Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do you think you could be able to do this with Core Image instead of ImageMagick? #8

Open
anhar opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@anhar
Copy link

anhar commented Jun 6, 2020

Open question, just wondering if the need to have ImageMagick as a dependency is actually needed? Also what benefits it introduces over going with the Core Image route.

Thank you for a great CLI application!

@anhar anhar changed the title Do you think you could be able to do this with CoreImage instead of ImageMagick? Do you think you could be able to do this with Core Image instead of ImageMagick? Jun 6, 2020
@arthurpalves
Copy link
Owner

arthurpalves commented Jun 7, 2020

Hi @anhar!

I’ve done it with ImageMagick for having been working with that tool for quite some years, for a variety of things, it only turned out more powerful for image processing.

For the sake of removing the dependency I’m willing to have it implemented with core image. Perhaps keeping both as an option if results aren’t optimal.

Is this something you want to help us with?

@anhar
Copy link
Author

anhar commented Jun 7, 2020

Sure I'd be willing to take a look at it.
Although I have to be honest with you it wasn't my intention when asking the question.
It was more to understand your thought process of using ImageMagick, which I think is great by the way. I've used it on the backend side of things for creating image servers for example.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants