Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it necessary to support adding named function themselves? #8

Open
kchanqvq opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Is it necessary to support adding named function themselves? #8

kchanqvq opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@kchanqvq
Copy link
Collaborator

We don't get anything out of it, it seems -- adding anonymous function objects won't work because they don't have a name, and for named function, one can just add symbols themselves.

And it is easily misused. An extra #' instead of ' will screw up redefinitionability.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kchanqvq