You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We were alerted to this by viewing the Report Attachments with download URL question in metabase. Some file paths are missing & for every record that is missing a file path the record is also missing an md5 hash.
We'll need to do some investigation on this bug (sounds like a possible parsing error in the GGIRCS schema where we are parsing this attachment data). Once a solution has been found & implemented, alert Robb in the metabase channel as this was affecting some of the results used in compliance work.
Probability: 5 - this is currently an active issue that affects a large set of live results.
Effect: 2 - It is affecting some results needed for compliance regarding verification statements and file paths, but has been flagged as a fairly low priority/impact bug.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dleard
changed the title
Some GGIRCS md5 hash values and file path values are not being parsed for attachment records
Some GGIRCS md5 hash values and file path values are not being parsed for attachment records [7]
Jul 14, 2022
We were alerted to this by viewing the
Report Attachments with download URL
question in metabase. Some file paths are missing & for every record that is missing a file path the record is also missing an md5 hash.We'll need to do some investigation on this bug (sounds like a possible parsing error in the GGIRCS schema where we are parsing this attachment data). Once a solution has been found & implemented, alert Robb in the metabase channel as this was affecting some of the results used in compliance work.
Probability: 5 - this is currently an active issue that affects a large set of live results.
Effect: 2 - It is affecting some results needed for compliance regarding verification statements and file paths, but has been flagged as a fairly low priority/impact bug.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: