diff --git a/integration/testdata/alpine-310.sarif.golden b/integration/testdata/alpine-310.sarif.golden index cf7b55af852a..535bd2d09f71 100644 --- a/integration/testdata/alpine-310.sarif.golden +++ b/integration/testdata/alpine-310.sarif.golden @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ }, "helpUri": "https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549", "help": { - "text": "Vulnerability CVE-2019-1549\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nPackage: libssl1.1\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)\\nOpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).", - "markdown": "**Vulnerability CVE-2019-1549**\\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\\n|MEDIUM|libssl1.1|1.1.1d-r0|[CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)|\\n\\nOpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c)." + "text": "Vulnerability CVE-2019-1549\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nPackage: libssl1.1\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)\nOpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).", + "markdown": "**Vulnerability CVE-2019-1549**\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|MEDIUM|libssl1.1|1.1.1d-r0|[CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)|\n\nOpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c)." }, "properties": { "precision": "very-high", @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ }, "helpUri": "https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551", "help": { - "text": "Vulnerability CVE-2019-1551\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nPackage: libssl1.1\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)\\nThere is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).", - "markdown": "**Vulnerability CVE-2019-1551**\\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\\n|MEDIUM|libssl1.1|1.1.1d-r2|[CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)|\\n\\nThere is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)." + "text": "Vulnerability CVE-2019-1551\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nPackage: libssl1.1\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)\nThere is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).", + "markdown": "**Vulnerability CVE-2019-1551**\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|MEDIUM|libssl1.1|1.1.1d-r2|[CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)|\n\nThere is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)." }, "properties": { "precision": "very-high", @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ "ruleIndex": 0, "level": "warning", "message": { - "text": "Package: libcrypto1.1\\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1549\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)" + "text": "Package: libcrypto1.1\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1549\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)" }, "locations": [ { @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ "ruleIndex": 1, "level": "warning", "message": { - "text": "Package: libcrypto1.1\\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1551\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)" + "text": "Package: libcrypto1.1\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1551\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)" }, "locations": [ { @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ "ruleIndex": 0, "level": "warning", "message": { - "text": "Package: libssl1.1\\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1549\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)" + "text": "Package: libssl1.1\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1549\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r0\nLink: [CVE-2019-1549](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1549)" }, "locations": [ { @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ "ruleIndex": 1, "level": "warning", "message": { - "text": "Package: libssl1.1\\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1551\\nSeverity: MEDIUM\\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)" + "text": "Package: libssl1.1\nInstalled Version: 1.1.1c-r0\nVulnerability CVE-2019-1551\nSeverity: MEDIUM\nFixed Version: 1.1.1d-r2\nLink: [CVE-2019-1551](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2019-1551)" }, "locations": [ { diff --git a/pkg/report/sarif.go b/pkg/report/sarif.go index 800737a84258..25f1ba47bee5 100644 --- a/pkg/report/sarif.go +++ b/pkg/report/sarif.go @@ -169,11 +169,11 @@ func (sw *SarifWriter) Write(ctx context.Context, report types.Report) error { resultIndex: getRuleIndex(vuln.VulnerabilityID, ruleIndexes), shortDescription: html.EscapeString(vuln.Title), fullDescription: html.EscapeString(fullDescription), - helpText: fmt.Sprintf(`Vulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nPackage: %v\nFixed Version: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)\n%v`, + helpText: fmt.Sprintf("Vulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nPackage: %v\nFixed Version: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)\n%v", vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.Severity, vuln.PkgName, vuln.FixedVersion, vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.PrimaryURL, vuln.Description), - helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf(`**Vulnerability %v**\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|%v|[%v](%v)|\n\n%v`, + helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf("**Vulnerability %v**\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|%v|[%v](%v)|\n\n%v", vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.Severity, vuln.PkgName, vuln.FixedVersion, vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.PrimaryURL, vuln.Description), - message: fmt.Sprintf(`Package: %v\nInstalled Version: %v\nVulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nFixed Version: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)`, + message: fmt.Sprintf("Package: %v\nInstalled Version: %v\nVulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nFixed Version: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)", vuln.PkgName, vuln.InstalledVersion, vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.Severity, vuln.FixedVersion, vuln.VulnerabilityID, vuln.PrimaryURL), }) } @@ -196,11 +196,11 @@ func (sw *SarifWriter) Write(ctx context.Context, report types.Report) error { resultIndex: getRuleIndex(misconf.ID, ruleIndexes), shortDescription: html.EscapeString(misconf.Title), fullDescription: html.EscapeString(misconf.Description), - helpText: fmt.Sprintf(`Misconfiguration %v\nType: %s\nSeverity: %v\nCheck: %v\nMessage: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)\n%s`, + helpText: fmt.Sprintf("Misconfiguration %v\nType: %s\nSeverity: %v\nCheck: %v\nMessage: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)\n%s", misconf.ID, misconf.Type, misconf.Severity, misconf.Title, misconf.Message, misconf.ID, misconf.PrimaryURL, misconf.Description), - helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf(`**Misconfiguration %v**\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|%v|%s|[%v](%v)|\n\n%v`, + helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf("**Misconfiguration %v**\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|%v|%s|[%v](%v)|\n\n%v", misconf.ID, misconf.Type, misconf.Severity, misconf.Title, misconf.Message, misconf.ID, misconf.PrimaryURL, misconf.Description), - message: fmt.Sprintf(`Artifact: %v\nType: %v\nVulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nMessage: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)`, + message: fmt.Sprintf("Artifact: %v\nType: %v\nVulnerability %v\nSeverity: %v\nMessage: %v\nLink: [%v](%v)", res.Target, res.Type, misconf.ID, misconf.Severity, misconf.Message, misconf.ID, misconf.PrimaryURL), }) } @@ -223,11 +223,11 @@ func (sw *SarifWriter) Write(ctx context.Context, report types.Report) error { resultIndex: getRuleIndex(secret.RuleID, ruleIndexes), shortDescription: html.EscapeString(secret.Title), fullDescription: html.EscapeString(secret.Match), - helpText: fmt.Sprintf(`Secret %v\nSeverity: %v\nMatch: %s`, + helpText: fmt.Sprintf("Secret %v\nSeverity: %v\nMatch: %s", secret.Title, secret.Severity, secret.Match), - helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf(`**Secret %v**\n| Severity | Match |\n| --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|`, + helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf("**Secret %v**\n| Severity | Match |\n| --- | --- |\n|%v|%v|", secret.Title, secret.Severity, secret.Match), - message: fmt.Sprintf(`Artifact: %v\nType: %v\nSecret %v\nSeverity: %v\nMatch: %v`, + message: fmt.Sprintf("Artifact: %v\nType: %v\nSecret %v\nSeverity: %v\nMatch: %v", res.Target, res.Type, secret.Title, secret.Severity, secret.Match), }) } @@ -245,11 +245,11 @@ func (sw *SarifWriter) Write(ctx context.Context, report types.Report) error { resultIndex: getRuleIndex(id, ruleIndexes), shortDescription: desc, fullDescription: desc, - helpText: fmt.Sprintf(`License %s\nClassification: %s\nPkgName: %s\nPath: %s`, + helpText: fmt.Sprintf("License %s\nClassification: %s\nPkgName: %s\nPath: %s", license.Name, license.Category, license.PkgName, license.FilePath), - helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf(`**License %s**\n| PkgName | Classification | Path |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|%s|%s|%s|`, + helpMarkdown: fmt.Sprintf("**License %s**\n| PkgName | Classification | Path |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|%s|%s|%s|", license.Name, license.PkgName, license.Category, license.FilePath), - message: fmt.Sprintf(`Artifact: %s\nLicense %s\nPkgName: %s\n Classification: %s\n Path: %s`, + message: fmt.Sprintf("Artifact: %s\nLicense %s\nPkgName: %s\n Classification: %s\n Path: %s", res.Target, license.Name, license.Category, license.PkgName, license.FilePath), }) } diff --git a/pkg/report/sarif_test.go b/pkg/report/sarif_test.go index 737662dcd536..d5f88d443373 100644 --- a/pkg/report/sarif_test.go +++ b/pkg/report/sarif_test.go @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { "security-severity": "7.5", }, Help: &sarif.MultiformatMessageString{ - Text: lo.ToPtr("Vulnerability CVE-2020-0001\\nSeverity: HIGH\\nPackage: foo\\nFixed Version: 3.4.5\\nLink: [CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)\\nbaz"), - Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Vulnerability CVE-2020-0001**\\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\\n|HIGH|foo|3.4.5|[CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)|\\n\\nbaz"), + Text: lo.ToPtr("Vulnerability CVE-2020-0001\nSeverity: HIGH\nPackage: foo\nFixed Version: 3.4.5\nLink: [CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)\nbaz"), + Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Vulnerability CVE-2020-0001**\n| Severity | Package | Fixed Version | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|HIGH|foo|3.4.5|[CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)|\n\nbaz"), }, }, }, @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { RuleID: lo.ToPtr("CVE-2020-0001"), RuleIndex: lo.ToPtr[uint](0), Level: lo.ToPtr("error"), - Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Package: foo\\nInstalled Version: 1.2.3\\nVulnerability CVE-2020-0001\\nSeverity: HIGH\\nFixed Version: 3.4.5\\nLink: [CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)")}, + Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Package: foo\nInstalled Version: 1.2.3\nVulnerability CVE-2020-0001\nSeverity: HIGH\nFixed Version: 3.4.5\nLink: [CVE-2020-0001](https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-0001)")}, Locations: []*sarif.Location{ { Message: &sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("library/test: foo@1.2.3")}, @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { "security-severity": "8.0", }, Help: &sarif.MultiformatMessageString{ - Text: lo.ToPtr("Misconfiguration KSV001\\nType: Kubernetes Security Check\\nSeverity: HIGH\\nCheck: Image tag ':latest' used\\nMessage: Message\\nLink: [KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)\\n"), - Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Misconfiguration KSV001**\\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\\n|Kubernetes Security Check|HIGH|Image tag ':latest' used|Message|[KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)|\\n\\n"), + Text: lo.ToPtr("Misconfiguration KSV001\nType: Kubernetes Security Check\nSeverity: HIGH\nCheck: Image tag ':latest' used\nMessage: Message\nLink: [KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)\n"), + Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Misconfiguration KSV001**\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|Kubernetes Security Check|HIGH|Image tag ':latest' used|Message|[KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)|\n\n"), }, }, { @@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { "security-severity": "9.5", }, Help: &sarif.MultiformatMessageString{ - Text: lo.ToPtr("Misconfiguration KSV002\\nType: Kubernetes Security Check\\nSeverity: CRITICAL\\nCheck: SYS_ADMIN capability added\\nMessage: Message\\nLink: [KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)\\n"), - Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Misconfiguration KSV002**\\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\\n|Kubernetes Security Check|CRITICAL|SYS_ADMIN capability added|Message|[KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)|\\n\\n"), + Text: lo.ToPtr("Misconfiguration KSV002\nType: Kubernetes Security Check\nSeverity: CRITICAL\nCheck: SYS_ADMIN capability added\nMessage: Message\nLink: [KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)\n"), + Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Misconfiguration KSV002**\n| Type | Severity | Check | Message | Link |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|Kubernetes Security Check|CRITICAL|SYS_ADMIN capability added|Message|[KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)|\n\n"), }, }, }, @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { RuleID: lo.ToPtr("KSV001"), RuleIndex: lo.ToPtr[uint](0), Level: lo.ToPtr("error"), - Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\\nType: \\nVulnerability KSV001\\nSeverity: HIGH\\nMessage: Message\\nLink: [KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)")}, + Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\nType: \nVulnerability KSV001\nSeverity: HIGH\nMessage: Message\nLink: [KSV001](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv001)")}, Locations: []*sarif.Location{ { Message: &sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("library/test")}, @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { RuleID: lo.ToPtr("KSV002"), RuleIndex: lo.ToPtr[uint](1), Level: lo.ToPtr("error"), - Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\\nType: \\nVulnerability KSV002\\nSeverity: CRITICAL\\nMessage: Message\\nLink: [KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)")}, + Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\nType: \nVulnerability KSV002\nSeverity: CRITICAL\nMessage: Message\nLink: [KSV002](https://avd.aquasec.com/appshield/ksv002)")}, Locations: []*sarif.Location{ { Message: &sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("library/test")}, @@ -383,8 +383,8 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { "security-severity": "9.5", }, Help: &sarif.MultiformatMessageString{ - Text: lo.ToPtr("Secret AWS Secret Access Key\\nSeverity: CRITICAL\\nMatch: 'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\""), - Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Secret AWS Secret Access Key**\\n| Severity | Match |\\n| --- | --- |\\n|CRITICAL|'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\"|"), + Text: lo.ToPtr("Secret AWS Secret Access Key\nSeverity: CRITICAL\nMatch: 'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\""), + Markdown: lo.ToPtr("**Secret AWS Secret Access Key**\n| Severity | Match |\n| --- | --- |\n|CRITICAL|'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\"|"), }, }, }, @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { RuleID: lo.ToPtr("aws-secret-access-key"), RuleIndex: lo.ToPtr[uint](0), Level: lo.ToPtr("error"), - Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\\nType: \\nSecret AWS Secret Access Key\\nSeverity: CRITICAL\\nMatch: 'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\"")}, + Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: library/test\nType: \nSecret AWS Secret Access Key\nSeverity: CRITICAL\nMatch: 'AWS_secret_KEY'=\"****************************************\"")}, Locations: []*sarif.Location{ { Message: &sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("library/test")}, @@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { ShortDescription: sarif.NewMultiformatMessageString("GPL-3.0 in alpine-base"), FullDescription: sarif.NewMultiformatMessageString("GPL-3.0 in alpine-base"), DefaultConfiguration: sarif.NewReportingConfiguration().WithLevel("error"), - Help: sarif.NewMultiformatMessageString("License GPL-3.0\\nClassification: restricted\\nPkgName: alpine-base\\nPath: "). - WithMarkdown("**License GPL-3.0**\\n| PkgName | Classification | Path |\\n| --- | --- | --- |\\n|alpine-base|restricted||"), + Help: sarif.NewMultiformatMessageString("License GPL-3.0\nClassification: restricted\nPkgName: alpine-base\nPath: "). + WithMarkdown("**License GPL-3.0**\n| PkgName | Classification | Path |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|alpine-base|restricted||"), Properties: map[string]interface{}{ "tags": []interface{}{ "license", @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ func TestReportWriter_Sarif(t *testing.T) { RuleID: lo.ToPtr("alpine-base:GPL-3.0"), RuleIndex: lo.ToPtr(uint(0)), Level: lo.ToPtr("error"), - Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: OS Packages\\nLicense GPL-3.0\\nPkgName: restricted\\n Classification: alpine-base\\n Path: ")}, + Message: sarif.Message{Text: lo.ToPtr("Artifact: OS Packages\nLicense GPL-3.0\nPkgName: restricted\n Classification: alpine-base\n Path: ")}, Locations: []*sarif.Location{ { Message: sarif.NewTextMessage(""),