You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The only thing I am not convinced about is if the rel field can convey enough semantics to the mention.
Our AI tool discovers both "used" and "created" types for the mention.
By checking the IANA Link Relation vocabulary there's not a direct match, the only ones that can roughly translate are those two, although they were not designed explicitly for this use:
software is created -> rel="describes"
software is used -> rel="relates"
Is this the recommended approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As part of the European project SoFair (https://sofair.org/) we are working on recommendations for describing Software mentions in the metadata.
Even if not explicitly mentioned in the profile, RIOXXv3 seems to support this pretty well by using something like:
The only thing I am not convinced about is if the
rel
field can convey enough semantics to the mention.Our AI tool discovers both "used" and "created" types for the mention.
By checking the IANA Link Relation vocabulary there's not a direct match, the only ones that can roughly translate are those two, although they were not designed explicitly for this use:
Is this the recommended approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: