You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When looking at the protocol used in the Developer Tool > Network tab of the most recent Google Chrome version, I can see that HTTP/1.1 is used. Other request sent by my application are H2, which is a confirmation that is well supported by the browser.
Why this question ? I built a file uploader that sends files in parallel to S3. It can barely reach 50% of my asceding connection throughput (340 Mb/s over 800 Mb/s available). I was hoping to get perforancem improvments by configuring the client to use HTTP/2 or 3. But looks like there is no documented possibility to do it.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Why is the S3Client not using HTTP/2 ?
When looking at the protocol used in the Developer Tool > Network tab of the most recent Google Chrome version, I can see that HTTP/1.1 is used. Other request sent by my application are H2, which is a confirmation that is well supported by the browser.
Why this question ? I built a file uploader that sends files in parallel to S3. It can barely reach 50% of my asceding connection throughput (340 Mb/s over 800 Mb/s available). I was hoping to get perforancem improvments by configuring the client to use HTTP/2 or 3. But looks like there is no documented possibility to do it.
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
O.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions