You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Open question, just wondering if the need to have ImageMagick as a dependency is actually needed? Also what benefits it introduces over going with the Core Image route.
Thank you for a great CLI application!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
anhar
changed the title
Do you think you could be able to do this with CoreImage instead of ImageMagick?
Do you think you could be able to do this with Core Image instead of ImageMagick?
Jun 6, 2020
I’ve done it with ImageMagick for having been working with that tool for quite some years, for a variety of things, it only turned out more powerful for image processing.
For the sake of removing the dependency I’m willing to have it implemented with core image. Perhaps keeping both as an option if results aren’t optimal.
Sure I'd be willing to take a look at it.
Although I have to be honest with you it wasn't my intention when asking the question.
It was more to understand your thought process of using ImageMagick, which I think is great by the way. I've used it on the backend side of things for creating image servers for example.
Open question, just wondering if the need to have ImageMagick as a dependency is actually needed? Also what benefits it introduces over going with the
Core Image
route.Thank you for a great CLI application!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: