-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement extended tests for bindings and AsyncAPI v3.0.0 definitions #551
Comments
Bounty Issue's service commentText labels: @asyncapi/bounty_team The Bounty Program is not a Mentorship Program. The accepted level of Bounty Program Participants is Middle/Senior.Third-party contributors should coherently articulate how they are going to approach the resolution process when expressing a desire to work on this Bounty Issue. |
Bounty Issue's Timeline
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline. |
@Pakisan, please provide the Draft PR. |
Review for PR #540 was requested on 2024-07-26, and it is still in progress. |
Do you need more reviews of PR #540 or reviews have been enough and you already have an understanding of what to do next? |
Responses, critical for technical resolution of this Bounty Issue (review of the PR) were delayed for three periods of three consecutive working days so all remaining target dates of the Bounty Issue's Timeline are extended by four calendar weeks. Bounty Issue's Timeline Extended
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline. |
#540 contains both double work result:
Everything else is out of scope of this issue:
So this Bounty Issue is completed. |
Bounty Issue Is Completed 🎉@Pakisan, please go to the AsyncAPI page on Open Collective and submit an invoice for |
Done |
Why do we need this improvement?
I have already wrote basic tests for bindings and AsyncAPI v3.0.0 definitions
Now, it's time to tune them up
I expect next:
Initial tests are here: #540
Related issue, witch schemas new format: #549
How will this change help?
We will be sure that after changes in our schemes nothing will be broken
Screenshots
No response
How could it be implemented/designed?
Tune up basic tests
🚧 Breaking changes
No
👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?
🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
Are you willing to work on this issue?
Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: