Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Breakout Rooms, include moderators in randomly-assign to rooms #17

Open
Braehler opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 11 comments
Open

Breakout Rooms, include moderators in randomly-assign to rooms #17

Braehler opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 11 comments

Comments

@Braehler
Copy link

Braehler commented Nov 5, 2020

Describe the bug
When you create several breakoutrooms and you want to assign the users randomly it´s not possible if you and one or more person with "moderator" rights

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to 'a meeting of your choise'
  2. Have at least two users with the right of "moderator"
  3. Click on 'Create breakout rooms'
  4. Click on randomly assign
  5. When you click on randomly assign, nothing happens

Expected behavior
Should be the same behavior if as if you just have only one moderator and some viewers, so you can randomly assign all users

Actual behavior
When you have two users with the "morderator rights" and the rest have viewer rights, you can not randomly assign the users to the breakout rooms

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

BBB version (optional):
2.2.28
BigBlueButton continually evolves. Providing the version/build helps us to pinpoint when an issue was introduced.
Example:
$ sudo bbb-conf --check | grep BigBlueButton
BigBlueButton Server 2.2.2 (1816)

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [Windows, Mac]
  • Browser [Firefox, Chrome, Safari]
  • Version [all the latest stable versions]

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
  • OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
  • Browser [e.g. stock browser, Safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@Braehler Braehler changed the title Breakout Rooms, no randomly assingn not possible when same user rights Breakout Rooms, randomly assingn not possible when 2 or more users have moderator rights Nov 5, 2020
@matiasilva
Copy link

I believe this is intentional behavior, and not a bug just fyi.

@kuehn-innerste
Copy link

It would be helpful to have a message to the user/moderator when this behavior is intended.
I just witnessed a moderator not knowing about this and thinking that this random assignment is broken.

@ffdixon
Copy link
Member

ffdixon commented Dec 6, 2020

Hmm .. just tried this on demo (running a dev build of 2.2.31) and was not able to reproduce. Can you try it on demo and let us know if you encounter the error there.

@krim404
Copy link

krim404 commented Dec 16, 2020

we can confirm this bug on 2.2.30.

@daminebenq
Copy link

Hey guys,
I just tried this on 2.2.30 with 2 Moderators and 1 Viewer
I started creating Breakout rooms from Moderator1 and clicked Randomly Assign. The expected behaviour happened which is to see the Viewer getting randomly placed to one of the Breakout rooms. Which means that there are no problems at all with randomly assigning Viewers, because only Viewers should be randomly assigned and none of the Moderators should get assigned.

@baumschubser
Copy link

only Viewers should be randomly assigned and none of the Moderators should get assigned

In communities where people trust each other and want to avoid additional technical problems, they often make all users moderators, at least in my experience. In 99% of my BBB calls vandalism is unimaginable, so "all users are mods" setting is the default. This issue demonstrates that people assign moderator roles differently, so maybe both options should be considered. A radiobutton "assign all members"/"assign only users"?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 13, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@antobinary
Copy link
Member

Reading the previous comments and talking to @gustavotrott , looks like the behavior is intentional. However, we can consider a setting similar to

   breakouts:
      sendInvitationToIncludedModerators: false

where we include moderators in the auto assign...
Or add yet another checkbox to the menu
[ ] Include moderators when auto-assigning to rooms

@antobinary antobinary removed their assignment Jan 13, 2022
@antobinary antobinary changed the title Breakout Rooms, randomly assingn not possible when 2 or more users have moderator rights Breakout Rooms, include moderators in randomly-assign to rooms Jan 13, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 10, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@baumschubser
Copy link

Since this issue was already considered for milestone 2.4, I assume that may be deprioritized but not rejected altogether, so I take stalebot's activity as opportunity to "ping" this request with this comment, to avoid it's automatic closure.

Maybe we see an implementation like this suggestion in the future..?

Reading the previous comments and talking to @gustavotrott , looks like the behavior is intentional. However, we can consider a setting similar to

   breakouts:
      sendInvitationToIncludedModerators: false

where we include moderators in the auto assign... Or add yet another checkbox to the menu [ ] Include moderators when auto-assigning to rooms

@antobinary
Copy link
Member

We transitioned to a plugin for this functionality in BBB 3.0. TODO -- transfer this to the plugin related issues. Related bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton#19785

@antobinary antobinary transferred this issue from bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants