-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Statix feature-parity #24
Comments
Note on performance: as I read it, this library serializes fetching the UDP socket through a single genserver https://github.com/beam-telemetry/telemetry_metrics_statsd/blob/master/lib/telemetry_metrics_statsd/event_handler.ex#L113 Statix's tactic is to |
@benwilson512 you're right, that's what we're currently doing. Thanks for the suggestion! I'll look into it 👍 |
I wonder if it would be more beneficial to adjust Statix if needed to work nicer with telemetry instead of reimplementing? |
@lexmag Initially I went for a new library due to different models that Since this project was the first Telemetry.Metrics reporter, it was simply easier and faster to implement it from scratch than try to find a way to integrate Statix with Telemetry.Metrics. That said, there are parts of Statix that I'd love to see in this library as well. My only concern is if it's possible to merge the two without introducing confusion. |
Can the library just translate calls from Metrics? Listening to metrics' events and firing Statix calls. |
This is a tracking issue for items that need to be completed In order to make TelemetryMetricsStatsd a complete alternative to Statix.
The following features need to be added to achieve a feature parity:
Apart from that, we're gonna need:
decrement/..
,increment/..
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: