Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 10 #456

Closed
leo816 opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 14 comments
Closed

For Cycle 10 #456

leo816 opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 14 comments
Assignees
Labels
was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Milestone

Comments

@leo816
Copy link

leo816 commented Jan 4, 2020

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting:

  • BSQ requested: 4100

Contributions delivered

Provide links to contributions you have delivered, the amount of BSQ you are requesting for each, and any comments that will help stakeholders understand its value.

I have mediated 252 finished cases so far. I request 50BSQ/case
16 cases from the old mediation.
83 cases in November
62 on December
69 on January
22 so far in February

I request 4100 BSQ as suggested by Chris to meet the budget criteria for this cycle,
will spread out the compensation requests for this reason.
4100BSQ correspond to 82 finished cases.

I have also been available on keybase for any issues that users might have had with the mediations I dealt with.

Contributions in progress

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional, and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

work goes on daily

Roles performed

My summary of my work is given on bisq-network/roles#83
There I also give a summary of how the mediation cases are distributed and what are their causes for the most part.

Provide links to your monthly report on any roles you are responsible for.

@chimp1984
Copy link

Can you please provide a detailed summary (with % distribution) of the reasons for the cases to help dev to fix the problems?

@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Jan 9, 2020

I have noted all the details here: bisq-network/roles#83

@chimp1984
Copy link

Thanks, overlooked it before...

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Jan 21, 2020

Has this proposal been sent to DAO for voting?
I'll leave this open, you can just resubmit CR For Cycle 10 changing title.

@leo816 leo816 changed the title For Cycle 9 For Cycle 10 Jan 22, 2020
@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Jan 22, 2020

yes, will resubmit for cycle 10, thanks

@cbeams cbeams self-assigned this Feb 10, 2020
@cbeams
Copy link
Member

cbeams commented Feb 11, 2020

Support team lead review

@leo816, this is your first compensation request as a mediator, even though you've been doing the work for quite some time now. There is no problem with that, but I want to make it clear here that the 165 mediation cases you mention you've handled are since the beginning of your time as a mediator.

Also, the 165 cases number was accurate as of your original submission on January 4th, for Cycle 9, but since that submission wasn't made in time, you are submitting that number again here, for Cycle 10. I assume there have been more cases in the meantime, and would ask that you account for them here in this issue, so that further compensation requests can be up-to-date and accurate for the current cycle.

Your 50 BSQ / mediation case rate is reasonable given that the DAO has accepted this rate in previous mediator compensation requests. However, because there are multiple cycles worth of cases in this request, the total BSQ amount requested (8250) is quite high with regard to the overall support budget of 15000 BSQ and risks breaking it. For this reason, I ask that you split up this request, requesting half of the amount now, for Cycle 10, and defer requesting the other half until Cycle 11 (plus whatever extra you will request for work performed during Cycle 11).

So, @leo816, if you're OK with these changes, please make them, including creating a [WIP] For Cycle 11 compensation request for the deferred half of cases. Please add a comment here when you're done, indicating that I can give this a final review. Thanks.

Process note

Finally—and this a note to @bisq-network/compensation-maintainers as well—when a compensation request is rejected because it was submitted too late (as was the case here in Cycle 9), I think it's probably better to have contributors create a new compensation request rather than just change the title (as was done here). This leaves a clearer "paper trail" as to what happened in each cycle, and reduces the burden on reviewers, who otherwise have to dig through and understand the history of a compensation request like this one.

@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Feb 12, 2020

done, will create the WIP later today for cycle 11 (for approximately the same BSQ)

@cbeams
Copy link
Member

cbeams commented Feb 12, 2020

Thanks, @leo816. Please go ahead with submitting this as a DAO proposal and paste the txid here as a comment when complete.

@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Feb 12, 2020

Proposal Tx ID 4c93a7ee73563287db4a3a56e6649397a0b840ede67a1ca1d60acc38b245e446

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 16, 2020

Proposal Tx ID 4c93a7ee73563287db4a3a56e6649397a0b840ede67a1ca1d60acc38b245e446

There's a "leo" proposal with tx ÏD 88fe7b8635e8be4a89c15c3eff56316fda4ad7eb180bf62e03bbe82e85effcfb requesting 8250 BSQ.

I'll accept only the quotated one, ending in e446 and requesting 4100 BSQ.

@MwithM MwithM added was:not submitted Indicates that a compensation request was not submitted for DAO voting and removed was:not submitted Indicates that a compensation request was not submitted for DAO voting labels Feb 16, 2020
@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Feb 16, 2020

that is correct, thank you

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@leo816 You've inserted a non-working link in your compensation request (It should be bisq.network not bisq-network)
Bildschirmfoto 2020-02-17 um 09 41 52

I guess most voters will figure it out, what the link should be, but I'm not sure how we want to handle in general such incorrect compensation requests @cbeams.

@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Feb 17, 2020

will make sure I don't make such mistake in the future. thank you!

@MwithM MwithM added the was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting label Feb 22, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 22, 2020

Was accepted

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Feb 22, 2020
@cbeams cbeams added this to the Cycle 10 milestone Apr 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants