You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
Propose merging the CopyrightInformation class with the LicenseInformationClass to simplify the model. It is very unlikely one would be present without the other.
Propose new class name of CopyrightLicenseInformation or IPInformation (IP being short for Intellectual Property)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That SDPX 3.0 Draft was pretty early in the discussions and was more intended as a guide to direction than anything else. I agree that license information and copyright could be combined, however, there was some negative sentiment to calling it intellectual property, so we could just stick with LicenseInformation.
I know that one problem in SPDX that @tsteenbe (I think) wanted to resolve in 3.0 is having the ability to correlate copyright holders with each license. We should definitely consider that as part of this.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Propose merging the CopyrightInformation class with the LicenseInformationClass to simplify the model. It is very unlikely one would be present without the other.
Propose new class name of CopyrightLicenseInformation or IPInformation (IP being short for Intellectual Property)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: