Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Asynchronous IO Support #462

Open
wimvc1 opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Asynchronous IO Support #462

wimvc1 opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wimvc1
Copy link

wimvc1 commented Jan 31, 2025

Hi,

We are currently reviewing if we should use this Python SDK or go for bare HTTP calls (in a Python enviroment).
While the SDK has many advantages the major disadvantage we see is that all methods seem to be synchronous.
Given that this is just a wrapper around the HTTP API calls using requests this will cause blocking invocations because of the IO nature of HTTP which isn't great for performance.
Are there any plans to implement async methods or create an async version of this SDK?

@lukaszsocha2 lukaszsocha2 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 31, 2025
@lukaszsocha2
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @wimvc1,
we were considering providing Python SDK with async operations using aiohttp library. However we don't know if this is going to be incorporated into existing SDK or would we provide a new async SDK. Also timeline is not clear, but for sure it won't be available in the near future.
Best,
@lukaszsocha2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants