, I think the clean one is ok to send to Bob Wright as is.  Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 05:37 PM ---------------------------\"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino\" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/09/2000 09:13:40 PM<jleitman@fce.com>, \"Ross M. Levine (E-mail)\" <rlevine@fce.com>As discussed, attached is a clean and blacklined version of the FuelCell /Enron Agreement reflecting the parties' agreements over the past two days.The marked up comments list will follow shortly by PDF file.  Please notethat some of the members of my client's team will be seeing this at the sametime as you and therefore may have additional comments.   <<FuelCell Enron (CLEAN) Purchase Agreement.doc>>  <<FuelCell Enron (RED)Purchase Agreement.rtf>>--------------------------------------------------Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq.Robinson & Cole LLP280 Trumbull StreetHartford, CT  06103(p) 860-275-8285(f) 860-275-8299jscheib@rc.com - FuelCell Enron (CLEAN) Purchase Agreement.doc - FuelCell Enron (RED) Purchase Agreement.rtf",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08270676691729323,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.045112781954887216,
        "Sentiment": 0.2439814814814815,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.16826923076923078
    }
],
"thread2245": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:21:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "michael",
        "Subject": "Transformers for LM's",
        "Text": "Hi Mike,Since we haven't had any luck hooking up on the telephone, I wanted to transmit to you an initial draft of a facility agreement, as contemplated by the contract for the transformer packages for the LM's.  I would have sent this to Dave, but I don't seem to have his email address.Since the WestLB financing facility is scheduled to expire soon, we need to get the transformers transferred into our new facility, as well as get them contractually allocated to various projects.  Please give me a call or have Dave call me so that we can handle this as expeditiously as possible.Thanks,Kay713 345 7566",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12149532710280374,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14953271028037382,
        "Sentiment": 0.06818181818181818,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.023064250411861616
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:22:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "michael",
        "Subject": "Transformers for LM's",
        "Text": "FYI.  ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 05:21 PM ---------------------------Kay Mann11/10/2000 11:21 AMHi Mike,Since we haven't had any luck hooking up on the telephone, I wanted to transmit to you an initial draft of a facility agreement, as contemplated by the contract for the transformer packages for the LM's.  I would have sent this to Dave, but I don't seem to have his email address.Since the WestLB financing facility is scheduled to expire soon, we need to get the transformers transferred into our new facility, as well as get them contractually allocated to various projects.  Please give me a call or have Dave call me so that we can handle this as expeditiously as possible.Thanks,Kay713 345 7566",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12396694214876033,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.1322314049586777,
        "Sentiment": 0.06818181818181818,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09651474530831099
    }
],
"thread2246": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 04:13:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kent",
        "Subject": "Facility AGreement",
        "Text": "I can assure you that no improvement in the relative risk allocation was intended.  They pointed out what appeared to be some disconnects, and in some cases I ok'd them putting the suggestions in for discussions purposes.  I wasn't trying to play games.Talk to you soon,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0625,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Sentiment": 0.5,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.02564102564102564
    }
],
"thread2247": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 02:25 PMBruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T ",
        "Recipient": "Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, ",
        "Subject": "Construction Schedule - Office Moves",
        "Text": "Hi Mark,I thought I was in my \"final\" office.  Where am I moving?KayBruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECTWhitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The current phase of the office construction process is almost finished.  We have been given a completion date when (we hope) your new office will be ready of Monday, November 20.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05825242718446602,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08737864077669903,
        "Sentiment": 0.17297979797979798,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09043927648578812
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:21:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 02:25 PMBruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T ",
        "Recipient": "Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, ",
        "Subject": "Construction Schedule - Office Moves",
        "Text": "FYI,  I expect to be on vacation that week.KayI think your \"final\" office changed when your group changed - the East Origination/Gas Trading Group is in the southeast quadrant of the floor and they have given you 3882, just  four doors down the hall from where I am now.  The construction workers are gone for the day if you want to stop by and see it.\tKay Mann@ENRON\t11/10/2000 03:07 PM\t\tHi Mark,I thought I was in my \"final\" office.  Where am I moving?KayBruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECTWhitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The current phase of the office construction process is almost finished.  We have been given a completion date when (we hope) your new office will be ready of Monday, November 20.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07471264367816093,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10919540229885058,
        "Sentiment": 0.0893939393939394,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07136715391229578
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:05:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 02:25 PMBruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T ",
        "Recipient": "Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, ",
        "Subject": "Construction Schedule - Office Moves",
        "Text": "Hi Jeff and Barbara,I would really like to stay where I am, if possible.  I like being close to Suzanne, not to mention the good neighbors and the benefit of facing the wall.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 05:02 PM ---------------------------Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECTWhitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The current phase of the office construction process is almost finished.  We have been given a completion date when (we hope) your new office will be ready of Monday, November 20.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.045454545454545456,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10606060606060606,
        "Sentiment": 0.1921717171717172,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12550200803212852
    }
],
"thread2248": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:53:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "GE Turbine Agreement",
        "Text": "1100 is just fine.  We are all so dependent on our computers, I can hardly remember what we did in the \"old days\".Kay\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 09:41:31 AMI should have the revised agreement to you by 11 AM CST.  I had hoped tohave it to you earlier, but we have experienced some technicaldifficulties as a result of the conversion of our system over theweekend.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.07352941176470588,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Sentiment": 0.2402777777777778,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.050505050505050504
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:34:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "GE Turbine Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi Peter,Do you have a new ETA yet?  I need to manage expectations on this end.Thanks,Kay\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 09:41:31 AMI should have the revised agreement to you by 11 AM CST.  I had hoped tohave it to you earlier, but we have experienced some technicaldifficulties as a result of the conversion of our system over theweekend.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11475409836065574,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.18032786885245902,
        "Sentiment": 0.2681818181818182,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.051630434782608696
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:19:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "GE Turbine Agreement",
        "Text": "Peter,If I can get the clean version, I'm happy to run a blackline here.  Maybe getting out of your system would help!Thanks,Kay\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:17:39 PMOur IT folks in Houston are still trying to run the blackline.  I wastold it would only be a few more minutes.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.057692307692307696,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.11538461538461539,
        "Sentiment": 0.3416666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06451612903225806
    }
],
"thread2249": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:47:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "mitch",
        "Subject": "Westinghouse letters",
        "Text": "Hi Mitch,My suggested changes are highlighted.Please let me know what else I can do.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14285714285714285,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07142857142857142,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.034482758620689655
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 16 Nov 2000 01:13:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Westinghouse letters",
        "Text": "FYI---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/16/2000 09:13 AM ---------------------------   \tEnron North America Corp.\t\tThanks Kay.  I'll forward them on the Westinghouse by e-mail first.MitchKay Mann11/13/2000 10:47 AMHi Mitch,My suggested changes are highlighted.Please let me know what else I can do.Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13953488372093023,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.046511627906976744,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.19938650306748465
    }
],
"thread2251": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:12:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "gdavis2@enron",
        "Subject": "a quick question",
        "Text": "Hi Geneva,The instruction sheet mentions a gift bag.  Do I pick this up at drop off?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11764705882352941,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.058823529411764705,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.3333333333333333,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0425531914893617
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:51:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "gdavis2@enron",
        "Subject": "a quick question",
        "Text": "Thanks!   \t\t\tSorry the bags came in but they were wrong and we had to order from NewYork and they will arrive in 2 weeks.  I will email everyone when they can pick up their bags and labels.Kay Mann11/13/2000 01:12 PMHi Geneva,The instruction sheet mentions a gift bag.  Do I pick this up at drop off?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.11864406779661017,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06779661016949153,
        "Sentiment": -0.125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.3333333333333333,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03225806451612903
    }
],
"thread2253": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:05:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com\tsheila.tweed@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "Compared Document",
        "Text": "Here's the blacklined version.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:03 PM ---------------------------\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:46:03 PM<christophercobb@akllp.com> Here is the blackline showing changes made from version 5.  Again, Iapologize for the delay.  As you can see, the blackline has deletedcertain section headings and internal section cites. I will have ITdebug version 6, so this shouldn't affect any future blacklines.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.0625,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.0625,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.15841584158415842
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:11:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "Compared Document",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:10 PM ---------------------------Kay Mann11/13/2000 02:05 PMBills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRONHere's the blacklined version.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:03 PM ---------------------------\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:46:03 PM<christophercobb@akllp.com> Here is the blackline showing changes made from version 5.  Again, Iapologize for the delay.  As you can see, the blackline has deletedcertain section headings and internal section cites. I will have ITdebug version 6, so this shouldn't affect any future blacklines.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05813953488372093,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.046511627906976744,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.19975031210986266
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:19:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "Compared Document",
        "Text": "Print job.---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 02:19 PM ---------------------------\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:46:03 PM<christophercobb@akllp.com> Here is the blackline showing changes made from version 5.  Again, Iapologize for the delay.  As you can see, the blackline has deletedcertain section headings and internal section cites. I will have ITdebug version 6, so this shouldn't affect any future blacklines.",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08064516129032258,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.08064516129032258,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.16390041493775934
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:56:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "peterthompson@akllp",
        "Subject": "Compared Document",
        "Text": "Hi Peter,When do you  think we will have a pretty compared document?Thanks,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.23076923076923078,
        "Sentiment": 0.25,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.038461538461538464
    }
],
"thread2254": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 11 Oct 2000 01:17:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "FuelCell Negotiations",
        "Text": "fyi.  I'll respond later.  Back to the contract....---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 08:16 AM ---------------------------   \t\t\tI spoke to Fuel Cells and here is my suggested schedule for the negotiations:October 11, 2000--We redraft purchase order and send it to FuelCells.October 12, 2000-We hold a conference call with FuelCells in the morning to walk them through the P.O. and give them our thoughts (probable length 1-1.5 hours).  We continue to work on P.O. October 15, 2000--Kay flies to New York.  We have a conference call with FuelCells in the afternoon to discuss their initial comments on P.O.  Kay meets with Bingham to get work assignments started (i.e., permitting work, start drafting construction agreement, changes to Development Agreement...etc).  Scott takes 'red-eye\" flight to N.Y.October 16, 2000--Meet with FuelCells in Bingham's offices.  Continue negotiations on P.O.October 17-19, 2000--To be determined based on progress of meetings.  If need be, we could continue negotiations in Houston or have Kay patch in by the telephone or do all the negotiations by telephone.  What are your thoughts?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12087912087912088,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12637362637362637,
        "Sentiment": 0.13636363636363635,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.0987012987012987
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:23:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "FuelCell Negotiations",
        "Text": "We might want to consider meeting with the  FuelCell team in their offices, if this is less intimidating for them.  I  may be able to fly up on Monday am and accomplish what I need to do with BD, although flying on Sunday is fine as well.  TBD.Kay   \t\t\tI spoke to Fuel Cells and here is my suggested schedule for the negotiations:October 11, 2000--We redraft purchase order and send it to FuelCells.October 12, 2000-We hold a conference call with FuelCells in the morning to walk them through the P.O. and give them our thoughts (probable length 1-1.5 hours).  We continue to work on P.O. October 15, 2000--Kay flies to New York.  We have a conference call with FuelCells in the afternoon to discuss their initial comments on P.O.  Kay meets with Bingham to get work assignments started (i.e., permitting work, start drafting construction agreement, changes to Development Agreement...etc).  Scott takes 'red-eye\" flight to N.Y.October 16, 2000--Meet with FuelCells in Bingham's offices.  Continue negotiations on P.O.October 17-19, 2000--To be determined based on progress of meetings.  If need be, we could continue negotiations in Houston or have Kay patch in by the telephone or do all the negotiations by telephone.  What are your thoughts?",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10697674418604651,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12093023255813953,
        "Sentiment": 0.18063973063973068,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046586345381526104
    }
],
"thread2255": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:27:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "lloyd",
        "Subject": "GE \"Standard\" Contract/off balance sheet",
        "Text": "Greetings,I'm working with Sheila Tweed and others at ENA and EECC in developing a more standardized contract with GE for equipment purchases.  The goal is to develop a more efficient contracting process, and to avoid negotiating the same  points repeatedly, with varying results among business units.  Sheila has suggested that I drop you a line to see if this is something you might find interesting and/or helpful.You now have my email address, and my phone number is 713 345 7566.  Please let me know your thoughts about participating in the process.Thank you,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10416666666666667,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10416666666666667,
        "Sentiment": 0.4166666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.021164021164021163
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:03:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Lloyd Wantschek/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT",
        "Subject": "GE \"Standard\" Contract/off balance sheet",
        "Text": "---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:03 AM ---------------------------Mark Evans@ECT11/19/2000 03:12 AMKay,our contact with GE tends to be indirect through turnkey contractors on power owner. So this would probably not be high on our list of priorities, although we would be interested to see what you come up with. You might want input to your process from our engineering team, lead by John Chappell, so I have copied this to John.       MarkKay Mann@ENRON13/11/2000 20:27Greetings,I'm working with Sheila Tweed and others at ENA and EECC in developing a more standardized contract with GE for equipment purchases.  The goal is to develop a more efficient contracting process, and to avoid negotiating the same  points repeatedly, with varying results among business units.  Sheila has suggested that I drop you a line to see if this is something you might find interesting and/or helpful.You now have my email address, and my phone number is 713 345 7566.  Please let me know your thoughts about participating in the process.Thank you,Kay",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10795454545454546,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.13068181818181818,
        "Sentiment": 0.36375,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07520891364902507
    }
],
"thread2256": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "no",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kay",
        "Subject": "Dewey McLain",
        "Text": "Need a sitter.  I'm working on it!  Any idea what time it starts?KayAndrea Dowlen <dowlena@camerondiv.com> on 11/13/2000 04:23:18 PMKay - will I see ya there?Andreadbennett@technip.com wrote:",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.21428571428571427,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.07142857142857142,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08900523560209424
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:29:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "dbennett@technip",
        "Subject": "Dewey McLain",
        "Text": "A que hora?  (what time?)",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": false,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.3333333333333333,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.16666666666666666,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.16
    }
],
"thread2257": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:44:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"Kay Mann (E-mail)\" <kay",
        "Subject": "GE Agreement Redline",
        "Text": "Looks like they have a rats nest to figure out.ckm---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 04:41 PM ---------------------------\"Thompson, Peter J.\" <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 04:13:35 PM<paulpipitone@akllp.com><paulpipitone@akllp.com>, \"Cobb, Christopher\" <chriscobb@akllp.com> I just opened the redline that I just forwarded to you all.  Iapologize, but it is still wrong.  The language I added shows up as astrike-through and ther language I deleted shows up as though added.  Iam desperately atempting to get this straightened out.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09210526315789473,
        "Sentiment": -0.55,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1545138888888889
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:08:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "\"'Kay",
        "Subject": "GE Agreement Redline",
        "Text": "Your suggestion is probably cheaper for Enron!\"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)\" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/13/2000 05:03:12 PMTell them to reverse the CompareWrite and redo (should be an easy fix).Otherwise, we can just agree to all of GE's suggested changes and call it aday!",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.05,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.075,
        "Sentiment": 0.5416666666666667,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08058608058608059
    }
],
"thread2260": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:01:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "kathleen",
        "Subject": "Ledford and Fehr Option Agreements",
        "Text": "Are these the ones which didn't have the date?  This is PITIFUL.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.046875
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "karen",
        "Subject": "Ledford and Fehr Option Agreements",
        "Text": "Stuart,Kay's venting for the day:Is it nitpicking to expect outside counsel to (1) make sure the option agreement is signed AND acknowledged (2) ascertain whether the thing has the dates filled in, and (3) makes sure that the legal description is included?Ok, maybe I'm whining, but I think Mark should know that we are having problems.  Have you mentioned anything to him?Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:19 PM ---------------------------Kathleen.Carnahan@enron.com on 10/11/2000 03:17:18 PMKaren,There are a few outstanding items missing on the Ledford and Fehr OptionAgreements.  They are as follows:Ledford Property1.   Steven and Lynn Ledfords's signatures were not acknowledged.2.   Exhibit B (Grant of Easement Legal Description) was to be inserted.Since it is our intention to have executed and record a Memorandum ofPurchase  Option and Grant of Easement, shouldn't we obtain from thedescription of the parent tract for      reference purposes; or (iii) aproperty identification number of the parent tract at the very least toinclude in the Memorandum?Fehr1.   No legal description (Exhibit A) was attached to the Fehr Option.  Doyou have a copy of the legal description?  Please advise.I look forward to hearing from you regarding the above.Thank youKathleen(713) 345-3386 - direct phone number(713) 646-3037 - fax",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13679245283018868,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10849056603773585,
        "Sentiment": 0.07638888888888888,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07900512070226774
    }
],
"thread2262": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:08:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Enovate Credit Agreement",
        "Text": "Hi Gregg,I've been tied up today so I haven't gotten this to you.   Maybe we can talk soon.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 04:07 PM ---------------------------\"Heather Brown\" <hbrown@bracepatt.com> on 10/11/2000 01:25:55 PMKay,Please find attached for your review a Closing Documents list and a very preliminary draft of the Enovate Credit Agreement.  Once you have had a chance to review the attached with your business people, let's set up a call to discuss structure/changes/etc.  In addition to confirming the basics (lending entity, interest rate, term), we will need to discuss financial covenantsPlease call me at 713.221.1419 regarding the foregoing.Regards,Heather - Checklist.doc - CreditAgmt.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.1308411214953271,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12149532710280374,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.11914323962516733
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:59:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "<kay",
        "Subject": "Enovate Credit Agreement",
        "Text": "I couldn't remember if I forwarded this to you, so here 'tis.Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000 05:58 PM ---------------------------\"Heather Brown\" <hbrown@bracepatt.com> on 10/11/2000 01:25:55 PMKay,Please find attached for your review a Closing Documents list and a very preliminary draft of the Enovate Credit Agreement.  Once you have had a chance to review the attached with your business people, let's set up a call to discuss structure/changes/etc.  In addition to confirming the basics (lending entity, interest rate, term), we will need to discuss financial covenantsPlease call me at 713.221.1419 regarding the foregoing.Regards,Heather - Checklist.doc - CreditAgmt.doc",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12121212121212122,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.12121212121212122,
        "Sentiment": 0.2,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.12273361227336123
    }
],
"thread1208": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:12:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "David W Delainey@ECT",
        "Subject": "Fuel Cells",
        "Text": "Marion, the leads include Heather Kroll and Ozzie Pagan in the Eastern Origination Group and Michael L Miller in the Principal Investing Group.RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 01:11 PM ---------------------------Marion W Cole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT10/02/2000 01:24 PMDavid,Congratulations on the Fuel Cell venture.  I have been trying to get Enron interested in this technology for many years.  I am glad someone found the right formula.  I would like to discuss applications of Fuel Cell technology and where Enron intends to take this product with someone in your organization.  The press release did not disclose who the lead promoter in your organization is.  Can you direct me to the right person?Best regards,Marion Cole",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.06896551724137931,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.06896551724137931,
        "Sentiment": 0.3202380952380952,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.08868894601542417
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 03:15:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "  \"'kay",
        "Subject": "Fuel Cells",
        "Text": "Well, you know Enron.  No boredom, ever!Kay\"JOHN G KLAUBERG\" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM> on 03/13/2001 11:03:11 AMthe lawyer in our CT office who I had talked to initially.  I hope that all is well.  It sure sounds like you all are just buried.  Speak to you soon.  John>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 03/13/01 09:23AM >>>Hi John,I still need a Connecticut lawyer to look at this.  Do you have someoneavailable?  I need input by Monday, March 19. Nothing comprehensive, just afatal flaw analysis under Connecticut law.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:21AM ---------------------------Kay Mann12/11/2000 06:57 AMSubject:Hi John,I'm attaching the current draft of the contract under which we will be ableto buy the Fuel Cell equipment for use on projects in Connecticut.  Thecontract will likely be a Connecticut law contract.  Could you have someonegive it a fatal flaw check, or should I use Connecticut counsel?One issue which is nagging me is their request for a security interest inthe equipment, as I think this might complicate financing.  I assume thatan equipment supplier has certain lien rights under Connecticut law anyway.Can you have this verified?  I only want the simplest of explanations.Thanks,Kay---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 06:52AM ---------------------------\"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino\" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/17/2000 10:26:09 PM      <jleitman@fce.com>, \"Ross M. Levine (E-mail)\" <rlevine@fce.com>Subject: <<jgtk01!.DOC>>  <<RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC>>--------------------------------------------------Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq.Robinson & Cole LLP280 Trumbull StreetHartford, CT  06103(p) 860-275-8285(f) 860-275-8299jscheib@rc.com \"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212 424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.John KlaubergLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.212 424-8125jklauber@llgm.com",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.13109756097560976,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.09451219512195122,
        "Sentiment": 0.21726190476190477,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.126890756302521
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 05:22:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "kay.mann@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "Fuel Cells",
        "Text": "Scott,I'll give you what we got from FCE when we meet at 300.  Remind me if I forget!Kay   \t\t\t1.  Can I get a copy of the FuelCell Energy purchase order form.  Jeff said that you would have a copy.2.  I forwarded to you a memo from Bingham that discusses the permitting requirements for the proposed projects.  FYI--I plan to call Bingham today with some follow up questions.3. I forwarded to you a memo by ENSR on the air permit requirements for fuel cells.4.  Please let me know when you can meet today to discuss the MOU.",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.14423076923076922,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.15384615384615385,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.030534351145038167
    }
],
"thread1209": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "relaxed"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:02:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "James D Steffes@ENRON on 09/30/2000 12:04 AM",
        "Recipient": "David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECTDave --",
        "Subject": "Presentation at Alstom ESCA Meeting in Las Vegas",
        "Text": "Jim, this sounds like an ambush..... :)---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 09:00 AM ---------------------------Dave --I am trying to obtain an attendance list as well as confirm the other speakers on the panel.  The initial list of speakers included the Governor of California and the Governor of Pennsylvania, although I am not sure if they are coming.  If ESCA gets Davis and Ridge, I think that we would have a good opportunity for you.Once I have more information I'll be in contact.Jim\tDavid W Delainey@ECT\t10/02/2000 12:53 PM\t\t Jim, I am not sure that this will attract the people we want to hear the message; however, I will hold back judgement until we discuss the strategy in more detail.RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 12:52 PM ---------------------------Dave --Alstom ESCA is holding \"Summit 2000\" in Las Vegas Oct 16 - Oct 17.  The purpose of the meeting is to bring together people from throughout the industry to discuss key issues.  Alstom ESCA is a French company that builds EMS systems in the US.  They developed the EMS for Enron's control areas.  We are working with them on Project e-trans (the RTO software).The first panel in the am on Monday involves Re-regulation and Competition.  They would like someone from Enron to present and participate.  Right now, they have  Pacificorp and are trying to get someone from government in PA and CA.  The presentation / speech is 10 - 15 minutes followed by 30 minutes of Q&A for the panel.Do you have any interest in presenting?  This could be a good opportunity to deliver our message throughout the industry.Please let me know.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.09219858156028368,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.10638297872340426,
        "Sentiment": 0.2411734693877551,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.09406231628453851
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 2 Oct 2000 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "James D Steffes@ENRON on 09/30/2000 12:04 AM",
        "Recipient": "David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECTDave --",
        "Subject": "Presentation at Alstom ESCA Meeting in Las Vegas",
        "Text": "Jim, I am not sure that this will attract the people we want to hear the message; however, I will hold back judgement until we discuss the strategy in more detail.RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 12:52 PM ---------------------------Dave --Alstom ESCA is holding \"Summit 2000\" in Las Vegas Oct 16 - Oct 17.  The purpose of the meeting is to bring together people from throughout the industry to discuss key issues.  Alstom ESCA is a French company that builds EMS systems in the US.  They developed the EMS for Enron's control areas.  We are working with them on Project e-trans (the RTO software).The first panel in the am on Monday involves Re-regulation and Competition.  They would like someone from Enron to present and participate.  Right now, they have  Pacificorp and are trying to get someone from government in PA and CA.  The presentation / speech is 10 - 15 minutes followed by 30 minutes of Q&A for the panel.Do you have any interest in presenting?  This could be a good opportunity to deliver our message throughout the industry.Please let me know.Thanks,Jim",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": false,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.10416666666666667,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.109375,
        "Sentiment": 0.2838095238095238,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.07535460992907801
    }
],
"thread1210": [
    {
        "conflict": "no",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Mon, 2 Oct 2000 05:55:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron",
        "Subject": "LIPA",
        "Text": "Guys, assuming that we receive $7M for the 6B's what is our cost basis in the Barges?RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 12:53 PM ---------------------------Brian Redmond09/29/2000 04:56 PMDave:We have an agreed turbine purchase contract that we have executed and that Enron Nigeria are supposed to execute today.  Per our discussion, Wes C.  suggested that we push the $2.0MM additional write down as well as the $7.1 turbine purchase revenue to Q4.1. Finding a buyer for either the LIPA PPA/Barges together, or just the barges by themselves2. Discussing with LIPA, the Power Desk, and BargeCo to find an acceptable PPA structure and barge price to meet our risk/return criteria.The decision tree for the LIPA deal is as follows:risk (discussions ongoing)replacement capacity charged by the desk.OR,PPA (ConEd, Montauk, NRG) ENA will purchase the barges from BargeCo (Barges are currently located in Brooklyn)  We will not purchase the barges and will shut down the LIPA deal.    to stop working on the deal.originally stated by BargeCo.  Additional capital investment would be required to meet our performance requirements - our position is that this additional cost must be borne by BargeCo.  We do not, however, want to implement this action until we have sold the 6B turbines to Enron Nigeria so that we are sure this transaction is completed.David W Delainey09/29/2000 08:25 AMGuys, what are we going to do with this contract and the barges?  My understanding is that we have a done deal on the 6B's.  Is this correct?  I may be a nervous nellie but I would like to put all this stuff behind us (ie) no more 6B's or barges.RegardsDelainey",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.08896797153024912,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.099644128113879,
        "Sentiment": -0.06458333333333335,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.06419316843345112
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Fri, 29 Sep 2000 01:25:00 -0700 (PDT)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com",
        "Recipient": "brian",
        "Subject": "LIPA",
        "Text": "Guys, what are we going to do with this contract and the barges?  My understanding is that we have a done deal on the 6B's.  Is this correct?  I may be a nervous nellie but I would like to put all this stuff behind us (ie) no more 6B's or barges.RegardsDelainey",
        "Conflict": false,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.12962962962962962,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.14814814814814814,
        "Sentiment": -0.325,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.034482758620689655
    }
],
"thread1211": [
    {
        "conflict": "yes",
        "professional": "yes",
        "tone": "stern"
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 6 Dec 2000 07:46:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com\tjames.bannantine@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, ",
        "Subject": "SA Memo",
        "Text": "Updated draft memo.RegardsDelainey---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 03:37 PM ---------------------------David W Delainey12/06/2000 01:14 PMBannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENTGuys, please take a read of the draft memo - would like to send out tommorrow.RegardsDelainey",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.03636363636363636,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.05454545454545454,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.1638591117917305
    },
    {
        "Timestamp": "Wed, 6 Dec 2000 05:14:00 -0800 (PST)",
        "Sender": "david.delainey@enron.com\tjames.bannantine@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, ",
        "Recipient": "orlando",
        "Subject": "SA Memo",
        "Text": "Guys, please take a read of the draft memo - would like to send out tommorrow.RegardsDelainey",
        "Conflict": true,
        "Professional": true,
        "Tone": true,
        "Conflict Words %": 0.125,
        "Friendly Words %": 0.125,
        "Subject Sentiment": 0.0,
        "Punctuation %": 0.03225806451612903
    }
]

}