We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Top-of-tree.
0.34.0
I think so.
Linux on x86_64
Attempted to build a binary that requires a C++ .a static library.
.a
Things link just fine.
Unresolved symbols during link.
See discussion at: https://groups.google.com/g/bazel-discuss/c/XOERsY0-ceU
I was able to build after adding: #4134 and modifying the client code as: thx123/bazel-cgo#1
Once done, things compile as one would expect. Video proof: https://photos.app.goo.gl/FeVhkqHNnngMQTv77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What version of rules_go are you using?
Top-of-tree.
What version of gazelle are you using?
What version of Bazel are you using?
0.34.0
Does this issue reproduce with the latest releases of all the above?
I think so.
What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
Linux on x86_64
Any other potentially useful information about your toolchain?
What did you do?
Attempted to build a binary that requires a C++
.a
static library.What did you expect to see?
Things link just fine.
What did you see instead?
Unresolved symbols during link.
See discussion at: https://groups.google.com/g/bazel-discuss/c/XOERsY0-ceU
I was able to build after adding:
#4134
and modifying the client code as: thx123/bazel-cgo#1
Once done, things compile as one would expect. Video proof: https://photos.app.goo.gl/FeVhkqHNnngMQTv77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: