You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Team,
First of all, thank you for the incredible Framework maintained by you.
I believe that the forward method of the A3T-GCN model is not in accordance with the paper. In the paper (Section 2.5) the authors describe this step as follows:
The calculation of the T-GCN is shown in eq. (11), where $h_{t-1}$ is the output at $t-1$.
The way it is implemented in the framework, I understand that $h_{t-1}$ is always passed with the value received as a parameter of the forward method, i.e., it is never updated.
If I am correct in my statement, a possible solution would be as follows:
Hi Team,
First of all, thank you for the incredible Framework maintained by you.
I believe that the forward method of the A3T-GCN model is not in accordance with the paper. In the paper (Section 2.5) the authors describe this step as follows:
The way it is implemented in the framework, I understand that$h_{t-1}$ is always passed with the value received as a parameter of the forward method, i.e., it is never updated.
If I am correct in my statement, a possible solution would be as follows:
Below is the reference in the repository
pytorch_geometric_temporal/torch_geometric_temporal/nn/recurrent/attentiontemporalgcn.py
Lines 130 to 157 in 6c98fb3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: