Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

we should use more specific tests than EXPECT_TRUE #87

Open
cstrotm opened this issue Nov 4, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

we should use more specific tests than EXPECT_TRUE #87

cstrotm opened this issue Nov 4, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@cstrotm
Copy link
Contributor

cstrotm commented Nov 4, 2014

BIND 10 trac # 398

In general, when we do

EXPECT_TRUE(a b);

it’s better to be changed to:

EXPECT_(a, b);

because when the test fails the latter will provide more detailed information (the values of a and b).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cstrotm