You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
some names are of the form 'field-name' and some use 'field_name'. This is not just a stylistic problem because there are fields like 'agency_id' and 'agency-id' in diifferent entity kinds. These fields processed in common code, which means we need to check for both flavors there.
The main issue besides just changing the code to use consistent naming is to change field names for DB entries, which for some entities is in the millions. We need to find out if there is support for bulk attribute name changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
some names are of the form 'field-name' and some use 'field_name'. This is not just a stylistic problem because there are fields like 'agency_id' and 'agency-id' in diifferent entity kinds. These fields processed in common code, which means we need to check for both flavors there.
The main issue besides just changing the code to use consistent naming is to change field names for DB entries, which for some entities is in the millions. We need to find out if there is support for bulk attribute name changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: