You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
isn't it just an attribute name issue more than a structural issue?
LicenseReference has urls <-> seeAlso, expression <-> extractedText, name, identifier <-> licenseId
Comments could generally be handled as annotations for any Element
@CASTResearchLabs After reviewing the model again, I agree with the exception of adding extratedText. Extracted text is semantically different from expression used in other parts of the document. The extractedText would hold the exact text of the license or notice as found in the artifact(s).
Propose changing LicenseReference Class to the SPDX ExtractedLicensingInfo class
Properties:
licenseId [1] – string
comment [0..1] – string
name [0..1] – string
seeAlso [*] – URL
extratedText [1] - string
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: