-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Start trading window timer after deposit transaction confirmation #1170
Comments
@ManfredKarrer, I've assigned you to this issue and slated it for v0.6.3, as I believe we agreed that this change should get into the next release. |
Seems to be a bit more tricky as I thought. I prefer to not include that in the 0.6.3 release. |
I assume you meant this post on the bitcoinj forum: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoinj/05TJbxAwKXs I've removed this from v0.6.3 and will add to v0.6.4 to make sure this important issue stays on our radar. |
@ManfredKarrer, I've removed this from v0.6.4 (as it's already shipped), and tentatively added it to v0.6.5. Do you think you can get to this? It is quite an important measure for avoiding future messes when blockchain congestion rears its head again. |
@cbeams Will try.... Though wanted to focus back on DAO stuff. |
Required a fix in BitcoinJ to get the block time (bisq-network/bitcoinj#11). Behavior is following:
|
Implemented via PR #1287 |
@ManfredKarrer, it's better to do this sort of thing on the PR side. Include the text |
Closing as complete now that #1287 has been merged. |
Currently, Bisq's trading window timer starts when an offer is taken. Usually this works out fine, but during blockchain congestion, Bisq's maker, taker and deposit transactions can take many hours or even days to confirm, causing the trading window to be exceeded and often resulting in drawn out arbitration cases and canceled trades.
A simple solution is to start the trading window timer only after the deposit transaction has confirmed. Indeed, this should have been the implementation all along—it just hadn't become important until recently.
See description in #1171 for details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: