From 3086c836389231984046d47238d2ccc14ceb2b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ed Morley <501702+edmorley@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:48:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix example process definition in RFC 0093

RFC 0093 contains a number of examples of how to migrate a buildpack
away from `direct=false` mode.

One of these examples was missing the "bash" command prior
to the "-c" argument.

Signed-off-by: Ed Morley <501702+edmorley@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md b/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md
index 269fee7c8..9a7f1876f 100644
--- a/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md
+++ b/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Using the new API this process could look like:
 ```
 [[processes]]
 type = "bash"
-command = ["-c", "dotnet", "my-app.dll", "--urls", "http://0.0.0.0:${PORT:-8080}"]
+command = ["bash", "-c", "dotnet", "my-app.dll", "--urls", "http://0.0.0.0:${PORT:-8080}"]
 default = true
 ```
 Things to note:
@@ -400,4 +400,4 @@ In addition to the changes described originally in 0093 we'd like some way of ve
 
 Why was this amendment necessary?
 
-The RFC text should reflect what was actually implemented / agreed upon to avoid confusion.
\ No newline at end of file
+The RFC text should reflect what was actually implemented / agreed upon to avoid confusion.