IllumOS build #1
Comments
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2013
… targets This commit implements the correct lowering of the COPY_STRUCT_BYVAL_I32 pseudo-instruction for thumb1 targets. Previously, the lowering of COPY_STRUCT_BYVAL_I32 generated the post-increment forms of ldr/ldrh/ldrb instructions. Thumb1 does not have the post-increment form of these instructions so the generated assembly contained invalid instructions. Passing the generated assembly to gcc caused it to complain with an error like this: Error: cannot honor width suffix -- `ldrb r3,[r0],#1' and the integrated assembler would generate an object file with an invalid instruction encoding. This commit contains a small test case that demonstrates the problem with thumb1 targets as well as an expanded test case that more throughly tests the lowering of byval struct passing for arm, thumb1, and thumb2 targets. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2013
order of slices of the alloca which have exactly the same size and other properties. This was found by a perniciously unstable sort implementation used to flush out buggy uses of the algorithm. The fundamental idea is that findCommonType should return the best common type it can find across all of the slices in the range. There were two bugs here previously: 1) We would accept an integer type smaller than a byte-width multiple, and if there were different bit-width integer types, we would accept the first one. This caused an actual failure in the testcase updated here when the sort order changed. 2) If we found a bad combination of types or a non-load, non-store use before an integer typed load or store we would bail, but if we found the integere typed load or store, we would use it. The correct behavior is to always use an integer typed operation which covers the partition if one exists. While a clever debugging sort algorithm found problem #1 in our existing test cases, I have no useful test case ideas for #2. I spotted in by inspection when looking at this code. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r195118 | chandlerc | 2013-11-19 01:03:18 -0800 (Tue, 19 Nov 2013) | 22 lines Fix an issue where SROA computed different results based on the relative order of slices of the alloca which have exactly the same size and other properties. This was found by a perniciously unstable sort implementation used to flush out buggy uses of the algorithm. The fundamental idea is that findCommonType should return the best common type it can find across all of the slices in the range. There were two bugs here previously: 1) We would accept an integer type smaller than a byte-width multiple, and if there were different bit-width integer types, we would accept the first one. This caused an actual failure in the testcase updated here when the sort order changed. 2) If we found a bad combination of types or a non-load, non-store use before an integer typed load or store we would bail, but if we found the integere typed load or store, we would use it. The correct behavior is to always use an integer typed operation which covers the partition if one exists. While a clever debugging sort algorithm found problem #1 in our existing test cases, I have no useful test case ideas for #2. I spotted in by inspection when looking at this code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_34@195217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 7, 2014
This commit adds the pre-UAL aliases of fconsts and fconstd for vmov.f32 and vmov.f64. They use an InstAlias rather than a MnemonicAlias to properly support the predicate operand. We need to support encoded 8-bit constants in order to implement the pre-UAL fconsts/fconstd aliases for vmov.f32/vmov.f64, so this commit also fixes parsing of encoded floating point constants used in vmov.f32/vmov.f64 instructions. Now we can support assembly code like this: fconsts s0, #0x70 which is equivalent to vmov.f32 s0, #1.0. Most of the code was already in place to support this feature. Previously the code was trying to accept encoded 8-bit float constants for the vmov.f32/vmov.f64 instructions. It looks like the support for parsing encoded floats was lost in a refactoring in commit r148556 and we did not have any tests in place to catch it. The change in this commit is to keep the parsed value as a 32-bit float instead of a 64-bit double because that is what the isFPImm() function expects to find. There is no loss of precision by using a 32-bit float here because we are still limited to an 8-bit encoded value in the end. Additionally, we explicitly reject encoded 8-bit floats for vmovf.32/64. This is the same as the current behavior, but we now do it explicitly rather than accidently. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198697 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2014
1) Fix a specific bug when certain conversion functions are called in a program compiled as mips16 with hard float and the program is linked as c++. There are two libraries that are reversed in the link order with gcc/g++ and clang/clang++ for mips16 in this case and the proper stubs will then not be called. These stubs are normally handled in the Mips16HardFloat pass but in this case we don't know at that time that we need to generate the stubs. This must all be handled later in code generation and we have moved this functionality to MipsAsmPrinter. When linked as C (gcc or clang) the proper stubs are linked in from libc. 2) Set up the infrastructure to handle 90% of what is in the Mips16HardFloat pass in this new area of MipsAsmPrinter. This is a more logical place to handle this and we have known for some time that we needed to move the code later and not implement it using inline asm as we do now but it was not clear exactly where to do this and what mechanism should be used. Now it's clear to us how to do this and this patch contains the infrastructure to move most of this to MipsAsmPrinter but the actual moving will be done in a follow on patch. The same infrastructure is used to fix this current bug as described in #1. This change was requested by the list during the original putback of the Mips16HardFloat pass but was not practical for us do at that time. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@201426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 10, 2014
…ify-libcall
optimize a call to a llvm intrinsic to something that invovles a call to a C
library call, make sure it sets the right calling convention on the call.
e.g.
extern double pow(double, double);
double t(double x) {
return pow(10, x);
}
Compiles to something like this for AAPCS-VFP:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
%0 = call double @llvm.pow.f64(double 1.000000e+01, double %x)
ret double %0
}
declare double @llvm.pow.f64(double, double) #1
Simplify libcall (part of instcombine) will turn the above into:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
%__exp10 = call double @__exp10(double %x) #1
ret double %__exp10
}
declare double @__exp10(double)
The pre-instcombine code works because calls to LLVM builtins are special.
Instruction selection will chose the right calling convention for the call.
However, the code after instcombine is wrong. The call to __exp10 will use
the C calling convention.
I can think of 3 options to fix this.
1. Make "C" calling convention just work since the target should know what CC
is being used.
This doesn't work because each function can use different CC with the "pcs"
attribute.
2. Have Clang add the right CC keyword on the calls to LLVM builtin.
This will work but it doesn't match the LLVM IR specification which states
these are "Standard C Library Intrinsics".
3. Fix simplify libcall so the resulting calls to the C routines will have the
proper CC keyword. e.g.
%__exp10 = call arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @__exp10(double %x) #1
This works and is the solution I implemented here.
Both solutions #2 and #3 would work. After carefully considering the pros and
cons, I decided to implement #3 for the following reasons.
1. It doesn't change the "spec" of the intrinsics.
2. It's a self-contained fix.
There are a couple of potential downsides.
1. There could be other places in the optimizer that is broken in the same way
that's not addressed by this.
2. There could be other calling conventions that need to be propagated by
simplify-libcall that's not handled.
But for now, this is the fix that I'm most comfortable with.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 1, 2014
For pattern like ((x >> C1) & Mask) << C2, DAG combiner may convert it into (x >> (C1-C2)) & (Mask << C2), which makes pattern matching of ubfx more difficult. For example: Given %shr = lshr i64 %x, 4 %and = and i64 %shr, 15 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [8 x [64 x i64]]* @arr, i64 0, %i64 2, i64 %and %0 = load i64* %arrayidx With current shift folding, it takes 3 instrs to compute base address: lsr x8, x0, #1 and x8, x8, #0x78 add x8, x9, x8 If using ubfx, it only needs 2 instrs: ubfx x8, x0, #4, #4 add x8, x9, x8, lsl #3 This fixes bug 19589 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207702 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 18, 2014
Since the result of a SETCC for AArch64 is 0 or -1 in each lane, we can
move unary operations, in this case [su]int_to_fp through the mask
operation and constant fold the operation away. Generally speaking:
UNARYOP(AND(VECTOR_CMP(x,y), constant))
--> AND(VECTOR_CMP(x,y), constant2)
where constant2 is UNARYOP(constant).
This implements the transform where UNARYOP is [su]int_to_fp.
For example, consider the simple function:
define <4 x float> @foo(<4 x float> %val, <4 x float> %test) nounwind {
%cmp = fcmp oeq <4 x float> %val, %test
%ext = zext <4 x i1> %cmp to <4 x i32>
%result = sitofp <4 x i32> %ext to <4 x float>
ret <4 x float> %result
}
Before this change, the code is generated as:
fcmeq.4s v0, v0, v1
movi.4s v1, #0x1 // Integer splat value.
and.16b v0, v0, v1 // Mask lanes based on the comparison.
scvtf.4s v0, v0 // Convert each lane to f32.
ret
After, the code is improved to:
fcmeq.4s v0, v0, v1
fmov.4s v1, #1.00000000 // f32 splat value.
and.16b v0, v0, v1 // Mask lanes based on the comparison.
ret
The svvtf.4s has been constant folded away and the floating point 1.0f
vector lanes are materialized directly via fmov.4s.
Rather than do the folding manually in the target code, teach getNode()
in the generic SelectionDAG to handle folding constant operands of
vector [su]int_to_fp nodes. It is reasonable (as noted in a FIXME) to do
additional constant folding there as well, but I don't have test cases
for those operations, so leaving them for another time when it becomes
appropriate.
rdar://17693791
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2014
…dvantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2014
This patch makes the ARM backend transform 3 operand instructions such as 'adds/subs' to the 2 operand version of the same instruction if the first two register operands are the same. Example: 'adds r0, r0, #1' will is transformed to 'adds r0, #1'. Currently for some instructions such as 'adds' if you try to assemble 'adds r0, r0, #8' for thumb v6m the assembler would throw an error message because the immediate cannot be encoded using 3 bits. The backend should be smart enough to transform the instruction to 'adds r0, #8', which allows for larger immediate constants. Patch by Ranjeet Singh. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218521 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2014
…mbined. This patch adds an optimization in CodeGenPrepare to move an extractelement right before a store when the target can combine them. The optimization may promote any scalar operations to vector operations in the way to make that possible. ** Context ** Some targets use different register files for both vector and scalar operations. This means that transitioning from one domain to another may incur copy from one register file to another. These copies are not coalescable and may be expensive. For example, according to the scheduling model, on cortex-A8 a vector to GPR move is 20 cycles. ** Motivating Example ** Let us consider an example: define void @foo(<2 x i32>* %addr1, i32* %dest) { %in1 = load <2 x i32>* %addr1, align 8 %extract = extractelement <2 x i32> %in1, i32 1 %out = or i32 %extract, 1 store i32 %out, i32* %dest, align 4 ret void } As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on armv7: vldr d16, [r0] @vector load vmov.32 r0, d16[1] @ cross-register-file copy: 20 cycles orr r0, r0, #1 @ scalar bitwise or str r0, [r1] @ scalar store bx lr Whereas we could generate much faster code: vldr d16, [r0] @ vector load vorr.i32 d16, #0x1 @ vector bitwise or vst1.32 {d16[1]}, [r1:32] @ vector extract + store bx lr Half of the computation made in the vector is useless, but this allows to get rid of the expensive cross-register-file copy. ** Proposed Solution ** To avoid this cross-register-copy penalty, we promote the scalar operations to vector operations. The penalty will be removed if we manage to promote the whole chain of computation in the vector domain. Currently, we do that only when the chain of computation ends by a store and the target is able to combine an extract with a store. Stores are the most likely candidates, because other instructions produce values that would need to be promoted and so, extracted as some point[1]. Moreover, this is customary that targets feature stores that perform a vector extract (see AArch64 and X86 for instance). The proposed implementation relies on the TargetTransformInfo to decide whether or not it is beneficial to promote a chain of computation in the vector domain. Unfortunately, this interface is rather inaccurate for this level of details and although this optimization may be beneficial for X86 and AArch64, the inaccuracy will lead to the optimization being too aggressive. Basically in TargetTransformInfo, everything that is legal has a cost of 1, whereas, even if a vector type is legal, usually a vector operation is slightly more expensive than its scalar counterpart. That will lead to too many promotions that may not be counter balanced by the saving of the cross-register-file copy. For instance, on AArch64 this penalty is just 4 cycles. For now, the optimization is just enabled for ARM prior than v8, since those processors have a larger penalty on cross-register-file copies, and the scope is limited to basic blocks. Because of these two factors, we limit the effects of the inaccuracy. Indeed, I did not want to build up a fancy cost model with block frequency and everything on top of that. [1] We can imagine targets that can combine an extractelement with other instructions than just stores. If we want to go into that direction, the current interfaces must be augmented and, moreover, I think this becomes a global isel problem. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5921 <rdar://problem/14170854> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220978 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2014
Our internal test reveals such case should not be transformed: cmp x17, #3 b.lt .LBB10_15 ... subs x12, x12, #1 b.gt .LBB10_1 where x12 is a liveout, becomes: cmp x17, #2 b.le .LBB10_15 ... subs x12, x12, #2 b.ge .LBB10_1 Unable to provide test case as it's difficult to reproduce on community branch. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6048 Patch by Zhaoshi Zheng <[email protected]>! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
chapuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2014
This commit introduces heap-use-after-free detected by ASan. Here is the output
for one of several tests that detect it:
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Linker/AppendingLinkage.ll' FAILED ********************
Command Output (stderr):
--
=================================================================
==2122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60c00000b9c8 at pc 0x0000005d05d1 bp 0x7fff64ed27c0 sp 0x7fff64ed27b8
READ of size 4 at 0x60c00000b9c8 thread T0
#0 0x5d05d0 in llvm::GlobalValue::setUnnamedAddr(bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:115:35
#1 0x69fff1 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1041:5
#2 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
#3 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
#4 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
#5 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
#6 0x41eb71 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/bin/llvm-link+0x41eb71)
0x60c00000b9c8 is located 72 bytes inside of 128-byte region [0x60c00000b980,0x60c00000ba00)
freed by thread T0 here:
#0 0x4a1e6b in operator delete(void*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/opt-build/../projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:94:3
#1 0x5d1a7a in llvm::iplist<llvm::GlobalVariable, llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::GlobalVariable> >::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::GlobalVariable>) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../inclu
de/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:466:5
#2 0x5d1980 in llvm::GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/IR/Globals.cpp:204:3
#3 0x6a8a4d in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkAppendingVarProto(llvm::GlobalVariable*, llvm::GlobalVariable const*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.
cpp:980:3
#4 0x6a7403 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalVariableProto(llvm::GlobalVariable const*, llvm::GlobalValue*, bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkMod
ules.cpp:1074:11
#5 0x69ff4e in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1028:13
#6 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
#7 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
#8 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
#9 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
previously allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x4a192b in operator new(unsigned long) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/opt-build/../projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:62:35
#1 0x61d85c in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, unsigned int) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/IR/User.cpp:57:19
#2 0x6a7525 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalVariableProto(llvm::GlobalVariable const*, llvm::GlobalValue*, bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkMod
ules.cpp:1100:3
#3 0x69ff4e in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1028:13
#4 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
#5 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
#6 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
#7 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:115 llvm::GlobalValue::setUnnamedAddr(bool)
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x0c187fff96e0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c187fff96f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c187fff9700: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa
0x0c187fff9710: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c187fff9720: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
=>0x0c187fff9730: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd[fd]fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c187fff9740: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c187fff9750: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c187fff9760: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c187fff9770: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c187fff9780: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Heap left redzone: fa
Heap right redzone: fb
Freed heap region: fd
Stack left redzone: f1
Stack mid redzone: f2
Stack right redzone: f3
Stack partial redzone: f4
Stack after return: f5
Stack use after scope: f8
Global redzone: f9
Global init order: f6
Poisoned by user: f7
Container overflow: fc
Array cookie: ac
ASan internal: fe
==2122==ABORTING
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Trying to get this to build on IllumOS based systems and I am coming up against
Any ideas what I need to resolve this.
Thanks for any pointers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: